ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03377049Updated Jul 27, 2023Results posted

Acetazolamide Challenge With Perfusion in the Prediction of Cerebral Vasospasm

A Phase 4 interventional study of Acetazolamide in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal and Vasospasm, Cerebral, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-27.

Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 149 studies in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with a site in United States — 31 open to participants now, 37 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage · United States.

Enrollment
80th of 107
11 · median 30
Started
2019
with 6 others
Phase 4
17 of 149
3 open now
Registered
92nd of 149
by date

Among the 149 studies in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with a site in United States, this one is the 80th largest by enrollment of the 107 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 7 that started in 2019, is one of 17 in phase 4, and was the 92nd registered.

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

510 studies on the registry are indexed under Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; 128 are open to participants now.

Browse Subarachnoid Hemorrhage studies →

Open to participants now

31 of the 149 studies in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

26 more — sign in →

All 31 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 89 Subarachnoid Hemorrhage studies recruiting now, 56 (63%) set no upper age limit and 4 (4%) stop at 75 or younger; 7 take children under 18; 7 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 149 studies in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The investigators propose a technique using cone beam CT perfusion (CBCTP) imaging with an acetazolamide challenge as a potential diagnostic tool to detect a defect in cerebral autoregulation at a time when it has not yet caused clinically apparent signs or symptoms. 30 participants will be enrolled at the University of Wisconsin - Madison and can expect to be on study for about 2 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Acetazolamide or vasodilatory challenge should identify subjects having a abnormal cerebrovascular reactivity capacity. More specifically, after receiving the drug there will not be the expected increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) in some of the subjects because they are already suffering from a disturbance in the vasculature's ability to respond to the signal for vasodilation. The investigators believe the presence of this deficit will be helpful in identifying patients who are at risk for potential brain ischemia due to this decreased capacity to autoregulate if/when clinically significant vasospasm occurs. The investigators predict that acetazolamide-activated regional cerebral blood flow studies will be more sensitive in the detection of mild cerebral vasospasm and will not just detect changes in cerebral blood flow as does standard perfusion imaging, but will provide information regarding changes in cerebrovascular reactivity. Under these circumstances, a better predictor of those patients at risk of cerebral infarction due to delayed vasospasm would be delineated. Identifying this "high-risk cohort" prior to the onset of clinically apparent symptoms would result in the institution of preventative measures such as triple H therapy.

The objective of this proposal is to conduct a feasibility study of acetazolamide activated C-arm cone beam CT perfusion (CBCTP) to determine its application in the prediction of symptomatic cerebral vasospasm (i.e. ischemia or stroke) in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The initial plan is to obtain C-arm CBCTP pre- and post-intravenous infusion of 1g acetazolamide within 24 hours of symptom onset in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. The hypothesis is that some of these patients that will later develop clinical vasospasm of a degree sufficient to cause cerebral ischemia. The investigators believe this cohort of patients will demonstrate altered cerebrovascular reactivity during the acetazolamide challenge at a time before there is either angiographic evidence of vasospasm or clinical evidence of abnormal perfusion.

03

Conditions studied

  • Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal
  • Vasospasm, Cerebral

Keywords

  • acetazolamide challenge
  • cerebral vasospasm
  • aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage presenting to our institution within 24 hours of symptom onset
  • Adults, 18 years of age or older
  • Women of must not be pregnant (negative urine pregnancy test)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to acetazolamide (i.e. sulfonamide allergy, renal or liver failure)
  • Contraindication to contrast media (Allergy or abnormal serum Cr and/or based on current UW guidelines for IV contrast)
  • Renal insufficiency, history of renal failure or renal transplant
  • Hunt and Hess grade 1 and 5 (Attached protocol provides details on the grading scale. Grade 1 have lowest yield for vasospasm and Grade 5 are by definition critically ill and unstable patients)
  • Critically ill patients who are unstable and who cannot undergo scans within the proposed timeline i.e. within 24 hours of the onset of their symptoms.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Acetazolamide Challenge

    Participants entered into the study as a cohort, will because of their participation, undergo only two additional digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) imaging acquisitions. These will be done in conjunction with their standard diagnostic DSA evaluation and consist of two CBCTPs, one before and one after administration of 1 g acetazolamide through a peripheral IV line. Each CBCTP will require administration of 75-100 mL iodinated contrast medium also through an intravenous line. Neither of these imaging studies will be used for clinical decision making, but would be processed and evaluated at later date for a formal analysis of the results. Following completion of diagnostic imaging subjects will receive the usual standard of care for treatment of their ruptured aneurysm i.e. endovascular embolization or open surgical clipping.

    Drug: Acetazolamide

Interventions

  • 1 g acetazolamide through a peripheral IV line

    Also known as: Diamox

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Develop Delayed Cerebral Vasospasm

    Clinical neurological deterioration not attributable to other causes, mores specifically not due to re-bleeding, hydrocephalus, or metabolic changes.

    Time frame: Day 1-14 during the hospitalization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Relative Percent Change in Cerebral Blood Flow

    The data that will be statistically compared is the pre-diamox perfusion in comparison to the post-diamox perfusion. A statistically significant change increase in CBF represents an appropriate response to Diamox. Lack of change in CBF or decrease in CBF could be suggestive of potential for developing vasospasm.

    Time frame: pre and post perfusion during imaging procedure, up to an hour

  2. Percent Change in Left Hemisphere Brain Imaging Maps

    Using perfusion map values, relative percent change will be calculated

    Time frame: pre and post perfusion during imaging procedure, up to an hour

  3. Percent Change in Right Hemisphere Brain Imaging Maps

    Using perfusion map values, relative percent change will be calculated

    Time frame: pre and post perfusion during imaging procedure, up to an hour

07

Results

Posted Jul 27, 2023

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from July 2019 to April 2022.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAcetazolamide Challenge
Started11
Completed11
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Develop Delayed Cerebral Vasospasm

Clinical neurological deterioration not attributable to other causes, mores specifically not due to re-bleeding, hydrocephalus, or metabolic changes.

Time frame:
Day 1-14 during the hospitalization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Develop Delayed Cerebral Vasospasm
ParticipantsAcetazolamide Challenge
Number of Participants Who Develop Delayed Cerebral Vasospasm2
SecondaryRelative Percent Change in Cerebral Blood Flow

The data that will be statistically compared is the pre-diamox perfusion in comparison to the post-diamox perfusion. A statistically significant change increase in CBF represents an appropriate response to Diamox. Lack of change in CBF or decrease in CBF could be suggestive of potential for developing vasospasm.

Time frame:
pre and post perfusion during imaging procedure, up to an hour
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Relative Percent Change in Cerebral Blood Flow
percent changeAcetazolamide Challenge
Relative Percent Change in Cerebral Blood Flow20.722 ± 13.967
SecondaryPercent Change in Left Hemisphere Brain Imaging Maps

Using perfusion map values, relative percent change will be calculated

Time frame:
pre and post perfusion during imaging procedure, up to an hour
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Percent Change in Left Hemisphere Brain Imaging Maps
percent changeAcetazolamide Challenge
Percent Change in Left Hemisphere Brain Imaging Maps19.785 ± 13.488
SecondaryPercent Change in Right Hemisphere Brain Imaging Maps

Using perfusion map values, relative percent change will be calculated

Time frame:
pre and post perfusion during imaging procedure, up to an hour
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Percent Change in Right Hemisphere Brain Imaging Maps
percent changeAcetazolamide Challenge
Percent Change in Right Hemisphere Brain Imaging Maps21.659 ± 15.046

Adverse events

Collected over Days 1-14 during hospitalization. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Acetazolamide Challenge1/11 (9.1%)2/11 (18.2%)1/11 (9.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAcetazolamide Challenge
CardiomyopathyCardiac disorders1/11
External Ventricular Drainage infectionNervous system disorders1/11
HydrocephalusNervous system disorders1/11
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAcetazolamide Challenge
Pulmonary edemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/11

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Acetazolamide Challenge
30-39 years2
40-49 years0
50-59 years3
60-69 years3
70-79 years3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Acetazolamide Challenge
Female7
Male4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Acetazolamide Challenge
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino9
Unknown or Not Reported2
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Acetazolamide Challenge
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White8
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported2
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Acetazolamide Challenge
United States11
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Wisconsin
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shinoda J, Kimura T, Funakoshi T, Araki Y, Imao Y. Acetazolamide reactivity on cerebral blood flow in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;109(3-4):102-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01403003. PubMed 1858527 ↗
  • Tanaka A, Yoshinaga S, Nakayama Y, Tomonaga M. Cerebral blood flow and the response to acetazolamide during the acute, subacute, and chronic stages of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1998 Oct;38(10):623-30; discussion 630-2. doi: 10.2176/nmc.38.623. PubMed 9861845 ↗
  • Lee KH, Lukovits T, Friedman JA. "Triple-H" therapy for cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2006;4(1):68-76. doi: 10.1385/NCC:4:1:068. PubMed 16498198 ↗
  • Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Soliman EZ, Sorlie PD, Sotoodehnia N, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):e2-e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. Epub 2011 Dec 15. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2012 Jun 5;125(22):e1002. PubMed 22179539 ↗
  • Sullivan HG, Kingsbury TB 4th, Morgan ME, Jeffcoat RD, Allison JD, Goode JJ, McDonnell DE. The rCBF response to Diamox in normal subjects and cerebrovascular disease patients. J Neurosurg. 1987 Oct;67(4):525-34. doi: 10.3171/jns.1987.67.4.0525. PubMed 3655890 ↗
  • Hinson JS, Ehmann MR, Fine DM, Fishman EK, Toerper MF, Rothman RE, Klein EY. Risk of Acute Kidney Injury After Intravenous Contrast Media Administration. Ann Emerg Med. 2017 May;69(5):577-586.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.11.021. Epub 2017 Jan 25. PubMed 28131489 ↗
  • Hauge A, Nicolaysen G, Thoresen M. Acute effects of acetazolamide on cerebral blood flow in man. Acta Physiol Scand. 1983 Feb;117(2):233-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1983.tb07202.x. PubMed 6869033 ↗
  • Kimura T, Shinoda J, Funakoshi T. Prediction of cerebral infarction due to vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage using acetazolamide-activated 123I-IMP SPECT. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993;123(3-4):125-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01401867. PubMed 8237489 ↗
  • Bruce RJ, Djamali A, Shinki K, Michel SJ, Fine JP, Pozniak MA. Background fluctuation of kidney function versus contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Mar;192(3):711-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1413. PubMed 19234268 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2019 to primary completion in Jul 2022, 35 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2023, 1 year after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 13, 2017
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
StartActual
Jul 28, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jul 15, 2022
CompletionActual
Jul 15, 2022
Results first posted
Jul 27, 2023
Last update
Jul 27, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03377049
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
Start date
Jul 28, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2022
Completion
Jul 15, 2022
Results posted
Jul 27, 2023
Last update
Jul 27, 2023

Study contacts

Azam Ahmed, MD
principal investigator · University of Wisconsin, Madison

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Acetazolamide

Start the discussion