ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03376607D²RwandaUpdated Feb 21, 2021

Community- and mHealth-Based Integrated Management of Diabetes in Primary Healthcare in Rwanda

An interventional study of HBCP programme and mobile health application in Diabetes Mellitus, Telemedicine and Community Health Workers, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Status unknown at 9 sites in Rwanda. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-21.

Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2020), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
209
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Home Based Care Practitioners (HBCPs) programme has been established by the Rwandan Ministry of Health in response to the shortage of health professionals. Currently in its pilot first phase, it entails laypeople providing longitudinal care to chronic patients after receiving a six-month training.The diabetes mellitus (DM) prevalence in Rwanda is estimated at 3.5%. Technological mobile solutions can improve care by enabling patients to self-manage their disease.

It is hypothesised that the establishment of the HBCP programme with regular monthly assessments of DM patients and disease management by the programme's HBCPs improves the patients' HbA1c levels, medication adherence, health-related quality of life, mental well-being, and health literacy levels. It is also hypothesised that patients will show further improvement when the HBCP programme is coupled with a mobile health application for patients that includes diaries, notifications and educational material. The aim of the study is to determine the efficacy of such an integrated programme for the management of DM in primary health care in Rwanda.

Study design: The study is designed as a one-year, open-label cluster trial of two interventions (intervention 1: HBCP programme; intervention 2: HBCP programme + mobile health application) and usual care (control). In preparation for the onset of the study, a mobile application is being developed. Focus discussion groups will be carried out with selected patients and HBCPs after the end of the main trial to explore their opinions in participating in the study.

Study population: District hospitals from those running the HBCP programme will be selected according to criteria. Under each district hospital, the administrative areas ("cells") participating in the HBCP programme will be randomised to receive intervention 1 or 2. The patients from each group who meet the eligibility criteria of the study will receive the same intervention. Cells that do not participate in HBCP programme will be assigned to the control group.

Study endpoints: The primary outcomes will be changes in HbA1c levels. Medication adherence, mortality, complications, health-related quality of life, mental well-being and health literacy will be assessed as secondary outcomes.

Sponsor: The D²Rwanda project has received financial support by the Karen Elise Jensens Fond (Denmark), and the Universities of Aarhus and Luxembourg.

Read the detailed description

Background: In Rwanda, diabetes mellitus (DM) prevalence has been estimated between 3.0 - 3.5%. Several factors, including an increase in screening and diagnosis programmes, the urbanization of the population, and changes in lifestyle are likely to contribute to a sharp increase in the prevalence of DM in the next decade, posing a daunting challenge for the fragile health care systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). At the same time, the level of knowledge and perceptions of DM among patients is inadequate. Patients with low health literacy levels are often unable to recognise the signs and symptoms of DM, and may access their health provider late, hence presenting with more complications.

Although the majority of the Rwandan population seek care at the health centres, the Rwandan primary health care is facing a shortage of human resources. A community health worker programme was introduced in Rwanda in 2007 covering mainly infectious diseases, maternal and child health, and family planning.

In response to the need for better management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) at the community level, the Ministry of Health of Rwanda and its partners adopted a new strategy and initiated a Home-Based Care Practitioner (HBCP) programme. Approximately 100 cells, belonging to the catchment area of nine selected hospitals, participate in the first phase of the HBCP programme (a "cell" is a small administrative area under the larger areas called "districts"). Every cell has two HBCPs, who completed high school and received six months of technical vocational education and training organised by the Ministry of Health in collaboration with its partners.

There is growing evidence for the efficacy of interventions using mobile devices (mHealth) in LMICs, particularly in improving treatment adherence, appointment compliance, data gathering, and developing support networks for health workers. In Rwanda, there is an urgent call to using mHealth interventions for the prevention and management of NCDs. The present research project responds to this by developing an mHealth intervention integrated in the current primary health care system, in support of both the DM patients and their healthcare providers.

Randomisation: The unit of randomisation will be the cluster, defined by the cell. In each cell two HBCPs work. Under each district hospital, the cells participating in the HBCP programme will be randomised to receive intervention 1 or 2. The patients from each group will receive the same intervention. An equal number of cells, out of those not participating in the HBCP programme, will be randomly selected and assigned to the control group.

Sample size: Lacking other data on diabetes in Rwanda, the standard deviation from a study of Levitt et al. in South Africa is used to calculate the within and between variance. A one-point difference in HbA1c is considered as clinically significant outcome based on previous studies. For the power calculation, a within variance of 4.76, a between variance of 0.53, and an intra-class correlation of 0.1 are assumed. Based on the information which will be gathered before the onset of the trial, the final sample will be estimated assuming either four or six patients per cell (in each cell two HBCPs work).

Assuming four patients per cell, the number of clusters per group needed is 27 for a total number of 108 patients per group to achieve 80% power with a 5% level of significance (total number of patients: 324, total number of cells: 81). 144 patients per group (total number of patients: 432; total number of cells: 108) will be needed to allow for a 30% attrition.

Assuming six patients per cell, the number of clusters per group needed is 21 for a total number of 126 patients per group to achieve 80% power with a 5% level of significance (total number of patients: 378, total number of cells: 63). 168 patients per group (total number of patients: 504; total number of cells: 84) will be needed to allow for a 30% attrition.

Study questionnaires: Four questionnaires will be employed for the assessment of the patients of the trial (D-39, PAID, BMQ, ISHA-Q). In preparation for their use both their translation in Kinyarwanda and their cultural adaptation will be carried out.

Qualitative study: At the end of the trial two types of focus discussion groups will be conducted: a) with patients of the two intervention groups, and; b) with HBCPs delivering the two interventions of the study. The aim of these focus discussion groups is to explore the ways the intervention will have been enacted in practice, expected and unexpected impacts, and the perceptions of relevance and contextual issues that may have impacted the intervention.

Ethical review: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Rwanda National Ethics Committee (100/RNEC/2017; amendment approved in 463/RNEC/2017; renewed in 113/RNEC/2018) and the Ethics Review Panel of the University of Luxembourg (ERP 17-014 D2Rwanda; amendment approved in ERP 17-048 D2Rwanda).

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Telemedicine
  • Community Health Workers

Keywords

  • Primary Health Care
  • Health Behavior
  • Quality of Life
  • Health Literacy
  • Global Health
  • Medication Adherence
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

8,290 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,077 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 209 is above the median of 80 across 6,023 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,300 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for patients:

  1. Adult patients (male and female) aged between 21 and 80 years
  2. Diagnosed and confirmed as diabetic patient at least 6 months prior to study start
  3. Living in the administrative areas (called "cells") of the district hospitals participating in the first phase of the HBCP programme
  4. Residing, and planning to reside within a 2-hour travel distance on foot from the study site for the duration of follow-up
  5. Willing and able to adhere to the study protocol
  6. Willing and able to give for enrolment in the study

Exclusion Criteria for patients:

  1. Severe mental health conditions, including cognitive impairments, as registered in their clinical records
  2. Severe hearing and visual impairments as registered in their clinical records
  3. Terminal illness
  4. Illiteracy
  5. Pregnancy or post-partum period

Inclusion criteria for HBCPs:

  1. Permanent residence in one of the cells of the study
  2. Willing and able to give informed consent for enrolment in the study

Exclusion criteria for HBCPs:

  1. Not capable of accomplishing questionnaires due to reading or communication problems
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
209 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group 1

    Intervention group 1 will receive access to the newly-established HBCP programme.

    Other: HBCP programme

  • Experimental
    Intervention group 2

    Intervention group 2 will receive access to the newly-established HBCP programme, and facilitated access to a mobile health application.

    Other: HBCP programme · Behavioral: mobile health application

  • No intervention
    Control group

    The control group will receive routine practice.

Interventions

  • OtherHBCP programme

    The newly-established Home-Based Community Practitioners (HBCPs) programme will enable frontline workers to offer monthly health assessments, disease management and lifestyle advice to diabetic patients, and referral to the district hospitals when needed.

    Also known as: Intervention 1

  • Behavioralmobile health application

    HBCPs will actively encourage the use of a mobile app by assisting patients to access it (this process is known as "facilitated access"). The app will enable: (i) the registration of measurements, such as blood glucose and weight; (ii) the registration of concerns and questions in a diary; (iii) the reception of alerts and notifications for the appointments to the health facilities, and; (iv) access to advice on lifestyle improvement and other patient educational material.

    Also known as: Intervention 2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in HbA1c

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in medication adherence

    To assess medication adherence and evaluate patients' medication-taking behaviour, reported side-effects, concerns and barriers to adherence, the Kinyarwanda version of the Brief Medication Questionnaire (BMQ) will be administered at: baseline, after six months, and on trial completion (after 12 months). Data will also be gathered from the pharmacies dispensing medications to calculate the pill count, in an attempt to triangulate the information received from the BMQ with a more objective method.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6- and 12-month follow-up

  2. Number of dropouts of the NCD clinics of the district hospitals

    Time frame: From baseline to 12-month follow-up

  3. Number of lost appointments to the NCD clinics of the district hospitals

    Time frame: From baseline to 12-month follow-up

  4. Mortality

    Time frame: From baseline to 12-month follow-up

  5. Number of complications

    Time frame: From baseline to 12-month follow-up

  6. Number of referrals

    Time frame: From baseline to 12-month follow-up

  7. Change in health literacy

    The Kinyarwanda version of the Information and Support for Health Actions Questionnaire (ISHA-Q) will be employed to assess the health literacy level (at baseline and after 12 months).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  8. Change in health-related quality of life

    The Kinyarwanda version of the Diabetes-39 (D-39) questionnaire will be used to measure health-related quality of life (at baseline, after six months, and on trial completion (after 12 months)).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6- and 12-month follow-up

  9. Change in mental well-being

    The Kinyarwanda version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes questionnaire (PAID) questionnaire will be administered to evaluate psychological well-being (at baseline, after six months, and on trial completion (after 12 months)).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6- and 12-month follow-up

  10. Percentage of patients with at least one measurement of HbA1c

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  11. Percentage of patients with at least one measurement of fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  12. Percentage of patients with at least one measurement of creatinine

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  13. Percentage of patients with at least one measurement of urine proteins (dipstick)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  14. Percentage of patients with at least one measurement of blood pressure

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  15. Percentage of patients with at least one recording of body mass index (BMI)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  16. Fasting blood glucose (FBG)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  17. Creatinine

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  18. Urine proteins (dipstick)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  19. Blood pressure

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  20. Body mass index (BMI)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  21. Recorded number of smokers

    Recording of whether a patient is smoker or not

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  22. Number of patients with recorded pack years

    Pack years are calculated by multiplying the number of packs of cigarettes smoked per day by the number of years the person has smoked

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  23. Number of patients with recorded alcohol intake per week

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  24. Number of smokers

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  25. Number of cigarettes per day

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

  26. Alcohol intake per week

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up

Other outcomes

  1. Patients' challenges receiving care

    The qualitative part of the study will include focus discussion groups and interviews with patients

    Time frame: On trial completion (approximately after 12 months)

  2. Patients understanding of diabetes' natural history

    The qualitative part of the study will include focus discussion groups and interviews with patients

    Time frame: On trial completion (approximately after 12 months)

  3. How the patients' disease-related decision-making is influence

    The qualitative part of the study will include focus discussion groups and interviews with patients

    Time frame: On trial completion (approximately after 12 months)

  4. How the patients' disease-related decision-making is influenced

    The qualitative part of the study will include focus discussion groups and interviews with patients

    Time frame: On trial completion (approximately after 12 months)

  5. The challenges of patients in using the mobile app

    The qualitative part of the study will include focus discussion groups and interviews with patients

    Time frame: On trial completion (approximately after 12 months)

  6. The changes in behaviour that the intervention brought about

    The qualitative part of the study will include focus discussion groups and interviews with patients

    Time frame: On trial completion (approximately after 12 months)

  7. The challenges in the work of HBCPs

    The qualitative part of the study will include focus discussion groups and interviews with HBCPs

    Time frame: On trial completion (approximately after 12 months)

  8. The level of satisfaction of HBCPs

    The qualitative part of the study will include focus discussion groups and interviews with HBCPs

    Time frame: On trial completion (approximately after 12 months)

  9. The challenges in integrating the app to the usual visits

    The qualitative part of the study will include focus discussion groups and interviews with HBCPs

    Time frame: On trial completion (approximately after 12 months)

  10. The differences the HBCPs note from patient to patient

    The qualitative part of the study will include focus discussion groups and interviews with HBCPs

    Time frame: On trial completion (approximately after 12 months)

07

Study locations

9 sites
  • Kibuye Referral Hospital
    Kibuye, Karongi, Rwanda
  • Ruhengeri Provincial Hospital
    Ruhengeri, Musanze, Rwanda
  • Kibungo Referral Hospital
    Kibungo, Ngoma, Rwanda
  • Bushenge Provincial Hospital
    Bushenge, Nyamasheke, Rwanda
  • Muhima District Hospital
    Kigali, Nyarugenge, Rwanda
  • Ruhango Provincial Hospital
    Kinazi, Ruhango, Rwanda
  • Kinihira Provincial Hospital
    Kinihira, Rulindo, Rwanda
  • Kabutare District Hospital
    Huye, Rwanda
  • Rwamagana Provincial Hospital
    Rwamagana, Rwanda
08

References and documents

Publications

  • World Health Organization (WHO). Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. 2014;298. Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en/
  • Hilawe EH, Yatsuya H, Kawaguchi L, Aoyama A. Differences by sex in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Sep 1;91(9):671-682D. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.113415. PubMed 24101783 ↗
  • Tapela N, Habineza H, Anoke S, Harerimana E, Mutabazi F, Hedt-Gauthier B, et al. Diabetes in Rural Rwanda: High Retention and Positive Outcomes after 24 Months of Follow-up in the Setting of Chronic Care Integration. Int J Diabetes Clin Res [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Dec 5];3(2). Available from: http://clinmedjournals.org/articles/ijdcr/international-journal-of-diabetes-and-clinical-research-ijdcr-3-058.php
  • Hall V, Thomsen RW, Henriksen O, Lohse N. Diabetes in Sub Saharan Africa 1999-2011: epidemiology and public health implications. A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 14;11:564. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-564. PubMed 21756350 ↗
  • World Health Organization (WHO). WHO STEPwise approach to Surveillance (STEPS). 2013.
  • International Diabetes Federation (IDF). IDF Diabetes Atlas 7th edition [Internet]. idf.org. Brussels; 2015. Available from: http://www.diabetesatlas.org/
  • Windus DW, Ladenson JH, Merrins CK, Seyoum M, Windus D, Morin S, Tewelde B, Parvin CA, Scott MG, Goldfeder J. Impact of a multidisciplinary intervention for diabetes in Eritrea. Clin Chem. 2007 Nov;53(11):1954-9. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.095067. PubMed 17954497 ↗
  • Mukeshimana MM, Nkosi ZZ. Communities' knowledge and perceptions of type two diabetes mellitus in Rwanda: a questionnaire survey. J Clin Nurs. 2014 Feb;23(3-4):541-9. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12199. Epub 2013 Jun 21. PubMed 23789978 ↗
  • Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, Wang F, Osmond D, Daher C, Palacios J, Sullivan GD, Bindman AB. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002 Jul 24-31;288(4):475-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.4.475. PubMed 12132978 ↗
  • Gill GV, Mbanya JC, Ramaiya KL, Tesfaye S. A sub-Saharan African perspective of diabetes. Diabetologia. 2009 Jan;52(1):8-16. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1167-9. Epub 2008 Oct 10. PubMed 18846363 ↗
  • National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. Rwanda Integrated Household Living Conditions Survey (EICV) 2013/2014. 2014.
  • National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR). The Statistical Yearbook, 2014 Edition [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://statistics.gov.rw/publications/statistical-yearbook-2014
  • Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda]. Non communicable diseases policy [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.moh.gov.rw/fileadmin/templates/policies/NCDs_Policy.2015.pdf
  • National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. Statistical Yearbook 2014. 2014.
  • Campbell J, Buchan J, Cometto G, David B, Dussault G, Fogstad H, Fronteira I, Lozano R, Nyonator F, Pablos-Mendez A, Quain EE, Starrs A, Tangcharoensathien V. Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage. Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Nov 1;91(11):853-63. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.118729. PubMed 24347710 ↗
  • Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda]. Health Sector Policy [Internet]. Kigali; 2014. Available from: http://www.moh.gov.rw/fileadmin/templates/policies/Health_Sector_Policy_2014.pdf
  • Fox LM, Ravishankar N, Squires J, Williamson RT, Derick B. Rwanda Health Governance Report [Internet]. Bethesda, MD; 2010. Available from: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s18413en/s18413en.pdf
  • Agarwal S, Rosenblum L, Goldschmidt T, Carras M, Goal N, Labrique AB. Mobile Technology in Support of Frontline Health Workers. John Hopkins Univ Glob mHealth Initiat 2016 [Internet]. 2016;86. Available from: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5243748/mFHW Landscape_2016 Final.pdf
  • Braun R, Catalani C, Wimbush J, Israelski D. Community health workers and mobile technology: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 12;8(6):e65772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065772. Print 2013. PubMed 23776544 ↗
  • Binagwaho A. Role of community health in strengthening Rwandan health system [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2016 Feb 6]. Available from: http://www.webcitation.org/6f5urhqiP
  • Condo J, Mugeni C, Naughton B, Hall K, Tuazon MA, Omwega A, Nwaigwe F, Drobac P, Hyder Z, Ngabo F, Binagwaho A. Rwanda's evolving community health worker system: a qualitative assessment of client and provider perspectives. Hum Resour Health. 2014 Dec 13;12:71. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-12-71. PubMed 25495237 ↗
  • Farmer PE, Nutt CT, Wagner CM, Sekabaraga C, Nuthulaganti T, Weigel JL, Farmer DB, Habinshuti A, Mugeni SD, Karasi JC, Drobac PC. Reduced premature mortality in Rwanda: lessons from success. BMJ. 2013 Jan 18;346:f65. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f65. Erratum In: BMJ. 2013;346:f534. PubMed 23335479 ↗
  • Joshi R, Alim M, Kengne AP, Jan S, Maulik PK, Peiris D, Patel AA. Task shifting for non-communicable disease management in low and middle income countries--a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 14;9(8):e103754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103754. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25121789 ↗
  • Mishra SR, Neupane D, Preen D, Kallestrup P, Perry HB. Mitigation of non-communicable diseases in developing countries with community health workers. Global Health. 2015 Nov 10;11:43. doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0129-5. PubMed 26555199 ↗
  • Kok MC, Dieleman M, Taegtmeyer M, Broerse JE, Kane SS, Ormel H, Tijm MM, de Koning KA. Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review. Health Policy Plan. 2015 Nov;30(9):1207-27. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu126. Epub 2014 Dec 11. PubMed 25500559 ↗
  • Hill Z, Dumbaugh M, Benton L, Kallander K, Strachan D, ten Asbroek A, Tibenderana J, Kirkwood B, Meek S. Supervising community health workers in low-income countries--a review of impact and implementation issues. Glob Health Action. 2014 May 8;7:24085. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.24085. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24815075 ↗
  • United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific 2017. Bloomberg Data for Health Initiative. 201.
  • Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda]. Health Sector Annual Report: July 2015-June 2016 [Internet]. Kigali; 2016. Available from: http://www.moh.gov.rw/fileadmin/templates/MOH-Reports/Health_20Sector_20Annual_20Report_202015-2016_25082016.pdf
  • Stephani V, Opoku D, Quentin W. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of mHealth interventions against non-communicable diseases in developing countries. BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 15;16:572. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3226-3. PubMed 27417513 ↗
  • Vital Wave Consulting. mHealth for Development: The Opportunity of Mobile Technology for Healthcare in the Developing World [Internet]. Washington, D.C.; 2009. Available from: http://www.unfoundation.org/what-we-do/issues/global-health/mhealth-report.html
  • GSMA. The Mobile Economy: Sub Saharan Africa 2014 [Internet]. London, United Kingdom; 2014. Available from: http://www.gsmamobileeconomyafrica.com/GSMA_ME_SubSaharanAfrica_Web_Singles.pdf
  • National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) [Rwanda], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda], ICF International. Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2014-15. Rockville, Maryland, USA: NISR, MOH, and ICF International; 2015.
  • Utilities Rwanda Regulatory Authority. Statistics and tariff information in telecommunication, media and postal service as of the fourth quarter 2016 [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://www.rura.rw/fileadmin/docs/statistics/Statistics_report_4th_quarter___2016_for_publication_.pdf
  • World Health Organization (WHO). ITU and WHO launch mHealth initiative to combat noncommunicable diseases [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Feb 6]. Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/events/2012/mhealth/en/
  • Bloomfield GS, Vedanthan R, Vasudevan L, Kithei A, Were M, Velazquez EJ. Mobile health for non-communicable diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the literature and strategic framework for research. Global Health. 2014 Jun 13;10:49. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-49. PubMed 24927745 ↗
  • Asiimwe-kateera B, Condo J, Ndagijimana A, Kumar S, Mukeshimana M, Gaju E, et al. Mobile Health Approaches to Non-Communicable Diseases in Rwanda. 2015;2(1):89-92.
  • Torjesen I. Maternal deaths have nearly halved in past 25 years. BMJ. 2015 Nov 13;351:h6129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6129. No abstract available. PubMed 26566922 ↗
  • International Diabetes Federation. Global Diabetes Scorecard Tracking Progress for Action [Internet]. Bruxelles; 2014. Available from: http://www.idf.org/global-diabetes-scorecard/assets/downloads/Scorecard-29-07-14.pdf
  • World Health Organization (WHO). Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. 2003;2014:1-194. Available from: http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_full_report.pdf
  • Bagonza J, Rutebemberwa E, Bazeyo W. Adherence to anti diabetic medication among patients with diabetes in eastern Uganda; a cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 19;15:168. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0820-5. PubMed 25898973 ↗
  • Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27(5):1218-24. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1218. PubMed 15111553 ↗
  • Hamine S, Gerth-Guyette E, Faulx D, Green BB, Ginsburg AS. Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 24;17(2):e52. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3951. PubMed 25803266 ↗
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available. PubMed 11124735 ↗
  • Torgerson DJ. Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer? BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):355-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7282.355. No abstract available. PubMed 11159665 ↗
  • Lopez-Pelayo H, Wallace P, Segura L, Miquel L, Diaz E, Teixido L, Baena B, Struzzo P, Palacio-Vieira J, Casajuana C, Colom J, Gual A. A randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of primary care-based facilitated access to an alcohol reduction website (EFAR Spain): the study protocol. BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 31;4(12):e007130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007130. PubMed 25552616 ↗
  • Boyer JG, Earp JA. The development of an instrument for assessing the quality of life of people with diabetes. Diabetes-39. Med Care. 1997 May;35(5):440-53. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199705000-00003. PubMed 9140334 ↗
  • Garratt AM, Schmidt L, Fitzpatrick R. Patient-assessed health outcome measures for diabetes: a structured review. Diabet Med. 2002 Jan;19(1):1-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00650.x. PubMed 11869297 ↗
  • Watkins K, Connell CM. Measurement of health-related QOL in diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(17):1109-26. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422170-00002. PubMed 15612830 ↗
  • Speight J, Reaney MD, Barnard KD. Not all roads lead to Rome-a review of quality of life measurement in adults with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2009 Apr;26(4):315-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02682.x. PubMed 19388959 ↗
  • Dodson S, Good S, Osborne R. Health literacy toolkit for low- and middle-income countries: a series of information sheets to empower communities and strengthen health systems [Internet]. National Network of Libraries of Medicine Southeastern/Atlantic Region. New Delhi: World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2015. Available from: http://apps.searo.who.int/PDS_DOCS/B5148.pdf?ua=1
  • Svarstad BL, Chewning BA, Sleath BL, Claesson C. The Brief Medication Questionnaire: a tool for screening patient adherence and barriers to adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Jun;37(2):113-24. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00107-4. PubMed 14528539 ↗
  • Lavsa SM, Holzworth A, Ansani NT. Selection of a validated scale for measuring medication adherence. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2011 Jan-Feb;51(1):90-4. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2011.09154. PubMed 21247831 ↗
  • Lam WY, Fresco P. Medication Adherence Measures: An Overview. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:217047. doi: 10.1155/2015/217047. Epub 2015 Oct 11. PubMed 26539470 ↗
  • Levitt NS, Bradshaw D, Zwarenstein MF, Bawa AA, Maphumolo S. Audit of public sector primary diabetes care in Cape Town, South Africa: high prevalence of complications, uncontrolled hyperglycaemia, and hypertension. Diabet Med. 1997 Dec;14(12):1073-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199712)14:123.0.CO;2-9. PubMed 9455936 ↗
  • Mash RJ, Rhode H, Zwarenstein M, Rollnick S, Lombard C, Steyn K, Levitt N. Effectiveness of a group diabetes education programme in under-served communities in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2014 Aug;31(8):987-93. doi: 10.1111/dme.12475. Epub 2014 May 20. PubMed 24766179 ↗
  • van Teijlingen E, Hundley V. The importance of pilot studies. Nurs Stand. 2002 Jun 19-25;16(40):33-6. doi: 10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214. PubMed 12216297 ↗
  • Schenker MB, Castañeda X, Rodriguez-Lainz A, editors. Migration and Health - A Research Methods Handbook. Oakland, California: University of California Press; 2014
  • Mrc, Clark A, Clark A. Anonymising Research Data. Sociol J Br Sociol Assoc. 2006;44:1-48
  • Lygidakis C, Uwizihiwe JP, Bia M, Uwinkindi F, Kallestrup P, Vogele C. Quality of life among adult patients living with diabetes in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study in outpatient clinics. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 19;11(2):e043997. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043997. PubMed 33608403 ↗
  • Lygidakis C, Uwizihiwe JP, Kallestrup P, Bia M, Condo J, Vogele C. Community- and mHealth-based integrated management of diabetes in primary healthcare in Rwanda (D(2)Rwanda): the protocol of a mixed-methods study including a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 24;9(7):e028427. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028427. PubMed 31345971 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2019 to primary completion in Dec 2020, 23 months.

Of 1,583 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes Mellitus, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43. This study's 23 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,743 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 6, 2017
First posted
Dec 18, 2017
StartActual
Jan 11, 2019
Primary completionActual
Dec 18, 2020
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2021
Last update
Feb 21, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03376607
Collaborators
University of Luxembourg, Karen Elise Jensens Fond, University of Rwanda, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 18, 2017
Start date
Jan 11, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 18, 2020
Completion
Dec 31, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 21, 2021

Study contacts

Per Kallestrup, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Aarhus
Claus Vögele, DPsych, PhD
principal investigator · University of Luxembourg
Jeanine Condo Umutesi, MD, MSc, PhD
principal investigator · Rwanda Biomedical Centre
Conchitta D'Ambrosio, MSc, PhD
principal investigator · University of Luxembourg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion