ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03374592Updated Nov 16, 2022

Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy vs. Conventional Radiotherapy for Cancer Pain

An interventional study of Volumetric Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy and Conventional Radiotherapy in Neoplasm Metastasis, Pain and Radiotherapy Side Effect, sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM). Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-16.

Sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2014, registered Dec 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
73
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares the use of conventional radiotherapy technique with volumetric intensity-modulated radiotherapy (VMAT) in the treatment of painful cancer metastases. Half of the patients will receive radiotherapy using a conventional technique, while the other half will receive their treatment using a the VMAT technique.

Read the detailed description

Radiotherapy to painful sites of metastasis can provide pain relief.

Side-effects from radiotherapy is dependent on the volume and dose received by normal tissues. Conventional radiotherapy techniques delivers similar doses of radiation to the targeted cancer lesion and the normal tissues along the entrance and exit paths of the radiation.

Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is an advanced technique of radiotherapy that spares normal tissues from receiving high-dose irradiation. However, VMAT increases the volume of normal tissues receiving low-dose irradiation.

This study aims at comparing the quality of life and side-effect profiles of patients treated by palliative radiotherapy using the conventional technique vs. VMAT.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Pain
  • Radiotherapy Side Effect
  • Quality of Life

Keywords

  • Intensity-modulated radiation therapy
  • Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy
  • Radiotherapy
  • Pain
  • Metastasis
  • Quality of Life
  • Acute Toxicity
03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

4,043 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 886 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 73 is above the median of 50 across 3,269 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) is the lead sponsor of 376 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Pain (SF-BPI score ≥1) should be related to (bone or others) or to the tumor itself
  2. Capable of providing the full list of analgesic medication being used
  3. Capable of completing the SF-BPI and EORTC questionnaires without any help
  4. of at least 3 month
  5. greater or equal to 50
  6. Radiotherapy to 1 site pain
  7. Site of treatment not previously irradiated
  8. No planned changes in analgesic within 7 days before and after treatment

    • Patient may be started on Dexamethasone on the first day of radiotherapy
  9. No planned chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery within 7 days before and after treatment
  10. Patient provided to participate in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Major mental or psychiatric impairments, which in the investigator's opinion will prevent administration or completion of the protocol therapy and/or interfere with follow-up.
  2. Treatment to upper and lower limb
  3. Treatment to 2 or more sites of pain
  4. Re-irradiation of the site of treatment
  5. Women who are pregnant
  6. less than 3 month
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
73 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Radiotherapy

    8Gy in 1 fraction or 20Gy in 5 fractions

    Radiation: Conventional Radiotherapy

  • Experimental
    Volumetric Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy

    8Gy in 1 fraction or 20Gy in 5 fractions

    Radiation: Volumetric Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy

Interventions

  • RadiationVolumetric Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy

    Advanced radiotherapy technique

    Also known as: Intensity modulated radiotherapy

  • RadiationConventional Radiotherapy

    Conventional radiotherapy technique

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life (QOL)

    The global QOL subscale will be measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 questionnaire and compared to baseline. The global QOL subscales will be scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (min: 0, max: 100). Higher scores represent better global QOL.

    Time frame: 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life - Function subscales

    Quality of life function subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social and financial functions) will be measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 questionnaire and compared to baseline. QOL subscales will be scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (min: 0, max: 100). For function subscales, higher scores represent better function.

    Time frame: 3 month

  2. Quality of Life - Symptom subscales

    Quality of life symptom subscales (dyspnea, pain, fatigue, appetite loss, nausea, constipation, and diarrhea symptoms) will be measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 questionnaire and compared to baseline. QOL subscales will be scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (min: 0, max: 100). For symptom subscales, higher scores represent worse symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 month

  3. Pain relief

    Pain response to radiotherapy as defined by the International Bone Metastases Consensus Endpoint Definitions

    Time frame: 1 week

  4. Pain relief

    Pain response to radiotherapy as defined by the International Bone Metastases Consensus Endpoint Definitions

    Time frame: 1 month

  5. Pain relief

    Pain response to radiotherapy as defined by the International Bone Metastases Consensus Endpoint Definitions

    Time frame: 3 month

  6. Toxicities

    Descriptive tabulation of toxicities related to radiotherapy as defined by CTCAE v4

    Time frame: 1 week

  7. Toxicities

    Descriptive tabulation of toxicities related to radiotherapy as defined by CTCAE v4

    Time frame: 1 month

  8. Toxicities

    Descriptive tabulation of toxicities related to radiotherapy as defined by CTCAE v4

    Time frame: 3 month

Other outcomes

  1. Resource utilization

    Time spent in planning and delivering radiotherapy

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Physical activity

    Change in the daily number of steps taken by patients before and after radiotherapy as measured using an activity tracker

    Time frame: 1 week

  3. Blood biomarkers

    Change in cytokine levels in blood following radiotherapy as a biomarker of response to radiotherapy

    Time frame: 1 week

  4. Blood biomarkers

    Change in circulating microRNA levels in blood following radiotherapy as a biomarker of response to radiotherapy

    Time frame: 1 week

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wong P, Lambert L, Thanomsack P, Coulombe G, Lambert C, Charpentier AM, Barkati M, Fortin I, Lafontaine J, Roberge D. Quality of Life: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Palliative Volumetric Arc Therapy Versus 3-Dimensional Conventional Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Apr 1;109(5):1431-1439. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.061. Epub 2020 Nov 28. PubMed 33259935 ↗
  • Dorion V, Lambert L, Frazzi A, Cayer JF, Wong P. A Pilot Study in the Use of Activity Trackers for Assessing Response to Palliative Radiotherapy. Cureus. 2017 Nov 22;9(11):e1871. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1871. PubMed 29383293 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2014 to primary completion in Dec 2017, 41 months.

Of 291 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neoplasm Metastasis, half reached primary completion within 58 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 93. This study's 41 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 316 studies reached it within 54 months; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 91.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 12, 2017
First posted
Dec 15, 2017
StartActual
Jul 7, 2014
Primary completionActual
Dec 20, 2017
CompletionActual
Feb 21, 2018
Last update
Nov 16, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 16, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03374592
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 15, 2017
Start date
Jul 7, 2014
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2017
Completion
Feb 21, 2018
Last update
Nov 16, 2022

Study contacts

Philip Wong
principal investigator · Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion