ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03373461Updated Jan 30, 2023Results posted

Study of Safety and Efficacy of LNP023 in Patients With Kidney Disease Caused by Inflammation

A Phase 2 interventional study of LNP023 and Placebo in IgA Nephropathy, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 56 sites in 25 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-30.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals (part of Novartis) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
112
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 18 studies in Glomerulonephritis, IGA by Novartis — 9 open to participants now, 12 under way, 7 of them phase 3. Glomerulonephritis, IGA · Novartis.

Enrollment
7th of 14
112 · median 108
Started
2018
the only one that year
Phase 2
5 of 18
2 open now
Registered
1st of 18
by date

Among the 18 studies in Glomerulonephritis, IGA by Novartis, this one is the 7th largest by enrollment of the 14 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2018, is one of 5 in phase 2, and was the 1st registered.

Glomerulonephritis, IGA

276 studies on the registry are indexed under Glomerulonephritis, IGA; 108 are open to participants now.

Browse Glomerulonephritis, IGA studies →

Open to participants now

9 of the 18 studies in Glomerulonephritis, IGA by Novartis are open now, in 12 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

4 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 9 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 68 Glomerulonephritis, IGA studies recruiting now, 39 (57%) set no upper age limit and 24 (35%) stop at 75 or younger; 21 take children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 18 studies in Glomerulonephritis, IGA by Novartis, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Efficacy and safety of LNP023 in IgAN patients

Read the detailed description

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging, parallel-group study with an adaptive design (Part 1 informed the design adaptations for Part 2). In Part 1, three doses of LNP023 (10 mg, 50 mg, and 200 mg) vs. placebo control were compared; In Part 2, four doses of LNP023 (10 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg) vs. placebo control were compared. The study comprised a run-in phase in order that patients were on stable and maximally tolerated dose of Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARB) for at least 90 days, a 90 days treatment phase in Part 1; a 180 days treatment phase in Part 2 and a 90 days follow-up phase in both Parts 1 and 2.

03

Conditions studied

  • IgA Nephropathy

Keywords

  • glomerunephritis, complement driven, chronic kidney disease
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female and male patients above 18 years of age with a -verified IgA nephropathy and where the biopsy was performed within the prior three years.
  • Patients must weigh at least 35 kg to participate in the study, and must have a (BMI) within the range of 15 - 38 kg/m2. BMI = Body weight (kg) / [Height (m)]2
  • Measured (GFR) or estimated GFR (using the CKD-EPI formula) ≥30 mL/min per 1.73 m2
  • Urine protein ≥1 g/24hr at screening and ≥0.75 g / 24h after the run- in period
  • Vaccination against Neisseria meningitidis types A, C, Y and W-135 is required at least 30 days prior to first dosing with LNP023. Vaccination against N. meningitidis type B, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae should be conducted if available and acceptable by local regulations, at least 30 days prior to first dosing with LNP023
  • All patients must have been on supportive care including a maximally tolerated dose of ACEi or ARB therapy for the individual, antihypertensive therapy or diuretics for at least 90 days before dosing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  1. Presence of crescent formation in ≥50% of glomeruli assessed on renal
  2. Patients previously treated with agents such as cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or cyclosporine, systemic exposure within 90 days prior to start of LNP023/Placebo dosing
  3. Use of other drugs at the time of enrollment, or within 5 half-lives of enrollment, or within 30 days, whichever is longer; or longer if required by local regulations
  4. All transplanted patients (any organ, including bone marrow)
  5. History of immunodeficiency diseases, or a positive (ELISA and Western blot) test result.

    Chronic infection with (HBV) or (HCV). A positive HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) test, or if standard local practice, a positive HBV core antigen test, excludes a patient. Patients with a positive HCV antibody test should have HCV RNA levels measured. Subjects with positive (detectable) HCV RNA should be excluded

  6. Any surgical or medical condition which might significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs, or which may jeopardize the subject in case of participation in the study. The Investigator should make this determination in consideration of the subject's medical history and/or clinical or laboratory evidence of any of the following:

    • A history of invasive infections caused by encapsulated organisms, e.g. meningococcus or pneumococcus
    • Splenectomy
    • Inflammatory bowel disease, peptic ulcers, severe gastrointestinal disorder including rectal bleeding;
    • Major gastrointestinal tract surgery such as gastrectomy, gastroenterostomy, or bowel resection;
    • Pancreatic injury or pancreatitis;
    • Liver disease or liver injury as indicated by abnormal liver function tests. (SGPT), AST (SGOT), GGT, alkaline phosphatase and serum will be tested.
    • Any single parameter of ALT, AST, GGT, alkaline phosphatase or serum bilirubin must not exceed 3 x (ULN)
    • must be within the reference range of normal individuals
    • Evidence of urinary obstruction or difficulty in voiding any urinary tract disorder other than IgNA that is associated with hematuria at screening and before dosing; [If necessary, laboratory testing may be repeated on one occasion (as soon as possible) prior to randomization, to rule out any laboratory error]
  7. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test.
  8. A history of abnormalities, or any of the following ECG abnormalities at screening or baseline:

    • PR > 200 msec
    • QRS complex > 120 msec
    • > 450 msec (males)
    • QTcF > 460 msec (females)
    • History of familial long QT syndrome or known family history of Torsades de Pointes
    • Use of agents known to prolong the QT interval unless they can be permanently discontinued for the duration of the study
  9. History of severe allergic reactions as per Investigator decision
  10. Plasma donation (> 200mL) within 30 days prior to first dosing.
  11. Donation or loss of 400 mL or more of blood within eight (8) weeks prior to initial dosing, or longer if required by local regulation
  12. Women of , defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using highly effective methods of during dosing and for 1 week after stopping of investigational drug. Highly effective contraception methods include:

    • Total abstinence from heterosexual intercourse (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject). Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
    • Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking investigational drug. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment.
    • Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female subjects on the study the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that subject.
    • Use of oral (estrogen and progesterone), injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure \<1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception In case of use of oral contraception women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking investigational drug.

    If local regulations deviate from the contraception methods listed above and require more extensive measures to prevent pregnancy, local regulations apply and will be described in the ICF.

    Women are considered and not of child bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks ago. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential.

  13. History of of any organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in-situ cervical cancer), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or
  14. History of any porphyria metabolic disorder
  15. History of drug or alcohol abuse within the 12 months prior to dosing, or evidence of such abuse as indicated by the laboratory assays conducted during screening and baseline.
  16. History of to any of the study treatments or or to drugs of similar chemical classes
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(23)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
112 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo identical to LNP023 twice a day

    Other: Placebo

  • Experimental
    LNP023 10 mg BID

    10 mg taken twice a day.

    Drug: LNP023

  • Experimental
    LNP023 50 mg BID

    50 mg taken twice a day.

    Drug: LNP023

  • Experimental
    LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2

    100 mg taken twice a day.

    Drug: LNP023

  • Experimental
    LNP023 200 mg BID

    200 mg taken twice a day.

    Drug: LNP023

Interventions

  • DrugLNP023

    LNP023 5, 25, 100 mg capsles

  • OtherPlacebo

    Matching placebo to LNP023

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MCP-Mod Estimates of the Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) (g/Mol) - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90

    The primary analysis of the dose-response effect of LNP023 versus placebo on the reduction in UPCR 24 hours at Day 90 was done using Multiple Comparison Procedure Modelling (MCP-Mod). The existence of a dose-response relationship was assessed at the MCP step at the one-sided 10% significance level vis a multiple contrasts test. In the Mod step, the mean predicted difference between each LNP023 dose and placebo were then estimated using parametric bootstrap model averaging. Results are presented on the original scale as geometric mean ratios. A ratio less than 1 indicates a reduction in proteinuria. Participants collected all urine over a 24 hour period for UPCR test.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90

    eGFR was calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI). The CKD-EPI equation is an established, widely used and Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline recommended method of GFR estimation based on serum creatinine, age, gender and race of the patient. It was derived and validated established from a meta-analyses of multiple studies including large number of patients.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

  2. Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Serum Creatinine - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90

    Serum creatinine

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

  3. Shift Table From Baseline for Hematuria Levels - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90

    Hematuria levels were the number of erythrocytes/high-power-field (hpf) measured through microscopic examination. The table shows the shift in hematuria grade (Low: \<9 rbc/hpf, Intermediate: \>=9 to \<= 50 rbc/hpf, High: \>50 rbc/hpf) from baseline (rows) to Day 90 (columns). A lower grade corresponds to a better outcome. Only patients with both baseline and Day 90 hematuria values are presented. L=low, I=intermediate and H=high in column headings for doses and BL=baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

  4. Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24hour Urine Protein (UP) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90

    Participants collected all of their urine over a 24-hour period.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

  5. Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline of 24 Hour Urine Albumin (UA) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90

    Participants collected all of their urine over a 24-hour period.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

  6. Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24 Hour Urine Albumin to Creatinine (UACR) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90

    Participants collected all of their urine over a 24-hour period.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

  7. Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in Urine Protein to Creatinine (UPCR) From 1st Morning Void - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90

    A midstream urine sample was obtained from the first morning void (FMV) on the visit day.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

  8. Plasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Area Under the Curve at Steady State (AUCtau,ss and AUClast,ss) at Day 30

    AUClast,ss: the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last quantifiable concentration at steady state AUCtau,ss: the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval tau at steady state

    Time frame: Baseline (0 hr), Day 15 (0 hr) Day 30 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hrs)

  9. Plasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Pre-dose Trough at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) and Maximum Concentrations (Cmax,ss) at Day 30

    Cmax,ss: the observed maximum plasma concentration following drug administration at steady state (ng/mL) Ctrough,ss: the pre-dose plasma concentration observed during a dosing interval at steady state (ng/mL)

    Time frame: Baseline (0 hr), Day 15 (0 hr) Day 30 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hrs)

  10. Plasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Time to Maximum Concentration at Steady State (Tmax,ss) at Day 30

    Tmax,ss: the time to reach the maximum concentration after drug administration at steady state (h)

    Time frame: Baseline (0 hr), Day 15 (0 hr) Day 30 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hrs)

  11. Amount of LNP023 Excreted Into Urine (Ae,ss) at Day 30

    Ae,ss: the total cumulative urinary excretion at steady state

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 30

  12. Percent of LNP023 Excreted Into Urine at Day 30

    Percent of drug excreted into the urine

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 30

  13. Renal Clearance From Plasma at Steady State (CLr,ss) at Day 30

    The renal clearance from plasma at steady state

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 30

  14. Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Circulating Fragment of Factor B (Bb) and Soluble Terminal Complement Complex (sC5b-9) Biomarkers for Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90

    The complement AP biomarkers Bb and sC5b-9 were evaluated as potential pharmacodynamics and mode-of-action markers. Both biomarkers were measured using validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 30, 60, 90

  15. Estimation of the Lowest Dose Providing Maximal Reduction of Proteinuria as Measured by the Ratio to Baseline in UPCR at Day 90

    The table shows the ratio to baseline in UPCR at Day 90 by treatment group. The lowest dose providing maximal reduction of proteinuria is the dose with the smallest UPCR ratio to baseline estimate (i.e. LNP023 200mg),

    Time frame: Baseline up to Month 3

  16. Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Part 2 up to Day 180

    eGFR; estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

  17. Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline Protein to Creatinine (UPCR) From 1st Morning Void - Part 2 up to Day 180

    A midstream urine sample was obtained from the first morning void (FMV) on the visit day.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

  18. Shift Table From Baseline for Hematuria Levels - Part 2 at Day 180

    Hematuria levels were the number of erythrocytes/high-power-field (hpf) measured through microscopic examination. The table shows the shift in hematuria grade (Low: \<9 rbc/hpf, Intermediate: \>=9 to \<= 50 rbc/hpf, High: \>50 rbc/hpf) from baseline (rows) to Day 180 (columns). A lower grade corresponds to a better outcome. Only patients with both baseline and Day 90 hematuria values are presented. L=low, I=intermediate and H=high in column headings for doses and BL=baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

  19. Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline in Protein Level Urine Using the Urine Protein-creatinine Ratio (UPCR) From 24 Hour Urine Collection - Part 2 up to Day 180

    For UPCR test, participants collected all of their urine over a 24-hour period

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 30, 90 and 180

  20. Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24 Hour Urine Albumin to Creatinine (UACR) - Part 2 up to Day 180

    The 24-hour urine collection was started 1 day prior to the clinic visit, after participant urinated for the first time, than all urine was collected for the next 24 hours and refrigerated prior to clinic visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

07

Results

Posted Oct 7, 2022

Participant flow

Part 1
Participant flow — Part 1
MilestoneLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Started9801514
Completed9801514
Not completed00000
Part 2
Participant flow — Part 2
MilestoneLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Started1111221111
Completed1110221110
Not completed01001
Withdrew: Adverse event01001

Outcome measures

PrimaryMCP-Mod Estimates of the Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) (g/Mol) - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90

The primary analysis of the dose-response effect of LNP023 versus placebo on the reduction in UPCR 24 hours at Day 90 was done using Multiple Comparison Procedure Modelling (MCP-Mod). The existence of a dose-response relationship was assessed at the MCP step at the one-sided 10% significance level vis a multiple contrasts test. In the Mod step, the mean predicted difference between each LNP023 dose and placebo were then estimated using parametric bootstrap model averaging. Results are presented on the original scale as geometric mean ratios. A ratio less than 1 indicates a reduction in proteinuria. Participants collected all urine over a 24 hour period for UPCR test.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 90
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio to baseline
MCP-Mod Estimates of the Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) (g/Mol) - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90
Ratio to baselineLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
MCP-Mod Estimates of the Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) (g/Mol) - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 900.85 (0.77 to 0.93)0.80 (0.73 to 0.87)0.76 (0.70 to 0.81)0.69 (0.61 to 0.77)0.88 (0.80 to 1.00)
Statistical analysis
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs LNP023 50 mg BID vs LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Multiple Comparison Procedure-Modeling · p = 0.038
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.99 · 80% CI 0.86 to 1.00
  • LNP023 50 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.94 · 80% CI 0.76 to 0.98
  • LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.87 · 80% CI 0.72 to 0.96
  • LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.77 · 80% CI 0.66 to 0.92
SecondaryMixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90

eGFR was calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI). The CKD-EPI equation is an established, widely used and Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline recommended method of GFR estimation based on serum creatinine, age, gender and race of the patient. It was derived and validated established from a meta-analyses of multiple studies including large number of patients.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 90
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/SSA
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90
mL/min/SSALNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90-0.06 ± 1.7602.49 ± 1.8590.23 ± 1.8212.42 ± 1.545-3.34 ± 1.606
Statistical analysis
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): 3.28 · 80% CI 0.210 to 6.344
  • LNP023 50 mg BID vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): 5.83 · 80% CI 2.642 to 9.010
  • LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): 3.56 · 80% CI 0.427 to 6.700
  • LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): 5.76 · 80% CI 2.882 to 8.638
SecondaryMixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Serum Creatinine - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90

Serum creatinine

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 90
Reported as:
Mean · umol/L
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Serum Creatinine - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90
umol/LLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Serum Creatinine - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90-2.55 ± 3.488-2.60 ± 3.6650.76 ± 3.555-3.47 ± 3.0436.65 ± 3.150
Statistical analysis
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): -9.20 · 80% CI -15.253 to -3.145
  • LNP023 50 mg BID vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): -9.25 · 80% CI -15.499 to -3.000
  • LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): -5.89 · 80% CI -12.040 to 0.260
  • LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): -10.12 · 80% CI -15.763 to -4.471
SecondaryShift Table From Baseline for Hematuria Levels - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90

Hematuria levels were the number of erythrocytes/high-power-field (hpf) measured through microscopic examination. The table shows the shift in hematuria grade (Low: \<9 rbc/hpf, Intermediate: \>=9 to \<= 50 rbc/hpf, High: \>50 rbc/hpf) from baseline (rows) to Day 90 (columns). A lower grade corresponds to a better outcome. Only patients with both baseline and Day 90 hematuria values are presented. L=low, I=intermediate and H=high in column headings for doses and BL=baseline

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 90
Reported as:
Number · participants
Shift Table From Baseline for Hematuria Levels - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90
participants10mg-L10mg-I10mg-H50mg-L50mg-I50mg-H100mg-L100mg-I100mg-H200mg-L200mg-I200mg-HPl-LPL-IPL-H
Low at baseline71—130—60—60—620
Intermediate at baseline13—11—40—62—401
High at baseline00—00—21—00—000
SecondaryMixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24hour Urine Protein (UP) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90

Participants collected all of their urine over a 24-hour period.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 90
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio to baseline
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24hour Urine Protein (UP) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90
Ratio to baselineLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24hour Urine Protein (UP) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 900.80 (0.661 to 0.965)0.89 (0.740 to 1.070)0.61 (0.509 to 0.729)0.70 (0.601 to 0.823)0.84 (0.713 to 0.987)
Statistical analysis
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.95 · 80% CI 0.742 to 1.222
  • LNP023 50 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 1.06 · 80% CI 0.830 to 1.356
  • LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.73 · 80% CI 0.569 to 0.928
  • LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.84 · 80% CI 0.669 to 1.050
SecondaryMixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline of 24 Hour Urine Albumin (UA) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90

Participants collected all of their urine over a 24-hour period.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 90
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio to baseline
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline of 24 Hour Urine Albumin (UA) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90
Ratio to baselineLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline of 24 Hour Urine Albumin (UA) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 900.79 (0.648 to 0.964)0.93 (0.763 to 1.122)0.61 (0.504 to 0.734)0.73 (0.623 to 0.865)0.82 (0.693 to 0.973)
Statistical analysis
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.96 · 80% CI 0.741 to 1.250
  • LNP023 50 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 1.13 · 80% CI 0.872 to 1.458
  • LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.74 · 80% CI 0.574 to 0.957
  • LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.89 · 80% CI 0.706 to 1.132
SecondaryMixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24 Hour Urine Albumin to Creatinine (UACR) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90

Participants collected all of their urine over a 24-hour period.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 90
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio to baseline
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24 Hour Urine Albumin to Creatinine (UACR) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90
Ratio to baselineLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24 Hour Urine Albumin to Creatinine (UACR) - Parts 1 and 2 to Day 900.85 (0.728 to 0.998)0.89 (0.765 to 1.045)0.66 (0.567 to 0.772)0.74 (0.647 to 0.842)0.87 (0.756 to 0.998)
Statistical analysis
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.98 · 80% CI 0.794 to 1.214
  • LNP023 50 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 1.03 · 80% CI 0.835 to 1.269
  • LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.76 · 80% CI 0.616 to 0.942
  • LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.85 · 80% CI 0.704 to 1.027
SecondaryMixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in Urine Protein to Creatinine (UPCR) From 1st Morning Void - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90

A midstream urine sample was obtained from the first morning void (FMV) on the visit day.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 90
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio to baseline
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in Urine Protein to Creatinine (UPCR) From 1st Morning Void - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 90
Ratio to baselineLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in Urine Protein to Creatinine (UPCR) From 1st Morning Void - Parts 1 and 2 at Day 900.76 (0.638 to 0.908)0.81 (0.674 to 0.970)0.61 (0.509 to 0.725)0.70 (0.598 to 0.815)0.83 (0.704 to 0.970)
Statistical analysis
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.92 · 80% CI 0.723 to 1.172
  • LNP023 50 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.98 · 80% CI 0.767 to 1.249
  • LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.74 · 80% CI 0.577 to 0.937
  • LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.84 · 80% CI 0.678 to 1.052
SecondaryPlasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Area Under the Curve at Steady State (AUCtau,ss and AUClast,ss) at Day 30

AUClast,ss: the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last quantifiable concentration at steady state AUCtau,ss: the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval tau at steady state

Time frame:
Baseline (0 hr), Day 15 (0 hr) Day 30 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hrs)
Reported as:
Mean · hr*ng/mL
Plasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Area Under the Curve at Steady State (AUCtau,ss and AUClast,ss) at Day 30
hr*ng/mLLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BID
AUClast,ss5820 ± 175013000 ± 274018400 ± 604027900 ± 9930
AUCtau,ss8010 ± 255017700 ± 425024700 ± 803037100 ± 13500
SecondaryPlasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Pre-dose Trough at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) and Maximum Concentrations (Cmax,ss) at Day 30

Cmax,ss: the observed maximum plasma concentration following drug administration at steady state (ng/mL) Ctrough,ss: the pre-dose plasma concentration observed during a dosing interval at steady state (ng/mL)

Time frame:
Baseline (0 hr), Day 15 (0 hr) Day 30 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hrs)
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Plasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Pre-dose Trough at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) and Maximum Concentrations (Cmax,ss) at Day 30
ng/mLLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BID
Ctrough,ss515 ± 2321130 ± 3481510 ± 5672200 ± 964
Cmax,ss964 ± 2642150 ± 4803300 ± 10804940 ± 1770
SecondaryPlasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Time to Maximum Concentration at Steady State (Tmax,ss) at Day 30

Tmax,ss: the time to reach the maximum concentration after drug administration at steady state (h)

Time frame:
Baseline (0 hr), Day 15 (0 hr) Day 30 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hrs)
Reported as:
Median · hour
Plasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Time to Maximum Concentration at Steady State (Tmax,ss) at Day 30
hourLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BID
Plasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Time to Maximum Concentration at Steady State (Tmax,ss) at Day 302.00 (0.250 to 6.00)2.00 (1.00 to 6.00)2.00 (0.500 to 6.00)2.00 (0.500 to 4.00)
SecondaryAmount of LNP023 Excreted Into Urine (Ae,ss) at Day 30

Ae,ss: the total cumulative urinary excretion at steady state

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 30
Reported as:
Mean · mg
Amount of LNP023 Excreted Into Urine (Ae,ss) at Day 30
mgLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BID
Amount of LNP023 Excreted Into Urine (Ae,ss) at Day 301.72 ± 1.1511.7 ± 5.8430.9 ± 17.060.3 ± 27.1
SecondaryPercent of LNP023 Excreted Into Urine at Day 30

Percent of drug excreted into the urine

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 30
Reported as:
Mean · percent of dose
Percent of LNP023 Excreted Into Urine at Day 30
percent of doseLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BID
Percent of LNP023 Excreted Into Urine at Day 308.59 ± 5.7711.7 ± 5.8415.5 ± 8.5015.1 ± 6.77
SecondaryRenal Clearance From Plasma at Steady State (CLr,ss) at Day 30

The renal clearance from plasma at steady state

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 30
Reported as:
Mean · L/hr
Renal Clearance From Plasma at Steady State (CLr,ss) at Day 30
L/hrLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BID
Renal Clearance From Plasma at Steady State (CLr,ss) at Day 300.112 ± 0.07440.348 ± 0.1790.719 ± 0.4790.942 ± 0.540
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Circulating Fragment of Factor B (Bb) and Soluble Terminal Complement Complex (sC5b-9) Biomarkers for Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90

The complement AP biomarkers Bb and sC5b-9 were evaluated as potential pharmacodynamics and mode-of-action markers. Both biomarkers were measured using validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, 30, 60, 90
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Circulating Fragment of Factor B (Bb) and Soluble Terminal Complement Complex (sC5b-9) Biomarkers for Parts 1 and 2 to Day 90
ng/mLLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Day 8 - Bb, n=14,16,13,25,1976.7 ± 22.8972.2 ± 22.8671.4 ± 30.6666.3 ± 28.15102.7 ± 19.78
Day 15 - Bb, n=13,14,16,22,2280.4 ± 32.5974.1 ± 23.3078.5 ± 33.3572.9 ± 20.47108.6 ± 23.19
Day 30 - Bb, n=16,17,18,26,2476.4 ± 18.3276.2 ± 23.6276.8 ± 34.0070.4 ± 28.9699.3 ± 22.07
Day 60 - Bb, n=14,16,17,25,2178.8 ± 20.2675.2 ± 19.0577.4 ± 35.2372.8 ± 23.97102.9 ± 24.07
Day 90 - Bb, n=17,16,17,25,2190.5 ± 25.5779.3 ± 22.4777.6 ± 35.4274.6 ± 23.91102.7 ± 22.01
Day 8 sC5B-9, n=12,16,13,22,1780.6 ± 12.2969.6 ± 37.4065.9 ± 24.0575.8 ± 30.1595.2 ± 22.01
Day 15 sC5B-9, n=13,14,16,21,2179.4 ± 27.6072.2 ± 33.8678.4 ± 33.3578.0 ± 32.0699.4 ± 25.40
Day 30 sC5B-9, n=16,17,18,25,2485.8 ± 23.8868.6 ± 41.3276.4 ± 25.9769.8 ± 21.9894.2 ± 24.96
Day 60 sC5B-9, n=14,16,17,24,2084.6 ± 27.3773.7 ± 31.9974.9 ± 29.6576.2 ± 29.8095.7 ± 30.11
Day 90 sC5B-9, n=16,16,17,23,1989.6 ± 28.6673.8 ± 36.2179.0 ± 22.8275.0 ± 34.21103.4 ± 21.52
SecondaryEstimation of the Lowest Dose Providing Maximal Reduction of Proteinuria as Measured by the Ratio to Baseline in UPCR at Day 90

The table shows the ratio to baseline in UPCR at Day 90 by treatment group. The lowest dose providing maximal reduction of proteinuria is the dose with the smallest UPCR ratio to baseline estimate (i.e. LNP023 200mg),

Time frame:
Baseline up to Month 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio to baseline
Estimation of the Lowest Dose Providing Maximal Reduction of Proteinuria as Measured by the Ratio to Baseline in UPCR at Day 90
Ratio to baselineLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Estimation of the Lowest Dose Providing Maximal Reduction of Proteinuria as Measured by the Ratio to Baseline in UPCR at Day 900.85 (0.77 to 0.93)0.80 (0.73 to 0.87)0.76 (0.70 to 0.81)0.69 (0.61 to 0.77)0.88 (0.80 to 1.00)
SecondaryMixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Part 2 up to Day 180

eGFR; estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 180
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/SSA
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Part 2 up to Day 180
mL/min/SSALNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Part 2 up to Day 1800.78 ± 1.977-2.35 ± 1.995-2.91 ± 1.359-1.18 ± 1.798-3.17 ± 1.868
Statistical analysis
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): 3.95 · 80% CI 0.420 to 7.472
  • LNP023 50 mg BID vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): 0.82 · 80% CI -2.747 to 4.390
  • LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): 0.26 · 80% CI -2.745 to 3.262
  • LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Mean difference (final values): 1.98 · 80% CI -1.368 to 5.337
SecondaryMixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline Protein to Creatinine (UPCR) From 1st Morning Void - Part 2 up to Day 180

A midstream urine sample was obtained from the first morning void (FMV) on the visit day.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 180
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio to baseline
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline Protein to Creatinine (UPCR) From 1st Morning Void - Part 2 up to Day 180
Ratio to baselineLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline Protein to Creatinine (UPCR) From 1st Morning Void - Part 2 up to Day 1800.81 (0.599 to 1.108)0.72 (0.534 to 0.976)0.63 (0.507 to 0.784)0.72 (0.544 to 0.949)0.79 (0.590 to 1.047)
Statistical analysis
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 1.04 · 80% CI 0.680 to 1.579
  • LNP023 50 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.92 · 80% CI 0.607 to 1.390
  • LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.80 · 80% CI 0.558 to 1.153
  • LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.91 · 80% CI 0.614 to 1.362
SecondaryShift Table From Baseline for Hematuria Levels - Part 2 at Day 180

Hematuria levels were the number of erythrocytes/high-power-field (hpf) measured through microscopic examination. The table shows the shift in hematuria grade (Low: \<9 rbc/hpf, Intermediate: \>=9 to \<= 50 rbc/hpf, High: \>50 rbc/hpf) from baseline (rows) to Day 180 (columns). A lower grade corresponds to a better outcome. Only patients with both baseline and Day 90 hematuria values are presented. L=low, I=intermediate and H=high in column headings for doses and BL=baseline

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 180
Reported as:
Number · participants
Shift Table From Baseline for Hematuria Levels - Part 2 at Day 180
participants10mg-L10mg-I10mg-H50mg-L50mg-I50mg-H100mg-L100mg-I100mg-H200mg-L200mg-I200mg-HPl-LPL-IPL-H
Low at baseline11—5——20—4——4—0
Intermediate at baseline21—1——30—2——0—1
High at baseline00—0——21—0——0—0
SecondaryMixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline in Protein Level Urine Using the Urine Protein-creatinine Ratio (UPCR) From 24 Hour Urine Collection - Part 2 up to Day 180

For UPCR test, participants collected all of their urine over a 24-hour period

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 30, 90 and 180
Reported as:
Geometric mean · mg/d
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline in Protein Level Urine Using the Urine Protein-creatinine Ratio (UPCR) From 24 Hour Urine Collection - Part 2 up to Day 180
mg/dLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Change From Baseline in Protein Level Urine Using the Urine Protein-creatinine Ratio (UPCR) From 24 Hour Urine Collection - Part 2 up to Day 1801.06 (0.803 to 1.394)0.59 (0.452 to 0.779)0.66 (0.540 to 0.798)0.73 (0.568 to 0.940)0.91 (0.705 to 1.185)
Statistical analysis
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs Placebo · Geometric mean ratio: 1.16 · 80% CI 0.792 to 1.692
  • LNP023 50 mg BID vs Placebo · Geometric mean ratio: 0.65 · 80% CI 0.446 to 0.945
  • LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs Placebo · Geometric mean ratio: 0.72 · 80% CI 0.518 to 0.997
  • LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Geometric mean ratio: 0.80 · 80% CI 0.558 to 1.146
SecondaryMixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24 Hour Urine Albumin to Creatinine (UACR) - Part 2 up to Day 180

The 24-hour urine collection was started 1 day prior to the clinic visit, after participant urinated for the first time, than all urine was collected for the next 24 hours and refrigerated prior to clinic visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 180
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio to baseline
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24 Hour Urine Albumin to Creatinine (UACR) - Part 2 up to Day 180
Ratio to baselineLNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlacebo
Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) of the Ratio to Baseline in 24 Hour Urine Albumin to Creatinine (UACR) - Part 2 up to Day 1801.04 (0.779 to 1.392)0.61 (0.454 to 0.808)0.65 (0.526 to 0.792)0.69 (0.533 to 0.902)0.91 (0.696 to 1.200)
Statistical analysis
  • LNP023 10 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 1.14 · 80% CI 0.765 to 1.699
  • LNP023 50 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.66 · 80% CI 0.446 to 0.984
  • LNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2 vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.71 · 80% CI 0.501 to 0.995
  • LNP023 200 mg BID vs Placebo · Ratio to placebo (of ratio to baseline): 0.76 · 80% CI 0.520 to 1.107

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were reported from first dose to end of study treatment (tx) plus 7 days post tx. Maximum reporting time for Treatment Emergent Adverse Events was: Part 1=99 days, Part II: 197 days. There was an additional 90 day safety follow up period for both periods.. Non-serious events are listed at a 1.8% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
LNP023 10mg On-treatment0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)14/20 (70%)
LNP023 50mg On-treatment0/19 (0%)1/19 (5.3%)16/19 (84.2%)
LNP023 100mg On-treatment0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)15/22 (68.2%)
LNP023 200mg On-treatment0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)14/26 (53.8%)
Placebo On-treatment0/25 (0%)1/25 (4%)17/25 (68%)
LNP023 10mg Follow-up0/20 (0%)1/20 (5%)6/20 (30%)
LNP023 50mg Follow-up0/19 (0%)1/19 (5.3%)5/19 (26.3%)
LNP023 100mg Follow-up0/22 (0%)2/22 (9.1%)5/22 (22.7%)
LNP023 200mg Follow-up0/26 (0%)1/26 (3.8%)10/26 (38.5%)
Placebo Follow-up0/25 (0%)1/25 (4%)7/25 (28%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLNP023 10mg On-treatmentLNP023 50mg On-treatmentLNP023 100mg On-treatmentLNP023 200mg On-treatmentPlacebo On-treatmentLNP023 10mg Follow-upLNP023 50mg Follow-upLNP023 100mg Follow-upLNP023 200mg Follow-upPlacebo Follow-up
COVID-19Infections and infestations0/201/190/220/260/250/201/190/220/260/25
InfluenzaInfections and infestations0/200/190/220/260/251/200/190/220/260/25
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/200/190/220/260/250/200/191/220/260/25
Renal impairmentRenal and urinary disorders0/200/190/220/260/250/200/191/221/260/25
Polycythaemia veraNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/200/190/220/260/250/200/190/220/261/25
AspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/200/190/220/261/250/200/190/220/260/25
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 146
Most frequent other events
EventLNP023 10mg On-treatmentLNP023 50mg On-treatmentLNP023 100mg On-treatmentLNP023 200mg On-treatmentPlacebo On-treatmentLNP023 10mg Follow-upLNP023 50mg Follow-upLNP023 100mg Follow-upLNP023 200mg Follow-upPlacebo Follow-up
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/202/192/222/266/250/200/191/220/260/25
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders0/203/192/220/260/250/201/190/220/261/25
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/203/191/220/260/251/200/191/220/261/25
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders3/201/190/220/261/250/200/191/220/261/25
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders3/202/190/221/261/250/200/190/220/260/25
HypotensionVascular disorders3/200/190/222/260/250/200/190/220/260/25
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/200/193/221/263/251/200/190/221/260/25
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/202/191/221/263/251/200/190/220/260/25
FatigueGeneral disorders0/202/191/220/263/250/200/190/221/260/25
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/202/191/221/260/250/200/190/220/260/25

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)LNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Mean39.2 ± 12.4236.6 ± 8.4236.0 ± 13.1542.5 ± 15.7639.4 ± 11.0038.9 ± 12.58
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)LNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
18 years - <65 years2019212425109
65 years - <85 years001203
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Female1161111746
Male91311151866
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)LNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Asian10912121154
White10910131355
Black or African American010102
American Indian or Alaska Native000011
Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR)
Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR)(g/mol)LNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Mean214.1 ± 122.29188.2 ± 90.38203.4 ± 98.29151.0 ± 109.46146.6 ± 61.62177.9 ± 100.02
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)(mL/min/1.73m^2)LNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Mean66.0 ± 28.5153.8 ± 22.7367.0 ± 31.7557.9 ± 28.9265.7 ± 32.6062.2 ± 29.30
Supine Blood Pressure
Supine Blood Pressure(mmHg)LNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Systolic134.4 ± 11.65122.6 ± 12.15125.0 ± 11.30125.7 ± 11.66125.5 ± 11.37126.5 ± 11.89
Diastolic84.1 ± 7.6576.9 ± 8.4180.0 ± 10.4079.7 ± 7.6278.2 ± 7.3279.6 ± 8.26
Prior use of ACEi and/or ARB
Prior use of ACEi and/or ARB(Participants)LNP023 10 mg BIDLNP023 50 mg BIDLNP023 100 mg BID - Part 2LNP023 200 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Count of participants1919222625111
08

Study locations

56 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Caba, Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ciudad Autonoma de Bs As, Buenos Aires C1015ABO, Argentina
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Edegem, Antwerpen 2650, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Roeselare, 8800, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Curitiba, PR 80440-020, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Porto Alegre, RS 90020-090, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Beijing, 100034, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Guang Zhou, 510080, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shanghai, 200040, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Barranquilla, Colombia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Praha, 12808, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Arhus N, DK-8200, Denmark
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    HUS, 00029, Finland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    New Delhi, Delhi 110 017, India
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    New Delhi, 110029, India
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ashkelon, 78278, Israel
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Jerusalem, 9112001, Israel
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Petach Tikva, 49100, Israel
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Toyoake city, Aichi 470 1192, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sapporo-city, Hokkaido 006-8555, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sendai, Miyagi 981-3205, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Okayama-city, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Osaka-city, Osaka 530-8480, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Seoul, 03080, Korea, Republic of
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kuala Lumpur, 50589, Malaysia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bergen, 5021, Norway
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Loerenskog, NO 1478, Norway
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Oslo, NO 0450, Norway
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Singapore, 119228, Singapore
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Singapore, 169608, Singapore
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lund, 221 85, Sweden
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Stockholm, 141 86, Sweden
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    New Taipei City, 23561, Taiwan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Taichung, 40705, Taiwan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Taipei, 10048, Taiwan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Istanbul, TUR 34098, Turkey
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ankara, 06100, Turkey
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kocaeli, 41380, Turkey
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Talas / Kayseri, 38039, Turkey
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cambridge, Cambrigdeshire CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Salford, Manchester M6 8HD, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Leicester, LE5 4PW, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2020, 34 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2022, 1 year 9 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Jul 2021.

Of 41 phase 2 interventional studies under Glomerulonephritis, IGA, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 50. This study's 34 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 30, 2017
First posted
Dec 14, 2017
StartActual
Feb 7, 2018
Primary completionActual
Dec 29, 2020
CompletionActual
Jun 22, 2021
Results delay requested
Jul 7, 2021
Results first posted
Oct 7, 2022
Last update
Jan 30, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03373461
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 14, 2017
Start date
Feb 7, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 29, 2020
Completion
Jun 22, 2021
Results posted
Oct 7, 2022
Last update
Jan 30, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Iptacopan

Start the discussion