CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03369704Updated Jan 12, 2026Results posted

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Omalizumab in Severe Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Adult and Adolescent Patients

A Phase 3 interventional study of Omalizumab and Placebo in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 22 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-12.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
337
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab compared with placebo, on top of SoC (anti-histamine and nasal corticosteroid) in adult and adolescent patients with severe Japanese cedar pollinosis, whose symptoms were inadequately controlled despite the current recommended therapies (nasal corticosteroids plus one or more medications out of anti-histamine, leukotriene receptor antagonist, or prostaglandin D2/thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist) in the previous 2 Japanese cedar pollen seasons.

02

Conditions studied

  • Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

  • cryptomeria, omalizumab, seasonal allergic rhinitis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A clinical history of Japanese cedar pollinosis defined by the following

    • Took nasal corticosteroid plus one or more medications out of antihistamine (second generation), leukotriene receptor antagonist, or prostaglandin D2 thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist in Japanese cedar pollen seasons in 2016 and 2017.
    • Had inadequately controlled symptoms of Japanese cedar pollinosis lasting at least one week in the Japanese cedar pollen season in 2017 despite the nasal corticosteroid plus one or more medications out of anti-histamine (second generation), leukotriene receptor antagonist, or prostaglandin D2/thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist (regardless of having perennial allergic rhinitis or not)
  • Serum cedar pollen-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels of ≥ score of 3 by CAP/RAST-FEIA, ImmunoCAP or MAST at the screening epoch.
  • Developing a symptom of Japanese cedar pollinosis during the period from first observational day in cedar pollen in Kanto area to initial drug administration (Visit 101), as defined by the following

    • Having any nasal or ocular symptom (≥ score of 1 in sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, itchy eye or watery eye) in at least 2 days or
    • Having both any nasal symptom (≥ score of 1 in sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion) and any eye symptom (≥ score of 1 in itchy eye or watery eye) in at least one day, which is confirmed by patient e-diary (unless a symptom is clearly consider to take place due to other than Japanese cedar pollinosis/allergic rhinitis (e.g., upper respiratory tract infection, or common cold)).
  • Body weight and serum total IgE level at screen epoch within the dosing table range; body weight of ≥ 20 to ≤ 150 kg and serum total IgE levels of ≥ 30 to ≤ 1500 IU/mL at a maximum.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • With an active rhinitis other than allergic rhinitis (e.g acute or chronic rhinitis, idiopathic rhinitis).
  • With an active nose disease other than allergic rhinitis (e.g., acute or chronic rhinosinusitis or deflected septum) which is expected to affect the evaluation of efficacy of the study drug judged by the investigator.
  • With elevated serum IgE levels for reasons other than allergy (e.g., parasite infections, hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome or clinical allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis).
  • With a severe asthma treated with high dose inhaled corticosteroid (≥ 800 μg/day fluticasone propionate or an equivalent for aged ≥ 16 to \<75 years, > 200 μg/day for aged ≥ 12 to \<16 years).
  • Who are receiving operative treatment for allergic rhinitis (e.g., electrocoagulation, laser surgery, 80% trichloroacetic acid chemo-surgery, inferior turbinectomy or posterior nasal neurectomy) within 1 years prior to the screening epoch.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
337 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Omalizumab

    Eligible patients randomized to this arm received omalizumab subcutaneously for 12 weeks

    Drug: Omalizumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Eligible patients randomized to this arm received placebo subcutaneously for 12 weeks

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugOmalizumab

    Omalizumab were administered by subcutaneous injection. Dose (75 to 600 mg) and dosing frequency (every 2 or 4 weeks) were determined by serum total IgE level (IU/mL) and body weight (kg) measured at the screening epoch according the dosing table.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo were administered by subcutaneous injection. Dose (75 to 600 mg) and dosing frequency (every 2 or 4 weeks) were determined by serum total IgE level (IU/mL) and body weight (kg) measured at the screening epoch according the dosing table.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Nasal Symptom Score

    Nasal symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal congestion) were recorded by the patient everyday in their e-Diary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (intense/severe). Nasal symptom score (0-12 point) consisted of score for severity of sneezing (0-4 point), rhinorrhea (0-4 point) and nasal congestion (0-4 point). Severe symptom period: The three weeks where the cumulative value of the mean daily nasal symptom score is the maximum. The three weeks must also meet one of the following criteria: 2) ≥ 70% of the period with concomitant use of fluticasone propionate is included in this three weeks. 2) ≥ 70% of this three weeks includes the period with concomitant use of fluticasone propionate. If not, severe symptom period was extended at a minimum to meet one of the criteria above. The severe symptom period will be defined as: the three weeks where the cumulative value of the mean daily nasal symptom score will be the maximum.

    Time frame: Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24March2018)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Ocular Symptom Score and Mean Nasal Ocular Symptom Score

    Ocular symptoms (itchy and watery eye) were recorded by the patient everyday in their e-Diary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (intense/severe). Ocular symptom score (0-8 point) consisted of score for severity of itchy eye (0-4 point) and watery eye (0-4 point). Nasal ocular symptom score consisted of nasal symptom score and ocular symptom score. Nasal ocular symptom score is the sum of nasal symptom score (0-12) and ocular symptom score (0-8) 0 presents no nasal ocular symptom and 20 presents worse outcome.

    Time frame: Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)

  2. Mean Nasal Symptom Medication Score, Mean Ocular Symptom Medication Score, and Mean Nasal Ocular Symptom Medication Score

    Medication scores were given for fluticasone propionate (nasal, 2 point), fexofenadine hydrochloride (oral, 1 point), tramazoline hydrochloride (nasal, 1 point), and levocabastine hydrochloride (ocular, 1 point). Symptom medication score consisted of severe symptom period. Nasal symptom medication score is the sum of nasal symptom score and medication score (fexofenadine hydrochloride, fluticasone propionate, tramazoline hydrochloride) Ocular symptom medication score is the sum of ocular symptom score and medication score (fexofenadine hydrochloride, levocabastine hydrochloride) Nasal ocular symptom medication score is the sum of nasal symptom score, ocular symptom score and medication score (fexofenadine hydrochloride, fluticasone propionate, tramazoline hydrochloride, levocabastine hydrochloride).

    Time frame: Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)

  3. Mean Score for Severity of Sneezing, Rhinorrhea and Nasal Congestion

    Symptoms of sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal congestion were evaluated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (intense/severe).

    Time frame: Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)

  4. Mean Score for Severity of Itchy and Watery Eye

    Symptoms of itchy and watery eye were evaluated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (intense/severe).

    Time frame: Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)

  5. Mean Score for Impairment of Daily Activities

    Impairment of daily activities were evaluated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (intense/severe).

    Time frame: Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)

  6. Number of Symptom Free Days

    Nasal symptom free days (days with all nasal symptoms are not more than mild in severity) during the severe symptom period. Ocular symptom free days (days with all ocular symptoms are not more than mild in severity) during the severe symptom period.

    Time frame: Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24March2018)

  7. Completely Nasal Symptom Free Patients

    Completely nasal symptom free patients is the number of patients who were nasal symptom free (all nasal symptoms were not more than mild in severity) on all non-missing days and had nasal symptom scores for at least 26 days during the 30 days of severe symptom period.

    Time frame: Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)

  8. Rescue Medication Score

    Rescue medication scores were given for tramazoline hydrochloride (nasal, 1 point) and levocabastine hydrochloride (ocular, 1 point). Rescue medication score for nasal is medication score for Tramazoline hydrochloride, Rescue medication score for ocular is medication score for Levocabastine hydrochloride and Rescue medication score for nasal and ocular is the sum of medication score for Tramazoline hydrochloride and Levocabastine hydrochlorid

    Time frame: Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)

  9. Rescue Medication Free Days

    Number of days with no rescue medication (tramazoline hydrochloride, levocabastine hydrochloride). Nasal ocular rescue medication free days were defined as the days with no use of tramazoline hydrochloride (nasal rescue medication) and levocabastine hydrochloride (ocular rescue medication).

    Time frame: Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)

  10. Number of Rescue Medication Used

    Amount number of rescue medication used (a total number of times used).

    Time frame: Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)

  11. Japanese Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JRQLQ, No1) Score

    Nasal and eye symptoms (JRQLQ I) included 6 categories: Runny nose, Sneezing, Nasal congestion, Itchy nose, itchy eyes and watery eyes, on a 5-point scale of 0 to 4 (no symptoms to very severe symptoms). JRQLQ I score was a mean of these 6 categories. JRQLQ II included 17 items on a 5-point scale, 0 to 4 (no significant problem to very greatly). JRQLQ II scores was a mean of these 17 items. Overall face scale (JRQLQ III) evaluated overall symptoms, condition and feelings on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 (fine to crying). Evaluation visit was defined as follows independently for each evaluation item and for each patient: 1) If there was a single visit during the severe symptom period, the visit was the evaluation visit. 2) If there were ≥ 2 visits during the severe symptom period and a) if Visit 105 was one of them, Visit 105 was the evaluation visit; b) if Visit 105 was outside the period, the closest visit to Visit 105 during the period was the evaluation visit.

    Time frame: Evaluation Visit, one visit during severe symptom period (23-Feb-2018 to 24-Mar-2018) for each patient

  12. Number of Participants With Anti-omalizumab Antibodes

    Number of participants with antibodies against the Fab and Fc region of omalizumab in serum.

    Time frame: Prior to first dosing (Day 1), At follow-up investigation which were conducted 20/22 weeks after 12 week-treatment epoch

  13. Serum Trough Omalizumab Concentration

    Blood samples were collected Prior to first dosing (Day 1), at Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 and follow-up investigation which were conducted 20/22 weeks after 12 week-treatment epoch

    Time frame: Prior to first dosing (Day 1), at Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 and 24 weeks after last dose

  14. Free IgE and Total IgE

    Blood samples were collected Prior to first dosing (Day 1), at Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 and follow-up investigation were conducted 20/22 weeks after 12 week-treatment epoch

    Time frame: Day 1, at Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 and 24 weeks after last dose

06

Results

Posted Nov 4, 2019

Participant flow

This study was conducted at 22 centers in Kanto-area of Japan.

Treatment Epoch
Participant flow — Treatment Epoch
MilestoneOmalizumabPlacebo
Started162175
Completed158172
Not completed43
Withdrew: Technical problems10
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy02
Withdrew: Adverse event20
Follow-up Epoch
Participant flow — Follow-up Epoch
MilestoneOmalizumabPlacebo
Started161174
Completed160174
Not completed10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Nasal Symptom Score

Nasal symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal congestion) were recorded by the patient everyday in their e-Diary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (intense/severe). Nasal symptom score (0-12 point) consisted of score for severity of sneezing (0-4 point), rhinorrhea (0-4 point) and nasal congestion (0-4 point). Severe symptom period: The three weeks where the cumulative value of the mean daily nasal symptom score is the maximum. The three weeks must also meet one of the following criteria: 2) ≥ 70% of the period with concomitant use of fluticasone propionate is included in this three weeks. 2) ≥ 70% of this three weeks includes the period with concomitant use of fluticasone propionate. If not, severe symptom period was extended at a minimum to meet one of the criteria above. The severe symptom period will be defined as: the three weeks where the cumulative value of the mean daily nasal symptom score will be the maximum.

Time frame:
Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24March2018)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score
Mean Nasal Symptom Score
scoreOmalizumabPlacebo
Mean Nasal Symptom Score3.66 ± 0.1514.69 ± 0.144
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (H0: Omalizumab is not different to placebo with respect to mean nasal symptom score over the severe symptom period. H1: Omalizumab is different to placebo with respect to mean nasal symptom score over the severe symptom period.) · Least square mean: -1.03 · 95% CI -1.44 to -0.62nasal symptom score
SecondaryMean Ocular Symptom Score and Mean Nasal Ocular Symptom Score

Ocular symptoms (itchy and watery eye) were recorded by the patient everyday in their e-Diary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (intense/severe). Ocular symptom score (0-8 point) consisted of score for severity of itchy eye (0-4 point) and watery eye (0-4 point). Nasal ocular symptom score consisted of nasal symptom score and ocular symptom score. Nasal ocular symptom score is the sum of nasal symptom score (0-12) and ocular symptom score (0-8) 0 presents no nasal ocular symptom and 20 presents worse outcome.

Time frame:
Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score
Mean Ocular Symptom Score and Mean Nasal Ocular Symptom Score
ScoreOmalizumabPlacebo
Mean ocular symptom score2.45 ± 0.1153.32 ± 0.110
Mean nasal ocular symptom score6.11 ± 0.2408.01 ± 0.228
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -1.89 · 95% CI -2.55 to -1.24Nasal Ocular Symptom
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.87 · 95% CI -1.18 to -0.55Ocular symptom
SecondaryMean Nasal Symptom Medication Score, Mean Ocular Symptom Medication Score, and Mean Nasal Ocular Symptom Medication Score

Medication scores were given for fluticasone propionate (nasal, 2 point), fexofenadine hydrochloride (oral, 1 point), tramazoline hydrochloride (nasal, 1 point), and levocabastine hydrochloride (ocular, 1 point). Symptom medication score consisted of severe symptom period. Nasal symptom medication score is the sum of nasal symptom score and medication score (fexofenadine hydrochloride, fluticasone propionate, tramazoline hydrochloride) Ocular symptom medication score is the sum of ocular symptom score and medication score (fexofenadine hydrochloride, levocabastine hydrochloride) Nasal ocular symptom medication score is the sum of nasal symptom score, ocular symptom score and medication score (fexofenadine hydrochloride, fluticasone propionate, tramazoline hydrochloride, levocabastine hydrochloride).

Time frame:
Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score
Mean Nasal Symptom Medication Score, Mean Ocular Symptom Medication Score, and Mean Nasal Ocular Symptom Medication Score
scoreOmalizumabPlacebo
Mean nasal symptom medication score6.19 ± 0.1667.29 ± 0.158
Mean ocular symptom medication score3.91 ± 0.1374.86 ± 0.130
Mean nasal ocular symptom medication score9.10 ± 0.27111.15 ± 0.259
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -1.10 · 95% CI -1.55 to -0.64nasal symptom medication score
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.95 · 95% CI -1.32 to -0.58ocular symptom medication score
  • Omalizumab · Ancova: -2.05 · 95% CI -2.78 to -1.31nasal ocular symptom medication score
SecondaryMean Score for Severity of Sneezing, Rhinorrhea and Nasal Congestion

Symptoms of sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal congestion were evaluated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (intense/severe).

Time frame:
Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score
Mean Score for Severity of Sneezing, Rhinorrhea and Nasal Congestion
scoreOmalizumabPlacebo
Mean sneezing score1.15 ± 0.0531.56 ± 0.050
Mean rhinorrhea score1.46 ± 0.0631.79 ± 0.060
Mean nasal congestion score1.05 ± 0.0581.34 ± 0.056
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.40 · 95% CI -0.54 to -0.26sneezing score
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.34 · 95% CI -0.51 to -0.16rhinorrhea score
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.29 · 95% CI -0.45 to -0.13nasal congestion score
SecondaryMean Score for Severity of Itchy and Watery Eye

Symptoms of itchy and watery eye were evaluated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (intense/severe).

Time frame:
Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score
Mean Score for Severity of Itchy and Watery Eye
scoreOmalizumabPlacebo
Mean itchy eye score1.47 ± 0.0611.94 ± 0.058
Mean watery eye score0.98 ± 0.0631.38 ± 0.060
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.47 · 95% CI -0.63 to -0.30itchy eye score
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.40 · 95% CI -0.57 to -0.23watery eye score
SecondaryMean Score for Impairment of Daily Activities

Impairment of daily activities were evaluated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (intense/severe).

Time frame:
Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score
Mean Score for Impairment of Daily Activities
scoreOmalizumabPlacebo
Mean Score for Impairment of Daily Activities1.09 ± 0.0521.43 ± 0.050
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.34 · 95% CI -0.48 to -0.20score for impairment of daily activities
SecondaryNumber of Symptom Free Days

Nasal symptom free days (days with all nasal symptoms are not more than mild in severity) during the severe symptom period. Ocular symptom free days (days with all ocular symptoms are not more than mild in severity) during the severe symptom period.

Time frame:
Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24March2018)
Reported as:
Median · days
Number of Symptom Free Days
daysOmalizumabPlacebo
Nasal symptom free days15 (0 to 30)10 (0 to 30)
Ocular symptom free days12 (0 to 30)6 (0 to 30)
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · van Elteren test · p = 0.005 · Hodges-lehmann estimate: 3.0 · 95% CI 1.0 to 5.0Nasal symptom free days
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · van Elteren test · p = <0.001 · Hodges-lehmann estimate: 4.0 · 95% CI 2.0 to 6.5Ocular symptom free days
SecondaryCompletely Nasal Symptom Free Patients

Completely nasal symptom free patients is the number of patients who were nasal symptom free (all nasal symptoms were not more than mild in severity) on all non-missing days and had nasal symptom scores for at least 26 days during the 30 days of severe symptom period.

Time frame:
Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Completely Nasal Symptom Free Patients
ParticipantsOmalizumabPlacebo
Completely Nasal Symptom Free Patients134
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · logistic regression · p = 0.005 · Odds ratio (or): 3.43 · 95% CI 1.21 to 9.75Completely nasal symptom free patients
SecondaryRescue Medication Score

Rescue medication scores were given for tramazoline hydrochloride (nasal, 1 point) and levocabastine hydrochloride (ocular, 1 point). Rescue medication score for nasal is medication score for Tramazoline hydrochloride, Rescue medication score for ocular is medication score for Levocabastine hydrochloride and Rescue medication score for nasal and ocular is the sum of medication score for Tramazoline hydrochloride and Levocabastine hydrochlorid

Time frame:
Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score
Rescue Medication Score
scoreOmalizumabPlacebo
Nasal rescue medication score0.20 ± 0.0240.28 ± 0.023
Ocular rescue medication score0.46 ± 0.0290.54 ± 0.027
Nasal ocular rescue medication score0.66 ± 0.0450.82 ± 0.043
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.08 · 95% CI -0.14 to -0.01Nasal rescue mediation score
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.08 · 95% CI -0.16 to 0.00Ocular rescue medication score
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.16 · 95% CI -0.28 to -0.04Nasal ocular rescue medication score
SecondaryRescue Medication Free Days

Number of days with no rescue medication (tramazoline hydrochloride, levocabastine hydrochloride). Nasal ocular rescue medication free days were defined as the days with no use of tramazoline hydrochloride (nasal rescue medication) and levocabastine hydrochloride (ocular rescue medication).

Time frame:
Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)
Reported as:
Median · days
Rescue Medication Free Days
daysOmalizumabPlacebo
Nasal rescue medication free days27.0 (0 to 30)23.5 (0 to 30)
Ocular rescue medication free days16.0 (0 to 30)11.0 (0 to 30)
Nasal ocular rescue medication free days12.5 (0 to 30)9.0 (0 to 30)
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · van Elteren test · p = 0.011 · Hodges-lehmann estimate: 1.5 · 95% CI 0.0 to 3.5Nasal rescue mediation free days
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · van Elteren test · p = 0.074 · Hodges-lehmann estimate: 2.0 · 95% CI 0.0 to 4.8Ocular rescue medication free days
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · van Elteren test · p = 0.098 · Hodges-lehmann estimate: 1.8 · 95% CI 0.0 to 4.0Nasal ocular rescue medication free days
SecondaryNumber of Rescue Medication Used

Amount number of rescue medication used (a total number of times used).

Time frame:
Severe symptom period (from 23Feb2018 to 24Mar2018)
Reported as:
Median · Number of times used
Number of Rescue Medication Used
Number of times usedOmalizumabPlacebo
Number of rescue nasal medication used1.0 (0 to 120)6.0 (0 to 109)
Number of ocular rescue medication used18.5 (0 to 109)28.5 (0 to 113)
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · van Elteren test · p = 0.006 · Hodges-lehmann estimate: -2.0 · 95% CI -4.5 to 0.0Nasal rescue mediation used
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · van Elteren test · p = 0.012 · Hodges-lehmann estimate: -7.0 · 95% CI -12.0 to -1.0Ocular rescue medication used
SecondaryJapanese Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JRQLQ, No1) Score

Nasal and eye symptoms (JRQLQ I) included 6 categories: Runny nose, Sneezing, Nasal congestion, Itchy nose, itchy eyes and watery eyes, on a 5-point scale of 0 to 4 (no symptoms to very severe symptoms). JRQLQ I score was a mean of these 6 categories. JRQLQ II included 17 items on a 5-point scale, 0 to 4 (no significant problem to very greatly). JRQLQ II scores was a mean of these 17 items. Overall face scale (JRQLQ III) evaluated overall symptoms, condition and feelings on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 (fine to crying). Evaluation visit was defined as follows independently for each evaluation item and for each patient: 1) If there was a single visit during the severe symptom period, the visit was the evaluation visit. 2) If there were ≥ 2 visits during the severe symptom period and a) if Visit 105 was one of them, Visit 105 was the evaluation visit; b) if Visit 105 was outside the period, the closest visit to Visit 105 during the period was the evaluation visit.

Time frame:
Evaluation Visit, one visit during severe symptom period (23-Feb-2018 to 24-Mar-2018) for each patient
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score
Japanese Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JRQLQ, No1) Score
ScoreOmalizumabPlacebo
Nasal and eye symptoms (JRQLQ I)1.27 ± 0.0621.76 ± 0.059
Mean score of QoL-related questionnaire (JRQLQ II)0.70 ± 0.0671.20 ± 0.064
Overall face scale (JRQLQ III)1.6 ± 0.082.2 ± 0.07
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.50 · 95% CI -0.66 to -0.33JRQLQ I
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.51 · 95% CI -0.69 to -0.33JRQLQ II
  • Omalizumab vs Placebo · Ancova: -0.6 · 95% CI -0.8 to -0.4JRQLQ III
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Anti-omalizumab Antibodes

Number of participants with antibodies against the Fab and Fc region of omalizumab in serum.

Time frame:
Prior to first dosing (Day 1), At follow-up investigation which were conducted 20/22 weeks after 12 week-treatment epoch
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Anti-omalizumab Antibodes
participantsOmalizumabPlacebo
Anti-Fab-(pre-dose)00
Anti-Fab (post dose)00
Anti-Fc-(pre-dose)12
Anti-Fc-(post-dose)02
SecondarySerum Trough Omalizumab Concentration

Blood samples were collected Prior to first dosing (Day 1), at Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 and follow-up investigation which were conducted 20/22 weeks after 12 week-treatment epoch

Time frame:
Prior to first dosing (Day 1), at Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 and 24 weeks after last dose
Reported as:
Mean · μg/mL
Serum Trough Omalizumab Concentration
μg/mLOmalizumab
Day 1 (pre-dose)0 ± 0
Day 2942.6 ± 34.8
Day 5754.1 ± 42.3
Day 8566.3 ± 49.0
Day 225/2390.928 ± 1.11
SecondaryFree IgE and Total IgE

Blood samples were collected Prior to first dosing (Day 1), at Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 and follow-up investigation were conducted 20/22 weeks after 12 week-treatment epoch

Time frame:
Day 1, at Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 and 24 weeks after last dose
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Free IgE and Total IgE
ng/mLOmalizumabPlacebo
Free IgE (Day 1 predose)NA ± NANA ± NA
Free IgE (Day 29)21.3 ± 9.8NA ± NA
Free IgE (Day 57)20.8 ± 10.1NA ± NA
Free IgE (Day 85)18.6 ± 11.9NA ± NA
Free IgE (Day 225/239)NA ± NANA ± NA
Total IgE (Day 1 pre-dose)524 ± 531570 ± 641
Total IgE (Day 29)2040 ± 1620558 ± 608
Total IgE (Day 57)2160 ± 1660640 ± 721
Total IgE (Day 85)1960 ± 1480673 ± 775
Total IgE (Day 225/239)702 ± 639669 ± 783

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events (AEs) were collected up to 85 days(end of the treatment epoch). Serious adverse events (SAE) were collected until 30 days after the end of the treatment epoch, up to approximately 4 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
IGE0250/161 (0%)1/161 (0.6%)26/161 (16.1%)
Placebo0/175 (0%)0/175 (0%)21/175 (12%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventIGE025Placebo
Testicular neoplasmNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1610/175
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIGE025Placebo
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations15/1618/175
InfluenzaInfections and infestations4/1618/175
PharyngitisInfections and infestations7/1615/175

Baseline characteristics

Randomized set (RAN): The RAN included all randomized patients, regardless of whether they received any study drug. Patients in the RAN was analyzed according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)OmalizumabPlaceboTotal
< 15 years4610
15 <=, < 65 years149158307
>= 65 years91120
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)OmalizumabPlaceboTotal
Female9997196
Male6378141
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)OmalizumabPlaceboTotal
Asian162175337
07

Study locations

22 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chiba, Chiba 262-0015, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ichikawa, Chiba 272-0143, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kashiwa, Chiba 2270082, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Matsudo, Chiba 270-0034, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Matsudo, Chiba 2710077, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Urayasu, Chiba 279-0012, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kawasaki, Kanagawa 212-0027, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kawasaki, Kanagawa 216 0006, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kawasaki, Kanagawa 216-0002, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Koshigaya, Saitama 343-0031, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116 0011, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0063, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chuo Ku, Tokyo 103 0027, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Edogawa-ku, Tokyo 132-0014, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 125-0061, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164-0012, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-0097, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 160-0008, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0017, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Toshima-Ku, Tokyo 170-0005, Japan
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 7, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 19, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03369704
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 12, 2017
Start date
Dec 15, 2017
Primary completion
May 11, 2018
Completion
Oct 20, 2018
Results posted
Nov 4, 2019
Last update
Jan 12, 2026

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion