ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03369236Updated Oct 14, 2022Results posted

A Proof-of-Concept Study of Danicopan for 6 Months of Treatment in Participants With C3 Glomerulopathy (C3G)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Danicopan and Placebo in C3 Glomerulopathy, C3 Glomerulonephritis and Dense Deposit Disease, sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 7 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 17 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-14.

Sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (part of AstraZeneca) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
17 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 15 studies in Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative with a site in United States — 1 open to participants now, 2 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative · United States.

Enrollment
8th of 15
13 · median 13
Started
2018
with 2 others
Phase 2
7 of 15
none open now
Registered
9th of 15
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 15
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Among the 15 studies in Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative with a site in United States, this one is the 8th largest by enrollment, is one of 3 that started in 2018, is one of 7 in phase 2, and was the 9th registered.

Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative

33 studies on the registry are indexed under Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative; 10 are open to participants now.

Browse Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 15 studies in Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative with a site in United States is open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 9 Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative studies recruiting now, 5 set no upper age limit and none stop at 75 or younger; 5 take children under 18; 1 takes healthy volunteers.

This study: 17 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 15 studies in Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The primary purpose of this proof-of-concept clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the study drug, ACH-0144471 (also known as danicopan and ALXN2040), in participants with C3G who also had significant proteinuria attributable to C3G.

03

Conditions studied

  • C3 Glomerulopathy
  • C3 Glomerulonephritis
  • Dense Deposit Disease

Keywords

  • factor D
  • fD
  • Alternative pathway
  • Complement mediated disease
  • Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis
  • Primary MPGN
  • MPGN
  • Mesangiocapillary Glomerulonephritis
  • Idiopathic MPGN
  • DDD
  • C3GN
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
17 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Had -confirmed primary C3G
  • Had clinical evidence of ongoing disease based on significant proteinuria, attributable to C3G disease in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (PI), and present prior to study entry and confirmed during Screening
  • Was willing to comply with vaccination requirements.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Had a history or presence of any co-morbidities that would make the participant inappropriate for the study
  • Had ever received danicopan
  • Had more than 50% fibrosis or more than 50% of glomeruli with cellular crescents on the pre-treatment renal biopsy
  • Had an estimated \<30 milliliters/minute/1.73 meters squared at the time of screening or at any time over the preceding 4 weeks
  • Was a renal transplant recipient or receiving renal replacement therapy
  • Had a history of a major organ transplant or hematopoietic stem cell/marrow transplant
  • Had evidence of monoclonal gammopathy of unclear significance, infections, , diseases, or other conditions to which C3G is secondary
  • Had other renal diseases that would interfere with interpretation of the study
  • Had been diagnosed with or showed evidence of hepatobiliary cholestasis
  • Females who were pregnant, nursing, or planning to become pregnant during the study or within 90 days of study drug administration
  • Had a history of febrile illness, a body temperature >38°Celsius, or other evidence of a clinically significant active infection, within 14 days prior to study drug administration
  • Had evidence of , infection, or active infection at Screening
  • Had laboratory abnormalities at screening that, in the opinion of the PI, would make the participant inappropriate for the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period), Followed by Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)

    Danicopan was administered at a starting dose of 100 milligrams (mg) 3 times daily (TID) for the first 2 weeks, then dosage was to be increased to 200 mg TID for the remainder of the 6-month treatment period. All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period were enrolled in the open-label extension period and were to receive danicopan 200 mg TID.

    Drug: Danicopan

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period), Followed by Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)

    Placebo was administered TID during the 6-month treatment period. All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period were enrolled in the open-label extension period and were to receive danicopan 200 mg TID.

    Drug: Danicopan · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Danicopan was administered as an oral tablet.

    Also known as: ACH-4471, ACH4471, 4471, ACH-0144471 (formerly), ALXN2040

  • DrugPlacebo

    Matching placebo was administered as an oral tablet.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28

    The composite biopsy score was based on a score incorporating changes in the activity index, glomerular C3c staining, and glomerular macrophage infiltration at the end of 6 months of treatment. The composite renal biopsy index scoring system ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 28

  2. Participants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 28

    Proteinuria reduction was defined as ≥ 30% decrease from baseline based on 24-hour urine protein (mg/day).

    Time frame: Week 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28

    Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 28

  2. Percent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28

    Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 28

  3. Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months

    Slope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values from baseline until the end of the 6-month blinded treatment period, with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment

    Slope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values during the open-label extension period with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28

    Change from baseline in eGFR at Week 28 is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 28

  6. Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 28

    Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 28

  7. Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 52

    Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

07

Results

Posted Nov 4, 2021

Participant flow

To enroll in the study, participants were required to have a biopsy confirmed diagnosis of C3 Glomerulopathy (C3G), with initial diagnosis made at least 3 months prior to dosing and significant proteinuria.

Double-blind Treatment Period
Participant flow — Double-blind Treatment Period
MilestoneDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period), Followed by Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period), Followed by Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)
Started67
Received at least 1 dose of study drug67
Completed66
Not completed01
Withdrew: Accidental unblinding01
Open-label Extension Period
Participant flow — Open-label Extension Period
MilestoneDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period), Followed by Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period), Followed by Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)
Started66
Received at least 1 dose of study drug66
Completed10
Not completed56
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy21
Withdrew: Adverse event01
Withdrew: Sponsor decision to close study34

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28

The composite biopsy score was based on a score incorporating changes in the activity index, glomerular C3c staining, and glomerular macrophage infiltration at the end of 6 months of treatment. The composite renal biopsy index scoring system ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline In Composite Biopsy Score At Week 28
score on a scaleDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)
Baseline11.7 ± 4.239.3 ± 3.50
Week 289.2 ± 4.8710.7 ± 3.39
Change from Baseline-2.0 ± 1.871.3 ± 2.88
PrimaryParticipants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 28

Proteinuria reduction was defined as ≥ 30% decrease from baseline based on 24-hour urine protein (mg/day).

Time frame:
Week 28
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 28
participantsDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)
Participants With Reduction In Proteinuria At Week 2801
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28

Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · mg/day
Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28
mg/dayDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)
Baseline6137.67 ± 2904.3594274.47 ± 2992.819
Week 285301.75 ± 2984.4455186.80 ± 4069.279
Change from Baseline302.00 ± 764.211182.20 ± 994.558
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28

Proteinuria was assessed based on 24-hour urine collections at baseline and Week 28.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 28
percent changeDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)
Percent Change From Baseline In Proteinuria At Week 2812.5 ± 31.11-10.4 ± 31.35
SecondarySlope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months

Slope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values from baseline until the end of the 6-month blinded treatment period, with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/1.73 m^2 per month
Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months
mL/min/1.73 m^2 per monthDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)
Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) From Baseline To 6 Months-2.26840 ± 1.790814-1.45421 ± 2.228395
SecondarySlope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment

Slope of eGFR was estimated using a simple linear regression for each participant, including all data values during the open-label extension period with eGFR as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/1.73 m^2 per month
Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment
mL/min/1.73 m^2 per monthDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period), Followed by Danicopan (Open-label Extension PeriodPlacebo (Double-blind Treatment Period), Followed by Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)Total
Slope Of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) After Open-label Danicopan Treatment-1.02556 ± 1.389128-1.84935 ± 3.506810-1.39169 ± 2.401039
SecondaryChange From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28

Change from baseline in eGFR at Week 28 is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/1.73 m^2
Change From Baseline In eGFR At Week 28
mL/min/1.73 m^2Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)
Baseline79.890 ± 44.457168.381 ± 36.7249
Week 2867.543 ± 47.806250.874 ± 15.0517
Change from Baseline-12.347 ± 10.8063-8.700 ± 16.0990
SecondaryParticipants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 28

Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 28
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 28
participantsDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)
Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 2800
SecondaryParticipants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 52

Significant improvement relative to baseline was defined as a ≥ 20% increase from baseline in eGFR.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 52
participantsDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period), Followed by Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period), Followed by Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)
Participants With Significant Improvement In eGFR Relative To Baseline At Week 5200

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 (after dosing) through Week 28 (treatment period and follow-up) and Week 104 (open-label extension and follow-up). The median study duration was 548.0 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)5/6 (83.3%)
Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)5/7 (71.4%)
Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)0/12 (0%)1/12 (8.3%)8/12 (66.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders0/60/71/12
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 56
Most frequent other events
EventDanicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Danicopan (Open-label Extension Period)
Nasal congestionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/60/70/12
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/60/70/12
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/62/70/12
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/62/71/12
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/62/71/12
Orthostatic hypotensionVascular disorders1/60/70/12
Pregnancy of partnerSocial circumstances1/60/70/12
Paranasal sinus discomfortRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/60/70/12
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/60/70/12
PainGeneral disorders1/60/70/12

Baseline characteristics

All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the double-blind treatment period.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Total
Mean25.5 ± 10.5424.9 ± 4.8525.2 ± 7.63
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Total
Female224
Male459
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Total
Asian022
White549
Other112
Hispanic or Latino314
Not Hispanic or Latino369
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Danicopan (Double-blind Treatment Period)Placebo (Double-blind Treatment Period)Total
United States6612
United Kingdom011
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Clinical Study Site
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    Lawrenceville, Georgia 30046, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    London, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2019, 17 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2021, 1 year 10 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in May 2021.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 17, 2017
First posted
Dec 11, 2017
StartActual
Jun 12, 2018
Primary completionActual
Dec 11, 2019
CompletionActual
Dec 18, 2020
Results delay requested
May 7, 2021
Results first posted
Nov 4, 2021
Last update
Oct 14, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03369236
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 11, 2017
Start date
Jun 12, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 11, 2019
Completion
Dec 18, 2020
Results posted
Nov 4, 2021
Last update
Oct 14, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Danicopan

Start the discussion