ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03365531Updated Sep 23, 2019

RCT of Caloric Restriction vs. Alternate-Day Fasting in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

An interventional study of Alternate Daily Fasting (ADF) and Caloric Restriction (CR) in NAFLD, Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by University of Florida. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-23.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Inadequate enrollment.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with diabetes (T2DM) is increasing in prevalence and can lead to cirrhosis. Lifestyle intervention with caloric restriction (CR) is the cornerstone of treatment but remission is variable. Alternatively, the PI has shown alternate day fasting (ADF) is safe and well tolerated in obese patients and there might be additional beneficial effects. The objective is to combine the expertise of the PI with this novel intervention and the expertise of Dr. Cusi in NAFLD to explore the effects of ADF vs CR in patients with NAFLD and T2DM to test the following hypotheses:

H1: In patients with NAFLD and T2DM, the ADF intervention will result in more favorable metabolic changes than CR:

H1a: Hepatic triglyceride by MRS will decrease more with ADF than CR (Primary Outcome) and remain lower following a period of free living H1b: There will be greater improvements in glucose homeostasis following ADF vs CR H1c: There will be greater improvement in lipid metabolism following ADF vs CR and changes in ketone metabolism will predict changes in hepatic triglyceride content H2: ADF will have similar safety and tolerability and result in a similar degree of weight loss in participants with NAFLD and DM compared to CR

Read the detailed description

Rationale:

Non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has a prevalence of up to 80% in patients with T2DM and obesity and can lead to steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis as well as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. As NAFLD is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality and as NAFLD-induced liver disease is anticipated to be the most common indication for liver transplantation over the next decade, treatment options are desperately needed but very few are available.

Weight loss with caloric restriction (CR) is the preferred treatment of NAFLD, however successful maintenance of a significant weight loss is difficult to achieve. Additionally, despite significant association between degree of weight loss and improvements in NASH and NAFLD, there is extensive overlap in the response among populations. This suggests that it may not be weight loss in general, but rather the mechanistic underpinnings of the weight loss that potentiate the therapeutic effects. A study comparing dietary carbohydrate restriction vs CR in obese subjects with NAFLD found that, despite similar weight loss between groups, there was greater hepatic triglyceride reduction with carbohydrate restriction and this reduction was highly correlated with plasma ketone concentrations. Hence, although weight loss is ostensibly important, there might be additional factors beyond just weight loss per se causing the improvements in NASH. Therefore, rather than weight loss, reduction in intrahepatic triglyceride will be the primary endpoint of this proposal.

Progression to NASH and beyond is largely due to a spectrum of metabolic abnormalities including ectopic hepatic fat accumulation, insulin resistance, and abnormal lipid metabolism. A recent animal study showed blunted ketogenesis in NASH and suggested the overall etiology was due to inefficient oxidation and disposal of free fatty acids in the liver. A fasting paradigm, or facilitating times of ketosis that could then normalize lipid metabolism, might be one of the additional factors beyond weight loss that ensures improvements in NAFLD and NASH.

Intermittent fasting (IF) is a dietary intervention whereby food is restricted for varying timeframes, including alternate day fasting (ADF) where no or very few calories are given for a day or more with ad lib feeding in between. In animal models, IF has been shown to have numerous beneficial effects, many in excess of those seen with CR. In a mouse model of NAFLD, IF resulted in improvements in hepatic steatosis and inflammation along with gene expression changes showing enhanced activation of lipid oxidation and reduction of lipid synthesis. These benefits may be due to "flipping the metabolic switch" from glucose to ketone utilization for primary cellular energy needs. Data are only beginning to emerge on the effects of IF in humans, and very few studies have focused on ketone production as a mediator of positive outcomes. There are no data on the effect of ADF on NAFLD.

Specific Aims:

SA1: To compare the effect of ADF vs CR on metabolic changes including liver fat, glucose homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and inflammation in patients with NAFLD and T2DM SA1a: To determine changes in hepatic triglyceride by MRS after 4 weeks of ADF and after 4 weeks of ad lib diet SA1b: To determine changes in glucose homeostasis SA1c: To determine changes in whole body lipid metabolism and inflammation SA2: To determine the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness on weight loss of ADF vs CR SA2a: To determine safety of ADF SA2b: To compare changes in body weight, body composition, physical activity, physical functioning and physical fitness SA2c: To determine effect on eating behaviors, hunger/satiety, and body image SA2d: To determine effect on cognition and quality of life

02

Conditions studied

  • NAFLD
  • Obesity
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

  • fasting
03

In context

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

1,617 studies on the registry are indexed under Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; 324 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 7 is below the median of 60 across 1,176 interventional studies indexed under Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Browse Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,287 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 180 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 143 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient must give study-specific on an IRB-approved consent prior to any research related procedures or study treatment.
  • Patient must be at least 18 years at the time of consent Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with AJCC Clinical Stage T1to T3b disease with histological evaluation via or repeat biopsy within 12 months prior to registration. Refer to Appendix IV for clarification on study eligibility and AJCC stage group.
  • Patients must undergo a pretreatment diagnostic MRI of the prostate on a 1.5T to 3T Tesla machine within 6 months prior to study registration.
  • A focal IPT must be visible on MRI within the prostate and/or seminal vesicles and this MRI must be obtained within 6 months of planning CT scan.
  • A biopsy of the dominant lesion is recommended but not required. If an ultrasound guided sextant biopsy was positive for prostatic adenocarcinoma in the area of the MRI identified intraprostatic lesion, this will be acceptable and another guided biopsy targeting the MRI identified disease will not be necessary.
  • Patients with at least one of the following high-risk factors: cT3a-T3b OR Gleason 9-10 OR PSA > 30 OR more than 1 high-risk factors must be present: clinical stage of T3, Gleason score 8-10, or PSA 20 ng/ml or greater.
  • must be ≥ 10 g/ml within 4 months prior to registration.
  • Zubrod performance status must be 0-1 within 4 months prior to registration.
  • If patient has child-producing potential, they must be willing to use medically acceptable during treatment and must be advised to use it for at least 1 year thereafter. This is not applicable if the patient is not sexually active or has had a vasectomy. Please document as such.
  • Patients must be able to start treatment within 16 weeks of registration.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • T4 prostate disease on CT, MRI, or physical exam.
  • Patients unable to undergo MRI of the prostate.
  • Patients with a greater than 25% change in prostate volume from the pretreatment MRI of the prostate demonstrating the IPT and the treatment planning MRI. Patients in this case must undergo a repeat diagnostic MRI on a 1.5T to 3.0T Tesla machine and an IPT must still be visible.
  • IPT that is more than 75% of the prostate volume when measured on the CT simulation scan.
  • Evidence of distant (M1).
  • Patients with positive nodes on cross-sectional imaging.
  • Previous prostate cancer local treatment including prostatectomy, hyperthermia, high intensity focused ultrasound, brachytherapy, external-beam radiation therapy, and/or cryotherapy.
  • Prior pelvic radiation therapy.
  • No prior myocardial infarction within the last 6 months, congestive heart failure, or end stage renal disease.
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease (diverticulitis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) affecting the rectum.
  • Bilateral hip replacement
  • Prior intrapelvic surgery. This includes the following:Bladder surgery,Transrectal or rectal surgery other than prostate , Polypectomy or hemorrhoid removal or banding
  • Prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or laser ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
  • Patients receiving continuous and current anticoagulation with warfarin sodium (Coumadin), heparin sodium, clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix), dabigatran etexilate mesylate (Pradaxa), rivaroxaban (Xarelto), apixaban (Eliquis), edoxaban (Savaysa), enoxaparin sodium (Lovenox), prasugrel (Effient), ticagrelor (Brilinta), aspirin/er dipyridamole (Aggrenox), or fondaparinux sodium (Arixtra).
  • Patients with posterior or posterolateral extracapsular extension of prostate cancer. If this is present, it must resolve on diagnostic MRI after 2 to 3 months of androgen deprivation therapy prior to enrollment. Refer to Appendix V for definition of extracapsular extension
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Alternate Daily Fasting (ADF)

    Participants randomized to the ADF group will alternate between a day of ad lib feeding and a day of nearly no energy intake. Participants will be prescribed a core diet for feeding days that meets 110% of their estimated calorie needs within the fixed macronutrient distribution of 50% CHO, 20% PRO, and 30% FAT. In accordance with the ad lib feeding protocol, optional modules of similar macronutrient content will be prescribed, each providing an additional 200 kcals. Meal timing will not be restricted on these days. On fasting days, participants will be asked to consume 16 oz. of G2 Gatorade (40 kcal) in the morning and then only water or non-caloric beverages for the rest of the day.

    Other: Alternate Daily Fasting (ADF)

  • Active comparator
    Caloric Restriction

    Participants randomized to the CR group will consume a diet of fixed energy designed to yield a 500 kcal/d deficit with a macronutrient distribution of 50% CHO, 20% PRO, and 30% FAT. Meal timing and caloric distribution will not be restricted.

    Other: Caloric Restriction (CR)

Interventions

  • OtherAlternate Daily Fasting (ADF)

    See ADF arm for details

  • OtherCaloric Restriction (CR)

    See CR arm for details

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hepatic Triglyceride by MRS

    To determine changes in hepatic triglyceride by MRS after 4 weeks of ADF (Primary outcome) and after 4 weeks of ad lib diet

    Time frame: Baseline up to 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Glucose Homeostasis

    To determine changes in glucose homeostasis as measured by: Overall and hepatic insulin sensitivity following OGTT using the Matusda index

    Time frame: Baseline through 4 weeks

  2. Changes in whole body lipid metabolism - Adipose tissue insulin sensitivity by AdipoIR and fasting and postprandial free fatty acid excursion

    To determine changes in whole body lipid metabolism and inflammation as measured by: Adipose tissue insulin sensitivity by AdipoIR and fasting and postprandial free fatty acid excursion. Adipo-IR index (fasting, FFAs x insulin.

    Time frame: Baseline through 4 weeks

  3. Safety of ADF -Liver Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)

    MRS to determine hepatic fat content and elasticity

    Time frame: Baseline through 4 weeks

  4. Safety of ADF -Fibroscan.

    For liver steatosis (CAP) and fibrosis (VCTE) measurements

    Time frame: Baseline through 4 weeks

  5. Safety of ADF - blood

    To determine safety of ADF measured by complete metabolic panel, glucose, ketones, and free fatty acids

    Time frame: Baseline through 4 weeks

  6. To compare changes body composition measured

    To compare changes in body weight, body composition measured by: Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to include weight

    Time frame: Baseline up to 8 weeks

  7. Effect on eating behaviors

    Binge Eating Disorder Questionnaire: individuals can be categorized into three groups according to established cut-scores of binge eating severity. These groups are characterized by no binge eating (score ≤ 17), mild to moderate binge eating (score of 18 - 26) and severe binge eating (score ≥ 27)

    Time frame: Baseline up to 8 weeks

  8. Cognitive function

    Effect on cognition and quality of life NIH Cognitive Toolbox

    Time frame: Baseline up to 8 weeks

  9. Diet Tolerability

    ADF NAFLD Diet Tolerability a Likert scale design from 1-5, with 5 as strongly agree evaluating feasting days.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Need to determine if able to de-identify enough relevant individual participant data to make sharing worthwhile and appropriate for this very small study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2019, 16 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 20, 2017
First posted
Dec 7, 2017
StartActual
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 1, 2019
CompletionActual
Jul 1, 2019
Last update
Sep 23, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03365531
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 7, 2017
Start date
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2019
Completion
Jul 1, 2019
Last update
Sep 23, 2019

Study contacts

William T Donahoo, MD
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion