ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03359070Updated Dec 2, 2017

Clinical Trial Comparing Dapaconazole Versus Miconazole in Patients With Tinea Cruris

A Phase 2 interventional study of Dapaconazole and Miconazole Nitrate in Tinea Cruris, sponsored by Galeno Desenvolvimento de Pesquisas Clínicas. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-02.

Sponsored by Galeno Desenvolvimento de Pesquisas Clínicas · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2014, registered Nov 2017).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of dapaconazole tosylate 2% cream in the treatment of Tinea cruris compared to the active control miconazole nitrate 2% cream in patients with a single lesion.

Read the detailed description

This is a phase 2, non-inferiority, monocentric, double-blind, randomized (allocation of treatment), balanced, controlled (active comparator) trial, with two parallel groups.

Randomization depended on inclusion/exclusion criteria, taking into account the confirmation of diagnosis by the direct mycological test and culture performed during the screening phase.

Participants showed up to the clinic, for treatment, during 14 consecutive days, when one of the investigational products (according to the randomization) was applied by a blind member of the study staff. A non-blind member of the study staff weighed the corresponding investigational product and passed on to the blind member only a spatula with the weighed product, in order to maintain the blinded aspect of the trial.

For exploratory purposes, clinical and mycological evaluations was also performed after 7 and after 14 days of treatment.

Safety analysis was performed considering all the randomized patients to which at least one dose of the investigational products has been applied, regardless of the result of the fungal culture.

Conclusion of non-inferiority was based on the per protocol set. It was deemed as per protocol those participants who did not miss more than 20% of the applications and, also, no more than four consecutive application days.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tinea Cruris

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tinea cruris
  • dapaconazole
  • topical antifungal
  • dermatophytoses
03

In context

Tinea

39 studies on the registry are indexed under Tinea; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 64 across 33 interventional studies indexed under Tinea.

Browse Tinea studies →

Lead sponsor

Galeno Desenvolvimento de Pesquisas Clínicas is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants aged from 18 to 65 years old, male, or female with no or who are using an effective method and who do not plan to become pregnant during the study period.
  • Presence of dermatological lesion of Tinea cruris, with an area not exceeding 8 cm², having, also, the diagnosis confirmed by direct mycological (KOH) test and fungus culture.
  • No previous treatment with antimycotic medication for the current dermatologic lesion.
  • No evidence of other significant diseases, that, at the investigator's discretion, may affect the participation in the clinical trial, in accordance with the protocol requirements.
  • Ability to understand the nature and the objective of the clinical trial, including the risks and possible side effects; intention to cooperate with the investigator and act in accordance with the protocol requirements, as confirmed by the form signature.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known to miconazole or to chemically related compounds (azoles) or to the compounds of the products.
  • Existing hepatic and/or renal diseases or other pathologic findings, which might interfere with the safety and tolerability of the active ingredients.
  • Screening laboratory tests presenting deviations deemed as , which, due to possible risks, prevents the participation in clinical trial.
  • Treatment, within 3 months prior to the start of the clinical trial treatment, with any drug known to have a well-established toxic potential to major organs.
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Participation in any clinical trial, or intake of any investigational product, within the last six months prior to the inclusion in the clinical trial.
  • History of drug addiction.
  • Any prior treatment for the present lesion which, at investigator discretion, may interfere with the objectives of the clinical trial.
  • Participants who has any condition that prevents him from participating in the study according to the investigator's judgment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1 - dapaconazole cream 2%

    Topical application of dapaconazole cream 2%, twice a day (7 to 8 a.m. and 6 to 7 p.m.) for 14 days.

    Drug: Dapaconazole

  • Active comparator
    Group 2 - miconazole cream 2%

    Topical application of miconazole cream 2%, twice a day (7 to 8 a.m. and 6 to 7 p.m.) for 14 days.

    Drug: Miconazole Nitrate

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants with therapeutic cure.

    Proportion of participants, in each treatment group, who achieved therapeutic cure, defined as both clinical and mycological cure, on the assessment performed after 14 days of treatment. Clinical cure was considered when there was no more scaling of the lesions, total absence of erythema, itching and desquamation. Mycological cure was defined as negative result for the direct mycological examination (potassium hydroxide \[KOH\] test) and a negative fungal culture.

    Time frame: 14 days of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of days until clinical cure

    Number of days elapsed between the day of start of treatment and the day when the clinical cure was diagnosed, according to the daily assessment, in each treatment group.

    Time frame: up to 14 days

  2. Number of adverse events per participant

    Number of adverse events, in each treatment group, including clinically relevant alterations of vital signs and laboratory tests.

    Time frame: up to 30 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Galeno Desenvolvimento de Pesquisas Clinicas Ltda. - ME
    Campinas, SP, Brazil
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03359070
Lead sponsor
Galeno Desenvolvimento de Pesquisas Clínicas
Collaborators
Biolab Sanus Farmaceutica
Responsible party
Gilberto De Nucci (Doctor, Galeno Desenvolvimento de Pesquisas Clínicas) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 2, 2017
Start date
Jan 29, 2014
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2014
Completion
May 6, 2015
Last update
Dec 2, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dapaconazole

Start the discussion