ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03358576Updated Dec 1, 2020Results posted

Sulopenem Versus Ertapenem for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ertapenem and Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid in Intra Abdominal Infections, sponsored by Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited. Completed at 42 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-01.

Sponsored by Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
674
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 29 studies in Intraabdominal Infections with a site in United States — 3 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Intraabdominal Infections · United States.

Enrollment
Largest of 24
674 · median 144
Started
2018
with 4 others
Phase 3
9 of 29
none open now
Registered
19th of 29
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 29
Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited

Among the 29 studies in Intraabdominal Infections with a site in United States, this one has the largest enrollment of the 24 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2018, is one of 9 in phase 3, and was the 19th registered.

Intraabdominal Infections

129 studies on the registry are indexed under Intraabdominal Infections; 15 are open to participants now.

Browse Intraabdominal Infections studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 29 studies in Intraabdominal Infections with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 3 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 10 Intraabdominal Infections studies recruiting now, 6 (60%) set no upper age limit and 3 (30%) stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 29 studies in Intraabdominal Infections with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of sulopenem followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus ertapenem followed by ciprofloxacin-metronidazole for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults.

03

Conditions studied

  • Intra Abdominal Infections
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient or the patient's legally acceptable representative able to provide a signed written prior to any study-specific procedures.
  2. Adult patients ≥18 years of age
  3. EITHER:

    a. Intra-operative/post-operative enrollment with visual confirmation (presence of pus within the abdominal cavity) of an intra-abdominal infection associated with peritonitis including at least 1 of the following diagnosed during the surgical intervention: i. Cholecystitis with gangrenous rupture or perforation or progression of the infection beyond the gallbladder wall ii. Diverticular disease with perforation or abscess iii. Appendiceal perforation or peri-appendiceal abscess iv. Traumatic perforation of the intestines, only if operated on >12 hours after perforation occurs v. Secondary peritonitis (but not spontaneous bacterial peritonitis associated with cirrhosis and chronic ascites) vi. Intra-abdominal abscess (including of liver or spleen provided that there was extension beyond the organ with evidence of intraperitoneal involvement).

    OR:

    b. Pre-operative enrollment where one of the following surgical procedures are planned within 24 hours prior to the first dose of study drug: i. Open laparotomy, percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess, or laparoscopic surgery.

  4. Evidence of systemic inflammatory indicators, with at least one of the following:

    i. Fever (defined as body temperature >38°C) or hypothermia with a core body temperature \<35°C ii. Elevated white blood cell count (>12,000 cells/mm3) iii. Drop in blood pressure (systolic BP must be \<90 mmHg without pressor support) iv. Increased heart rate (>90 bpm) and respiratory rate (>20 breaths/min) v. Hypoxia (oxygen saturation ≤90 percent on room air)

  5. Physical findings or symptoms consistent with intra-abdominal infection, with at least one of the following:

    i. Abdominal pain and/or tenderness, with or without rebound ii. Localized or diffuse abdominal wall rigidity iii. Abdominal mass iv. Nausea/vomiting v. Altered Mental Status

  6. Specimen/s from the surgical intervention were sent for culture.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient diagnosed with traumatic bowel perforation undergoing surgery within 12 hours; perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers undergoing surgery within 24 hours. Other intra-abdominal processes in which the primary etiology was not likely to be infectious.
  2. Patient has abdominal wall abscess or bowel obstruction without perforation or ischemic bowel without perforation.
  3. Patient has simple cholecystitis or gangrenous cholecystitis without rupture, or simple appendicitis, or acute suppurative cholangitis; or infected necrotizing pancreatitis or pancreatic abscess.
  4. Patient whose surgery included staged abdominal repair, or "open abdomen" technique, or marsupialization.
  5. Patient known at study entry to have a complicated intra-abdominal infection caused by pathogens resistant to the study antimicrobial agents.
  6. Patient needed effective concomitant systemic antibacterials (oral, IV, or intramuscular) or antifungals in addition to those designated in the 2 study groups, except vancomycin, linezolid, or daptomycin if started for known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Enterococcus spp. as per clinical study protocol (CSP).
  7. Patient has perinephric infections or an indwelling peritoneal dialysis catheter.
  8. Patient has suspected intra-abdominal infections due to fungus, parasites (e.g., amoebic liver abscess), virus, or tuberculosis.
  9. Patient has a known history of serious allergy, or any serious reaction to carbapenem antibiotics, or to other β-lactam antibiotics
  10. Patient known to have any of the following laboratory values as defined below:

    1. Hematocrit \<25% or \<8 g/dL
    2. \<1000/mm3
    3. count \<75,000/mm3
    4. >3 x the (ULN), unless isolated hyperbilirubinemia was directly related to the acute infection or known Gilbert's disease
    5. (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3 x ULN values at Screening. Patients with elevations of AST and/or ALT up to 5 x ULN will be eligible if these elevations are acute and directly related to the infectious process being treated. This must be documented
    6. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) >3 x ULN. Patients with values >3.0 x ULN and \<5.0 x ULN are eligible if this value is acute and directly related to the infectious process being treated. This must be documented.
    7. Estimated creeatinine clearance \<50 mL/min
  11. Patient has a >45 kg/m2.
  12. Patient has APACHE II score >30.
  13. Patient considered unlikely to survive the 4-week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness, including septic shock that was associated with a high risk of mortality.
  14. Patient unlikely to respond to 10-14 days of treatment with antibiotics.
  15. Patient received systemic antibacterial agents within the 72-hour period prior to study entry, unless either of the following pertained:

    a. Patient has a new infection (not considered a treatment failure) and both of the following were met: i. Patient received no more than 24 hours of total prior antibiotic therapy ii. Patient received ≤1 dose of a treatment regimen post-operatively and antibiotics were not received more than 6 hours post-procedure.

    b. Patient considered to have failed the previous treatment regimen i.e., pre-operative treatment of any duration with non-study systemic antimicrobial therapy for peritonitis or abscess permitted provided that all of the following are met: i. The treatment regimen had been administered for at least 72 hours and was judged to have been inadequate ii. The patient had an operative intervention that was just completed or was intended no more than 24 hours after study entry iii. Findings of infection were documented at surgery iv. Specimens for bacterial cultures and susceptibility testing were taken at operative intervention v. No further non-study antibacterials were administered after randomization.

  16. Patient has a concurrent infection that may interfere with the evaluation of response to the study antibiotic.
  17. Patient receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
  18. Patient has a history of acute hepatitis in the recent past (3 months prior to study entry), chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, acute hepatic failure, or acute decompensation of chronic hepatic failure.
  19. Patient has past or current history of epilepsy or seizure disorders excluding febrile seizures of childhood.
  20. Patient as evidenced by any of the following:

    1. infection, with either a recent (in the past 6 months) acquired immune deficiency syndrome-defining condition or a CD4 + T lymphocyte count \<200/mm3
    2. Systemic or hematological requiring chemotherapeutic or radiologic/immunologic interventions within 6 weeks prior to randomization, or anticipated to begin prior to completion of study
    3. Immunosuppressive therapy, including maintenance therapy (>40 mg/day equivalent prednisolone) for 5 days or more.
  21. Patient participating in any other clinical study that involved the administration of an medication at the time of presentation, during the course of the study, or who had received treatment with an investigational medication in the 30 days prior to study enrollment, or had previously been enrolled in this study or had been treated with sulopenem.
  22. Patient is in a situation or has a condition that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with optimal participation in the study.
  23. Patient unlikely to comply with protocol e.g., uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and unlikely to complete the study.
  24. Patient has known inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease) or Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.
  25. Patients with a history of blood dyscrasias
  26. Patients with a history of uric acid kidney stones
  27. Patients with acute gouty attack
  28. Patients on chronic methotrexate therapy
  29. Females of who are unable to take adequate precautions, have a positive pregnancy test result within 24 hours of study entry, are otherwise known to be pregnant, or are currently breastfeeding an infant.
  30. Male subjects who do not agree to use an effective barrier method of contraception during the study and for 14 days post treatment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(16)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
674 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sulopenem

    Sulopenem 1000 mg IV once daily for at least 5 days, followed by Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid 500 mg PO twice daily to complete 7-10 days of treatment

    Drug: Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid · Drug: Sulopenem

  • Active comparator
    Ertapenem

    Ertapenem 1000 mg IV once daily for at least 5 days, followed by ciprofloxacin 500 mg PO twice daily along with metronidazole 500 mg PO four times daily. If patient is found to have causative pathogens that are resistant to ciprofloxacin they will receive amoxicillin-clavulanate 875 mg PO twice daily instead

    Drug: Ertapenem · Drug: Ciprofloxacin · Drug: Metronidazole · Drug: Amoxicillin-Clavulanate

Interventions

  • Antibiotic for complicated intra-abdominal infection

    Also known as: Invanz

  • DrugSulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid

    Drug pages: Sulopenem etzadroxil · Probenecid

    Antibiotic for complicated intra-abdominal infection

  • Antibiotic for complicated intra-abdominal infection

    Also known as: Cipro

  • Antibiotic for complicated intra-abdominal infection

    Also known as: Flagyl

  • DrugAmoxicillin-Clavulanate

    Drug pages: Amoxicillin · Clavulanic Acid

    Antibiotic for complicated intra-abdominal infection

    Also known as: Augmentin

  • Antibiotic for complicated intra-abdominal infection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success

    Clinical response is defined as resolution in signs and symptoms of the index infection and no new symptoms, without the need for additional antibiotics or interventions

    Time frame: Day 28 +/- 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success

    Clinical response is defined as resolution in signs and symptoms of the index infection and no new symptoms, without the need for additional antibiotics or interventions

    Time frame: Day 11-14 +/- 1 day

07

Results

Posted Dec 1, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSulopenemErtapenem
Started338336
Completed312311
Not completed2625

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Success

Clinical response is defined as resolution in signs and symptoms of the index infection and no new symptoms, without the need for additional antibiotics or interventions

Time frame:
Day 28 +/- 1 day
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success
percentage of participantsSulopenemErtapenem
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success85.590.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Success

Clinical response is defined as resolution in signs and symptoms of the index infection and no new symptoms, without the need for additional antibiotics or interventions

Time frame:
Day 11-14 +/- 1 day
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success
ParticipantsSulopenemErtapenem
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success208227

Adverse events

Collected over From the time of informed consent through the test-of-cure visit, an average of 28 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sulopenem4/338 (1.2%)25/338 (7.4%)0/335 (0%)
Ertapenem4/336 (1.2%)12/336 (3.6%)0/333 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 32
Most frequent serious events
EventSulopenemErtapenem
Abdominal abscessInfections and infestations6/3380/336
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/3380/336
liver abscessInfections and infestations2/3381/336
Angina unstableCardiac disorders0/3381/336
cardiac failure acuteCardiac disorders0/3381/336
ileusGastrointestinal disorders0/3381/336
intra-abdominal haematomaGastrointestinal disorders0/3381/336
intra-abdominal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/3381/336
irritable bowel syndromeGastrointestinal disorders0/3381/336
small intestine obstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/3381/336

Baseline characteristics

complicated intra-abdominal infections

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)SulopenemErtapenemTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years226217443
>=65 years112119231
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SulopenemErtapenemTotal
Mean53.9 ± 18.454.8 ± 18.054.3 ± 18.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SulopenemErtapenemTotal
Female160155315
Male178181359
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SulopenemErtapenemTotal
Hispanic or Latino9817
Not Hispanic or Latino329328657
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)SulopenemErtapenemTotal
Latvia263056
Hungary252146
United States161632
Georgia384583
Estonia374077
Czechia10717
Russia192140
Serbia51217
Ukraine6454118
Bulgaria9890188
creatinine clearance
creatinine clearance(mL/min)SulopenemErtapenemTotal
Mean92.7 ± 41.487.9 ± 39.190.3 ± 87.0
08

Study locations

42 sites
  • Medical Facility
    Chula Vista, California 91911, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Torrance, California 90509, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Butte, Montana 59701, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68510, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Omaha, Nebraska 68114, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Somers Point, New Jersey 08244, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Columbus, Ohio 43215, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Blagoevgrad, 2700, Bulgaria
  • Medical Facility
    Lom, 3600, Bulgaria
  • Medical Facility
    Pleven, 5809, Bulgaria
  • Medical Facility
    Plovdiv, 4003, Bulgaria
  • Medical Facility
    Plovdiv, 4004, Bulgaria
  • Medical Facility
    Ruse, 7002, Bulgaria
  • Medical Facility
    Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria
  • Medical Facility
    Varna, 9000, Bulgaria
  • Medical Facility
    Varna, 9002, Bulgaria
  • Medical Facility
    Kohtla-Järve, 31025, Estonia
  • Medical Facility
    Tallinn, 13419, Estonia
  • Medical Facility
    Tallin, 10138, Estonia
  • Medical Facility
    Tartu, 51014, Estonia
  • Medical Facility
    Viljandi, 71024, Estonia
  • Medical Facility
    Võru, 65526, Estonia
  • Medical Facility
    Gori, 1400, Georgia
  • Medical Facility
    Kutaisi, 4600, Georgia
  • Medical Facility
    Tbilisi, 0102, Georgia
  • Medical Facility
    Tbilisi, 0114, Georgia
  • Medical Facility
    Tbilisi, 0141, Georgia
  • Medical Facility
    Tbilisi, 0144, Georgia
  • Medical Facility
    Tbilisi, 0159, Georgia
  • Medical Facility
    Tbilisi, 0160, Georgia
  • Medical Facility
    Kaposvár, 7400, Hungary
  • Medical Facility
    Pécs, 7624, Hungary
  • Medical Facility
    Veszprém, 8200, Hungary
  • Medical Facility
    Daugavpils, 5417, Latvia
  • Medical Facility
    Riga, 1038, Latvia
  • Medical Facility
    Rēzekne, 4600, Latvia
  • Medical Facility
    Bielsk Podlaski, 17-100, Poland
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2018 to primary completion in Oct 2019, 12 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2020, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 20, 2017
First posted
Nov 30, 2017
StartActual
Sep 18, 2018
Primary completionActual
Oct 2, 2019
CompletionActual
Oct 2, 2019
Results first posted
Dec 1, 2020
Last update
Dec 1, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 1, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03358576
Lead sponsor
Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 30, 2017
Start date
Sep 18, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 2, 2019
Completion
Oct 2, 2019
Results posted
Dec 1, 2020
Last update
Dec 1, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Sulopenem etzadroxil · Probenecid · Sulopenem

Start the discussion