ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03355209Updated Jul 3, 2025Results posted

A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of ZX008 (Fenfluramine Hydrochloride) as an Adjunctive Therapy in Children and Adults With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome

A Phase 3 interventional study of ZX008 0.2 or 0.8 mg/kg/day and Matching Placebo in Lennox Gastaut Syndrome, sponsored by Zogenix International Limited, Inc., a subsidiary of Zogenix, Inc.. Completed at 72 sites in 14 countries. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-03.

Sponsored by Zogenix International Limited, Inc., a subsidiary of Zogenix, Inc. (part of UCB S.A.) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
296
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 38 studies in Lennox Gastaut Syndrome with a site in United States — 7 open to participants now, 10 under way, 4 of them phase 3. Lennox Gastaut Syndrome · United States.

Enrollment
5th of 32
296 · median 52
Started
2017
with 1 other
Phase 3
16 of 38
3 open now
Registered
12th of 38
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 38
Zogenix International Limited, Inc., a subsidiary of Zogenix, Inc.

Among the 38 studies in Lennox Gastaut Syndrome with a site in United States, this one is the 5th largest by enrollment of the 32 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2017, is one of 16 in phase 3, and was the 12th registered.

Lennox Gastaut Syndrome

68 studies on the registry are indexed under Lennox Gastaut Syndrome; 13 are open to participants now.

Browse Lennox Gastaut Syndrome studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 38 studies in Lennox Gastaut Syndrome with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

2 more — sign in →

All 7 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 4 Lennox Gastaut Syndrome studies recruiting now, none set no upper age limit and 4 stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; none take healthy volunteers.

This study: 2 Years to 35 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 38 studies in Lennox Gastaut Syndrome with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a two-part, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo controlled study to evaluate the effect of ZX008 when used as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of uncontrolled seizures in children and adults with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS).

03

Conditions studied

  • Lennox Gastaut Syndrome

Keywords

  • LGS
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female, age 2 to 35 years, inclusive as of the day of the Screening Visit.
  • Clinical diagnosis of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, where seizures that result in drops are not completely controlled by current antiepileptic treatments.
  • Onset of seizures at 11 years of age or younger.
  • Abnormal cognitive development.
  • Must be receiving at least 1 concomitant AED and up to 4 concomitant anti-epileptic treatments.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Etiology of seizures is a degenerative neurological disease.
  • History of hemiclonic seizures in the first year of life.
  • Subject only has drop seizures in clusters, where individual seizures cannot be counted reliably.
  • Pulmonary arterial hypertension.
  • Current or past history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, such as cardiac valvulopathy, myocardial infarction or stroke.
  • Receiving concomitant therapy with: centrally-acting anorectic agents; monoamineoxidase inhibitors; any centrally-acting compound with clinically appreciable amount of serotonin agonist or antagonist properties, including serotonin reuptake inhibition; atomoxetine, or other centrally-acting noradrenergic agonist; cyproheptadine.
  • Taking felbamate for less than 1 year prior to screening and/or does not have stable liver function and hematology laboratory tests, and/or the dose has not been stable for at least 60 days prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Currently receiving an product.
  • Institutionalized in a general nursing home (ie, in a facility that does not specialize in epilepsy care).
  • A condition, or has had clinically relevant symptoms or a clinically significant illness in the 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit, other than epilepsy, that would negatively impact study participation, collection of study data, or pose a risk to the subject.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
296 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ZX008 0.2 or 0.8 mg/kg/day

    Part 1: ZX008 is supplied as an oral solution. Subjects will be randomized to receive 1 of 2 doses of ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/day or 0.8 mg/kg/day.

    Drug: ZX008 0.2 or 0.8 mg/kg/day

  • Placebo comparator
    Matching Placebo

    Part 1: Matching ZX008 placebo is supplied as an oral solution.

    Drug: Matching Placebo

  • Experimental
    Open-Label

    Part 2: ZX008 is supplied as an oral solution. Study medication will be administered twice a day (BID) in equally divided doses.

    Drug: ZX008 0.2 or 0.8 mg/kg/day

Interventions

  • DrugZX008 0.2 or 0.8 mg/kg/day

    Drug page: Fenfluramine

    ZX008 drug product is an oral aqueous solution of fenfluramine hydrochloride. The product is sugar free and is intended to be compatible with a Ketogenic Diet.

  • DrugMatching Placebo

    Placebo will be administered twice a day (BID) in equally divided doses.

    Also known as: Placebo Comparator

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC-confirmed) in the Combined Titration and Maintenance Period (T+M) in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day Group Compared to the Placebo Group

    Percent change in frequency of seizures that result in drops (DSF: drop seizure frequency) per 28 days between the combined Titration and Maintenance (T+M) and Baseline. The percent change from Baseline DSF was calculated as the change in DSF between T+M and Baseline / DSF during Baseline\* 100. The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]

  2. Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of investigational product, or whether considered related to the investigational product. A TEAE in Part 2 was defined as any AE with an onset on or after the first dose in Part 2. AEs with onset in Part 1 that are ongoing in Part 2 were not included in the count of AEs in Part 2.

    Time frame: From Part 2 Baseline until end of the OLE Period (up to 72 months)

  3. Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Serious TEAEs

    A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or is medically significant.

    Time frame: From Part 2 Baseline until end of the OLE Period (up to 72 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC-confirmed) in T+M in the ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/Day Group Compared to the Placebo Group

    Percent change in frequency of seizures that result in drops (DSF: drop seizure frequency) per 28 days between the combined Titration and Maintenance (T+M) and Baseline. The percent change from Baseline DSF was calculated as the change in DSF between T+M and Baseline / DSF during Baseline\* 100. The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]

  2. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops Comparing the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

    The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops. Participants who achieved a \>=50% reduction from Baseline in the DSF, ie, a decrease in DSF of at least 50 percentage points per 28 days during Titration and Maintenance Period.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]

  3. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Improvement (Minimally, Much or Very Much Improved) in the CGI-I Scale as Assessed by Principal Investigator Comparing ZX008 0.8 and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

    Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) scale measures improvement in the participant's condition from Baseline. The severity of a participant's condition was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as follows: 1-very much improved,2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4- no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse and 7-very much worse.

    Time frame: At Day 99 (Visit 12)

  4. Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in Frequency of All Seizures That Typically Result in Drops in T+M, Whether ESC-confirmed as Drop or Not in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

    Seizures that typically result in drops included all: generalized tonic-clonic seizures \[GTC\], secondarily generalized tonic-clonic \[SGTC\], tonic seizures \[TS\], atonic seizures \[AS\], and tonic/atonic seizures \[TA\], whether confirmed by the ESC or not. Seizures that result in a drop were defined as seizures involving the entire body, trunk, or head that led to a fall, injury, slumping in a chair, or the participant's head hitting a surface or that could have led to a fall or injury, depending on the patient's position at the time of the seizure.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]

  5. Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

    Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, clonic seizures \[CS\], hemiclonic seizures \[HS\], and focal seizures \[FS\] with clearly observable signs.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]

  6. Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

    Countable non-motor seizures included: focal seizures \[FS\] without clear observable signs, myoclonic seizures \[MS\], absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. For each participant, the seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as the number of seizures recorded during the period, divided by the number of days in the period and multiplied by 28.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]

  7. Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (Motor and Non-motor) in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

    Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]

  8. Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) Between Baseline and the Maintenance Period

    The frequency of drop seizures during a given interval was derived from the number and type of events recorded in participant electronic diaries. The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops.

    Time frame: During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  9. Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Typically Result in Drops in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

    Seizures that typically result in drops included all: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, and TA, whether confirmed by the ESC or not.

    Time frame: During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  10. Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

    Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC,TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs.

    Time frame: During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  11. Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

    Countable non-motor seizures included: focal seizures \[FS\] without clear observable signs, myoclonic seizures \[MS\], absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. For each participant, the seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as the number of seizures recorded during the period, divided by the number of days in the period and multiplied by 28.

    Time frame: During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  12. Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (Motor and Non-motor) in the Maintenance Period in ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

    Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures.

    Time frame: During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  13. Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in Frequency of Countable Seizures That do Not Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed)

    Non-drop seizures were defined as any countable seizure types that did not meet the criteria of drop seizures, ie, are classified as CS, HC, FS with or without observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, or other; or are seizures of the following classifications that were approved for each participant as non-drop seizure types by the ESC: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, or TA.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]

  14. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline (ie <=0% Reduction), or >0, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in Seizures That Result in Drops

    The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  15. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in Seizures That Typically Results in Drops

    Seizures that typically result in drops included all: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, and TA, whether confirmed by the ESC or not. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  16. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in All Countable Motor Seizures

    Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  17. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in Countable Motor Seizures That do Not Result in Drops

    Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC; TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, FS with clearly observable signs. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  18. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline (ie <= 0% Reduction), or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in All Countable Seizures

    Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC; TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  19. Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in All Countable Non-motor Seizures

    Countable non-motor seizures include: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  20. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Seizure-free Days During T+M and M Period

    A day with no seizures leading to a drop was defined as a day for which electronic (e) diary data were available and no drop seizures were reported. The total number of drop seizure-free days was calculated per 28 days for Baseline and for T+M.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline

  21. Part 1: Duration of Longest Interval (Days) Between Seizures That Result in Drops Comparing the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

    The longest interval between seizures leading to drops were obtained from the eDiary entries in Titration and Maintenance Period. The interval was derived as the maximum value of the number of days between consecutive drop seizures.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]

  22. Part 1: Clinical Global Impression - Improvement as Assessed by the Parent/Caregiver

    CGI-I scale measures improvement in the participant's condition from Baseline. The severity of a participant's condition was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as follows: 1-very much improved, 2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4- no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse and 7-very much worse.

    Time frame: At Days 15, 43, 71 and 99

  23. Part 1: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs

    Adverse events were defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal, clinically significant laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE in Part 1 was defined as any AE that, based on start date information, occurred after the first dose of study drug in Part 1, but not on or after the first dose of study drug in Part 2.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 14 weeks + Taper/Transition (2 weeks)

  24. Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Serious TEAEs

    A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or is medically significant.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 14 weeks + Taper/Transition (2 weeks)

  25. Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine Determined Directly From the Concentration Time Profile [Cmax] at Steady State

    Cmax is the maximum plasma concentration determined directly from the concentration time profile.

    Time frame: At Visit 8 (Day 43) of the Maintenance Period: pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4-6 hours post-dose

  26. Part 1: Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration of Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine at Steady State Determined Directly From the Concentration-time Profile [Cmin] at Steady State

    Cmin is the minimum plasma concentration determined directly from the concentration-time profile.

    Time frame: At Visit 8 (Day 43) of the Maintenance Period: pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4-6 hours post-dose

  27. Part 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine From Time Zero to Time 24 Hours [AUC0-24hours] at Steady State

    AUC0-24 is the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours.

    Time frame: At Visit 8 (Day 43) of the Maintenance Period: pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4-6 hours post-dose

  28. Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period

    The frequency of drop seizures during a given interval was derived from the number and type of events recorded in participant electronic diaries. The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops.

    Time frame: From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)

  29. Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Seizures That Typically Result in Drops Between Baseline and the OLE Period Whether ESC Confirmed as Drop or Not

    Seizures that typically result in drops included all: generalized tonic-clonic seizures \[GTC\], secondarily generalized tonic-clonic \[SGTC\], tonic seizures \[TS\], atonic seizures \[AS\], and tonic/atonic seizures \[TA\], whether confirmed by the ESC or not. Seizures that result in a drop were defined as seizures involving the entire body, trunk, or head that led to a fall, injury, slumping in a chair, or the participant's head hitting a surface or that could have led to a fall or injury, depending on the patient's position at the time of the seizure.

    Time frame: From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)

  30. Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in OLE Period

    Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, clonic seizures \[CS\], hemiclonic seizures \[HS\], and focal seizures \[FS\] with clearly observable signs.

    Time frame: From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)

  31. Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in OLE Period

    Countable non-motor seizures included: focal seizures \[FS\] without clear observable signs, myoclonic seizures \[MS\], absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. For each participant, the seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as the number of seizures recorded during the period, divided by the number of days in the period and multiplied by 28.

    Time frame: From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)

  32. Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (ESC Confirmed or Not) in OLE Period

    Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures.

    Time frame: From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)

  33. Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures That Did Not Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period

    Nondrop seizures were defined as any countable seizure types that did not meet the criteria of drop seizures, ie, are classified as CS, HC, FS with or without observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, or other; or are seizures of the following classifications that were approved for each subject as non-drop seizure types by the ESC: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, or TA. For each participant, the seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as the number of seizures recorded during the period, divided by the number of days in the period and multiplied by 28.

    Time frame: From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)

  34. Part 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed)

    The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during OLE Period); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during OLE Period were reported.

    Time frame: From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)

  35. Part 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of Seizures That Typically Result in Drops

    Seizures that typically result in drops included all: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, and TA, whether confirmed by the ESC or not. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during OLE Period); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during OLE Period were reported.

    Time frame: From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)

  36. Part 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures

    Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during OLE Period); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during OLE Period were reported.

    Time frame: From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)

  37. Part 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures

    Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during OLE Period); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during OLE Period were reported.

    Time frame: From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)

  38. Part 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of All Countable Seizures

    Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC; TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during OLE Period); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during OLE Period were reported.

    Time frame: From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)

  39. Part 2: Change From Baseline in Number of Seizure-free Days Per 28 Days (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period

    A day with no seizures leading to a drop was defined as a day for which ediary data were available and no drop seizures were reported.

    Time frame: From Part 2 Baseline until end of OLE Period (up to 72 months)

  40. Part 2: Change From Baseline in Duration of Longest Interval Between Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period

    The longest interval between seizures leading to drops were obtained from the eDiary entries in OLE Period. The interval was derived as the maximum value of the number of days between consecutive drop seizures.

    Time frame: From Part 2 Baseline until end of the OLE Period (up to 72 months)

  41. Part 2: Clinical Global Impression - Improvement as Assessed by the Principal Investigator

    CGI-I scale measures improvement in the participant's condition from Baseline. The severity of a participant's condition was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as follows: 1-very much improved,2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4- no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse and 7-very much worse.

    Time frame: At OLE Day 1, OLE Months (M) 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and Last Assessment (up to 72 months)

  42. Part 2: Clinical Global Impression - Improvement as Assessed by the Parent/Caregiver

    CGI-I scale measures improvement in the participant's condition from Baseline. The severity of a participant's condition was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as follows: 1-very much improved,2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4- no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse and 7-very much worse.

    Time frame: At OLE Day 1, OLE Months (M) 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and Last Assessment (up to 72 months)

07

Results

Posted Jul 3, 2025

Participant flow

The study started to enroll participants in November 2017 and concluded in May 2024. Cohort A included participants enrolled at sites in North America, Europe, and Australia. Cohort B included participants enrolled at sites in Japan only.

Part 1: Double-Blind Period
Participant flow — Part 1: Double-Blind Period
MilestoneCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Started878987111111
Completed868381111011
Not completed166010
Withdrew: Adverse event044010
Withdrew: Death001000
Withdrew: Physician decision010000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject111000
Part 2:Open-Label Extension (OLE) Period
Participant flow — Part 2:Open-Label Extension (OLE) Period
MilestoneCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Started868378111011
Completed615146515
Not completed253232696
Withdrew: Adverse event553011
Withdrew: Death010000
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy132123001
Withdrew: Switching to commercial zx008000563
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject654020
Withdrew: Physician decision000101
Withdrew: Rollover into zx008-1900102000

Outcome measures

PrimaryPart 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC-confirmed) in the Combined Titration and Maintenance Period (T+M) in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day Group Compared to the Placebo Group

Percent change in frequency of seizures that result in drops (DSF: drop seizure frequency) per 28 days between the combined Titration and Maintenance (T+M) and Baseline. The percent change from Baseline DSF was calculated as the change in DSF between T+M and Baseline / DSF during Baseline\* 100. The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC-confirmed) in the Combined Titration and Maintenance Period (T+M) in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day Group Compared to the Placebo Group
percent changeCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC-confirmed) in the Combined Titration and Maintenance Period (T+M) in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day Group Compared to the Placebo Group-7.59 (-100.0 to 557.1)-26.49 (-95.2 to 402.1)-17.89 (-97.3 to 61.8)-34.52 (-69.4 to 45.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo vs Cohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0008 · Median difference (a-p): -19.88 · 95% CI -31.02 to -8.74Hodges-Lehmann (HL) method
PrimaryPart 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of investigational product, or whether considered related to the investigational product. A TEAE in Part 2 was defined as any AE with an onset on or after the first dose in Part 2. AEs with onset in Part 1 that are ongoing in Part 2 were not included in the count of AEs in Part 2.

Time frame:
From Part 2 Baseline until end of the OLE Period (up to 72 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
percentage of participantsPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)83.096.9
PrimaryPart 2: Percentage of Participants With Serious TEAEs

A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or is medically significant.

Time frame:
From Part 2 Baseline until end of the OLE Period (up to 72 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Serious TEAEs
percentage of participantsPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Serious TEAEs16.618.8
SecondaryPart 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC-confirmed) in T+M in the ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/Day Group Compared to the Placebo Group

Percent change in frequency of seizures that result in drops (DSF: drop seizure frequency) per 28 days between the combined Titration and Maintenance (T+M) and Baseline. The percent change from Baseline DSF was calculated as the change in DSF between T+M and Baseline / DSF during Baseline\* 100. The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC-confirmed) in T+M in the ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/Day Group Compared to the Placebo Group
percent changeCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC-confirmed) in T+M in the ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/Day Group Compared to the Placebo Group-7.59 (-100.0 to 557.1)-14.16 (-100.0 to 3307.3)-17.89 (-97.3 to 61.8)-14.12 (-95.6 to 66.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo vs Cohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/Day · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.1460 · Median difference (a-p): -10.50 · 95% CI -24.99 to 3.99Hodges-Lehmann (HL) method
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops Comparing the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops. Participants who achieved a \>=50% reduction from Baseline in the DSF, ie, a decrease in DSF of at least 50 percentage points per 28 days during Titration and Maintenance Period.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops Comparing the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo
percentage of participantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a >=50% Reduction From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops Comparing the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo10.328.125.39.136.436.4
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo vs Cohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/Day · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0051 · Odds ratio (or): 3.30 · 95% CI 1.43 to 7.59
  • Cohort A: Placebo vs Cohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0150 · Odds ratio (or): 2.87 · 95% CI 1.23 to 6.70
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Improvement (Minimally, Much or Very Much Improved) in the CGI-I Scale as Assessed by Principal Investigator Comparing ZX008 0.8 and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) scale measures improvement in the participant's condition from Baseline. The severity of a participant's condition was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as follows: 1-very much improved,2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4- no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse and 7-very much worse.

Time frame:
At Day 99 (Visit 12)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Improvement (Minimally, Much or Very Much Improved) in the CGI-I Scale as Assessed by Principal Investigator Comparing ZX008 0.8 and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo
percentage of participantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Improvement (Minimally, Much or Very Much Improved) in the CGI-I Scale as Assessed by Principal Investigator Comparing ZX008 0.8 and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo33.844.748.89.145.572.7
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo vs Cohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/Day · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1565 · Odds ratio (or): 1.58 · 95% CI 0.84 to 2.97
  • Cohort A: Placebo vs Cohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0567 · Odds ratio (or): 1.86 · 95% CI 0.98 to 3.52
SecondaryPart 1: Percent Change From Baseline in Frequency of All Seizures That Typically Result in Drops in T+M, Whether ESC-confirmed as Drop or Not in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

Seizures that typically result in drops included all: generalized tonic-clonic seizures \[GTC\], secondarily generalized tonic-clonic \[SGTC\], tonic seizures \[TS\], atonic seizures \[AS\], and tonic/atonic seizures \[TA\], whether confirmed by the ESC or not. Seizures that result in a drop were defined as seizures involving the entire body, trunk, or head that led to a fall, injury, slumping in a chair, or the participant's head hitting a surface or that could have led to a fall or injury, depending on the patient's position at the time of the seizure.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in Frequency of All Seizures That Typically Result in Drops in T+M, Whether ESC-confirmed as Drop or Not in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo
percent changeCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in Frequency of All Seizures That Typically Result in Drops in T+M, Whether ESC-confirmed as Drop or Not in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo-8.43 (-100.0 to 557.1)-11.75 (-100.0 to 3307.3)-26.28 (-95.2 to 402.1)-17.89 (-97.3 to 61.8)-14.12 (-95.6 to 66.4)-34.04 (-69.4 to 45.5)
SecondaryPart 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, clonic seizures \[CS\], hemiclonic seizures \[HS\], and focal seizures \[FS\] with clearly observable signs.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo
percent changeCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo-8.43 (-80.8 to 497.8)-11.75 (-100.0 to 3307.3)-26.28 (-91.9 to 402.1)-17.89 (-97.3 to 61.8)-14.12 (-95.6 to 174.1)-34.04 (-69.4 to 45.5)
SecondaryPart 1: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

Countable non-motor seizures included: focal seizures \[FS\] without clear observable signs, myoclonic seizures \[MS\], absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. For each participant, the seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as the number of seizures recorded during the period, divided by the number of days in the period and multiplied by 28.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Reported as:
Median · seizure frequency per 28 days
Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo
seizure frequency per 28 daysCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo0.00 (-338.3 to 364.3)0.00 (-418.7 to 675.8)0.00 (-364.0 to 2952.7)-7.16 (-30.3 to 13.1)0.00 (-32.3 to 104.8)0.00 (-61.6 to 209.5)
SecondaryPart 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (Motor and Non-motor) in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (Motor and Non-motor) in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo
percent changeCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (Motor and Non-motor) in T+M in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo-9.40 (-85.4 to 497.8)-23.55 (-100.0 to 882.1)-21.70 (-91.9 to 224.9)-17.69 (-97.2 to 61.8)-20.41 (-87.1 to 826.2)-13.85 (-64.9 to 63.8)
SecondaryPart 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) Between Baseline and the Maintenance Period

The frequency of drop seizures during a given interval was derived from the number and type of events recorded in participant electronic diaries. The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops.

Time frame:
During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) Between Baseline and the Maintenance Period
percent changeCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) Between Baseline and the Maintenance Period-7.28 (-100.0 to 516.7)-18.63 (-100.0 to 964.0)-27.16 (-100.0 to 643.3)-18.18 (-99.4 to 66.7)-12.88 (-100.0 to 239.4)-45.07 (-77.8 to 52.2)
SecondaryPart 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Typically Result in Drops in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

Seizures that typically result in drops included all: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, and TA, whether confirmed by the ESC or not.

Time frame:
During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Typically Result in Drops in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo
percent changeCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Typically Result in Drops in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo-9.37 (-100.0 to 516.7)-17.30 (-100.0 to 964.0)-26.30 (-100.0 to 643.3)-18.18 (-99.4 to 66.7)-12.88 (-100.0 to 239.4)-46.88 (-77.8 to 52.2)
SecondaryPart 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC,TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs.

Time frame:
During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo
percent changeCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo-10.21 (-81.1 to 439.8)-17.30 (-100.0 to 964.0)-28.33 (-100.0 to 643.3)-18.18 (-99.4 to 66.7)-12.88 (-100.0 to 472.7)-46.88 (-77.8 to 52.2)
SecondaryPart 1: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

Countable non-motor seizures included: focal seizures \[FS\] without clear observable signs, myoclonic seizures \[MS\], absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. For each participant, the seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as the number of seizures recorded during the period, divided by the number of days in the period and multiplied by 28.

Time frame:
During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Median · seizure frequency per 28 days
Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo
seizure frequency per 28 daysCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in the Maintenance Period in the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo-0.04 (-340.6 to 362.3)-0.13 (-442.3 to 588.1)0.00 (-368.3 to 3219.3)-4.00 (-30.7 to 15.3)0.00 (-37.2 to 192.0)0.00 (-86.8 to 250.7)
SecondaryPart 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (Motor and Non-motor) in the Maintenance Period in ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures.

Time frame:
During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (Motor and Non-motor) in the Maintenance Period in ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo
percent changeCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (Motor and Non-motor) in the Maintenance Period in ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo-9.49 (-85.7 to 439.8)-27.63 (-100.0 to 211.1)-23.34 (-100.0 to 254.5)-18.18 (-99.5 to 66.7)-20.33 (-95.7 to 1626.7)-17.68 (-72.3 to 80.5)
SecondaryPart 1: Percent Change From Baseline in Frequency of Countable Seizures That do Not Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed)

Non-drop seizures were defined as any countable seizure types that did not meet the criteria of drop seizures, ie, are classified as CS, HC, FS with or without observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, or other; or are seizures of the following classifications that were approved for each participant as non-drop seizure types by the ESC: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, or TA.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in Frequency of Countable Seizures That do Not Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed)
percent changeCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percent Change From Baseline in Frequency of Countable Seizures That do Not Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed)-26.92 (-100.0 to 5070.3)-31.32 (-100.0 to 571.8)-22.68 (-100.0 to 481.3)-23.38 (-96.9 to 657.1)0.27 (-32.3 to 2915.4)-22.99 (-85.7 to 138.8)
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline (ie <=0% Reduction), or >0, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in Seizures That Result in Drops

The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline (ie <=0% Reduction), or >0, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in Seizures That Result in Drops
percentage of participantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Worsening or No Change (T+M)37.934.821.836.427.39.1
> 0% reduction (T+M)62.165.278.263.672.790.9
>= 25% reduction (T+M)31.047.251.736.436.463.6
>= 50% reduction (T+M)10.328.125.39.136.436.4
>= 75% reduction (T+M)4.610.18.09.19.10
100% reduction (T+M)1.11.10000
Near Seizure free (T+M)1.12.21.1000
Worsening or No Change (M)40.235.220.936.427.39.1
> 0% reduction (M)59.864.879.163.672.790.9
>= 25% reduction (M)33.346.653.536.436.472.7
>= 50% reduction (M)12.631.831.49.136.436.4
>= 75% reduction (M)3.411.414.09.19.19.1
100% reduction (M)1.13.42.309.10
Near Seizure free (M)1.14.52.39.19.10
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in Seizures That Typically Results in Drops

Seizures that typically result in drops included all: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, and TA, whether confirmed by the ESC or not. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in Seizures That Typically Results in Drops
percentage of participantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Worsening or No Change (T+M)35.636.020.736.427.39.1
> 0% reduction (T+M)64.464.079.363.672.790.9
>= 25% reduction (T+M)31.046.150.636.436.463.6
>= 50% reduction (T+M)9.227.026.49.136.436.4
>= 75% reduction (T+M)3.49.08.09.19.10
100% reduction (T+M)1.11.10000
Near Seizure free (T+M)1.11.11.1000
Worsening or No Change (M)37.937.519.836.427.39.1
> 0% reduction (M)62.162.580.263.672.790.9
>= 25% reduction (M)33.345.552.336.436.472.7
>= 50% reduction (M)10.330.731.49.136.436.4
>= 75% reduction (M)2.310.212.89.19.19.1
100% reduction (M)1.12.32.309.10
Near Seizure free (M)1.12.32.39.19.10
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in All Countable Motor Seizures

Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in All Countable Motor Seizures
percentage of participantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Worsening or No Change (T+M)34.538.220.736.427.39.1
> 0% reduction (T+M)65.561.879.363.672.790.9
>= 25% reduction (T+M)33.344.950.636.436.463.6
>= 50% reduction (T+M)9.224.725.39.136.436.4
>= 75% reduction (T+M)2.39.06.99.19.10
100% reduction (T+M)01.10000
Near Seizure free (T+M)01.10000
Worsening or No Change (M)36.838.618.636.427.39.1
> 0% reduction (M)63.261.481.463.672.790.9
>= 25% reduction (M)34.545.553.536.436.472.7
>= 50% reduction (M)10.328.426.79.136.436.4
>= 75% reduction (M)1.111.410.59.19.19.1
100% reduction (M)02.31.209.10
Near Seizure free (M)02.31.29.19.10
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in Countable Motor Seizures That do Not Result in Drops

Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC; TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, FS with clearly observable signs. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in Countable Motor Seizures That do Not Result in Drops
percentage of participantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Worsening or No Change (T+M)35.734.234.425.057.144.4
> 0% reduction (T+M)64.365.865.675.042.955.6
>= 25% reduction (T+M)51.453.446.950.014.344.4
>= 50% reduction (T+M)30.043.832.825.0022.2
>= 75% reduction (T+M)12.926.012.512.5011.1
100% reduction (T+M)2.95.54.7000
Near Seizure free (T+M)2.99.67.8000
Worsening or No Change (M)31.433.334.925.057.144.4
> 0% reduction (M)68.666.765.175.042.955.6
>= 25% reduction (M)54.356.949.250.014.344.4
>= 50% reduction (M)31.444.433.325.0022.2
>= 75% reduction (M)17.129.217.512.5011.1
100% reduction (M)5.79.76.312.500
Near Seizure free (M)7.113.99.512.500
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline (ie <= 0% Reduction), or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in All Countable Seizures

Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC; TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline (ie <= 0% Reduction), or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in All Countable Seizures
percentage of participantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Worsening or No Change (T+M)36.832.628.727.327.336.4
> 0% reduction (T+M)63.267.471.372.772.763.6
>= 25% reduction (T+M)35.648.346.027.327.345.5
>= 50% reduction (T+M)11.522.520.79.127.327.3
>= 75% reduction (T+M)3.46.74.69.19.10
100% reduction (T+M)01.10000
Near Seizure free (T+M)01.10000
Worsening or No Change (M)34.533.027.927.327.327.3
> 0% reduction (M)65.567.072.172.772.772.7
>= 25% reduction (M)34.551.147.727.327.345.5
>= 50% reduction (M)13.828.424.49.127.327.3
>= 75% reduction (M)3.49.17.09.19.10
100% reduction (M)01.11.2000
Near Seizure free (M)01.11.29.100
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in All Countable Non-motor Seizures

Countable non-motor seizures include: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during T+M); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during combined T+M Period and Maintenance Period were reported.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or >0%, >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" Between Baseline and T+M, and Baseline and M, in All Countable Non-motor Seizures
percentage of participantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Worsening or No Change (T+M)33.334.436.825.057.137.5
> 0% reduction (T+M)66.765.663.275.042.962.5
>= 25% reduction (T+M)52.456.343.950.014.337.5
>= 50% reduction (T+M)30.248.435.125.0025.0
>= 75% reduction (T+M)14.332.812.312.500
100% reduction (T+M)3.26.33.5000
Near Seizure free (T+M)3.214.15.3000
Worsening or No Change (M)30.230.233.912.557.137.5
> 0% reduction (M)69.869.866.187.542.962.5
>= 25% reduction (M)54.060.348.250.014.337.5
>= 50% reduction (M)34.949.233.925.0037.5
>= 75% reduction (M)17.531.717.912.500
100% reduction (M)6.39.58.912.500
Near Seizure free (M)7.915.910.712.500
SecondaryPart 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Seizure-free Days During T+M and M Period

A day with no seizures leading to a drop was defined as a day for which electronic (e) diary data were available and no drop seizures were reported. The total number of drop seizure-free days was calculated per 28 days for Baseline and for T+M.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]; During Maintenance Period (12 weeks), compared to Baseline
Reported as:
Median · seizure free days per 28 days
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Seizure-free Days During T+M and M Period
seizure free days per 28 daysCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
T+M Period0.27 (-5.0 to 16.0)0.00 (-9.0 to 16.8)0.29 (-6.1 to 20.0)0.00 (-2.2 to 23.6)0.38 (-2.3 to 22.0)6.65 (-2.4 to 8.5)
M Period0.31 (-5.4 to 15.7)0.00 (-4.1 to 18.2)0.16 (-7.4 to 21.7)-0.65 (-2.7 to 24.7)0.33 (-7.3 to 26.0)7.72 (-2.3 to 10.3)
SecondaryPart 1: Duration of Longest Interval (Days) Between Seizures That Result in Drops Comparing the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo

The longest interval between seizures leading to drops were obtained from the eDiary entries in Titration and Maintenance Period. The interval was derived as the maximum value of the number of days between consecutive drop seizures.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) + Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Reported as:
Median · days
Part 1: Duration of Longest Interval (Days) Between Seizures That Result in Drops Comparing the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo
daysCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Duration of Longest Interval (Days) Between Seizures That Result in Drops Comparing the ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day and 0.2 mg/kg/Day Groups Independently Versus Placebo5.00 (1.0 to 39.0)4.00 (1.0 to 97.0)5.00 (1.0 to 89.0)4.00 (1.0 to 91.0)4.00 (1.0 to 32.0)6.00 (2.0 to 16.0)
SecondaryPart 1: Clinical Global Impression - Improvement as Assessed by the Parent/Caregiver

CGI-I scale measures improvement in the participant's condition from Baseline. The severity of a participant's condition was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as follows: 1-very much improved, 2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4- no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse and 7-very much worse.

Time frame:
At Days 15, 43, 71 and 99
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Clinical Global Impression - Improvement as Assessed by the Parent/Caregiver
percentage of participantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
1=Very much improved (D15)2.45.99.99.110.09.1
2=Much improved (D15)4.715.321.018.210.018.2
3=Minimally improved (D15)31.827.139.59.130.027.3
4=No Change (D15)51.842.418.563.630.027.3
5=Minimally worse (D15)4.75.97.4020.018.2
6=Much worse (D15)4.73.52.5000
7=Very much worse (D15)001.2000
1=Very much improved (D43)1.27.313.89.1010.0
2=Much improved (D43)9.419.525.0022.240.0
3=Minimally improved (D43)20.018.333.818.244.430.0
4=No Change (D43)60.039.017.563.633.30
5=Minimally worse (D43)5.911.05.09.1020.0
6=Much worse (D43)2.44.95.0000
7=Very much worse (D43)1.200000
1=Very much improved (D71)2.44.010.79.100
2=Much improved (D71)6.120.028.0022.211.1
3=Minimally improved (D71)24.416.033.318.222.255.6
4=No Change (D71)53.748.024.063.655.622.2
5=Minimally worse (D71)7.38.01.39.1011.1
6=Much worse (D71)6.14.02.7000
7=Very much worse (D71)000000
1=Very much improved (D99)1.28.210.09.1018.2
2=Much improved (D99)3.718.823.8018.218.2
3=Minimally improved (D99)32.116.527.518.227.336.4
4=No Change (D99)53.137.627.563.645.527.3
5=Minimally worse (D99)7.48.25.009.10
6=Much worse (D99)2.57.15.09.100
7=Very much worse (D99)03.51.3000
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs

Adverse events were defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal, clinically significant laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE in Part 1 was defined as any AE that, based on start date information, occurred after the first dose of study drug in Part 1, but not on or after the first dose of study drug in Part 2.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 14 weeks + Taper/Transition (2 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs
percentage of participantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With TEAEs80.578.789.772.790.963.6
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants With Serious TEAEs

A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or is medically significant.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 14 weeks + Taper/Transition (2 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Serious TEAEs
percentage of participantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Serious TEAEs4.64.511.59.19.10
SecondaryPart 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine Determined Directly From the Concentration Time Profile [Cmax] at Steady State

Cmax is the maximum plasma concentration determined directly from the concentration time profile.

Time frame:
At Visit 8 (Day 43) of the Maintenance Period: pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4-6 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine Determined Directly From the Concentration Time Profile [Cmax] at Steady State
nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Cohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Fenfluramine11.9 ± 56.144.8 ± 47.0
Norfenfluramine9.04 ± 53.428.9 ± 52.9
SecondaryPart 1: Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration of Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine at Steady State Determined Directly From the Concentration-time Profile [Cmin] at Steady State

Cmin is the minimum plasma concentration determined directly from the concentration-time profile.

Time frame:
At Visit 8 (Day 43) of the Maintenance Period: pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4-6 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Part 1: Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration of Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine at Steady State Determined Directly From the Concentration-time Profile [Cmin] at Steady State
ng/mLCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Fenfluramine8.19 ± 75.631.8 ± 60.8
Norfenfluramine8.23 ± 61.326.2 ± 58.9
SecondaryPart 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine From Time Zero to Time 24 Hours [AUC0-24hours] at Steady State

AUC0-24 is the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours.

Time frame:
At Visit 8 (Day 43) of the Maintenance Period: pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4-6 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)
Part 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine From Time Zero to Time 24 Hours [AUC0-24hours] at Steady State
nanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Cohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day
Fenfluramine246 ± 63.0933 ± 52.1
Norfenfluramine209 ± 56.3667 ± 55.1
SecondaryPart 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period

The frequency of drop seizures during a given interval was derived from the number and type of events recorded in participant electronic diaries. The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops.

Time frame:
From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period
percent changePart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period-29.53 (-100.0 to 2625.3)-43.42 (-99.0 to 64.2)
SecondaryPart 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Seizures That Typically Result in Drops Between Baseline and the OLE Period Whether ESC Confirmed as Drop or Not

Seizures that typically result in drops included all: generalized tonic-clonic seizures \[GTC\], secondarily generalized tonic-clonic \[SGTC\], tonic seizures \[TS\], atonic seizures \[AS\], and tonic/atonic seizures \[TA\], whether confirmed by the ESC or not. Seizures that result in a drop were defined as seizures involving the entire body, trunk, or head that led to a fall, injury, slumping in a chair, or the participant's head hitting a surface or that could have led to a fall or injury, depending on the patient's position at the time of the seizure.

Time frame:
From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Seizures That Typically Result in Drops Between Baseline and the OLE Period Whether ESC Confirmed as Drop or Not
percent changePart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Seizures That Typically Result in Drops Between Baseline and the OLE Period Whether ESC Confirmed as Drop or Not-27.94 (-100.0 to 2625.3)-43.78 (-99.0 to 64.2)
SecondaryPart 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in OLE Period

Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, clonic seizures \[CS\], hemiclonic seizures \[HS\], and focal seizures \[FS\] with clearly observable signs.

Time frame:
From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in OLE Period
percent changePart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures in OLE Period-28.18 (-100.0 to 2625.3)-41.94 (-99.0 to 64.2)
SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in OLE Period

Countable non-motor seizures included: focal seizures \[FS\] without clear observable signs, myoclonic seizures \[MS\], absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. For each participant, the seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as the number of seizures recorded during the period, divided by the number of days in the period and multiplied by 28.

Time frame:
From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)
Reported as:
Median · seizure frequency per 28 days
Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in OLE Period
seizure frequency per 28 daysPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures in OLE Period0.00 (-4257.2 to 1774.3)0.00 (-89.4 to 258.9)
SecondaryPart 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (ESC Confirmed or Not) in OLE Period

Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures.

Time frame:
From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (ESC Confirmed or Not) in OLE Period
percent changePart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Part 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures (ESC Confirmed or Not) in OLE Period-28.83 (-100.0 to 606.1)-28.00 (-99.1 to 83.3)
SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures That Did Not Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period

Nondrop seizures were defined as any countable seizure types that did not meet the criteria of drop seizures, ie, are classified as CS, HC, FS with or without observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, or other; or are seizures of the following classifications that were approved for each subject as non-drop seizure types by the ESC: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, or TA. For each participant, the seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as the number of seizures recorded during the period, divided by the number of days in the period and multiplied by 28.

Time frame:
From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)
Reported as:
Median · seizure frequency per 28 days
Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures That Did Not Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period
seizure frequency per 28 daysPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Frequency of All Countable Seizures That Did Not Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period-0.99 (-4482.2 to 1774.3)0.00 (-89.4 to 258.9)
SecondaryPart 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed)

The seizure types included in the count were: atonic, tonic, tonic/atonic, generalized tonic-clonic, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures resulting in drops. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during OLE Period); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during OLE Period were reported.

Time frame:
From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed)
percentage of participantsPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Worsening or No Change31.518.8
> 0%68.581.3
>= 25%55.662.5
>= 50%32.843.8
>= 75%12.421.9
100%1.20
Near Seizure free1.70
SecondaryPart 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of Seizures That Typically Result in Drops

Seizures that typically result in drops included all: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, and TA, whether confirmed by the ESC or not. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during OLE Period); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during OLE Period were reported.

Time frame:
From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of Seizures That Typically Result in Drops
percentage of participantsPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Worsening or No Change32.021.9
> 0%68.078.1
>= 25%53.165.6
>= 50%29.943.8
>= 75%11.221.9
100%0.80
Near Seizure free1.20
SecondaryPart 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures

Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC, TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during OLE Period); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during OLE Period were reported.

Time frame:
From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of All Countable Motor Seizures
percentage of participantsPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Worsening or No Change29.521.9
> 0%70.578.1
>= 25%54.862.5
>= 50%29.940.6
>= 75%9.121.9
100%0.40
Near Seizure free0.80
SecondaryPart 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures

Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during OLE Period); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during OLE Period were reported.

Time frame:
From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of All Countable Non-motor Seizures
percentage of participantsPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Worsening or No Change24.137.5
> 0%46.131.3
>= 25%41.925.0
>= 50%34.018.8
>= 75%22.86.3
100%4.63.1
Near Seizure free7.56.3
SecondaryPart 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of All Countable Seizures

Countable motor seizures included: GTC, SGTC; TS, AS, TA, CS, HS, and FS with clearly observable signs. Countable non-motor seizures included: FS without clear observable signs, MS, absence/atypical absence, infantile spasms, epileptic spasms, and other seizures. The participants who experienced a worsening or no change from Baseline (ie \<= 0% reduction); \>0%, \>=25%, \>=50%, \>=75%, and 100% reduction (a 100% reduction was equivalent to achieving seizure freedom during OLE Period); and "near seizure freedom," (defined as 0 or 1 seizure leading to a drop) during OLE Period were reported.

Time frame:
From OLE Month 1 to Month12, compared to Baseline (Part 1)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Worsening From Baseline, or > 0%, >=25%, >= 50%, >= 75%, 100% Reduction, and "Near Seizure Freedom" From Baseline in Frequency of All Countable Seizures
percentage of participantsPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Worsening or No Change30.337.5
> 0%69.762.5
>= 25%53.156.3
>= 50%30.728.1
>= 75%9.112.5
100%0.40
Near Seizure free0.40
SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in Number of Seizure-free Days Per 28 Days (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period

A day with no seizures leading to a drop was defined as a day for which ediary data were available and no drop seizures were reported.

Time frame:
From Part 2 Baseline until end of OLE Period (up to 72 months)
Reported as:
Median · seizure free days per 28 days
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Number of Seizure-free Days Per 28 Days (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period
seizure free days per 28 daysPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Number of Seizure-free Days Per 28 Days (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period2.16 (-23.0 to 27.8)4.24 (-3.6 to 24.5)
SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in Duration of Longest Interval Between Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period

The longest interval between seizures leading to drops were obtained from the eDiary entries in OLE Period. The interval was derived as the maximum value of the number of days between consecutive drop seizures.

Time frame:
From Part 2 Baseline until end of the OLE Period (up to 72 months)
Reported as:
Median · days
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Duration of Longest Interval Between Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period
daysPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Duration of Longest Interval Between Seizures That Result in Drops (ESC Confirmed) in OLE Period4.0 (-10 to 360)6.0 (0 to 200)
SecondaryPart 2: Clinical Global Impression - Improvement as Assessed by the Principal Investigator

CGI-I scale measures improvement in the participant's condition from Baseline. The severity of a participant's condition was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as follows: 1-very much improved,2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4- no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse and 7-very much worse.

Time frame:
At OLE Day 1, OLE Months (M) 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and Last Assessment (up to 72 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 2: Clinical Global Impression - Improvement as Assessed by the Principal Investigator
percentage of participantsPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
1=Very much improved (OLE D1)2.53.1
2=Much improved (OLE D1)15.318.8
3=Minimally improved (OLE D1)25.818.8
4=No Change (OLE D1)48.356.3
5=Minimally worse (OLE D1)7.23.1
6=Much worse (OLE D1)0.80
7=Very much worse (OLE D1)00
1=Very much improved (OLE M1)4.49.4
2=Much improved (OLE M1)20.021.9
3=Minimally improved (OLE M1)32.437.5
4=No Change (OLE M1)34.231.3
5=Minimally worse (OLE M1)7.60
6=Much worse (OLE M1)1.30
7=Very much worse (OLE M1)00
1=Very much improved (OLE M2)5.56.5
2=Much improved (OLE M2)24.519.4
3=Minimally improved (OLE M2)34.135.5
4=No Change (OLE M2)27.732.3
5=Minimally worse (OLE M2)5.06.5
6=Much worse (OLE M2)3.20
7=Very much worse (OLE M2)00
1=Very much improved (OLE M3)7.26.9
2=Much improved (OLE M3)25.117.2
3=Minimally improved (OLE M3)36.255.2
4=No Change (OLE M3)21.720.7
5=Minimally worse (OLE M3)7.20
6=Much worse (OLE M3)2.40
7=Very much worse (OLE M3)00
1=Very much improved (OLE M6)8.23.4
2=Much improved (OLE M6)33.727.6
3=Minimally improved (OLE M6)31.034.5
4=No Change (OLE M6)20.127.6
5=Minimally worse (OLE M6)3.86.9
6=Much worse (OLE M6)3.30
7=Very much worse (OLE M6)00
1=Very much improved (OLE M9)9.03.6
2=Much improved (OLE M9)37.628.6
3=Minimally improved (OLE M9)27.128.6
4=No Change (OLE M9)18.835.7
5=Minimally worse (OLE M9)6.03.6
6=Much worse (OLE M9)1.50
7=Very much worse (OLE M9)00
1=Very much improved (OLE M12)9.70
2=Much improved (OLE M12)39.353.8
3=Minimally improved (OLE M12)26.223.1
4=No Change (OLE M12)18.619.2
5=Minimally worse (OLE M12)3.43.8
6=Much worse (OLE M12)2.80
7=Very much worse (OLE M12)00
1=Very much improved (Last Assessment)7.66.3
2=Much improved (Last Assessment)27.425.0
3=Minimally improved (Last Assessment)21.925.0
4=No Change (Last Assessment)28.340.6
5=Minimally worse (Last Assessment)7.23.1
6=Much worse (Last Assessment)7.60
7=Very much worse (Last Assessment)00
SecondaryPart 2: Clinical Global Impression - Improvement as Assessed by the Parent/Caregiver

CGI-I scale measures improvement in the participant's condition from Baseline. The severity of a participant's condition was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as follows: 1-very much improved,2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4- no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse and 7-very much worse.

Time frame:
At OLE Day 1, OLE Months (M) 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and Last Assessment (up to 72 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Part 2: Clinical Global Impression - Improvement as Assessed by the Parent/Caregiver
percentage of participantsPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
1=Very much improved (OLE D1)6.99.4
2=Much improved (OLE D1)16.812.5
3=Minimally improved (OLE D1)24.628.1
4=No Change (OLE D1)40.143.8
5=Minimally worse (OLE D1)6.93.1
6=Much worse (OLE D1)3.93.1
7=Very much worse (OLE D1)0.90
1=Very much improved (OLE M1)7.112.5
2=Much improved (OLE M1)21.415.6
3=Minimally improved (OLE M1)32.131.3
4=No Change (OLE M1)29.540.6
5=Minimally worse (OLE M1)5.80
6=Much worse (OLE M1)4.00
7=Very much worse (OLE M1)00
1=Very much improved (OLE M2)7.312.9
2=Much improved (OLE M2)25.616.1
3=Minimally improved (OLE M2)32.041.9
4=No Change (OLE M2)25.622.6
5=Minimally worse (OLE M2)6.46.5
6=Much worse (OLE M2)2.30
7=Very much worse (OLE M2)0.90
1=Very much improved (OLE M3)9.713.8
2=Much improved (OLE M3)30.010.3
3=Minimally improved (OLE M3)29.537.9
4=No Change (OLE M3)19.337.9
5=Minimally worse (OLE M3)9.70
6=Much worse (OLE M3)0.50
7=Very much worse (OLE M3)1.40
1=Very much improved (OLE M6)13.410.3
2=Much improved (OLE M6)30.131.0
3=Minimally improved (OLE M6)27.434.5
4=No Change (OLE M6)23.120.7
5=Minimally worse (OLE M6)3.20
6=Much worse (OLE M6)2.23.4
7=Very much worse (OLE M6)0.50
1=Very much improved (OLE M9)13.414.3
2=Much improved (OLE M9)37.325.0
3=Minimally improved (OLE M9)26.121.4
4=No Change (OLE M9)14.232.1
5=Minimally worse (OLE M9)8.23.6
6=Much worse (OLE M9)0.73.6
7=Very much worse (OLE M9)00
1=Very much improved (OLE M12)16.819.2
2=Much improved (OLE M12)34.226.9
3=Minimally improved (OLE M12)26.846.2
4=No Change (OLE M12)14.83.8
5=Minimally worse (OLE M12)4.73.8
6=Much worse (OLE M12)2.00
7=Very much worse (OLE M12)0.70
1=Very much improved (Last Assessment)11.412.5
2=Much improved (Last Assessment)24.128.1
3=Minimally improved (Last Assessment)24.518.8
4=No Change (Last Assessment)25.328.1
5=Minimally worse (Last Assessment)9.39.4
6=Much worse (Last Assessment)3.43.1
7=Very much worse (Last Assessment)2.10

Adverse events

Collected over From Day 1 up to 72 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Part 1: Cohort A- Placebo0/87 (0%)4/87 (4.6%)60/87 (69%)
Part 1: Cohort A- ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/Day0/89 (0%)4/89 (4.5%)64/89 (71.9%)
Part 1: Cohort A- ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day1/87 (1.1%)10/87 (11.5%)68/87 (78.2%)
Part 2: Cohort A- Overall1/247 (0.4%)41/247 (16.6%)166/247 (67.2%)
Part 1: Cohort B- Placebo0/11 (0%)1/11 (9.1%)8/11 (72.7%)
Part 1: Cohort B- ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/Day0/11 (0%)1/11 (9.1%)10/11 (90.9%)
Part 1: Cohort B- ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)7/11 (63.6%)
Part 2: Cohort B- Overall0/32 (0%)6/32 (18.8%)30/32 (93.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 50
Most frequent serious events
EventPart 1: Cohort A- PlaceboPart 1: Cohort A- ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayPart 1: Cohort A- ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 1: Cohort B- PlaceboPart 1: Cohort B- ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayPart 1: Cohort B- ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
SomnolenceNervous system disorders0/870/891/873/2470/111/110/111/32
Seizure clusterNervous system disorders0/870/890/870/2471/110/110/112/32
Change in seizure presentationNervous system disorders0/872/890/8710/2470/110/110/110/32
Status epilepticusNervous system disorders1/870/893/878/2470/110/110/110/32
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/871/892/875/2470/110/110/111/32
Dental cariesGastrointestinal disorders0/870/890/870/2470/110/110/111/32
Enterobacter bacteraemiaInfections and infestations0/870/890/870/2470/110/110/111/32
Facial bones fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/870/890/870/2470/110/110/111/32
Foreign body in gastrointestinal tractInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/870/890/870/2470/110/110/111/32
SeizureNervous system disorders2/870/890/873/2470/110/110/110/32
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 56
Most frequent other events
EventPart 1: Cohort A- PlaceboPart 1: Cohort A- ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayPart 1: Cohort A- ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayPart 2: Cohort A- OverallPart 1: Cohort B- PlaceboPart 1: Cohort B- ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayPart 1: Cohort B- ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayPart 2: Cohort B- Overall
Corona virus infectionInfections and infestations0/870/890/872/2470/110/110/1112/32
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders13/8718/8932/8739/2472/113/113/114/32
Weight decreasedInvestigations2/873/897/8712/2471/112/114/114/32
SomnolenceNervous system disorders10/8710/8915/8724/2471/114/113/1111/32
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations8/874/897/8731/2472/112/110/119/32
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders4/8710/8910/8713/2470/113/112/115/32
Blood prolactin increasedInvestigations1/870/893/879/2470/111/110/118/32
PyrexiaGeneral disorders11/8711/899/8725/2471/110/110/117/32
FatigueGeneral disorders11/878/8916/8733/2470/110/110/110/32
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders5/875/898/8718/2470/110/110/115/32

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics refers to Safety Population which consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayTotal
Mean14.4 ± 7.7113.4 ± 7.7913.4 ± 7.2818.5 ± 7.7820.1 ± 7.7918.5 ± 7.9414.3 ± 7.76
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayTotal
2 - < 12 years324137232117
12 - < 18 years29232552387
18 - 35 years26252546692
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayTotal
Female414333522126
Male464654699170
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayTotal
White716770000208
Black or African American45300012
Asian23411111142
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0100001
Not Reported611700024
Unknown2220006
Multiple2010003
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cohort A: PlaceboCohort A: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort A: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/DayCohort B: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/DayTotal
Hispanic or Latino16211400051
Not Hispanic or Latino655866111111222
Not Reported610700023
08

Study locations

72 sites
  • Ep0214 107
    Tucson, Arizona 85718, United States
  • Ep0214 144
    Los Angeles, California 90095-1752, United States
  • Ep0214 101
    San Francisco, California 94158, United States
  • Ep0214 103
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Ep0214 149
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Ep0214 115
    Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561, United States
  • Ep0214 104
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Ep0214 141
    Orlando, Florida 32803, United States
  • Ep0214 121
    Orlando, Florida 32819, United States
  • Ep0214 117
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Ep0214 110
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Ep0214 140
    Bethesda, Maryland 20817, United States
  • Ep0214 112
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Ep0214 136
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • Ep0214 147
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • Ep0214 109
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Ep0214 132
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102, United States
  • Ep0214 105
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Ep0214 118
    Livingston, New Jersey 07039, United States
  • Ep0214 150
    Hartsdale, New York 10530, United States
  • Ep0214 142
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Ep0214 131
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Ep0214 143
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Ep0214 120
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4318, United States
  • Ep0214 139
    York, Pennsylvania 17403, United States
  • Ep0214 146
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Ep0214 126
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Ep0214 145
    San Antonio, Texas 78207-3108, United States
  • Ep0214 106
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84113, United States
  • Ep0214 125
    Tacoma, Washington 98405, United States
  • Ep0214 301
    Heidelberg, Australia
  • Ep0214 302
    South Brisbane, Australia
  • Ep0214 802
    Brussels, Belgium
  • Ep0214 803
    Brussels, Belgium
  • Ep0214 801
    Edegem, Belgium
  • Ep0214 204
    Toronto, Canada
  • Ep0214 201
    Vancouver, Canada
  • Ep0214 701
    Dianalund, Denmark
  • Ep0214 1004
    Bordeaux, France
  • Ep0214 1006
    Bron, France
  • Ep0214 1005
    Lille, France
  • Ep0214 1007
    Marseille, France
  • Ep0214 1001
    Paris, France
  • Ep0214 1002
    Paris, France
  • Ep0214 902
    Bielefeld, Germany
  • Ep0214 906
    Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
  • Ep0214 905
    Jena, Germany
  • Ep0214 908
    Kiel, Germany
  • Ep0214 903
    Radeberg, Germany
  • Ep0214 901
    Vogtareuth, Germany
  • Ep0214 1211
    Bologna, Italy
  • Ep0214 1201
    Florence, Italy
  • Ep0214 1204
    Genova, Italy
  • Ep0214 1206
    Roma, Italy
  • Ep0214 1208
    Roma, Italy
  • Ep0214 1510
    Fukuoka, Japan
  • Ep0214 1505
    Niigata, Japan
  • Ep0214 1501
    Okayama, Japan
  • Ep0214 1507
    Osaka, Japan
  • Ep0214 1504
    Ōmura, Japan
  • Ep0214 1508
    Sapporo, Japan
  • Ep0214 1506
    Shinjuku-ku, Japan
  • Ep0214 1502
    Shizuoka, Japan
  • Ep0214 1604
    Guadalajara, Mexico
  • Ep0214 1401
    Zwolle, Netherlands
  • Ep0214 1702
    Bydgoszcz, Poland
  • Ep0214 1701
    Krakow, Poland
  • Ep0214 1105
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Ep0214 1107
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Ep0214 1101
    Mirasierra, Spain
  • Ep0214 1102
    Pamplona, Spain
  • Ep0214 502
    Gothenburg, Sweden
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Knupp KG, Scheffer IE, Ceulemans B, Sullivan JE, Nickels KC, Lagae L, Guerrini R, Zuberi SM, Nabbout R, Riney K, Shore S, Agarwal A, Lock M, Farfel GM, Galer BS, Gammaitoni AR, Davis R, Gil-Nagel A. Efficacy and Safety of Fenfluramine for the Treatment of Seizures Associated With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2022 Jun 1;79(6):554-564. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0829. PubMed 35499850 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion.

Access criteria: Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.vivli.org

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in May 2024, 77 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2025, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 19, 2017
First posted
Nov 28, 2017
StartActual
Nov 27, 2017
Primary completionActual
May 23, 2024
CompletionActual
May 23, 2024
Results first posted
Jul 3, 2025
Last update
Jul 3, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03355209
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 28, 2017
Start date
Nov 27, 2017
Primary completion
May 23, 2024
Completion
May 23, 2024
Results posted
Jul 3, 2025
Last update
Jul 3, 2025

Study contacts

UCB Cares
study director · 001 844 599 2273

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fenfluramine

Start the discussion