ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03353207Updated Feb 24, 2021

Striatal Dopamine Transmission in Individuals With Isolated Rapid Eye Movement Sleep With Atonia: a Search for Precursor Biomarker for Neurodegeneration

An observational study in REM Sleep Behavior Disorder and Neurodegenerative Diseases, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Completed at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-24.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
50
Ages
45 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 11 studies in REM Sleep Behavior Disorder by Chinese University of Hong Kong — 4 open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. REM Sleep Behavior Disorder · Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Enrollment
11th of 11
50 · median 400
Started
2017
with 1 other
Observational
11 of 11
4 open now
Registered
1st of 11
by date

Among the 11 studies in REM Sleep Behavior Disorder by Chinese University of Hong Kong, this one is the 11th largest by enrollment, is one of 2 that started in 2017, is one of 11 observational ones, and was the 1st registered.

REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

101 studies on the registry are indexed under REM Sleep Behavior Disorder; 45 are open to participants now.

Browse REM Sleep Behavior Disorder studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 11 studies in REM Sleep Behavior Disorder by Chinese University of Hong Kong are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 4 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 32 REM Sleep Behavior Disorder studies recruiting now, 18 (56%) set no upper age limit and 4 (13%) stop at 75 or younger; 4 take children under 18; 17 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 45 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 11 studies in REM Sleep Behavior Disorder by Chinese University of Hong Kong, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Background:

Previous studies have confirmed that most patients with idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder (iRBD) eventually develop neurodegenerative diseases. In addition, REM sleep without atonia (RSWA), a hallmark of RBD feature, is a significant predictor of development of neurodegenerative diseases in patients with iRBD. Some preliminary studies have implied that isolated RSWA in the absence of RBD symptoms may also indicate neurodegeneration. However, this speculation needs to be confirmed by more refined study with sophisticated measures in both RSWA and markers of neurodegeneration

Objectives: 1) to determine the differences in striatal dopamine transmission and other markers of neurodegeneration among individuals with isolated RSWA and healthy controls; 2) to examine the correlation of severity of RSWA with striatal dopamine transmission.

Design: Case-control study

Setting: Community-based sample

Participants: 1) iRBD first degree relatives with isolated RSWA (n=18) 2) iRBD first degree relatives without isolated RSWA (n=18) 3) Community-based health controls without isolated RSWA (n=18)

Main outcome measures:

  1. The dopamine transmission as measured by triple-tracer PET/ CT imaging protocol including 18F-DOPA, 11C-Raclopride and 18F-FDG images;
  2. Brain glucose metabolism and neurocognitive measures;
  3. Severity of EMG activity during REM sleep
Read the detailed description

In the past two decades, a number of studies have confirmed that most patients with idiopathic RBD will eventually develop neurodegenerative diseases, especially α-synucleinopathies. Previous studies, including our preliminary data, suggested that RSWA is a marker of predicting the conversion of neurodegenerative diseases in idiopathic RBD. In other words, RSWA is an early marker of neurodegeneration in patients with idiopathic RBD. However, a number of individuals who are absent of any RBD symptoms (including patients with α-synucleinopathies, also have RSWA, which is described to have isolated RSWA. Only a few studies have attempted to understand the clinical importance and predictive prognosis of isolated RSWA. These preliminary studies suggest that isolated RSWA in healthy subjects may be a silent biomarker of neurodegeneration. However, these preliminary findings need to be replicated and confirmed by more refined study with dopamine neurotransmission neuroimaging.

This proposed study will enrich the limited scientific literature of the potential pathogenesis and progression of isolated RSWA. By using an ongoing family study, we have screened a number of individuals with isolated RSWA, who are the first degree relatives of patients with RBD and are presumed to have a higher risk of neurodegeneration. Based on the existing sample, the current study will provide the first neuroimaging data on isolated RSWA to test the hypothesis that isolated RSWA, even in the absence of RBD symptoms, is an early marker of neurodegeneration. Individuals with isolated RSWA are expected to show dopamine dysfunction when compared with individuals without RSWA. If we confirm this hypothesis, the findings in the current study will extend our understanding of the spectrum of RBD and RSWA. The potential implication of our findings is that asymptomatic RSWA, especially in the presence of family history, will harbour the neurodegenerative progression. The results will pave the way for future prospective follow up to determine the course of neurodegeneration. From an etiological understanding, it will help to expand the understanding of the evolution course of synucleinopathy neurodegeneration. From an interventional angle, this study will have significant implication for developing a longer prevention window for neuroprotective trial.

The inclusion criteria for the subjects:

iRBD first degree relatives with isolated RSWA

  1. First degree relatives of patients with iRBD;
  2. Age 45 years or above;
  3. Absence of dream enactment behaviors;
  4. A total score on REM Sleep Behavior Questionnaire (RBDQ-HK) less than 19, which is the cut-off suggestive of a diagnosis of RBD;
  5. Presence of RSWA as measured by v-PSG; RSWA is defined as the percentage of increased EMG activity (phasic or tonic) at least 10% during REM sleep for any channel.
  6. for those individuals with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index, AHI > 15/hour), effective CPAP treatment should be documented and a second night of V-PSG is required to determine RSWA.

Community-based health controls without isolated RSWA:

  1. No family history of RBD;
  2. Age- and sex- matched with isolated RSWA subjects
  3. Absence of dream enactment behaviors;
  4. A score of RBDQ-HK less than 19;
  5. Absence of RSWA as measured by v-PSG;
  6. for those individuals with moderate obstructive sleep apnea (AHI > 15/hour), effective CPAP treatment should be documented and a second night of V-PSG is required to determine RSWA.
03

Conditions studied

  • REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
  • Neurodegenerative Diseases

Keywords

  • REM Sleep Without Atonia
  • Dopamine transmission
  • Neurodegeneration
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Subjects will be identified and recruited from our previous cohort.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. No family history of RBD;
  2. Age- and sex- matched with isolated RSWA subjects
  3. Absence of dream enactment behaviors;
  4. A score of RBDQ-HK less than 19;
  5. Absence of RSWA as measured by v-PSG;
  6. for those individuals with moderate obstructive sleep apnea (AHI > 15/hour), effective CPAP treatment should be documented and a second night of V-PSG is required to determine RSWA.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of dream enactment behaviors by self-report or documented by v-PSG;
  2. Presence of narcolepsy and other neurological diseases that may give rise to RBD and RWSA;
  3. Presence of neurodegenerative diseases;
  4. A total score of the MOCA ≤ 22 and the CDR ≥ 1.
  5. On medication that potentially increases EMG activity and triggers the symptoms of RBD, such as antidepressants;
  6. On medication that affects dopamine neural transmission;
  7. Not capable of giving for participation of the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
2 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • health Control

    1. No family history of RBD; 2. Age- and sex- matched with isolated RSWA subjects 3. Absence of dream enactment behaviors; 4. A score of RBDQ-HK less than 19; 5. Absence of RSWA as measured by v-PSG; 6. for those individuals with moderate obstructive sleep apnea (AHI \> 15/hour), effective CPAP treatment should be documented and a second night of V-PSG is required to determine RSWA.

  • Case with isolated RSWA

    1. First degree relatives of patients with iRBD; 2. Age 45 years or above; 3. Absence of dream enactment behaviors; 4. A total score on REM Sleep Behavior Questionnaire (RBDQ-HK) less than 19, which is the cut-off suggestive of a diagnosis of RBD; 5. Presence of RSWA as measured by v-PSG; RSWA is defined as the percentage of increased EMG activity (phasic or tonic) at least 10% during REM sleep for any channel. 6. for those individuals with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index, AHI \> 15/hour), effective CPAP treatment should be documented and a second night of V-PSG is required to determine RSWA.

  • Case without isolated RSWA

    1. First degree relatives of patients with iRBD; 2. Age- and sex- matched with isolated RSWA subjects; 3. Absence of dream enactment behaviors; 4. A score of RBDQ-HK less than 19; 5. Absence of RSWA as measured by v-PSG; 6. for those individuals with moderate obstructive sleep apnea (AHI \> 15/hour), effective CPAP treatment should be documented and a second night of V-PSG is required to determine RSWA.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dopamine neurotransmission

    PET dopamine neurotransmission with a specific interest in striatal dopamine transmission

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. REMREEA

    Correlations of severity of REMREEA with dopamine transmission, brain glucose metabolism, and neurocognitive measures.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Shatin Hospital
    Shatin, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — In this stage, we didin't decide which information of IPD will share with other researchers

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Jul 2019, 20 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 21, 2017
First posted
Nov 27, 2017
StartActual
Oct 30, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jul 1, 2019
CompletionActual
Feb 8, 2021
Last update
Feb 24, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03353207
Responsible party
Professor Wing Yun Kwok (Professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 27, 2017
Start date
Oct 30, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2019
Completion
Feb 8, 2021
Last update
Feb 24, 2021

Study contacts

Yun Kwok Wing, Professor
principal investigator · Chinese University of Hong Kong

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion