CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03352661ENDOVOCUpdated Nov 24, 2017

Influence of an Endometrioma on Oocyte Quality

An observational study in Endometriosis, sponsored by IVI Vigo. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-24.

Sponsored by IVI Vigo · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2017), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
25 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if there are differences in oocyte quality depending on whether these oocytes come from an ovary in contact with an endometrioma.

Read the detailed description

There is no consensus for whether an endometrioma influences oocyte quality, as well as the possible mechanisms that induce them.

In this study, the oocyte maturation will proof oocyte quality: This mean, the percentage of oocytes in metaphase II obtained after stimulation, as well as the rate of oocytes fertilized in direct contact with an endometrioma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometriosis

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients \<40 years, BMI \<30kg / m2,

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients \<40 years, BMI \<30kg / m2,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Endometriosis

    No drugs are administered. It is an observational study. Collect retrospectively data

    Other: Collect retrospectively data

  • No endometriosis

    No drugs are administered. It is an observational study. Collect retrospectively data

    Other: Collect retrospectively data

Interventions

  • OtherCollect retrospectively data

    Collect retrospectively data

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of mature oocytes

    Number of MII oocytes from the total of cumulus granulosa cell-oocyte complex by 100

    Time frame: Up to 36 months

  2. Fertilization rate

    Number of oocytes with pronuclear activation after ICSI procedure from the total oocytes microinjected by 100

    Time frame: Up to 36 months

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Garcia-Velasco JA, Mahutte NG, Corona J, Zuniga V, Giles J, Arici A, Pellicer A. Removal of endometriomas before in vitro fertilization does not improve fertility outcomes: a matched, case-control study. Fertil Steril. 2004 May;81(5):1194-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.04.006. PubMed 15136074 ↗
  • Garrido N, Navarro J, Remohi J, Simon C, Pellicer A. Follicular hormonal environment and embryo quality in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2000 Jan-Feb;6(1):67-74. doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.1.67. PubMed 10711831 ↗
  • Filippi F, Benaglia L, Paffoni A, Restelli L, Vercellini P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Ovarian endometriomas and oocyte quality: insights from in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014 Apr;101(4):988-93.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Mar 3. PubMed 24602751 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03352661
Lead sponsor
IVI Vigo
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 24, 2017
Start date
Jan 2017
Primary completion
Nov 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 24, 2017

Study contacts

Elkin Muñoz, Principal Investigator
principal investigator · IVI Vigo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion