An observational study in Catheters, Indwelling and Catheter-Related Infections, sponsored by Linkoeping University. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-07.
Sponsored by Linkoeping University · Observational
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Peripheral intravenous cannulas (PIVCs) are utilized in large scale in modern health care. Known complications due to a PIVC are phlebitis, thrombosis, bleeding, nerve damage and infection. PIVC-related infection causes morbidity, mortality and increased healthcare costs. PIVC-related infections can and should be prevented.
Indwell time is a known risk factor for PIVC-related infection. Another factor potentially influencing the risk of developing PIVC-related infection is what type of PIVC that is being used. Roughly there are two types of PIVCs. One with an open injection valve and another with a closed injection valve. The former being far more used in our hospital and the latter being suggested as lowering the risk of PIVC-related infection compared to the open one.
The investigators aim with this study is to evaluate the incidence of PIVC-colonization in 300 patients at our 500-bed secondary level hospital in Sweden, as a first step in trying to understand what healthcare-providers can improve regarding prevention of PIVC-related infections.
Background:
Peripheral intravenous cannulas (PIVCs) are utilized in large scale in modern health care. Known complications due to a PIVC are phlebitis, thrombosis, bleeding, nerve damage and infection. PIVC-related infection causes morbidity, mortality and increased healthcare costs. In an Australian study the investigators found the presence of a PIVC the most frequent cause (36%) of healthcare-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia during 2012. PIVC-related infections can and should be prevented.
Indwell time is a known risk factor for PIVC-related infection. Another factor potentially influencing the risk of developing PIVC-related infection is what type of PIVC that is being used. Roughly there are two types of PIVCs. One with an open injection valve and another with a closed injection valve. The former being far more used in Ryhov County Hospital, Sweden, and the latter being suggested as lowering the risk of PIVC-related infection compared to the open one.
In a systematic review from 2006 Maki et al report a point incidence of blood stream infections of 0,5 per 1000 catheter-days in PIVCs. In 2014 Hammarskjöld reported an incidence of 0,6 per 1000 catheter-days regarding central venous catheters (CVC). Maki et al concludes "..., infection control programs must strive to consistently apply essential control measures and preventive technologies with all types of intravascular devices." The investigators find there is a gap between the large scale utilization of PIVCs and the knowledge about PIVC-related infections and recommendations on how to prevent them. Hammarskjöld et al has done research on infections related to CVCs, subcutaneous venous ports and on arterial cannulas but not PIVCs.
The aim with this study is to evaluate the incidence of PIVC-colonization at Ryhov County Hospital, a 500-bed secondary level hospital in Sweden, as a first step in trying to understand what can be done to improve work regarding prevention of PIVC-related infections.
Materials and methods
Setting The hospital is a 500-bed general county hospital including most medical, oncological and surgical specialties except neurosurgery and cardiac surgery. No solid organ or stem cell transplantations are performed.
Patients Patients admitted to surgical, medical or infectious wards were regularly included by a specifically trained nurse from June 2016 until December 2017.
Inclusion criteria: Patients ≥ 18 years of age with a PIVC in situ for 48 hours or more informed verbally and in written and invited to take part in the study. Exclusion criteria: Patients \< 18 years of age.
Microbiological methods Intraluminal hub culturing from the two injection sites of the PIVC performed with sterile cotton-tipped applicators moistened with sterile sodium chloride 0,9 %. Swabs transported in Amies medium with charcoal. Identification performed by standard methods at our local microbiology laboratory (www.srga.org.accessed _ http:// www.srga.org.accessed/ _ January 1, 2007).
Statistics Descriptive. How many positive cultures and which type of microbes were found.
112 studies on the registry are indexed under Catheter-Related Infections; 18 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 337 is above the median of 175 across 22 observational studies indexed under Catheter-Related Infections.
Browse Catheter-Related Infections studies →Linkoeping University is the lead sponsor of 193 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Setting The hospital is a 500-bed general county hospital including most medical, oncological and surgical specialties except neurosurgery and cardiac surgery. No solid organ or stem cell transplantations are performed. Patients Patients admitted to surgical, medical or infectious wards were regularly included by a specifically trained nurse from June 2016 until December 2017.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: peripheral venous catheter (PVC)
No intervention is made only in situ swab from the PVC
Positive culture
Swab from peripheral venous catheter (PVC) in situ on patient having had the PVC for 48 hours or more.
Time frame: 2-7 days
Plan to share: No — No individual data, but the the data regarding positive Cultures and what type of microbia found will be official
Ran from Jun 2016 to primary completion in Dec 2017, 18 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.