An interventional study of ACT-Based Intervention and Activity Tracker WITH Feedback and Gold Standard Intervention + Activity Tracker WITHOUT Feedback in Health Behavior, sponsored by Istituto Auxologico Italiano. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-20.
Sponsored by Istituto Auxologico Italiano · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 13 studies in Health Behavior with a site in Italy — 3 open to participants now, 3 under way, none of them phase 3. Health Behavior · Italy.
Among the 13 studies in Health Behavior with a site in Italy, this one is one of 2 that started in 2020, is one of 6 with no phase, and was the 3rd registered.
968 studies on the registry are indexed under Health Behavior; 166 are open to participants now.
Browse Health Behavior studies →3 of the 13 studies in Health Behavior with a site in Italy are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo · Sites in Italy
Ages 18+ · Women only · Healthy volunteers
Istituto Auxologico Italiano · Sites in Italy
Ages 18–65
A study can be open while its sites in Italy have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Italy →
Of the 93 Health Behavior studies recruiting now, 39 (42%) set no upper age limit and 37 (40%) stop at 75 or younger; 25 take children under 18; 58 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years to 70 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
13 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2013; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2020.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 150 across 825 interventional studies indexed under Health Behavior.
Median enrollment 168 across the 6 interventional studies, 581 across the 7 observational. Of the 8 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
1 of 13 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Istituto Auxologico Italiano is the lead sponsor of 202 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.
Istituto Auxologico Italiano has 2 studies filed under Health Behavior — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
None of the studies under way reaches primary completion within a year.
Among the 13 studies in Health Behavior with a site in Italy, from their registry updates:
Nothing recorded among them since 2026-09-25.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
Obesity and overweight are growing steadily and becoming a global epidemic. Recent researches report a 64% of the adult population as overweight. The social and economical impact is increasing and the most of the rehabilitation programs, while effective in the short term, do not produce long lasting results. From a behavioral perspective an explanatory model can describe the phenomena with the lack of sources of reinforcement related to healthy habits in the daily-life context. The goal of this project, combining Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Wearable Technology, is to develop an effective intervention, efficient and sustainable, which continues after ending of the hospitalization, providing adequate contingencies of reinforcement in the natural environment, integrating systematic measurements, continuous feedbacks and individualized, values-based objectives. Related goal-setting show a shift from results linked with weight loss towards action connected with healthy life-style.
Background The condition of being overweight is an increasing problem worldwide, becoming an epidemic both in Europe and in the United States. Recent estimates that over 60% of adults are overweight and at the same time obesity affects around 35% of the population. In the US the cost of the health system to cope with obesity and related diseases now exceeds the sum of 100 billion and in Europe costs are currently similar. Health risks related to being overweight include psychological difficulties, depression and stigma, physical problems and heart diseases, cancer and respiratory diseases not to mention musculoskeletal and metabolic problems.
Obesity is a chronic health condition, but is also a major risk factor for various diseases both chronic and acute. This problem is currently steadily rising, with prevalence data and epidemiological estimates that should be of great concern. Despite strong biological components and hereditary aspects, obesity is primarily linked to incorrect habits of everyday life, mainly eating habits and physical activity. Numerous studies have documented that regular physical activity and wise choices in food uptake can prevent obesity and related conditions.
The main challenge in addressing obesity and associated disorders is represented by developing and making available and sustainable comprehensive programs that include combinations of physical activity, dietary aspects and psychological interventions.
Interventions developed in this way, including dietary education protocols, physical rehabilitation and exercises programs, nutritional, endocrinological, psychological, surgical and pharmacological treatments are mainly effective in the short term, despite many of which are characterized by high costs and several periods of hospitalization. The analysis of the literature suggests the superiority of intensive multidisciplinary interventions: health protocols, dietary programs, psychological and physical rehabilitation. One of the problems of such interventions is that they are often only possible during an hospitalization period, with high costs associated. However, despite good evidence of effectiveness, the long-term results are generally limited.
In general, availability, costs, compliance and long-term efficacy are important limitations to this variety of approaches. Frequently obese individuals regain about 30% of the weight they lost within the first year. After only 3 years they are returning to pre-treatment weight. Psychological intervention are generally assumed to be one of the core parts in the treatment aimed to obesity. In particular, Cognitive-Behavioral interventions, usually within multidisciplinary paths and rarely implemented individually, are generally considered the gold-standard for addressing the epidemic of obesity, or "globesity".
Rationale Reasons for the long-term failure of interventions for obesity can be found in the lack of long-term sources of reinforcement for healthy habits acquired during the intensive treatment period. The tradition of behavioral sciences has developed models of interpretation, explanation and pragmatic operation supported by evidence of effectiveness and efficiency in the promotion of desired behaviors in various contexts and with a longer time effect. These span from the cessation of smoking, passing trough the ability to adapt and live with chronic diseases, ending with the promotion of safety behaviors in working environments. For this reason behavior analysis in general, and in particular the Contextual Behavioral Science, can play a decisive role in the prevention of obesity and keeping the results achieved within short intensive protocols, usually held in hospitals.
By modifying deeply rooted and long-term acquired habits, the person with obesity can obtain more psychological and physical health, reduce risk factors and improve his overall health, wellness and quality of life with benefits not only for the individual but also for his social environment.
During the rehabilitation periods patients affected by obesity are frequently in contact with contingencies that are very different from those of their daily lives. In the rehabilitation facility or during the hospitalization, contingencies are efficiently shaped to promote desired behaviors and decrease actions that are identified as dysfunctional, with both aversive and reinforcing contingencies. Later on, after the treatment, in his natural environment initially behaviors are maintained, but having been promoted in a environment that provide contingencies supporting healthy behaviors, they often undergo a processes of extinction consequently with cessation of reinforce. At the same time, outside the hospital, dysfunctional behaviors such as avoiding physical activity and eating tasty food, are reinforced in a systematic and contingent way. This tendency to extinction of functional and healthy habits and reinforcement of dysfunctional habits leads, in the long term to gain the weight lost laboriously and this also leads to lower levels of well-being.
Although the existing programs already provide protocol phases to be implemented once they are home, often the patients fail to adhere to nutrition programs and planned activities. On the contrary they return frequently to previous habits, and show a high drop-out rate at follow-ups.
To overcome the limited long-term adherence after the hospitalization period, it is necessary to find a way to give significant, contingent and informative feedback also after the rehabilitation phase. In this regard the use of activity trackers represents a clear, valid and "smart" use of new technologies, linked to well established behavioral science.
Hypothesis, goals and expected results The project aims to promote a long-term change in lifestyle of as part of a multidisciplinary intervention, in close collaboration with physicians, the service of Clinical Nutrition and the osteo-articular rehabilitation.
The main goal of this study is test the efficacy of combining behavioral change technologies through contingent and meaningful feedbacks provided by wearable devices with ACT-based intervention, a well-studied psychological treatment developed in a contextual behavioral framework. The combination of thisapproach should be feasible and efficient, compared with gold standard treatment with inferior costs. Four experimental condition are provided: 1) usual care during hospitalization with programmed follow-up checks, 2) contingent feedback on daily life activities through activity trackers or wearable device stand-alone, 3) ACT based intervention stand-alone, 4). combination of the previous two, ACT-Based Intervention and Activity Tracker with Feedback.
Primary outcome, or dependent variable, of the study is physical activity as collected by wearable electronic devices. Other outcomes, as for example time of sleep, are collected by wearables, and other provided by self report through web platform. The independent variable of the study is the type of treatment (ACT intervention and feedbacks provided by activity trackers). For the purpose of the study we collect data about daily steps and workout log for each participants.
The intervention aims to help people in their everyday environment to remain more consistent with the choices made, and follow appropriate diets and physical activity. The project is directed to participants in the multidisciplinary rehabilitation program at St. Joseph Hospital - Verbania, Italian Auxological Institute, a private research institute that works also for the Italian national health system. The recruitment will take place progressively and subjects will be randomized to the four experimental conditions expected by the protocol. Data will be analyzed in different experimental single-subjects over multiple baselines designs. The subjects are also grouped according to the experimental condition to allow statistical analysis of experimental designs intergroup, consistent with the approach of a controlled and randomized trial.
Due to the novelty of using a combination of behavioral change strategies with Acceptance and Mindfulness - based therapy with wearable device to promote healthy life-style in the post-rehabilitation period, no well defined hypothesis have been established about the possible contribution of this kind of intervention in comparison with usual care, the "gold standard" multi-disciplinary treatment chronic conditions linked to obesity. With the development of mobile technology and brief clinical protocols, new interventions in the field of obesity and connected chronic pathologies have to be evaluated.
Anyway, the mACTonHEALTH study is quite innovative for different reasons. First, combination of single case designs with RCT is uncommon, particularly with medium-scale studies like this. Second, using wearable device activity trackers both as device for data collection measuring the primary outcomes and as device to provide contingent feedbacks, assumed to as one the two independent variable. Third, combining directly brief ACT intervention and behavior modification strategies with mobile-tech implementation is another element of innovation. Furthermore, although ACT is becoming well-studied in the traditional clinical context, large-scale application to both medical and natural settings has not largely occurred. Including in assessment procedure direct collectable data, indicators of both physical and psychosocial health. Also, the inclusion of objective physiological outcome measures constitutes an aspect of innovation in ACT research. Last, the study will focus on mediation mechanisms underlying treatment success and presents possible links to systematic models on psychological flexibility, a core process assessed in ACT researches.
Hypothesis To the best of the researcher's knowledge, this study will be the first randomized controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of a combination of contingent feedbacks provided with wearable devices with ACT-based interventions to improve healthy life style according to medical and behavioral prescription among obese patients. It is also one of the first example of a large implementation of multiple single case designs with a continuous data collection, made possible due the implementation of wearable-technology. Conducted in the context of clinical practice, this trial will potentially offer empirical support to alternative interventions to improve radical long-time change in life habits and consequently promote quality of life reducing mortality and morbidity rates among obese population. Furthermore, by virtue of its short duration, the program could potentially be utilized for health promotion also in non-hospitalization context and primary or secondary prevention of obesity and linked conditions.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Gold Standard Intervention + Activity Tracker WITHOUT Feedback (Medical Rehabilitation, Motivational Support and Psycho-Education) During the in-patient phase, participants will participate in the intensive four-week hospital-based and medically-managed rehabilitation program for weight reduction. All patients will be placed on a hypocaloric nutritionally balanced diet tailored to the individual after consultation with a dietitian. Furthermore, they will receive nutritional counseling provided by dietitians, have physical activity training provided by physiotherapists and motivational support with elements of psycho-education provided by physicians trained and informed by psychologists-psychotherapists.
Behavioral: Gold Standard Intervention + Activity Tracker WITHOUT Feedback
In this experimental condition, will be provided the same rehabilitation program for the 4-weeks in-patient phase. In addition, for these subjects will be implemented a Stepped Protocol using wearable devices / activity trackers to collect information about daily physical activity and providing meaningful and informative feedbacks. The additional procedure starts during the in-patients phase, delivering and explaining the use of the wearable devices. In this meeting, longer than the one previously described for the control condition, experimenters provide information, set individualized goals and explain feedbacks which will be delivered after ending in-patients phase by the electronic wearable devices.
Behavioral: Gold Standard Intervention and Activity Tracker WITH Feedback
In this experimental condition, the subjects followed the normal medical rehabilitation program described above for the first experimental condition. For the out-patient phase the ACT intervention includes monthly 30 minutes skype-telephone sessions. The ACT-based interventions includes different processes: 1) Acceptance, that involves the active awareness of difficult private experiences without attempts to control or avoid unpleasant emotions. 2) Mindfulness, refers to engaging in present moment experience and adopting an open and curious attitude. 3) Defusion: Participants will be encouraged to defuse from thoughts and feelings by turning attention toward the 'noticing-self', instead of becoming attached to thoughts and 'run' through life on 'auto-pilot'. 4) Values and Commitment: encouraging participants to live in accordance with their values, participants can engage in meaningful activities despite experiencing unwanted emotions/ sensations.
Behavioral: ACT-Based Intervention and Activity Tracker WITHOUT Feedback
ACT-Based Intervention and Activity Tracker WITH Feedback (Combining ACT and Behavioral Change) In the last experimental condition, obese individuals will follow the same rehabilitation program in the in-patients phase of the Behavioral Change condition, with the addition of the brief ACT intervention of 4 45-minutes sessions for a total amount of 3 hours one-to-one therapy sessions, exactly as in the ACT condition. In the out-patient phase of 16 weeks, each participant receive feedback from activity tracker following the same stepped protocol but message and feedbacks are informed by ACT therapist, including Value-based goal setting, prompt for including defusion from difficult thoughts, mindfulness cues and a set of ACT-consistent metaphors and messages.
Behavioral: ACT-Based Intervention and Activity Tracker WITH Feedback
Combining ACT and Behavioral Change
Medical Rehabilitation, Motivational Support and Psycho-Education
Behavioral Change Condition - Activity Tracker
ACT-Based Intervention Standalone
Physical Activity directly measured by wearable devices Daily STEPS Count
Daily Steps directly collected by wearable devices
Time frame: Baseline - after 4 weeks treatment - 6 months Follow Up - 12 months Follow Up - 18 months Follow Up -
MDS - Mediterranean Diet Score
psychometric questionnaire about diet habits
Time frame: Baseline - after 4 weeks treatment - 6 months Follow Up - 12 months Follow Up - 18 months Follow Up -
PGWBI - Psychological General Well-Being Index
psychometric questionnaire assessing well-being
Time frame: Baseline - after 4 weeks treatment - 6 months Follow Up - 12 months Follow Up - 18 months Follow Up -
Acceptance & Action Questionnaire AAQ-II
psychometric questionnaire - a measure of Psychological Flexibility
Time frame: Baseline - after 4 weeks treatment - 6 months Follow Up - 12 months Follow Up - 18 months Follow Up -
International Physical Activity Questionnaires (IPAQ-SF)
Psychometric questionnaire that assesses Physical Activity
Time frame: Baseline - after 4 weeks treatment - 6 months Follow Up - 12 months Follow Up - 18 months Follow Up -
Started Nov 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2024, 40 months after the start.
Of 568 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Health Behavior, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 33. This study's planned 40 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 586 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Istituto Auxologico Italiano →