CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03347656Updated Aug 20, 2024

Effects of Mobility Dose on Discharge Disposition in Critically Ill Stroke Patients

An observational study in Sarcopenia, Stroke, Acute and Muscle Weakness, sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Completed at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-20.

Sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
164
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary aim of the study is to assess the mobility dose in neurocritical care patients with ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage and its effects on discharge disposition and patient outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that patients' mobilization dose in the intensive care unit (ICU) predicts discharge disposition, 90 day Barthel Index and other outcomes like muscle wasting (expressed as decrease in rectus femoris cross sectional area (RF-CSA) in the paretic and non-paretic limb measured by bedside ultrasound), and ICU length of stay (LOS).

Read the detailed description

The investigators have previously developed and validated the Surgical Intensive Care Unit Optimal Mobilization Score (SOMS), an algorithm to guide and facilitate early mobilization to advance mobility of surgical intensive care unit patients (NCT01363102). In addition, the investigators have established the use of bedside ultrasound technology to quantify cross sectional area of the rectus femoris muscle, which allows an objective, user-independent quantification of muscle wasting (NCT02270502).

This is a prospective, observational study to observe the relation between mobility dose, muscle wasting and patient outcomes in critically ill stroke patients.

Patients will be enrolled within 48 hours of ICU admission. The investigators will measure the dose of activity, that is duration and intensity of mobilization in critically ill patients with ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage. By mobility "dose" the investigators are referring to all provider-directed activities (by nursing, and physical therapists) meant to enhance the patient's mobility level. The investigators take into account mobility "dose", defined as a function of both the mobility level (e.g., sitting at the edge of the bed, ambulating) as well as its duration. Of note, there is so far no published data available that describes patients' mobility "dose" in such an integrative, semi-quantitative fashion.

The investigators use the existing mobility intensity quantification tool (MQS) (NCT03196960) and test the hypotheses that mobilization dose predicts muscle wasting in critically ill stroke patients, adverse hospital discharge disposition as well as 90 day Barthel Index. The investigators will apply hierarchical testing to evaluate the association between mobilization dose and discharge disposition as well as 90-day Barthel Index.

The Mobilization Quantification Score (MQS) is a composition of the validated ICU mobility score (SOMS), a 0 to 10 value scale that measures the mobility milestones in critically ill patients, multiplied by a for each level previously defined time unit (5 or 30 minutes correspond to one unit depending on mobilization level).

In order to capture the muscle status at ICU admission, determined by the first bedside ultrasound of the rectus femoris muscle after enrollment, and the change in rectus femoris muscle diameter throughout stay, the investigators will conduct repetitive measurements of the cross sectional area of the rectus femoris muscles (RF-CSA) of both legs. This longitudinal setting will allow to investigate muscle wasting due to immobilization and other severe illness related factors in the paretic and non-paretic limb.

The investigators will conduct a scheduled phone call 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge by getting in contact with either the patient or a family member to obtain follow-up data. This conversation will include questions that allow to identify the Barthel Index at 30 days, the Barthel Index and GOS-E score at 90 days, and if the patient has been readmitted to a hospital within 30 days of hospital discharge and mortality.

Discharge disposition is defined as discharge to facilities providing long-term care assistance for daily activities, including nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities, hospice at the patient's home, hospice in a health care facility; or in-hospital mortality. The Barthel Index is a measure of functional disability originally designed to evaluate progress of rehabilitation in patients with stroke and neuromuscular disease. The GOS-E (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale) is a global scale for functional outcome that rates patient status into eight categories: Dead Vegetative State, Upper and Lower Severe Disability, Upper and Lower Moderate Disability, Upper and Lower Good Recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sarcopenia
  • Stroke, Acute
  • Muscle Weakness
  • Critical Illness

Keywords

  • Mobilization Therapy
  • Clitical Illness
  • Stroke
  • Intensive Care
  • Functional Mobility
  • Quality of Life
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

critically ill stroke patients recovering in the neurological intensive care unit

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 years and older
  • Admitted to the neurological intensive care service within the past 48 hours
  • an expected ICU length of stay of at least 48h
  • New onset ischemic stroke or non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Baseline functional independence: Barthel-Index of 70 or above 2 weeks before admission (obtained retrospectively from patient or proxy)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transfers from other institutions (hospitals, long-term rehabilitation facilities, skilled nursing facilities) with a stay >48h at the outside institution
  • absence of lower extremities
  • not committed to full support
  • exclusive or clinically predominant posterior circulation ischemic stroke
  • subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural and epidural hemorrhage
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
164 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse Hospital Discharge Disposition

    Adverse hospital discharge is defined as discharge to facilities providing long-term care assistance for daily activities, including nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities, hospice at the patient's home, hospice in a health care facility, or in-hospital mortality.

    Time frame: patient will be followed until hospital discharge; assessed at hospital discharge; expected between study day 3 and 30

  2. 90 day Barthel Index (hierarchical testing)

    The Barthel Index is a measure of functional disability originally designed to evaluate progress of rehabilitation in patients with stroke and neuromuscular disease.

    Time frame: 90 days post discharge from hospital (collected through follow up phone call)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rectus Femoris Muscle Cross Sectional Area Rectus Femoris Muscle Cross Sectional Area

    Rectus femoris cross sectional area will be measured by bedside ultrasound, raw numbers as well as change over time will be respected

    Time frame: will be measured at least twice (on day of enrollement and before discharge); if stay longer than one week, ultrasound will be performed weekly (every 7 days); expected total time period of 3 to 30 days

  2. 30 day Barthel Index

    The Barthel Index is a measure of functional disability originally designed to evaluate progress of rehabilitation in patients with stroke and neuromuscular disease.

    Time frame: 30 days post discharge from hospital (collected through follow up phone call)

  3. Neurological ICU length of stay

    number of days patient stays on the neurological ICU

    Time frame: admission until discharge from neurological ICU; an expected 3 to 20 days

  4. Neurological ICU length of stay until discharge readiness

    number of days patient stays on the neurological ICU until time point from which patient is stable for discharge from ICU

    Time frame: admission until discharge readiness from neurological ICU; an expected 3 to 20 days

  5. hospital length of stay

    number of days patients stays in hospital during index admission

    Time frame: admission until discharge from hospital: patient will be followed until discharge from hospital; an expected 3 to 30 days

  6. FIM Score at ICU discharge

    Functional independence measure score in the domains transfer and locomotion at ICU discharge

    Time frame: assessed at discharge from neurological ICU; expected between study day 3 and 20

  7. Days on sedation

    number of days patient receives sedatives

    Time frame: during hospital stay; an expected 0 to 30 days

  8. mortality

    we will distinguish between ICU mortality, hospital mortality and mortality within 30 or 90 days after discharge from hospital

    Time frame: during ICU stay, hospital stay or within the 30day or 90day follow up period (follow up data collected through phone call

  9. ICU readmission

    readmission to the ICU after discharge from ICU but within hospital stay

    Time frame: during hospital stay; expected to be assessed between study day 3 and 30

  10. 30-day hospital readmission

    readmission to a hospital within 30 days after discharge from index stay

    Time frame: 30 days after discharge from hospital, obtained through follow up phone call

  11. 90-day GOS-E (Extended Glasgow Outcomes Scale)

    The GOS-E is a global scale for functional outcome that rates patient status into eight categories: Dead Vegetative State, Upper and Lower Severe Disability, Upper and Lower Moderate Disability, Upper and Lower Good Recovery

    Time frame: obtained 90 days after discharge from hospital through follow up phone call

  12. Total costs of care

    total costs of care

    Time frame: during hospital stay

  13. Falls

    number of falls

    Time frame: during hospital stay; expected to be assessed between study day 3 and 30

  14. Delirium-free days

    defined by CAM-ICU (Confusion Assessment Method)

    Time frame: CAM-ICU will be evaluated daily during hospital stay; an expected 0 to 30 days

06

Study locations

3 sites
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Beth Israel Deconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Klinikum rechts der Isar of Technische Universität München
    Munich, Bavaria, Germany
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Schaller SJ, Anstey M, Blobner M, Edrich T, Grabitz SD, Gradwohl-Matis I, Heim M, Houle T, Kurth T, Latronico N, Lee J, Meyer MJ, Peponis T, Talmor D, Velmahos GC, Waak K, Walz JM, Zafonte R, Eikermann M; International Early SOMS-guided Mobilization Research Initiative. Early, goal-directed mobilisation in the surgical intensive care unit: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1377-1388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31637-3. PubMed 27707496 ↗
  • Mueller N, Murthy S, Tainter CR, Lee J, Riddell K, Fintelmann FJ, Grabitz SD, Timm FP, Levi B, Kurth T, Eikermann M. Can Sarcopenia Quantified by Ultrasound of the Rectus Femoris Muscle Predict Adverse Outcome of Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients as well as Frailty? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2016 Dec;264(6):1116-1124. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001546. PubMed 26655919 ↗
  • Lee JJ, Waak K, Grosse-Sundrup M, Xue F, Lee J, Chipman D, Ryan C, Bittner EA, Schmidt U, Eikermann M. Global muscle strength but not grip strength predicts mortality and length of stay in a general population in a surgical intensive care unit. Phys Ther. 2012 Dec;92(12):1546-55. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110403. Epub 2012 Sep 13. PubMed 22976446 ↗
  • Kasotakis G, Schmidt U, Perry D, Grosse-Sundrup M, Benjamin J, Ryan C, Tully S, Hirschberg R, Waak K, Velmahos G, Bittner EA, Zafonte R, Cobb JP, Eikermann M. The surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score predicts mortality and length of stay. Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1122-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182376e6d. PubMed 22067629 ↗
  • Sainsbury A, Seebass G, Bansal A, Young JB. Reliability of the Barthel Index when used with older people. Age Ageing. 2005 May;34(3):228-32. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi063. PubMed 15863408 ↗
  • Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Dec 15;113(12):941-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941. PubMed 2240918 ↗
  • Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):573-85. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573. PubMed 9726257 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03347656
Lead sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Collaborators
Massachusetts General Hospital, Technical University of Munich
Responsible party
Balachundhar Subramaniam (Professor of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 20, 2017
Start date
Oct 12, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2019
Completion
Jun 30, 2021
Last update
Aug 20, 2024

Study contacts

Balachundhar Subramaniam, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion