ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03346993Updated Nov 20, 2017

Can Latency of Action in Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block be Shortened With Warmed Bupivacaine?

A Phase 1 interventional study of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 5 MG/ML in Effect Increased, sponsored by Erzurum Palandöken State Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-20.

Sponsored by Erzurum Palandöken State Hospital · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2016, registered Nov 2017).
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Brachial plexus blocks have some advantages, but also have some disadvantages as well. As with all nerve blocks, having to wait sometime for an effective block, sometimes failure to achieve an adequate block and possible requirement for isolated nerve block, having to wait a long time for resolution of the block, and immobilization of the extremity for some time can be seen as handicaps for brachial plexus block as well. In the present study, Study was aimed to compare the effects of bupivacaine warmed to body temperature and kept at room temperature on the onset time of ultrasound guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Read the detailed description

The study design was approved by the locale ethics committee. This double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial recruited 60 patients aged between 18 and 65 years with the American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification systems I/II and III who were candidated for surgical operations on any of the forearm, wrist and hand regions. All the participants were asked to sign an informed consent form after having been provided with details of the aim and proceedings of the study.

Patients were excluded from the study if they had a neurological and neuromuscular disorders, psychiatric problems, cardiopulmonary diseases, coagulopathy, infections or allergy to local anesthetic agents.

The patients were equally and randomly distributed into a 24C° 20 ml 0,5% bupivacaine group (Group 1), and 37C° 20 ml 0,5% bupivacaine group (Group 2) via closed envelope technique. All the participants were premedicated with 0.05 mg/kg of intravenous midazolam and monitored routinely before attempting nerve block.

Bupivacaine stored for at least 2 hours in a bain-marie (Memmert Waterbath WNB7, Germany) at 38˚C (regular temperature calibration was made) for Group 2.

The block process was accomplished by an anesthesiologist, who was blind to the temperature of bupivacaine and local anesthetic agent was administered by different anesthesiologist.

At the end of the ICBP block, an anesthetist blinded to the technique evaluated sensory and motor block in every minutes between 5th and 30th minutes as follows. The innervated areas (each dermatome) was evaluated using a pinprick test. The motor block was evaluated by bromage modified scale in every minutes between 10th and 30th minutes. Anxious patients were administered additional midazolam. Subjects refusing awake surgery were administered a propofol infusion with supplemental oxygen as necessary.

02

Conditions studied

  • Effect Increased

Keywords

  • Bupivacaine
  • Brachial Plexus Block
  • Ultrasound
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Erzurum Palandöken State Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients aged between 18 and 65 years
  2. (ASA) physical status classification systems I/II and III
  3. Candidate for surgical operations on any of the forearm, wrist and hand regions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Neurological and neuromuscular disorders,
  2. Psychiatric problems
  3. Cardiopulmonary diseases
  4. Coagulopathy
  5. Infections
  6. Sllergy to local anesthetic agents.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    24C° 0,5% bupivacaine group

    24C° 0,5% bupivacaine group will be performed USG guided infraclavicular block with 24C° 20 ml 0,5% bupivacaine

    Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 5 MG/ML

  • Experimental
    37C° 0,5% bupivacaine group

    37C° 0,5% bupivacaine group will be performed USG guided infraclavicular block with 37C° 20 ml 0,5% bupivacaine

    Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 5 MG/ML

Interventions

  • DrugBupivacaine Hydrochloride 5 MG/ML

    Drug page: Bupivacaine

    Ultrasound guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block with warmed bupivacaine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate sensory block's onset time

    Pain was evaluated by pinprick test (yes-there is a pain/ no-there is no pain)

    Time frame: 30 minutes after Brachial Plexus Block

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate motor block's onset times

    Motion on distal arm was evaluated by bromage scale (0- full flexion of distal arm, 3-unable to move distal arm)

    Time frame: 30 minutes after Brachial Plexus Block

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Palandöken State Hospital
    Erzurum, 25080, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03346993
Lead sponsor
Erzurum Palandöken State Hospital
Responsible party
Erkan Cem ÇELİK (Consult of Anesthesiologhy, Erzurum Palandöken State Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 20, 2017
Start date
Jul 1, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2016
Completion
Jan 1, 2017
Last update
Nov 20, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bupivacaine

Start the discussion