ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03345407Updated Jul 14, 2021Results posted

Dose Finding Study of Nemiralisib (GSK2269557) in Subjects With an Acute Moderate or Severe Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Placebo ELLIPTA and Nemiralisib ELLIPTA 50 µg in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Terminated at 162 sites in 16 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-14.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Unfavourable benefit:risk

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
943
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 276 studies in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive by GlaxoSmithKline — 7 open to participants now, 8 under way, 5 of them phase 3. Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive · GlaxoSmithKline.

Enrollment
24th of 236
943 · median 101
Started
2017
with 17 others
Phase 2
46 of 276
1 open now
Registered
241st of 276
by date

Among the 276 studies in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive by GlaxoSmithKline, this one is the 24th largest by enrollment of the 236 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 18 that started in 2017, is one of 46 in phase 2, and was the 241st registered.

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

5,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 857 are open to participants now.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 276 studies in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive by GlaxoSmithKline are open now, in 12 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

2 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 7 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 557 Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies recruiting now, 306 (55%) set no upper age limit and 82 (15%) stop at 75 or younger; 29 take children under 18; 89 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 40 Years to 80 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 276 studies in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive by GlaxoSmithKline, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Nemiralisib is being developed as an anti-inflammatory drug for the treatment of inflammatory airways disease. This study is designed to assess the dose response, efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of nemiralisib across a range of doses [up to 750 micrograms (µg)] compared with placebo. The study consists of a Screening Period, a 12-Week Treatment Period and a 12-Week Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period. Approximately 1,250 subjects with an acute moderate or severe exacerbation of COPD requiring standard of care (SoC) therapy will be randomized in this double-blind study. Subjects will be randomized to receive different doses of nemiralisib or placebo via ELLIPTA® inhaler. The total duration of study participation is approximately 6 months (170 days). ELLIPTA is the registered trademark of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) group of companies.

03

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Keywords

  • Nemiralisib
  • Dose-Finding
  • GSK2269557
  • Acute Moderate or Severe Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 40 to 80 years of age, inclusive, at Screening (Visit 1).
  • An established clinical history of in accordance with the definition by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society [ global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD), 2017] as follows: "Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a common, preventable and treatable disease that is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation that is due to airway and/or alveolar abnormalities usually caused by significant exposure to noxious particles or gases."
  • Current or former cigarette smoker with a history of cigarette smoking of >=10 pack-years. Former smokers are defined as those who have stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to Screening (Visit 1). Number of pack years = (number of cigarettes per day / 20) x number of years smoked).
  • Acute exacerbation of COPD requiring an escalation in therapy to include oral/systemic (s) (prednisone 40 mg/day or equivalent) for 5 days and antibiotic(s) for 7 days; the dose and/or duration of prednisone (40 mg/day or equivalent) and/or the antibiotic can be modified according to the Investigator's/medically qualified designee's judgment or according to local country/institution practice. Acute exacerbation to be confirmed by an experienced physician and to represent a recent worsening of at least two major and one minor symptoms, one major and two minor symptoms, or all 3 major symptoms. Major symptoms include subjective increase in dyspnea, increase in sputum volume or change in sputum color. Minor symptoms include increased cough, increased wheeze, sore throat, colds or fever (oral temperature >37.5 degree Celsius) without other cause.
  • Body weight >=45 kilogram (kg) and (BMI) within the range 16 - 35 kg per meter square (kg/m\^2) (inclusive)
  • Male and female subjects are eligible to participate in the study. A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Not a woman of (WOCBP) or a WOCBP who agrees to follow the guidance during the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period and for at least 5 half-lives (10 days) after the last of double-blind study treatment.
  • Capable of giving signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current diagnosis of asthma, according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA, 2017). Subjects with a prior history of asthma are eligible if they have a current diagnosis of .
  • Potential of hydrogen (pH) \< 7.30 or the need for invasive mechanical ventilation.
  • Moderate/severe exacerbation of COPD for which SoC was started >48 hours since diagnosis.
  • A chest X-ray [or computed tomography (CT) scan] that reveals evidence of abnormalities not believed to be due to the presence of COPD. A chest X-ray (or CT scan) must be taken at Screening (Visit 1). For sites in Germany: if a chest X-ray (or CT scan) within 1 year of Screening (Visit 1) is not available, approval to conduct a diagnostic chest X-ray (CT scan) will need to be obtained from the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS).
  • Clinically significant pneumonia, identified by chest X-ray (CT scan) at Screening.
  • A diagnosis of alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency as the underlying cause of COPD, active tuberculosis, lung cancer, clinically overt bronchiectasis (Note: focal bronchiectasis is not exclusionary), sarcoidosis, pulmonary fibrosis (Note: focal fibrotic pulmonary lesions are not exclusionary), primary pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung diseases,or any other respiratory condition that might, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the safety of the subject or affect the interpretation of the results.
  • A history or current evidence of clinically significant and unstable disease such as cardiovascular (e.g., subjects requiring implanted cardioverter defibrillator [ICD], pacemaker requiring a rate set >60 beats per minute (bpm), uncontrolled hypertension, New Your Heart Association Class IV [, 1994], known \<30 percent) neurological, psychiatric, renal, hepatic, immunological, endocrine (including uncontrolled diabetes or thyroid disease), peptic ulcer disease, or hematological abnormalities. Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through participation, or which would affect the efficacy or safety analysis if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study. (Note: subjects with adequately treated and well controlled concurrent medical conditions (e.g. hypertension or noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [NIDDM]) are permitted to be entered into the study).
  • Having undergone lung volume reduction surgery or lung resection for any other reason e.g. lung carcinoma
  • Liver diseases including >2x (ULN); Total >1.5xULN (Isolated bilirubin >1.5xULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin \<35 percent); current or chronic history of liver disease or known hepatic or biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones); Presence of surface antigen (HBsAg) at Screening or within 3 months prior to first dose of study treatment; Positive antibody test result at Screening or within 3 months prior to first dose of study treatment.
  • Positive hepatitis C ribonucleic acid (RNA) test result at Screening or within 3 months prior to first dose of study treatment.
  • Carcinoma that has not been in complete remission for at least 5 years. Carcinoma in situ of the cervix, squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma of the skin are not excluded if the subject has been considered cured within 5 years since diagnosis.
  • History of allergy or to any of the study medications [e.g. beta-agonists, Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Delta (PI3Kd) inhibitors] or components of the inhalation powder (e.g., lactose). In addition, subjects with a history of severe milk protein allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates the subject's participation are excluded.
  • Strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 () including antiretrovirals including protease inhibitors; Oral antifungal treatments such as ketoconazole and itraconazole. It is recommended that posaconazole is used as the oral antifungal treatment of choice. Short courses of up to 14 days are allowed for fluconazole and voriconazole, but chronic administrations are not permitted; Antibiotics such as telithromycin and troleandomycin (macrolide). It is recommended that azithromycin is used as the macrolide antibiotic of choice. Short courses up to 14 days are allowed for mibefradil (calcium channel blocker), erythromycin and clarithromycin (including intravenous clarithromycin) but chronic administrations are not permitted; Anti-epileptic treatments; and anti-tuberculosis therapy. These medications must all have been stopped at least 14 days prior to first dose of study treatment. Use of sensitive narrow therapeutic index CYP3A4 substrates including alfentanil, cyclosporine, dihydroergotamine, ergotamine, fentanyl, pimozide, quinidine, sirolimus and tacrolimus; Intravenous theophylline will be allowed but only under strict therapeutic drug monitoring for signs of theophylline toxicity as a result of co-administration with nemiralisib; Subjects may be recruited into the study already under treatment with theophylline or started on theophylline following the start of treatment and before the end of 14 days post last dose.
  • Chronic treatment with long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) or nocturnal oxygen therapy required for >15 hours a day. Oxygen prn use (\<=15 hours per day) is not exclusionary. Oxygen use during an exacerbation is permitted.
  • Chronic treatment with anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (anti-TNF), anti-Interleukin-1 (anti-IL1), or any other therapy within 60 days prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment.
  • Clinically significant sleep apnea that requires the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for > 48 hours.
  • Any other treatment within the following time periods prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment in the current study: 30 days, 5 half-lives or twice the duration of the biological effect of the investigational product, whichever is longer. Note: subjects who participated in a previously completed study and/or were withdrawn from an ongoing study that included/includes nemiralisib are excluded from participating in this study.
  • Exposure to more than 4 investigational medicinal products within 12 months prior to the first dose of double-blind study treatment in the current study.
  • A clinical abnormality or laboratory parameter(s) which is/are not specifically listed in the exclusion criteria, outside of the reference range for the population being studied may be included if the Investigator [in consultation with the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Medical Monitor if required] documents that the finding is unlikely to introduce additional risk factors and will not interfere with the study procedures.
  • Abnormal, clinically significant finding (e.g. myocardial Infarction or demonstrating a clinically significant arrhythmia requiring treatment) at Screening (Visit 1) or upon repeat prior to randomization.
  • corrected for heart rate according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF) >480 milliseconds (msec) for subjects with or without Bundle Branch Block, based on single QTcF value.
  • A positive test for (HIV) antibody at Screening.
  • Known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse within the last 2 years.
  • History of regular alcohol consumption defined as an average weekly intake of >28 units for males or >21 units for females within 6 months of Screening (Visit 1). One unit is equivalent to 8 grams of alcohol: a half-pint [approximately 240 milliliter (mL)] of beer, 1 glass (125 mL) of wine or 1 (25 mL) measure of spirits.
  • Subjects at risk of non-compliance, or unable to comply with the study procedures. Any infirmity, disability, or geographic location that would limit compliance for scheduled visits.
  • Subjects with a history of psychiatric disease, intellectual deficiency, poor motivation or other conditions that will limit the validity of to participate in the study.
  • Study investigators, sub-investigators, study coordinators, employees of a participating investigator or immediate family members of the aforementioned are excluded from participating in this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(21)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
943 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo once daily

    Eligible subjects will receive placebo ELLIPTA dry powder (blended with lactose) for oral inhalation once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules will also be provided to all subjects for use as rescue medication as needed.

    Drug: Placebo ELLIPTA · Drug: Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules · Drug: Standard of care therapy

  • Experimental
    Nemiralisib 50 µg once daily

    Eligible subjects will receive nemiralisib ELLIPTA 50 µg dry powder (blended with lactose and magnesium stearate) for oral inhalation once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules will also be provided to all subjects for use as rescue medication as needed.

    Drug: Nemiralisib ELLIPTA 50 µg · Drug: Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules · Drug: Standard of care therapy

  • Experimental
    Nemiralisib 100 µg once daily

    Eligible subjects will receive nemiralisib ELLIPTA 100 µg dry powder (blended with lactose and magnesium stearate) for oral inhalation once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules will also be provided to all subjects for use as rescue medication as needed.

    Drug: Nemiralisib ELLIPTA 100 µg · Drug: Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules · Drug: Standard of care therapy

  • Experimental
    Nemiralisib 250 µg once daily

    Eligible subjects will receive nemiralisib ELLIPTA 250 µg dry powder (blended with lactose and magnesium stearate) for oral inhalation once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules will also be provided to all subjects for use as rescue medication as needed.

    Drug: Nemiralisib ELLIPTA 250 µg · Drug: Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules · Drug: Standard of care therapy

  • Experimental
    Nemiralisib 500 µg once daily

    Eligible subjects will receive nemiralisib ELLIPTA 500 µg dry powder (blended with lactose and magnesium stearate) for oral inhalation once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules will also be provided to all subjects for use as rescue medication as needed.

    Drug: Nemiralisib ELLIPTA 500 µg · Drug: Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules · Drug: Standard of care therapy

  • Experimental
    Nemiralisib 750 µg once daily

    Eligible subjects will receive nemiralisib ELLIPTA 750 µg dry powder (blended with lactose and magnesium stearate) for oral inhalation once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules will also be provided to all subjects for use as rescue medication as needed.

    Drug: Nemiralisib ELLIPTA 750 µg · Drug: Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules · Drug: Standard of care therapy

Interventions

  • DrugPlacebo ELLIPTA

    Placebo will be administered via oral inhalation route once daily in the morning.

  • DrugNemiralisib ELLIPTA 50 µg

    Nemiralisib is a potent and highly selective inhaled PI3Kd inhibitor being developed as an anti-inflammatory for the treatment of inflammatory airways disease. Nemiralisib 50 µg will be administered as a dry powder inhaler via oral inhalation route. In addition, subjects will receive SOC therapy for the index acute moderate or severe exacerbation of COPD.

  • DrugNemiralisib ELLIPTA 100 µg

    Nemiralisib is a potent and highly selective inhaled PI3Kd inhibitor being developed as an anti-inflammatory for the treatment of inflammatory airways disease. Nemiralisib 100 µg will be administered as a dry powder inhaler via oral inhalation route. In addition, subjects will receive SOC therapy for the index acute moderate or severe exacerbation of COPD.

  • DrugNemiralisib ELLIPTA 250 µg

    Nemiralisib is a potent and highly selective inhaled PI3Kd inhibitor being developed as an anti-inflammatory for the treatment of inflammatory airways disease. Nemiralisib 250 µg will be administered as a dry powder inhaler via oral inhalation route. In addition, subjects will receive SOC therapy for the index acute moderate or severe exacerbation of COPD.

  • DrugNemiralisib ELLIPTA 500 µg

    Nemiralisib is a potent and highly selective inhaled PI3Kd inhibitor being developed as an anti-inflammatory for the treatment of inflammatory airways disease. Nemiralisib 500 µg will be administered as a dry powder inhaler via oral inhalation route. In addition, subjects will receive SOC therapy for the index acute moderate or severe exacerbation of COPD.

  • DrugNemiralisib ELLIPTA 750 µg

    Nemiralisib is a potent and highly selective inhaled PI3Kd inhibitor being developed as an anti-inflammatory for the treatment of inflammatory airways disease. Nemiralisib 750 µg will be administered as a dry powder inhaler via oral inhalation route. In addition, subjects will receive SOC therapy for the index acute moderate or severe exacerbation of COPD.

  • Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules will be provided to all subjects as a rescue medication.

  • DrugStandard of care therapy

    SoC therapy for the index exacerbation is defined as treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroid (prednisone 40 mg/day or equivalent) for 5 days and antibiotic for 7 days. Subjects will receive SoC as prescribed by the Investigator or medically qualified designee. The dose and/or duration of prednisone and/or the antibiotic can be modified according to the Investigator's/medically qualified designee's judgment or according to local country/institution practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Day 84 Measured Post Bronchodilator

    FEV1 is maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10-30 minutes after participant was administered 4 inhalations of albuterol (salbutamol) via MDI using spacer/valved-holding chamber or via one nebulized treatment. Post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and post-bronchodilator. Change from Baseline in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Day 84 measured post-bronchodilator is FEV1 measured prior to dosing and post-bronchodilator on Day 84 minus post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1. Bayesian repeated measure model adjusted for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender was used. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% highest posterior density (HPD) credible interval (CrI) was presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 84

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Moderate and Severe Exacerbations Over 12-week Treatment Period

    Moderate COPD exacerbations are defined as worsening symptoms of COPD treated with short-acting bronchodilators (SABDs) plus antibiotics and/or oral/systemic corticosteroids. Severe COPD exacerbations are defined as worsening symptoms of COPD that require hospitalization or visit to the emergency room. Severe exacerbation may also be associated with acute respiratory failure. Rate of exacerbations was analyzed using Bayesian Poisson model adjusting for length of on-treatment follow-up, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Posterior median exacerbation rate and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

  2. Number of Participants With Time to Next Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Following Index Exacerbation

    Number of participants with time to next (on-treatment) moderate/severe exacerbation following index exacerbation during the 12-Week Treatment Period was defined as time from the date of randomization until the date of onset of the first moderate/severe exacerbation whilst on study treatment. Participants who did not have an exacerbation whilst on study treatment were censored at the date of their last dose of study treatment. Time to next exacerbation was analyzed using a Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender.

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

  3. Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator

    Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from the lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10-30 minutes after participant was administered with 4 inhalations of albuterol via MDI using a spacer/valved-holding chamber or via 1 nebulized treatment. Pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator, respectively. Change from Baseline in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 measured pre-bronchodilator is defined as FEV1 measured prior to dosing and pre-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 minus pre-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1.

    Time frame: Baseline and Days 14, 28, 56 (pre and post bronchodilaor), 84 (pre-bronchodilator) and at hospital discharge (maximum 24 Weeks)

  4. Change From Hospital Discharge in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator

    Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from the lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10 to 30 minutes after participant was administered with 4 inhalations of albuterol via MDI using a spacer/valved-holding chamber or via 1 nebulized treatment. Pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is defined as latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator, respectively. Change from hospital discharge in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 measured pre- and post-bronchodilator is defined as FEV1 measured prior to dosing and pre- and post-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 minus pre and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1.

    Time frame: Baseline and pre- and post-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) Definition of Recovery From the Index Exacerbation

    EXACT patient-reported outcome (EXACT-PRO), 14-item instrument to capture occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations using an electronic diary (eDiary). Total score ranges from 0-100, higher score indicates more severe condition. Participants were required to complete EXACT-PRO every evening; however, on the day of randomization it was to be completed in the morning. Response was decrease in rolling average EXACT Total Score \>=9 points from maximum observed value, sustained for \>=7 days, with first of 7 days defined as recovery day. Analysis was performed using Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender.

    Time frame: Days 14, 28, 56 and 84

  6. Number of Participants With Time to Recovery From Index Exacerbation Using EXACT- PRO Tool

    Time to EXACT-defined recovery from index exacerbation is defined as time from the date of randomization until date of the first EXACT-defined recovery day during the 12-Week Treatment Period. EXACT-defined recovery from the index exacerbation is defined as a decrease in the Rolling Average EXACT total Score \>=9 points from the Maximum Observed Value, sustained for \>=7 days, with the first of the 7 days defined as the recovery day. Analysis was performed using a Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Number of participants reporting events is presented.

    Time frame: From randomization to Week 12

  7. Mean Severity of Subsequent Health Care Resource Use (HCRU) Exacerbations Defined by EXACT

    Severity of subsequent HCRU-defined exacerbations defined by EXACT was defined as the highest EXACT Total Score (not using the 3-day Rolling Average) during the period from date of onset of the subsequent HCRU-exacerbation until date of EXACT-defined recovery of subsequent exacerbation. EXACT-PRO, 14-item instrument to capture occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations using an eDiary. Total score ranges from 0-100, higher score indicates more severe condition. For participants with more than one subsequent exacerbation, severity was calculated for each subsequent exacerbation.

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

  8. Percentage of Responders Using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) on Treatment Days 28, 56, and 84, and Following EXACT Defined Recovery From the Index Exacerbation

    The CAT is a short, self-completed, 8-item questionnaire, each item was rated on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment). The total CAT score is calculated by summing the scores of all items and ranges from 0 to 40, higher scores indicating severe condition. The percentage of responders using the CAT is defined as number of participants with a decrease from Baseline in CAT Total Score \>=2 on or before Days 28, 56 and 84 divided by total number of participants in the MITT population. Percentage of responders using CAT was derived only for participants with a Baseline CAT Total Score \>=2. Analysis was performed using a separate Bayesian logistic regression for each time point adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender.

    Time frame: Days 28, 56 and 84

  9. Change From Baseline in CAT Total Score

    The CAT is a short, self-completed, 8-item questionnaire, each item was rated on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment). The total CAT score was calculated by summing the scores of all items and ranges from 0 to 40, higher scores indicating more severe condition. Baseline (Day 1) is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in CAT Total Score is defined as CAT Total Score on Days 28, 56 and 84 minus Baseline CAT Total Score. Analysis was performed using Bayesian repeated measures model adjusting for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and at Days 28, 56 and 84

  10. Percentage of Responders on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score as Measured by the SGRQ for COPD Participants (SGRQ-C) at Days 28, 56, and 84

    SGRQ-C is a 40-item questionnaire designed specifically to focus on COPD participants and was scored equivalent to the SGRQ Total Score, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect worse health-related quality of life. The percentage of responders on the SGRQ Total Score was derived for participants with a Baseline SGRQ Total Score \>=4. Percentage of responders on the SGRQ Total Score is defined as number of participants with a decrease from Baseline in SGRQ Total Score \>=4 on or before Days 28, 56 and 84 divided by total number of participants in the MITT population. Analysis was performed using a separate Bayesian logistic regression for each time point adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender.

    Time frame: Days 28, 56 and 84

  11. Change From Baseline in SGRQ Total Score at Days 28, 56 and 84

    SGRQ-C is a 40-item questionnaire designed specifically to focus on COPD participants and was scored equivalent to SGRQ Total Score, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect worse health-related quality of life. Scores on a scale were calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from positive items in questionnaire divided by sum of weights of all items in questionnaire. Baseline (Day 1) is defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in SGRQ Total Score is defined as SGRQ Total Score on Days 28, 56 and 84 minus Baseline SGRQ Total Score. Analysis was performed using Bayesian repeated measures model adjusting for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% HPD CrI was presented

    Time frame: Baseline and Days 28, 56 and 84

  12. Mean Number of Occasions of Rescue Medication Use Per Day

    Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules was used as a rescue medication. Rescue medication use was recorded as the number of occasions of rescue medication use each day. The mean number of occasions of rescue medication use per day is defined as sum of the number of occasions of rescue medication use each day within the time-period divided by the total number of days with non-missing values within the time-period. Over the 12-Week treatment period is defined as Day 1 to Day of last dose.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of treatment and over the Week 12 treatment period

  13. Percentage of Rescue-free Days

    Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules was used as a rescue medication. Percentage of Rescue-Free Days is defined as sum of the number of days where the number of occasions of rescue medication use is zero within the time-period divided by total number of days with non-missing values within the time-period multiplied by 100 where the time-period is defined as follows: Week 1: Day 1-7; Week 2: Day 8 - 14; Week 3: Day 15-21; Week 4: Day 22-28; Week 5: Day 29-35; Week 6: Day 36-42; Week 7: Day 43-49; Week 8: Day 50-56; Week 9: Day 57-63; Week 10: Day 64-70; Week 11: Day 71-77; Week 12: Day 78 to Day of last dose; Over the 12-Week: Day 1 to Day of last dose.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of treatment and over the Week 12 treatment period

  14. Plasma Concentration of Nemiralisib

    Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed for concentrations of Nemiralisb. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population consists of all participants in the Safety population who had at least 1 non-missing PK assessment (Non-quantifiable \[NQ\] values will be considered as non-missing values). Participants were summarized according to the treatment that they actually received.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

  15. Number of Participants Reporting Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs), SAEs and AE of Special Interest (AESI)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability, is a congenital anomaly/ birth effect and other important medical events. Safety Population consists of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Participants were summarized according to treatment that they actually received.

    Time frame: Up to Week 24

  16. Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Pulse Rate

    The DBP, SBP and pulse rate were measured with participants seated at least 5 minutes before the assessments. Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value.

    Time frame: Up to Week 16

  17. Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

    A single 12-lead ECG with a 15-second rhythm strip was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. Abnormal ECG findings are presented.

    Time frame: Screening, Days 14, 84, 112 and at early withdrawal

  18. Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Clinical Chemistry Values

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Crt), glucose (Glu), potassium (Pot), sodium (Sod), calcium (Cal), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total and direct bilirubin, total protein and albumin (Alb). Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value.

    Time frame: Upto Week 16

  19. Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Hematology Values

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters including: platelets (Pla), red blood cells count, Hemoglobin (Hb), Hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), percentage reticulocytes, neutrophils (Neu), lymphocytes (Lym), monocytes, eosinophils, leukocytes (Leu) and basophils. Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value.

    Time frame: Upto Week 16

  20. Number of Participants Reporting COPD Exacerbations

    Participants reporting acute COPD exacerbations during the study period has been presented.

    Time frame: Up to Week 16

Other outcomes

  1. Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of Nemiralisib

    Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

  2. AUC From Time Zero to Time 't' [AUC(0-t)] of Nemiralisib

    Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

  3. Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Nemiralisib

    Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

  4. Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Nemiralisib

    Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

  5. Plasma Drug Concentration at Pre-dose (Ctrough) of Nemiralisib

    Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28

07

Results

Posted Feb 10, 2020

Participant flow

This was a Phase IIb, multicenter, randomized, stratified, double-blind (sponsor open), placebo controlled parallel-group study in participants who presented with an acute moderate or severe exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring Standard of Care (SoC).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Started2762291929089278
Completed2441979817573233
Not completed3231211151645
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject111563616
Withdrew: Physician decision3100123
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2010123
Withdrew: Protocol-defined stopping criteria9000211
Withdrew: Protocol violation2000103
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1111103
Withdrew: Adverse event40546516

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Day 84 Measured Post Bronchodilator

FEV1 is maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10-30 minutes after participant was administered 4 inhalations of albuterol (salbutamol) via MDI using spacer/valved-holding chamber or via one nebulized treatment. Post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and post-bronchodilator. Change from Baseline in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Day 84 measured post-bronchodilator is FEV1 measured prior to dosing and post-bronchodilator on Day 84 minus post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1. Bayesian repeated measure model adjusted for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender was used. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% highest posterior density (HPD) credible interval (CrI) was presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 84
Reported as:
Median · Liters
Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Day 84 Measured Post Bronchodilator
LitersPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Day 84 Measured Post Bronchodilator0.052 (0.018 to 0.091)0.031 (-0.090 to 0.149)0.026 (-0.036 to 0.084)0.014 (-0.044 to 0.073)0.058 (-0.002 to 0.118)0.049 (-0.017 to 0.113)0.049 (0.012 to 0.086)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.022 · 95% CI -0.143 to 0.103Treatment comparison (posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg and placebo for Day 84 change from Baseline FEV1 measured post-bronchodilator has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.027 · 95% CI -0.098 to 0.036Treatment comparison (posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 50 mcg and placebo for Day 84 change from Baseline FEV1 measured post-bronchodilator has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.038 · 95% CI -0.102 to 0.028Treatment comparison (posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 100 mcg and placebo for Day 84 change from Baseline FEV1 measured post-bronchodilator has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 0.005 · 95% CI -0.064 to 0.071Treatment comparison (posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 250 mcg and placebo for Day 84 change from Baseline FEV1 measured post-bronchodilator has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.003 · 95% CI -0.075 to 0.061Treatment comparison (posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 500 mcg and placebo for Day 84 change from Baseline FEV1 measured post-bronchodilator has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.004 · 95% CI -0.051 to 0.042Treatment comparison (posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 750 mcg and placebo for Day 84 change from Baseline FEV1 measured post-bronchodilator has been presented.
SecondaryRate of Moderate and Severe Exacerbations Over 12-week Treatment Period

Moderate COPD exacerbations are defined as worsening symptoms of COPD treated with short-acting bronchodilators (SABDs) plus antibiotics and/or oral/systemic corticosteroids. Severe COPD exacerbations are defined as worsening symptoms of COPD that require hospitalization or visit to the emergency room. Severe exacerbation may also be associated with acute respiratory failure. Rate of exacerbations was analyzed using Bayesian Poisson model adjusting for length of on-treatment follow-up, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Posterior median exacerbation rate and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.

Time frame:
Up to Week 12
Reported as:
Median · No.of exacerbation per 84 Days
Rate of Moderate and Severe Exacerbations Over 12-week Treatment Period
No.of exacerbation per 84 DaysPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Rate of Moderate and Severe Exacerbations Over 12-week Treatment Period0.31 (0.25 to 0.39)NA (NA to NA)0.29 (0.20 to 0.39)0.28 (0.20 to 0.38)0.32 (0.23 to 0.43)0.20 (0.13 to 0.29)0.36 (0.29 to 0.43)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median exacerbation rate ratio: 0.92 · 95% CI 0.60 to 1.40Treatment comparison (posterior median exacerbation rate ratio and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 50 mcg and placebo for moderate/severe exacerbations has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median exacerbation rate ratio: 0.89 · 95% CI 0.57 to 1.35Treatment comparison (posterior median exacerbation rate ratio and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 100 mcg and placebo for moderate/severe exacerbations has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median exacerbation rate ratio: 1.01 · 95% CI 0.65 to 1.50Treatment comparison (posterior median exacerbation rate ratio and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 250 mcg and placebo for moderate/severe exacerbations has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median exacerbation rate ratio: 0.63 · 95% CI 0.37 to 1.02Treatment comparison (posterior median exacerbation rate ratio and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 500 mcg and placebo for moderate/severe exacerbations has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median exacerbation rate ratio: 1.13 · 95% CI 0.85 to 1.52Treatment comparison (posterior median exacerbation rate ratio and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 750 mcg and placebo for moderate/severe exacerbations has been presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Time to Next Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Following Index Exacerbation

Number of participants with time to next (on-treatment) moderate/severe exacerbation following index exacerbation during the 12-Week Treatment Period was defined as time from the date of randomization until the date of onset of the first moderate/severe exacerbation whilst on study treatment. Participants who did not have an exacerbation whilst on study treatment were censored at the date of their last dose of study treatment. Time to next exacerbation was analyzed using a Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender.

Time frame:
Up to Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Time to Next Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Following Index Exacerbation
ParticipantsPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Number of Participants With Time to Next Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Following Index Exacerbation7232425261580
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 0.455 · 95% CI 0.054 to 1.103Treatment comparison (Hazard Ratio and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg and placebo for time to next moderate/severe exacerbations has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 0.991 · 95% CI 0.580 to 1.500Treatment comparison (Hazard Ratio and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 50 mcg and placebo for time to next moderate/severe exacerbations has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 0.975 · 95% CI 0.581 to 1.467Treatment comparison (Hazard Ratio and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 100 mcg and placebo for time to next moderate/severe exacerbations has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 1.132 · 95% CI 0.682 to 1.709Treatment comparison (Hazard Ratio and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 250 mcg and placebo for time to next moderate/severe exacerbations has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 0.556 · 95% CI 0.268 to 0.902Treatment comparison (Hazard Ratio and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 500 mcg and placebo for time to next moderate/severe exacerbations has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 1.149 · 95% CI 0.800 to 1.539Treatment comparison (Hazard Ratio and 95% HPD CrI) of Nemiralisib 750 mcg and placebo for time to next moderate/severe exacerbations has been presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from the lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10-30 minutes after participant was administered with 4 inhalations of albuterol via MDI using a spacer/valved-holding chamber or via 1 nebulized treatment. Pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator, respectively. Change from Baseline in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 measured pre-bronchodilator is defined as FEV1 measured prior to dosing and pre-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 minus pre-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1.

Time frame:
Baseline and Days 14, 28, 56 (pre and post bronchodilaor), 84 (pre-bronchodilator) and at hospital discharge (maximum 24 Weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · Liters
Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator
LitersPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Day 14, Pre, n=240, 20, 85, 83, 76, 76, 2380.008 ± 0.27290.100 ± 0.2511-0.021 ± 0.2657-0.013 ± 0.25090.053 ± 0.29580.041 ± 0.27380.023 ± 0.2561
Day 14, Post, n=248, 20, 86, 83, 77, 78, 2410.034 ± 0.27070.075 ± 0.24250.010 ± 0.2168-0.050 ± 0.24770.054 ± 0.29830.073 ± 0.26550.044 ± 0.2216
Day 28, Pre, n=239, 20, 82, 79, 75, 71, 2320.017 ± 0.25850.081 ± 0.2661-0.034 ± 0.2875-0.010 ± 0.23330.064 ± 0.25920.016 ± 0.27130.020 ± 0.2512
Day 28, Post, n=245, 19, 83, 81, 76, 72, 2320.036 ± 0.26470.059 ± 0.25750.004 ± 0.2183-0.034 ± 0.24010.049 ± 0.26390.027 ± 0.23690.029 ± 0.2307
Day 56, Pre, n=230, 20, 78, 76, 73, 67, 2240.005 ± 0.2295-0.006 ± 0.2636-0.024 ± 0.32100.011 ± 0.24150.022 ± 0.2522-0.004 ± 0.2233-0.001 ± 0.2858
Day 56, Post, n=237, 19, 78, 77, 74, 69, 2240.020 ± 0.2614-0.002 ± 0.2252-0.012 ± 0.25240.004 ± 0.23730.026 ± 0.2556-0.011 ± 0.22600.011 ± 0.2470
Day 84, Pre, n=210, 17, 71, 73, 66, 58, 2120.000 ± 0.25660.003 ± 0.2232-0.049 ± 0.25490.005 ± 0.26680.015 ± 0.27390.007 ± 0.24610.010 ± 0.2829
Hospital discharge, Pre, n=23, 2, 8, 8, 7, 3, 220.071 ± 0.15860.168 ± 0.26520.108 ± 0.38880.056 ± 0.17820.052 ± 0.34810.162 ± 0.14260.075 ± 0.1974
Hospital discharge, Post, n=8, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 60.134 ± 0.15140.153 ± 0.09330.083 ± NA-0.076 ± NA0.094 ± NA—-0.006 ± 0.1079
SecondaryChange From Hospital Discharge in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as maximal amount of air exhaled forcefully from the lungs in 1 second. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 was conducted approximately 10 to 30 minutes after participant was administered with 4 inhalations of albuterol via MDI using a spacer/valved-holding chamber or via 1 nebulized treatment. Pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1 is defined as latest FEV1 measured prior to first dose of study treatment and pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator, respectively. Change from hospital discharge in clinic visit trough FEV1 at Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 measured pre- and post-bronchodilator is defined as FEV1 measured prior to dosing and pre- and post-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84 minus pre and post-bronchodilator Baseline FEV1.

Time frame:
Baseline and pre- and post-bronchodilator on Days 14, 28, 56 and 84
Reported as:
Mean · Liters
Change From Hospital Discharge in Clinic Visit Trough FEV1 Measured Pre and Post-bronchodilator
LitersPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Day 14, Pre, n=20, 2, 8, 8, 6, 4, 200.082 ± 0.27830.355 ± 0.42070.069 ± 0.3012-0.049 ± 0.1882-0.069 ± 0.49050.173 ± 0.51370.002 ± 0.2343
Day 14, Post, n=5, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 50.056 ± 0.33720.431 ± 0.51900.119 ± NA0.310 ± NA-0.305 ± NA—-0.021 ± 0.1326
Day 28, Pre, n=37, 2, 14, 8, 10, 9, 370.026 ± 0.26910.261 ± 0.52040.012 ± 0.2910-0.085 ± 0.20720.012 ± 0.40200.030 ± 0.4029-0.046 ± 0.2639
Day 28, Post, n=22, 2, 8, 1, 4, 4, 220.034 ± 0.27790.334 ± 0.56140.130 ± 0.23270.130 ± NA0.009 ± 0.20060.007 ± 0.3237-0.094 ± 0.2293
Day 56, Pre, n=37, 2, 14, 8, 9, 10, 360.019 ± 0.22820.106 ± 0.61380.019 ± 0.35090.014 ± 0.1938-0.074 ± 0.3847-0.042 ± 0.1840-0.054 ± 0.2942
Day 56, Post, n=22, 2, 7, 1, 4, 5, 21-0.014 ± 0.28960.139 ± 0.68380.042 ± 0.30680.098 ± NA-0.056 ± 0.3572-0.072 ± 0.1490-0.135 ± 0.2410
Day 84, Pre, n=37, 2, 12, 8, 7, 10, 350.007 ± 0.2741-0.027 ± 0.45540.121 ± 0.2770-0.081 ± 0.1738-0.072 ± 0.43910.043 ± 0.2511-0.062 ± 0.2816
Day 84, Post, n=22, 2, 6, 1, 4, 5, 22-0.039 ± 0.26100.133 ± 0.51620.037 ± 0.33410.108 ± NA0.021 ± 0.31510.006 ± 0.2180-0.106 ± 0.2956
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) Definition of Recovery From the Index Exacerbation

EXACT patient-reported outcome (EXACT-PRO), 14-item instrument to capture occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations using an electronic diary (eDiary). Total score ranges from 0-100, higher score indicates more severe condition. Participants were required to complete EXACT-PRO every evening; however, on the day of randomization it was to be completed in the morning. Response was decrease in rolling average EXACT Total Score \>=9 points from maximum observed value, sustained for \>=7 days, with first of 7 days defined as recovery day. Analysis was performed using Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender.

Time frame:
Days 14, 28, 56 and 84
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) Definition of Recovery From the Index Exacerbation
Percentage of participantsPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Day 1429273729282432
Day 2840415243422742
Day 5649455952503150
Day 8451505954503754
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.01 · 95% CI 0.21 to 2.30Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 14 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.37 · 95% CI 0.76 to 2.17Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 14 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.99 · 95% CI 0.54 to 1.61Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 14 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.94 · 95% CI 0.50 to 1.49Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 14 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.75 · 95% CI 0.38 to 1.25Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 14 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.16 · 95% CI 0.77 to 1.63Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 14 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.21 · 95% CI 0.36 to 2.69Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.53 · 95% CI 0.82 to 2.33Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.16 · 95% CI 0.67 to 1.79Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.12 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.74Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.55 · 95% CI 0.28 to 0.88Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.08 · 95% CI 0.72 to 1.49Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.00 · 95% CI 0.30 to 2.17Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.46 · 95% CI 0.84 to 2.27Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.15 · 95% CI 0.65 to 1.78Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.09 · 95% CI 0.62 to 1.67Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.49 · 95% CI 0.26 to 0.77Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.04 · 95% CI 0.71 to 1.42Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.08 · 95% CI 0.32 to 2.38Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.29 · 95% CI 0.70 to 2.00Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.12 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.71Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.95 · 95% CI 0.55 to 1.48Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.56 · 95% CI 0.31 to 0.87Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.08 · 95% CI 0.73 to 1.47Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Time to Recovery From Index Exacerbation Using EXACT- PRO Tool

Time to EXACT-defined recovery from index exacerbation is defined as time from the date of randomization until date of the first EXACT-defined recovery day during the 12-Week Treatment Period. EXACT-defined recovery from the index exacerbation is defined as a decrease in the Rolling Average EXACT total Score \>=9 points from the Maximum Observed Value, sustained for \>=7 days, with the first of the 7 days defined as the recovery day. Analysis was performed using a Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Number of participants reporting events is presented.

Time frame:
From randomization to Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Time to Recovery From Index Exacerbation Using EXACT- PRO Tool
ParticipantsPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Number of Participants With Time to Recovery From Index Exacerbation Using EXACT- PRO Tool1411154504534149
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 1.053 · 95% CI 0.477 to 1.765Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg was performed and posterior median hazard ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 1.200 · 95% CI 0.840 to 1.597Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 50 mcg was performed and posterior median hazard ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 1.060 · 95% CI 0.734 to 1.432Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 100 mcg was performed and posterior median hazard ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 1.030 · 95% CI 0.719 to 1.413Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 250 mcg was performed and posterior median hazard ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 0.751 · 95% CI 0.487 to 1.057Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 500 mcg was performed and posterior median hazard ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median hazard ratio: 1.149 · 95% CI 0.899 to 1.426Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 750 mcg was performed and posterior median hazard ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
SecondaryMean Severity of Subsequent Health Care Resource Use (HCRU) Exacerbations Defined by EXACT

Severity of subsequent HCRU-defined exacerbations defined by EXACT was defined as the highest EXACT Total Score (not using the 3-day Rolling Average) during the period from date of onset of the subsequent HCRU-exacerbation until date of EXACT-defined recovery of subsequent exacerbation. EXACT-PRO, 14-item instrument to capture occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations using an eDiary. Total score ranges from 0-100, higher score indicates more severe condition. For participants with more than one subsequent exacerbation, severity was calculated for each subsequent exacerbation.

Time frame:
Up to Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Mean Severity of Subsequent Health Care Resource Use (HCRU) Exacerbations Defined by EXACT
Scores on a scalePlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Moderate/Severe, n=66, 3, 23, 25, 26, 15, 7853.3 ± 12.1664.6 ± 25.2059.8 ± 12.8250.5 ± 10.7647.5 ± 13.9557.6 ± 10.3051.9 ± 10.78
Moderate, n=55, 3, 15, 23, 17, 10, 6353.1 ± 11.5460.0 ± 26.5657.4 ± 11.0850.0 ± 11.1546.3 ± 14.2053.8 ± 9.2850.0 ± 10.17
Severe, n=13, 1, 9, 3, 10, 6, 2054.0 ± 15.5383.0 ± NA64.0 ± 15.0155.3 ± 5.6949.5 ± 13.9564.1 ± 8.9958.8 ± 10.34
SecondaryPercentage of Responders Using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) on Treatment Days 28, 56, and 84, and Following EXACT Defined Recovery From the Index Exacerbation

The CAT is a short, self-completed, 8-item questionnaire, each item was rated on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment). The total CAT score is calculated by summing the scores of all items and ranges from 0 to 40, higher scores indicating severe condition. The percentage of responders using the CAT is defined as number of participants with a decrease from Baseline in CAT Total Score \>=2 on or before Days 28, 56 and 84 divided by total number of participants in the MITT population. Percentage of responders using CAT was derived only for participants with a Baseline CAT Total Score \>=2. Analysis was performed using a separate Bayesian logistic regression for each time point adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender.

Time frame:
Days 28, 56 and 84
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of responders
Percentage of Responders Using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) on Treatment Days 28, 56, and 84, and Following EXACT Defined Recovery From the Index Exacerbation
Percentage of respondersPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Day 2832363439383425
Day 5663507361695561
Day 8470557865726066
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.22 · 95% CI 0.35 to 2.70Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.11 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.77Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.41 · 95% CI 0.77 to 2.17Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.28 · 95% CI 0.71 to 2.00Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.11 · 95% CI 0.61 to 1.75Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.70 · 95% CI 0.46 to 0.99Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.64 · 95% CI 0.20 to 1.41Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.53 · 95% CI 0.84 to 2.46Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.95 · 95% CI 0.53 to 1.48Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.36 · 95% CI 0.74 to 2.16Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.76 · 95% CI 0.43 to 1.17Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.93 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.27Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.54 · 95% CI 0.16 to 1.20Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.53 · 95% CI 0.79 to 2.56Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.83 · 95% CI 0.46 to 1.30Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.16 · 95% CI 0.62 to 1.86Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.65 · 95% CI 0.36 to 1.02Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.85 · 95% CI 0.57 to 1.17Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in CAT Total Score

The CAT is a short, self-completed, 8-item questionnaire, each item was rated on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment). The total CAT score was calculated by summing the scores of all items and ranges from 0 to 40, higher scores indicating more severe condition. Baseline (Day 1) is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in CAT Total Score is defined as CAT Total Score on Days 28, 56 and 84 minus Baseline CAT Total Score. Analysis was performed using Bayesian repeated measures model adjusting for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and at Days 28, 56 and 84
Reported as:
Median · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in CAT Total Score
Scores on a scalePlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Day 28, n=234, 19, 86, 80, 77, 74, 229-4.7 (-5.6 to -3.8)-2.3 (-5.1 to 0.5)-4.0 (-5.4 to -2.7)-3.9 (-5.4 to -2.4)-5.1 (-6.5 to -3.7)-3.1 (-4.5 to -1.6)-4.7 (-5.6 to -3.8)
Day 56, n=231, 20, 78, 77, 76, 69, 222-4.2 (-5.2 to -3.3)-1.9 (-4.7 to 1.0)-3.4 (-5.0 to -1.9)-4.5 (-6.0 to -2.9)-4.8 (-6.4 to -3.4)-3.8 (-5.5 to -2.3)-4.4 (-5.4 to -3.5)
Day 84, n=218, 17, 75, 75, 69, 62, 213-4.6 (-5.6 to -3.6)-2.7 (-6.0 to 0.3)-3.5 (-5.0 to -1.9)-5.1 (-6.7 to -3.5)-4.7 (-6.3 to -3.1)-3.8 (-5.4 to -2.1)-4.2 (-5.2 to -3.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 2.4 · 95% CI -0.5 to 5.2Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 0.7 · 95% CI -0.8 to 2.3Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 0.8 · 95% CI -0.8 to 2.4Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -2.0 to 1.2Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior adjacent median difference: 1.6 · 95% CI 0.0 to 3.3Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -1.1 to 1.1Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 2.3 · 95% CI -0.5 to 5.4Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 0.8 · 95% CI -0.9 to 2.4Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -1.9 to 1.4Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -2.3 to 1.0Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 0.4 · 95% CI -1.2 to 2.2Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -1.4 to 1.0Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 1.9 · 95% CI -1.4 to 5.1Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 1.1 · 95% CI -0.7 to 2.8Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -2.3 to 1.1Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjsted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -1.9 to 1.7Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 0.8 · 95% CI -0.9 to 2.8Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 0.4 · 95% CI -0.8 to 1.7Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score as Measured by the SGRQ for COPD Participants (SGRQ-C) at Days 28, 56, and 84

SGRQ-C is a 40-item questionnaire designed specifically to focus on COPD participants and was scored equivalent to the SGRQ Total Score, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect worse health-related quality of life. The percentage of responders on the SGRQ Total Score was derived for participants with a Baseline SGRQ Total Score \>=4. Percentage of responders on the SGRQ Total Score is defined as number of participants with a decrease from Baseline in SGRQ Total Score \>=4 on or before Days 28, 56 and 84 divided by total number of participants in the MITT population. Analysis was performed using a separate Bayesian logistic regression for each time point adjusting for treatment group, smoking status at baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months and gender.

Time frame:
Days 28, 56 and 84
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of responders
Percentage of Responders on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score as Measured by the SGRQ for COPD Participants (SGRQ-C) at Days 28, 56, and 84
Percentage of respondersPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Day 2821141926322421
Day 5650365655604953
Day 8461506663685762
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.51 · 95% CI 0.03 to 1.41Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.87 · 95% CI 0.42 to 1.47Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.37 · 95% CI 0.69 to 2.24Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.78 · 95% CI 0.95 to 2.91Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.24 · 95% CI 0.61 to 2.08Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.95 · 95% CI 0.60 to 1.40Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.54 · 95% CI 0.14 to 1.16Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.27 · 95% CI 0.74 to 1.98Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.29 · 95% CI 0.73 to 1.97Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.47 · 95% CI 0.83 to 2.27Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.04 · 95% CI 0.57 to 1.62Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.10 · 95% CI 0.75 to 1.50Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.63 · 95% CI 0.17 to 1.39Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.27 · 95% CI 0.72 to 2.01Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.13 · 95% CI 0.64 to 1.79Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.35 · 95% CI 0.75 to 2.14Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 0.94 · 95% CI 0.53 to 1.45Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior median odds ratio: 1.03 · 95% CI 0.71 to 1.43Treatment comparison between placebo and nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior median odds ratio and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SGRQ Total Score at Days 28, 56 and 84

SGRQ-C is a 40-item questionnaire designed specifically to focus on COPD participants and was scored equivalent to SGRQ Total Score, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect worse health-related quality of life. Scores on a scale were calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from positive items in questionnaire divided by sum of weights of all items in questionnaire. Baseline (Day 1) is defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in SGRQ Total Score is defined as SGRQ Total Score on Days 28, 56 and 84 minus Baseline SGRQ Total Score. Analysis was performed using Bayesian repeated measures model adjusting for Baseline by visit interaction, treatment by visit interaction, smoking status at Baseline, region, severity of index exacerbation, number of moderate/severe exacerbations in previous 12 months and gender. Posterior adjusted median change from Baseline and 95% HPD CrI was presented

Time frame:
Baseline and Days 28, 56 and 84
Reported as:
Median · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in SGRQ Total Score at Days 28, 56 and 84
Scores on a scalePlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Day 28, n=232, 19, 86, 78, 77, 72, 225-7.7 (-9.8 to -5.7)-5.7 (-12.2 to 0.5)-8.2 (-11.4 to -5.1)-10.6 (-13.8 to -7.1)-10.9 (-14.2 to -7.6)-7.8 (-11.2 to -4.3)-7.9 (-9.9 to -5.9)
Day 56, n=227, 20, 78, 77, 74, 68, 219-8.0 (-10.2 to -6.0)-3.9 (-10.4 to 2.8)-9.3 (-12.5 to -5.9)-10.7 (-14.1 to -7.3)-11.3 (-14.6 to -7.6)-8.9 (-12.6 to -5.5)-8.4 (-10.6 to -6.3)
Day 84, n=218, 17, 74, 74, 69, 60, 209-9.1 (-11.3 to -6.8)-6.6 (-13.6 to 0.3)-9.3 (-12.8 to -6.0)-11.3 (-14.8 to -7.7)-10.9 (-14.4 to -7.2)-9.4 (-13.1 to -5.5)-7.9 (-10.1 to -5.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 2.0 · 95% CI -4.8 to 8.3Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -4.0 to 3.1Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -2.9 · 95% CI -6.2 to 1.1Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -3.2 · 95% CI -6.7 to 0.4Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -4.0 to 3.5Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -2.7 to 2.3Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 28 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 4.1 · 95% CI -2.5 to 11.0Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -1.2 · 95% CI -4.8 to 2.5Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -2.7 · 95% CI -6.3 to 1.1Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -3.3 · 95% CI -7.3 to 0.4Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.8 · 95% CI -4.6 to 3.0Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -2.9 to 2.5Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 56 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 2.4 · 95% CI -4.8 to 9.4Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 50 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -4.1 to 3.6Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 50 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 100 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -2.3 · 95% CI -6.1 to 1.8Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 100 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 250 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -1.8 · 95% CI -5.7 to 2.3Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 250 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 500 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -4.5 to 3.8Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 500 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
  • Placebo vs Nemiralisib 750 mcg · Posterior adjusted median difference: 1.2 · 95% CI -1.7 to 4.0Treatment comparison between placebo and Nemiralisib 750 mcg at Day 84 was performed and posterior adjusted median difference and 95% HPD CrI has been presented.
SecondaryMean Number of Occasions of Rescue Medication Use Per Day

Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules was used as a rescue medication. Rescue medication use was recorded as the number of occasions of rescue medication use each day. The mean number of occasions of rescue medication use per day is defined as sum of the number of occasions of rescue medication use each day within the time-period divided by the total number of days with non-missing values within the time-period. Over the 12-Week treatment period is defined as Day 1 to Day of last dose.

Time frame:
Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of treatment and over the Week 12 treatment period
Reported as:
Mean · No. of occasions of rescue use per day
Mean Number of Occasions of Rescue Medication Use Per Day
No. of occasions of rescue use per dayPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Week 1, n=254, 21, 87, 88, 80, 79, 2541.699 ± 1.76742.112 ± 2.29771.633 ± 1.43201.926 ± 2.15691.670 ± 1.57281.917 ± 1.92981.747 ± 1.7332
Week 2, n=259, 21, 88, 89, 80, 82, 2521.650 ± 1.87112.231 ± 2.71691.469 ± 1.40361.712 ± 2.03101.497 ± 1.57001.611 ± 1.77171.587 ± 1.6531
Week 3, n=256, 21, 90, 88, 80, 81, 2451.729 ± 1.81572.021 ± 2.29261.495 ± 1.39431.693 ± 1.96791.488 ± 1.66111.742 ± 1.83801.655 ± 1.7430
Week 4, n=250, 21, 89, 87, 81, 77, 2431.684 ± 1.77062.190 ± 2.36571.514 ± 1.50221.720 ± 2.00831.489 ± 1.67342.009 ± 2.05061.707 ± 1.7512
Week 5, n=251, 20, 88, 85, 78, 76, 2401.735 ± 1.86622.329 ± 2.63941.533 ± 1.57061.750 ± 2.03801.535 ± 1.83841.949 ± 1.96851.737 ± 1.8030
Week 6, n=250, 20, 86, 84, 78, 72, 2341.741 ± 1.95432.378 ± 2.69041.382 ± 1.40001.792 ± 2.08221.636 ± 1.80421.936 ± 2.07291.780 ± 1.8083
Week 7, n=250, 20, 85, 83, 77, 71, 2311.703 ± 1.99142.479 ± 2.69761.531 ± 1.63741.697 ± 2.07691.628 ± 1.87411.899 ± 2.16941.826 ± 1.8778
Week 8, n=250, 20, 84, 83, 77, 71, 2311.656 ± 1.86062.736 ± 3.15791.553 ± 1.58841.616 ± 1.94441.572 ± 1.82942.006 ± 2.22421.824 ± 1.8397
Week 9, n=244, 20, 82, 81, 76, 71, 2291.708 ± 1.87092.765 ± 3.11041.608 ± 1.76991.658 ± 2.06461.720 ± 1.89181.953 ± 2.18381.775 ± 1.8753
Week 10, n=241, 20, 81, 80, 73, 71, 2271.698 ± 1.90232.543 ± 2.87531.589 ± 1.65711.596 ± 1.98091.546 ± 1.88241.927 ± 2.16131.705 ± 1.7646
Week 11, n=241, 20, 79, 80, 73, 71, 2261.729 ± 1.94062.164 ± 2.25041.404 ± 1.48971.602 ± 1.94351.672 ± 1.94471.926 ± 2.32431.716 ± 1.7421
Week 12, n=240, 20, 78, 80, 73, 70, 2251.666 ± 1.79132.386 ± 2.81571.414 ± 1.39201.671 ± 1.96121.712 ± 1.95321.790 ± 2.11401.731 ± 1.7245
Over 12 Week, n=273, 21, 91, 91, 86, 83, 2681.684 ± 1.69032.330 ± 2.47151.553 ± 1.40441.750 ± 1.90481.620 ± 1.59941.921 ± 1.92011.733 ± 1.6618
SecondaryPercentage of Rescue-free Days

Albuterol (Salbutamol) MDI or nebules was used as a rescue medication. Percentage of Rescue-Free Days is defined as sum of the number of days where the number of occasions of rescue medication use is zero within the time-period divided by total number of days with non-missing values within the time-period multiplied by 100 where the time-period is defined as follows: Week 1: Day 1-7; Week 2: Day 8 - 14; Week 3: Day 15-21; Week 4: Day 22-28; Week 5: Day 29-35; Week 6: Day 36-42; Week 7: Day 43-49; Week 8: Day 50-56; Week 9: Day 57-63; Week 10: Day 64-70; Week 11: Day 71-77; Week 12: Day 78 to Day of last dose; Over the 12-Week: Day 1 to Day of last dose.

Time frame:
Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of treatment and over the Week 12 treatment period
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of rescue free days
Percentage of Rescue-free Days
Percentage of rescue free daysPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Week 1, n=254, 21, 87, 88, 80, 79, 25434.898 ± 37.711836.076 ± 44.318229.849 ± 38.338533.392 ± 39.737232.583 ± 38.357734.453 ± 35.980229.779 ± 36.1498
Week 2, n=259, 21, 88, 89, 80, 82, 25241.002 ± 40.956640.819 ± 46.789932.145 ± 41.222743.017 ± 43.988438.573 ± 40.362940.595 ± 41.171733.639 ± 38.9767
Week 3, n=256, 21, 90, 88, 80, 81, 24538.204 ± 39.062138.776 ± 44.061231.643 ± 38.094339.964 ± 40.393641.191 ± 42.175134.923 ± 40.402633.006 ± 38.4986
Week 4, n=250, 21, 89, 87, 81, 77, 24339.678 ± 40.835935.376 ± 43.940532.531 ± 39.007842.202 ± 43.069243.194 ± 41.020130.986 ± 38.594132.394 ± 39.0174
Week 5, n=251, 20, 88, 85, 78, 76, 24038.262 ± 40.780735.005 ± 41.834435.552 ± 40.574541.682 ± 41.364841.026 ± 42.158433.912 ± 37.997333.168 ± 39.0654
Week 6, n=250, 20, 86, 84, 78, 72, 23440.287 ± 42.216737.870 ± 40.212535.384 ± 40.917541.720 ± 44.011739.196 ± 41.657535.519 ± 42.212232.351 ± 39.2542
Week 7, n=250, 20, 85, 83, 77, 71, 23141.373 ± 43.426632.145 ± 43.199235.634 ± 41.331945.266 ± 43.591040.409 ± 42.056038.232 ± 41.029631.975 ± 39.4910
Week 8, n=250, 20, 84, 83, 77, 71, 23142.058 ± 41.216834.290 ± 42.830033.029 ± 41.086744.118 ± 41.668242.918 ± 42.835434.811 ± 39.358532.357 ± 39.9221
Week 9, n=244, 20, 82, 81, 76, 71, 22939.268 ± 40.530032.145 ± 44.665732.759 ± 39.297242.505 ± 41.212139.476 ± 42.237636.823 ± 42.351333.606 ± 39.4690
Week 10, n=241, 20, 81, 80, 73, 71, 22740.608 ± 41.049235.000 ± 42.343032.456 ± 40.719243.396 ± 42.304041.492 ± 42.198437.024 ± 41.229133.483 ± 40.1924
Week 11, n=241, 20, 79, 80, 73, 71, 22639.701 ± 41.968938.575 ± 44.236635.624 ± 42.662542.859 ± 41.784539.337 ± 42.306139.841 ± 43.723733.127 ± 39.1842
Week 12, n=240, 20, 78, 80, 73, 70, 22541.390 ± 40.887139.415 ± 45.044237.369 ± 40.261341.300 ± 39.819939.981 ± 40.829642.236 ± 42.156733.906 ± 38.4851
Over 12 Week, n=273, 21, 91, 91, 86, 83, 26839.743 ± 36.895735.533 ± 39.069433.590 ± 36.645640.441 ± 37.628539.631 ± 36.515735.820 ± 34.637732.743 ± 33.9362
SecondaryPlasma Concentration of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed for concentrations of Nemiralisb. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population consists of all participants in the Safety population who had at least 1 non-missing PK assessment (Non-quantifiable \[NQ\] values will be considered as non-missing values). Participants were summarized according to the treatment that they actually received.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Picograms per milliliter
Plasma Concentration of Nemiralisib
Picograms per milliliterNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Day 14, Pre-dose, n=2, 19, 24, 16, 18, 69113.6 ± 662.0 ± 46142.8 ± 44416.0 ± 59687.3 ± 531069.6 ± 70
Day 14, 0-1 hour, n=4, 19, 24, 15, 18, 6754.9 ± 43109.9 ± 51253.7 ± 73767.6 ± 711492.0 ± 591972.0 ± 110
Day 14, >1-6 hours, n=4, 20, 23, 15, 18, 6535.0 ± 5793.1 ± 58231.8 ± 53657.0 ± 611146.7 ± 561622.7 ± 90
Day 28, Pre-dose, n=2, 18, 23, 16, 16, 6723.6 ± 2460.5 ± 45129.4 ± 46315.6 ± 85528.3 ± 110937.6 ± 101
Day 28, 0-1 hour, n=3, 19, 23, 16, 15, 6336.2 ± 26104.9 ± 70253.3 ± 52807.0 ± 661552.2 ± 831717.6 ± 114
Day 28, >1-6 hours, n=3, 18, 23, 16, 14, 6428.1 ± 1585.4 ± 40211.4 ± 41598.8 ± 391079.5 ± 801388.1 ± 101
Other pre-specifiedArea Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Hours*picograms per milliliter
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of Nemiralisib
Hours*picograms per milliliterNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of NemiralisibNA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NA
Other pre-specifiedAUC From Time Zero to Time 't' [AUC(0-t)] of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Hours*picograms per milliliter
AUC From Time Zero to Time 't' [AUC(0-t)] of Nemiralisib
Hours*picograms per milliliterNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
AUC From Time Zero to Time 't' [AUC(0-t)] of NemiralisibNA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NA
Other pre-specifiedMaximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Picograms per milliliter
Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Nemiralisib
Picograms per milliliterNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) of NemiralisibNA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NA
Other pre-specifiedTime to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Nemiralisib
HoursNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of NemiralisibNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Other pre-specifiedPlasma Drug Concentration at Pre-dose (Ctrough) of Nemiralisib

Plasma samples were collected at indicated time points and analyzed.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0-1 hour, >1-6 hours post-dose on Days 14 and 28
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Picograms per milliliter
Plasma Drug Concentration at Pre-dose (Ctrough) of Nemiralisib
Picograms per milliliterNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Plasma Drug Concentration at Pre-dose (Ctrough) of NemiralisibNA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NANA ± NA
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs), SAEs and AE of Special Interest (AESI)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability, is a congenital anomaly/ birth effect and other important medical events. Safety Population consists of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Participants were summarized according to treatment that they actually received.

Time frame:
Up to Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs), SAEs and AE of Special Interest (AESI)
ParticipantsPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Any non-SAE31114192536101
Any SAE23291316626
Any AESI901010212993
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Pulse Rate

The DBP, SBP and pulse rate were measured with participants seated at least 5 minutes before the assessments. Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value.

Time frame:
Up to Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Pulse Rate
ParticipantsPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
DBP, To low8330447
DBP, To within range/no change2601785917982256
DBP, To high3131523
Pulse rate, To low1000000
Pulse rate,To within range/no change2652184908283258
Pulse rate, To high5072658
SBP, To low11153238
SBP, To withinn range/no change2501883827980239
SBP, To high102378619
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

A single 12-lead ECG with a 15-second rhythm strip was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. Abnormal ECG findings are presented.

Time frame:
Screening, Days 14, 84, 112 and at early withdrawal
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
ParticipantsPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Screening93102537282186
Day 148882433291874
Day 847982227241864
Day 11277112828252075
Early withdrawal3021314
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Clinical Chemistry Values

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Crt), glucose (Glu), potassium (Pot), sodium (Sod), calcium (Cal), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total and direct bilirubin, total protein and albumin (Alb). Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value.

Time frame:
Upto Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Clinical Chemistry Values
ParticipantsPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Alb,To low, n=266, 21, 91, 90, 87, 85, 2632000112
Alb,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,2632642190908584261
Alb,To high,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,2630010100
Cal,To low, n=266, 21, 90, 90, 87, 85, 2631000011
Cal,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,90,90,87,85,2632652190908784262
Cal,To high, n=266,21,90,90,87,85,2630000000
Crt,To low, n=266, 21, 91, 90, 87, 85, 2632731074932
Crt,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,2632371881828076231
Crt,To high, n=266,21,91,90,87,85,2632001300
Glu,To low, n=266, 21, 91, 90, 87, 85, 2630001000
Glu,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,2632662191898785263
Glu,To high, n=266,21,91,90,87,85,2630000000
Pot,To low, n=266, 21, 90, 90, 87, 85, 2630000000
Pot,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,90,90,87,85,2632642190908684262
Pot,To high, n=266,21,90,90,87,85,2632000111
Sod,To low, n=266, 21, 91, 90, 87, 85, 2630000000
Sod,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,2632662191908785263
Sod,To high, n=266,21,91,90,87,85,2630000000
BUN,To low, n=266, 21, 91, 90, 87, 85, 2637032236
BUN,w/in range/no change,n=266,21,91,90,87,85,2632562188868582253
BUN,To high, n=266,21,91,90,87,85,2633002004
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Hematology Values

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters including: platelets (Pla), red blood cells count, Hemoglobin (Hb), Hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), percentage reticulocytes, neutrophils (Neu), lymphocytes (Lym), monocytes, eosinophils, leukocytes (Leu) and basophils. Participants are counted in the worst case category if their value changes to (low, within range or no change, or high). Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants are counted twice if the participant has values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed to have within range value.

Time frame:
Upto Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Worst Case Post Baseline Hematology Values
ParticipantsPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Hb,To low, n=260, 20, 90, 90, 84, 81, 2540000000
Hb,w/in range/no change,n=260,20,90,90,84,81,2542602090908481253
Hb,To high,n=260, 20, 90, 90, 84, 81, 2540000001
Leu,To low,n=259, 20, 90, 90, 83, 78, 2510000000
Leu,w/in range/no change,n=259,20,90,90,83,78,2512111681746362201
Leu,To high, n=259,20,90,90,83,78,251484916201650
Lym,To low, n=256, 20, 85, 88, 82, 77, 24981677211
Lym,w/in range/no change,n=256,20,85,88,82,77,2492391979767073226
Lym,To high,n=256,20,85,88,82,77,24990055212
Neu, To low, n=256,20,85,88,82,77,2493011002
Neu,w/in range/no change,n=256,20,85,88,82,77,2492151773766860213
Neu,To high, n=256,20,85,88,82,77,2493831111141734
Pla,To low, n=253, 19, 88, 90, 84, 78, 2450000000
Pla,w/in range/no change,n=253,19,88,90,84,78,2452531988908478245
Pla,To high, n=253,19,88,90,84,78,2450000000
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting COPD Exacerbations

Participants reporting acute COPD exacerbations during the study period has been presented.

Time frame:
Up to Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting COPD Exacerbations
ParticipantsPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Number of Participants Reporting COPD Exacerbations81644317

Adverse events

Collected over Non-serious AEs and SAEs were collected up to Week 24. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo1/276 (0.4%)23/276 (8.3%)31/276 (11.2%)
Nemiralisib 12.5 mcg0/22 (0%)2/22 (9.1%)1/22 (4.5%)
Nemiralisib 50 mcg3/91 (3.3%)9/91 (9.9%)14/91 (15.4%)
Nemiralisib 100 mcg1/92 (1.1%)13/92 (14.1%)19/92 (20.7%)
Nemiralisib 250 mcg0/90 (0%)16/90 (17.8%)25/90 (27.8%)
Nemiralisib 500 mcg0/89 (0%)6/89 (6.7%)36/89 (40.4%)
Nemiralisib 750 mcg1/278 (0.4%)26/278 (9.4%)101/278 (36.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 61
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
Chroni obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders8/2761/226/914/924/903/8917/278
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/2761/220/910/920/900/890/278
Renal impairmentRenal and urinary disorders0/2761/220/910/920/900/890/278
PneumoniaInfections and infestations4/2760/221/912/923/900/891/278
Angina unstableCardiac disorders0/2760/220/911/922/900/890/278
Myocardial ischaemiaCardiac disorders0/2760/220/910/921/901/890/278
Ventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders0/2760/220/910/920/901/890/278
HaematocheziaGastrointestinal disorders0/2760/220/910/920/901/890/278
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations0/2760/220/910/920/901/890/278
Blood bilirubin increasedInvestigations0/2760/220/910/920/901/890/278
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcg
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders13/2760/2210/9111/9223/9031/8996/278
HeadacheNervous system disorders23/2761/226/918/924/902/8915/278
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/2760/220/912/923/905/892/278

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)PlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcgTotal
Mean65.4 ± 7.9467.8 ± 7.2063.1 ± 7.6165.1 ± 7.4366.0 ± 6.9464.9 ± 8.0464.8 ± 7.6165.0 ± 7.68
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcgTotal
Female86635293122100309
Male1901656635967178629
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)PlaceboNemiralisib 12.5 mcgNemiralisib 50 mcgNemiralisib 100 mcgNemiralisib 250 mcgNemiralisib 500 mcgNemiralisib 750 mcgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native202122615
Asian-East Asian Heritage18472971966
Asian-South East Asian Heritage10010114
Black or African American212102614
White-Arabic/North African Heritage10110104
White-White Caucasian/European Heritage2521779867976246835
08

Study locations

162 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Daytona Beach, Florida 32117, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Saint Petersburg, Florida 33704, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Adairsville, Georgia 30103, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Woodstock, Georgia 30189, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Columbia, Maryland 21044, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Saint Charles, Missouri 63301, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68134, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Gastonia, North Carolina 28054, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45231, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dayton, Ohio 45459, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Erie, Pennsylvania 16508, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Charleston, South Carolina 29406-7108, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Spartanburg, South Carolina 29303, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rapid City, South Dakota 57702, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Abingdon, Virginia 24210, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Richmond, Virginia 23225, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Richmond, Virginia 23229, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1414AIF, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Florida, Buenos Aires 1602, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires 7600, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Rafael, Mendoza 5600, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rosario, Santa Fe 2000, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Santo Tome, Santa Fe 3016, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Buenos Aires, C1280AEB, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Buenos Aires, C1424BSF, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, C1425BEN, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C1426ABP, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mendoza, 5500, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mendoza, M5500CCG, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tucuman, 4000, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Gosford, New South Wales 2250, Australia
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Woodville South, South Australia 5011, Australia
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G3, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sherwood Park, Alberta T8H 0N2, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R2H 2A6, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Windsor, Ontario N8X 5A6, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Montreal, Quebec H3T1E2, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Quebec City, Quebec G1V 4G5, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    St-Charles-Borromée, Quebec J6E 2B4, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Brest cedex, 29609, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lyon, 69004, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Montpellier cedex 5, 34295, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rennes Cedex 9, 35033, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy cedex, 54511, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Aschaffenburg, Bayern 63739, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bamberg, Bayern 96049, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rosenheim, Bayern 83022, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Potsdam, Brandenburg 14467, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Darmstadt, Hessen 64283, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Frankfurt, Hessen 60389, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Frankfurt, Hessen 60596, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hannover, Niedersachsen 30173, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rheine, Nordrhein-Westfalen 48431, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Warendorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen 48231, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Koblenz, Rheinland-Pfalz 56068, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Leipzig, Sachsen 04103, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Geesthacht, Schleswig-Holstein 21502, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Luebeck, Schleswig-Holstein 23558, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Schleswig, Schleswig-Holstein 24837, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 12203, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Reggio Emilia, Emilia-Romagna 42100, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Roma, Lazio 00133, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Roma, Lazio 00189, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Milano, Lombardia 20122, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pavia, Lombardia 27100, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tradate (VA), Lombardia 21049, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Catania, Sicilia 95123, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Messina, Sicilia 98125, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Negrar, Veneto 37024, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Daejon, 35365, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Incheon, 21431, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, 54907, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seoul, 02559, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seoul, 136-705, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seoul, 137-701, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seoul, 143-729, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seoul, 150-713, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seoul, 156-755, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Guadalajara, Jalisco 44100, Mexico
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Zapopan, Jalisco 45070, Mexico
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Monterrey, Nuevo León 64020, Mexico
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Alkmaar, 1815 JD, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Breda, 4818 CK, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Groningen, 9728 NT, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Harderwijk, 3844 DG, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hoorn, 1624 NP, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rotterdam, 3083 AN, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Utrecht, 3543 AZ, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Zwolle, 8025 AB, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bialystok, 15-044, Poland

Showing the first 100 of 162 sites across 16 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fahy WA, Homayoun-Valiani F, Cahn A, Robertson J, Templeton A, Meeraus WH, Wilson R, Lowings M, Marotti M, West SL, Tabberer M, Hessel EM. Nemiralisib in Patients with an Acute Exacerbation of COPD: Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jun 3;16:1637-1646. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S309320. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34113095 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD for this study is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (copy the URL below to your browser)

Access criteria: Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Jan 2019, 13 months.

Results were first posted in Feb 2020, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 14, 2017
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
StartActual
Nov 28, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jan 10, 2019
CompletionActual
Jan 10, 2019
Results first posted
Feb 10, 2020
Last update
Jul 14, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03345407
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
Start date
Nov 28, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 10, 2019
Completion
Jan 10, 2019
Results posted
Feb 10, 2020
Last update
Jul 14, 2021

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion