ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03343392NSAIDsUpdated Nov 13, 2019

The Effect of Different Drugs in the Prevention of Tooth Sensitivity Caused by Tooth Bleaching Treatment.

A Phase 3 interventional study of acetam/ketoro tromet group and Placebo group in Hydrogen Peroxide Allergy, sponsored by Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-13.

Sponsored by Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: The administration of the intra-oral drugs was not capable of reducing this side effect, maybe the use of two analgesics may to present better analgesic effect to avoid the bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity (TS). Methods: A triple-blind, parallel-randomized clinical trial was conducted with 114 health patients who received either a placebo or an association of ketorolac tromethamine/acetaminophen. The first doses of two analgesic (Acetaminophen 750 mg/ Ketorolac Tromethamine 10 mg) or placebo was administered 1 h before the in-office bleaching (35% hydrogen peroxide), and extra doses were administered every 8 h for 48 h. The TS was recorded using 0-10 visual analog scale and a 0-4 numeric rating scale in different periods: during bleaching and from 1 h up to 6h, from 12 h up to 18h, from 18h up to 24 h, from 24h up to 48 h post-bleaching. The color was measured before and one month after dental bleaching with a visual shade guide Vita Classical, Vita Bleachedguide 3D-Master and spectrophotometer Vita Easyshade (Vita Zahnfabrik). The absolute risk of TS was evaluated by Fisher's exact test. Data of TS intensity with NRS scale of the two groups were compared with Mann-Whitney and Friedman tests, while data from the VAS scale were evaluated by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's test for pairwise comparison. The color changes between groups were compared using a Student t-test (α = 0.05).

Read the detailed description

Trial design, settings and locations of data collection This was a randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled, triple-mask clinical trial, in which the patient, operator and evaluator were masked to the group assignment. A third researcher, not involved in the evaluation process, was responsible for the randomization process, and delivery and guidance on the administration of the drugs. This study was performed from 05/11/2017 up to 01/12/2018 in the city of Cascavel (Paraná, Brazil). All bleaching procedures were carried out within the Clinics of the Dental School of the State University of Oeste do Paraná (Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil).

Sample size calculation The primary outcome of this study was the absolute risk of TS. The absolute risk of TS was reported to be approximately 87% (Tay et al. 2009, De Paula et al. 2013) for the bleaching product Whiteness HP Maxx (FGM, Prod. Odont. Ltda, Joinville, SC, Brazil). Thus, a minimum sample size of 114 patients was required to have a 90% chance of detecting, as significant at the two-sided 5% level, a decrease in the primary outcome measure from 87% in the control group to 60% in the experimental group (which represent a difference of 31% in the absolute risk of TS).

Random sequence generation and allocation concealment. The investigator used blocked randomization (block sizes of 2 and 4) with an equal allocation ratio. The randomization process was performed by software freely available on the internet (www.sealedenvelope.com). Opaque and sealed envelopes containing the identification of the groups were prepared by third party, not involved in the study intervention. This third researcher, not involved in the evaluation process, was responsible for the randomization process, delivery and guidance on the administration of the drugs. A single random sequence was performed for both centers.

Study intervention Patients were divided into acetaminophen/ketorolac tromethamine and placebo groups. All patients received the same bleaching treatment, which was performed by four operators in the Dental School. One hour before in-office bleaching patients received either the acetaminophen 750 mg (Paracetamol 750 mg, Bioativa compounding pharmacy, Cascavel, PR, Brasil) and ketorolac tromethamine oral 10 mg (Toragesic® 10 mg, EMS Sigma Farma, Hortolândia, SP, Brasil) or placebo, for both medicines in identical tablets or capsules. The operator administered the first dose of drug 1 h before the protocol, and extra doses were administered every 8 h for 48 h to keep a safe maximum daily dosage of 4000 mg of acetaminophen and 40 mg of ketorolac tromethamine.

The tablets of Toragesic® and Paracetamol were removed them from their original packaging and inserted them whole into new vials made especially for this research. the investigator stored the capsules in individual vials containing 6 capsules of Paracetamol and 6 capsules of Toragesic® required for each bleaching session. The placebo tablets for Paracetamol contained starch lactose free (Bioativa compounding pharmacy, Cascavel, PR, Brasil) and the placebo capsules for Toragesic® contained base past, lactose free (Oro-tab®, Bioativa compounding pharmacy, Cascavel, PR, Brasil) and One hour before starting the bleaching application, the masked researcher responsible for drug administration gave the first dose to the patient. Then, the investigators isolated the gingival tissue of the teeth to be bleached using a light-cured resin dam (Top Dam, FGM Dental Products), and each tooth was light-cured for 10 s (Radii-cal, SDI, Victoria, Australia). After placement of a lip retractor (Arcflex, FGM), the researcher used the 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (Whiteness HP Automixx, FGM) in a single 50-minute application for both groups in accordance with the manufacturer's directions. Two bleaching sessions were performed 1 week apart. All participants were instructed to brush their teeth regularly using fluoridated toothpaste.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hydrogen Peroxide Allergy

Keywords

  • Hydrogen Peroxide
  • Analgesics
  • Tooth Bleaching
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients were at least 18 years old.
  • Patients had good general and oral health, and did not report any type of tooth sensitivity (TS).
  • The participants were required to have six caries-free maxillary anterior teeth and without restorations, absence of periodontal disease and must reviewed and signed the form.
  • The central incisors should be shade A2 or darker as judged by comparison with a value-oriented shade guide (Vita Classical, Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with anterior restorations or dental prosthesis, with orthodontics apparatus, with severe internal tooth discoloration (tetracycline stains, fluorosis, pulpless teeth) were not included in the study.
  • Pregnant/lactating women, participants with any other pathology that could cause sensitivity (such as recession, dentine exposure, presence of visible cracks in teeth), taking anti-inflammatory and/or analgesic drugs, smokers, bruxists or participants that had undergone tooth-whitening procedures were also excluded.
  • Patients that reported some earlier or present health problems in stomach, heart, kidney and liver, participants reporting continuous use of anti-inflammatory and/or analgesic drugs were excluded.
  • Diabetics, hypertensive or patients with known allergy to acetaminophen and lactose.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
114 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    acetam/ketoro tromet group

    One hour before in-office bleaching patients received either the acetaminophen 750 mg (Paracetamol 750 mg, Bioativa compounding pharmacy) and ketorolac tromethamine oral 10 mg (Toragesic® 10 mg, EMS Sigma Farma). The operator administered the first dose of drug 1 h before the protocol, and extra doses were administered every 8 h for 48 h to keep a safe maximum daily dosage of 4000 mg of acetaminophen and 40 mg of ketorolac tromethamine.

    Drug: acetam/ketoro tromet group

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    One hour before in-office bleaching patients received either placebo.

    Drug: Placebo group

Interventions

  • Drugacetam/ketoro tromet group

    One hour before in-office bleaching patients received either the acetaminophen 750 mg (Paracetamol 750 mg, Bioativa compounding pharmacy) and ketorolac tromethamine oral 10 mg (Toragesic® 10 mg, EMS Sigma Farma). The operator administered the first dose of drug 1 h before the protocol, and extra doses were administered every 8 h for 48 h to keep a safe maximum daily dosage of 4000 mg of acetaminophen and 40 mg of ketorolac tromethamine.

  • DrugPlacebo group

    One hour before in-office bleaching patients received either placebo,The operator administered the first dose of drug 1 h before the protocol, and extra doses were administered every 8 h for 48 h.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute risk of tooth sensitivity (TS)

    The TS was evaluated during bleaching to 48 h post-bleaching. The patient was asked to binary outcome if the sensitivity is present ou not present.

    Time frame: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intensity of TS

    The intensity of TS was evaluated during bleaching up to 1 h, from 12 h up to 18h, from 18h up to 24 h, from 24h up to 48 h post-bleaching in both sessions. The patient was asked to indicate the numerical value of the degree of sensitivity for each one of the periods above, using a five-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = considerable and 4 = severe.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  2. Color

    Color obtained with the Vita Classical and Vita Bleached guides between baseline vs. 1 month post bleaching.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Eloisa Andrade de Paula
    Santos, SP 11045551, Brazil
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 13, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03343392
Lead sponsor
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
Collaborators
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior., Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Responsible party
Eloisa Andrade de Paula (Clinical professor., Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
Start date
Nov 5, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2017
Completion
Dec 1, 2018
Last update
Nov 13, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion