ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03340922MANIaC-PVCUpdated Oct 20, 2020

MANual vs. automatIC Local Activation Time Annotation for Guiding Premature Ventricular Complex Ablation

A Phase 4 interventional study of Automatic annotation of LAT (WF-method) and Manual annotation of LAT (M-method) in Ventricular Premature Complexes and Catheter Ablation, sponsored by Centro Medico Teknon. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-20.

Sponsored by Centro Medico Teknon · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Current navigation systems incorporate algorithms for automatic identification of local activation time (LAT). However, data about their utility and accuracy in premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation procedures are scarce. This prospective, randomized study analyzes the accuracy and effectivity of an algorithmic method based on automatic annotation of the maximal negative slope of the unipolar electrogram within the window demarcated by the bipolar electrogram, compared with conventional, manual annotation during PVC ablation procedures.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled and international multicenter study. The investigators aim to analyze the accuracy of LAT annotation using a novel algorithmic method (Wavefront, CARTO, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, California, USA) (WF), based on automatic annotation of the maximal negative slope of the unipolar electrogram (U-EGM) within the window demarcated by the B-EGM, by comparison with conventional, manual annotation in a multicenter cohort of patients referred for PVC ablation. Further on, the automatic annotation of LAT will be aided by an ECG recognition pattern algorithm (included in the last version of CARTO), which is intended to avoid wrong annotation of ventricular complexes other than the clinical PVC. The investigators hypothesize that automatic LAT annotation (using WF and the ECG recognition algorithm) could be superior to conventional, manual annotation in terms of mapping success and could reduce both procedure time and radiofrequency time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventricular Premature Complexes
  • Catheter Ablation

Keywords

  • premature ventricular complex
  • catheter ablation
  • activation mapping
  • wavefront
03

In context

Ventricular Premature Complexes

102 studies on the registry are indexed under Ventricular Premature Complexes; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 84 across 58 interventional studies indexed under Ventricular Premature Complexes.

Browse Ventricular Premature Complexes studies →

Lead sponsor

Centro Medico Teknon is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years.
  • Indication for PVC ablation.
  • Signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years.
  • Pregnancy.
  • PVC ablation procedures guided by pace-mapping (PASO® module); eg. low burden of PVCs during the study, mechanical impact during activation mapping.
  • Impossibility to perform activation mapping with the required density of points in the region of interest (see section 4.5.3).
  • Concomitant investigation treatments.
  • Medical, geographical and social factors that make study participation impractical, and inability to give written . Patient's refusal to participate in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Automatic annotation of LAT (WF-method)

    The annotation of LAT in each acquired point will be automatically performed using the LAT annotation tool integrated into CARTO navigation system, called Wavefront (WF). Automatic annotation of LAT performed by the CARTO system uses the maximum negative slope of the distal U-EGM to set the timing of the mapping annotation, displayed on the corresponding B-EGM. Additionally, the automatic annotation of LAT will be aided by an ECG recognition pattern algorithm (included in the last version of CARTO), which is intended to avoid wrong annotation of ventricular complexes other than the clinical PVC.

    Device: Automatic annotation of LAT (WF-method)

  • Active comparator
    Manual annotation of LAT (M-method)

    A detailed electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated activation map of the chamber of interest will be acquired using the CARTO navigation system. An experienced electrophysiologist will perform the annotation of LAT in each acquired point. The LAT will be measured from the onset of B-EGM (earliest positive or negative deflection) of the distal dipole of the mapping catheter to the defined reference. The use of the U-EGM as a guidance to identify the real onset of B-EGM will be decided under electrophysiologist criteria.

    Device: Manual annotation of LAT (M-method)

Interventions

  • DeviceAutomatic annotation of LAT (WF-method)

    Automatic annotation of LAT during PVC activation mapping. Acquisition of points will be automatically performed using the Wavefront (WF) annotation tool integrated into CARTO navigation system.

    Also known as: Wavefront

  • DeviceManual annotation of LAT (M-method)

    Conventional, manual annotation of LAT during PVC activation mapping. Acquisition of points will be performed using the CARTO navigation system by an expert electrophysiologist.

    Also known as: Manual

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rates of mapping success, using the assigned mapping approach (automatic vs. manual), as defined in description

    Mapping success will be defined as complete PVC abolition after RF applications at the earliest activation site (EAS) identified using the assigned mapping approach. A maximum of 2 RF applications with appropriate parameters (contact force, impedance drop, catheter stability) during a maximum of 45 seconds will be allowed. If the PVC is not abolished after 2 RF applications with appropriate parameters, mapping will not be considered successful.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mapping time

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Number of mapped chambers

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Accuracy of a proposed algorithm for selection of first chamber to map

    In the case of PVCs arising from ventricular outflow tracts, we propose an algorithm to avoid subjective criteria, and to deal with eventual wrong selection of the first mapped chamber, leading to unnecessary RF applications. This algorithm involves a step-by-step analysis of the PVC-ECG morphology: precordial R/S transition and presence of one or more of the following clinical items, which have been previously related with a left origin: male gender, hypertension, or age \> 50 years.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Number of target points

    Target point is defined as any suspected PVC-site of origin where RF is delivered according to mapping data. Therefore, for one case there can be found a single target point with multiple RF applications, or multiple target points with one single RF application. The maximum distance between 2 RF applications to be considered at the same target point will be defined as 5 mm (equivalent to a 1-cm2 area).

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Radiofrequency (RF) time

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Number of RF applications

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Acute procedure success

    Complete elimination of the PVC at the end of the procedure.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Clinical success

    Reduction of, at least, 80% in the 24-hour PVC burden 1 month after the procedure.

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Antonio Berruezo, MD, PhD
    Barcelona, 08022, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stevenson WG, Soejima K. Recording techniques for clinical electrophysiology. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Sep;16(9):1017-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.50155.x. PubMed 16174026 ↗
  • Liuba I, Walfridsson H. Activation mapping of focal atrial tachycardia: the impact of the method for estimating activation time. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009 Dec;26(3):169-80. doi: 10.1007/s10840-009-9437-0. Epub 2009 Oct 29. PubMed 19866350 ↗
  • Ndrepepa G, Caref EB, Yin H, el-Sherif N, Restivo M. Activation time determination by high-resolution unipolar and bipolar extracellular electrograms in the canine heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995 Mar;6(3):174-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1995.tb00769.x. PubMed 7620643 ↗
  • El Haddad M, Houben R, Stroobandt R, Van Heuverswyn F, Tavernier R, Duytschaever M. Novel algorithmic methods in mapping of atrial and ventricular tachycardia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;7(3):463-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000833. Epub 2014 May 14. PubMed 24829224 ↗
  • Andreu D, Berruezo A, Fernandez-Armenta J, Herczku C, Borras R, Ortiz-Perez JT, Mont L, Brugada J. Displacement of the target ablation site and ventricles during premature ventricular contractions: relevance for radiofrequency catheter ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Jul;9(7):1050-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.02.018. Epub 2012 Feb 15. PubMed 22342861 ↗
  • Penela D, De Riva M, Herczku C, Catto V, Pala S, Fernandez-Armenta J, Acosta J, Cipolletta L, Andreu D, Borras R, Rios J, Mont L, Brugada J, Carbucicchio C, Zeppenfeld K, Berruezo A. An easy-to-use, operator-independent, clinical model to predict the left vs. right ventricular outflow tract origin of ventricular arrhythmias. Europace. 2015 Jul;17(7):1122-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu373. Epub 2015 Feb 10. PubMed 25672982 ↗
  • Penela D, Van Huls Van Taxis C, Van Huls Vans Taxis C, Aguinaga L, Fernandez-Armenta J, Mont L, Castel MA, Heras M, Tolosana JM, Sitges M, Ordonez A, Brugada J, Zeppenfeld K, Berruezo A. Neurohormonal, structural, and functional recovery pattern after premature ventricular complex ablation is independent of structural heart disease status in patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction: a prospective multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 24;62(13):1195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Jul 10. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 25;63(7):746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.001.. Van Huls Vans Taxis, Carine [corrected to Van Huls Van Taxis, Carine]. PubMed 23850913 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2018 to primary completion in May 2020, 23 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 3, 2017
First posted
Nov 14, 2017
StartActual
Jun 26, 2018
Primary completionActual
May 31, 2020
CompletionActual
Aug 31, 2020
Last update
Oct 20, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 20, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03340922
Lead sponsor
Centro Medico Teknon
Responsible party
Antonio Berruezo, MD, PhD (Principal Investigator, Centro Medico Teknon) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2017
Start date
Jun 26, 2018
Primary completion
May 31, 2020
Completion
Aug 31, 2020
Last update
Oct 20, 2020

Study contacts

Antonio Berruezo, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Centro Medico Teknon
Felipe Bisbal, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Universitari German Trias i Pujol (Badalona, Spain)
Alonso Pedrote, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Virgen del Rocio University Hospital (Sevilla, Spain)
Diego Penela, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto (Piacenza, Italy)
Juan Fernández-Armenta, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Puerta del Mar University Hospital (Cadiz, Spain)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion