ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03340116Updated Oct 15, 2024

Measurement of Blood Volume Loss During Burn Surgery

An observational study in Surgical Blood Loss and Burns, sponsored by Virginia Commonwealth University. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-15.

Sponsored by Virginia Commonwealth University · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
Unable to find any suitable patients to enroll

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Burn surgery is associated with significant reductions in hematocrit. However, it is unclear whether these reductions are the result of hemodilution from non-red cell containing intraoperative transfusions or from loss of red blood cells. The investigators will be using the Daxor Blood Volume Analyzer (BVA-100), an FDA approved instrument that can measure total blood volume, plasma volume, and RBC volume using the indicator dilution technique. By comparing pre-operative measurements of blood volume, plasma volume, and RBC volume to that of post-operative measurements after burn surgery, the investigators can determine the primary cause of the reduction in hematocrit associated with burn surgery. The investigators hypothesize that these reductions in hematocrit are primarily the result of hemodilution rather than blood loss and that there will be a statistically significant difference in measured plasma volume from the pre-operative group to the post-operative group.

Read the detailed description

Burn surgery is associated with significant changes (reductions) in hematocrit. However, it is unclear whether these reductions are the result of hemodilution from non-red cell containing intraoperative transfusions or from loss of red blood cells. The investigators will be using the Daxor Blood Volume Analyzer (BVA-100), an FDA approved instrument that can measure total blood volume, plasma volume, and RBC volume using the indicator dilution technique. With this technique, a tracer substance (I-131 albumin) is mixed with an unknown volume. An identical amount of the tracer is mixed into a solution with a known volume. By comparing the concentration of the indicator between the known and unknown volumes, the investigators can determine the volume of the unknown volume (or in this case, the blood volume).

The investigators will be measuring the change in blood volume, plasma volume, and RBC volume from the pre-operative to the post-operative state after completion of burn surgery. We hypothesize that these reductions in hematocrit are primarily the result of hemodilution rather than blood loss and that there will be a statistically significant change in measured plasma volume from the pre-operative to the post-operative measurements.

Average plasma volume for male and female patients is 2950ml SD=590 ml. To detect a 10% increase in plasma volume from hemodilution with a power 0.80 and alpha error 0.05, a one tailed normal distribution t-test determines a sample size fifty. To account for a 10% data loss (technical difficulty, patient withdraw) a sample size of fifty-five would be required.

Fifty-five consecutive adult patients (18 years or older) having burn surgery will be enrolled. Patients with recognized coagulopathy will be excluded. The outcome variables included blood volume (BV, ml), plasma volume (PV, ml) and red blood cell volume (RBCV, ml). All three outcome variables will be measured at two time points; pre-surgery and post-surgery. The pre-surgery measurement will be collected precisely after induction of general anesthesia but prior to surgery start. The post-surgery measurement will be taken immediately after the operation and after all intraoperative red blood cell transfusions are complete. For those patients receiving blood transfusions in the operating room prior to all data collection points, the transfused RBC volume will be recorded and subtracted from the RBCV measured after the transfusion. Transfused RBCV will take into account Hct of 60% for pRBCs. Additional baseline information, including age (year), sex (male, female), weight (kg), and surgery type, will be collected. For the tracer dilution method, the following blood samples will be collected: a baseline (no radiation sample), a first sample 12 minutes after injection (after complete mixing in the blood volume) and additional samples every 6 minutes for at least three successive timed sample points. These multiple timed sample points produce a logarithmic curve of radiation over time, as only a small fraction of albumin leaves the blood volume into the interstitial space. The investigators will compare the pre-operative and post-operative blood volume, RBC volume, and plasma volume measurements to determine if the decrease in hematocrit associated with burn surgery is truly due to hemodilution or loss of RBC volume.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgical Blood Loss
  • Burns
03

In context

Blood Loss, Surgical

213 studies on the registry are indexed under Blood Loss, Surgical; 40 are open to participants now.

Browse Blood Loss, Surgical studies →

Lead sponsor

Virginia Commonwealth University is the lead sponsor of 648 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

18-70 year old male or non-pregnant females who have sustained deep partial thickness to full thickness thermal burns between 10-50% TBSA who are undergoing burn surgery

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Sustained thermal burn of a depth that is deep partial thickness to full thickness and requires operative management
  • Burn excision must occur within one week of thermal injury
  • Burn size between 10-50% of total body surface area
  • Must survive initial resuscitation
  • Must consent for blood product transfusion
  • Male or non-pregnant female

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cause of burn other than thermal injury (ie electrical or chemical injury)
  • Women who are nursing, pregnant, or think they may be pregnant
  • Patients with recognized coagulopathy
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Pre-operative cohort

    This cohort will have their total blood volume, RBC volume, and plasma volumes measured using the Daxor BVA-100 prior to any surgical intervention

    Diagnostic Test: Measurement of RBC volume, plasma volume, and total blood volume using Daxor BVA-100

  • Post-operative cohort

    This cohort will consist of the same study participants in the pre-operative cohort. The only difference is that this cohort will have their total blood volume, RBC volume, and plasma volumes measured using the Daxor BVA-100 AFTER burn surgery.

    Procedure: Burn surgery · Diagnostic Test: Measurement of RBC volume, plasma volume, and total blood volume using Daxor BVA-100

Interventions

  • ProcedureBurn surgery

    Burn surgery including wound debridement, skin grafting

  • Diagnostic testMeasurement of RBC volume, plasma volume, and total blood volume using Daxor BVA-100

    Measurement of RBC volume, plasma volume, and total blood volume using Daxor BVA-100

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in measured plasma volume

    Measured plasma volume using Daxor BVA-100

    Time frame: Pre-operative period after intubation, but before surgery start and post-operative period after surgery stop and after all intraoperative blood transfusions are complete

  2. Change in measured RBC volume

    Measured RBC volume using Daxor BVA-100

    Time frame: Pre-operative period after intubation, but before surgery start and post-operative period after surgery stop and after all intraoperative blood transfusions are complete

  3. Change in measured total blood volume

    Measured total blood volume using Daxor BVA-100

    Time frame: Pre-operative period after intubation, but before surgery start and post-operative period after surgery stop and after all intraoperative blood transfusions are complete

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ong YS, Samuel M, Song C. Meta-analysis of early excision of burns. Burns. 2006 Mar;32(2):145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.09.005. Epub 2006 Jan 18. PubMed 16414197 ↗
  • Budny PG, Regan PJ, Roberts AH. The estimation of blood loss during burns surgery. Burns. 1993 Apr;19(2):134-7. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(93)90036-8. PubMed 8471147 ↗
  • Meiser A, Casagranda O, Skipka G, Laubenthal H. [Quantification of blood loss. How precise is visual estimation and what does its accuracy depend on?]. Anaesthesist. 2001 Jan;50(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/s001010050957. German. PubMed 11220251 ↗
  • CRISPELL KR, PORTER B, NIESET RT. Studies of plasma volume using human serum albumin tagged with radioactive iodine. J Clin Invest. 1950 May;29(5):513-6. doi: 10.1172/JCI102288. No abstract available. PubMed 15415456 ↗
  • Manzone TA, Dam HQ, Soltis D, Sagar VV. Blood volume analysis: a new technique and new clinical interest reinvigorate a classic study. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007 Jun;35(2):55-63; quiz 77, 79. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.106.035972. Epub 2007 May 11. PubMed 17496003 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers outside of the investigators listed in this study group.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2020; primary completion for Jan 2021, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 1, 2017
First posted
Nov 13, 2017
StartEst.
Jan 2020
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2021
CompletionEst.
Jan 2021
Last update
Oct 15, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03340116
Collaborators
Daxor Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 13, 2017
Start date
Jan 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2024

Study contacts

Mark Nelson, MD
principal investigator · VCU Medical Center
Michael Feldman, MD
principal investigator · VCU Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion