An interventional study of Professional Development Enhancement in Bullying, School Fear and Professional Role, sponsored by University of Florida. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-12.
Sponsored by University of Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Among 22 studies in Bullying with a site in United States — 2 open to participants now, 3 under way, none of them phase 3. Bullying · United States.
Among the 22 studies in Bullying with a site in United States, this one is the 13th largest by enrollment of the 21 interventional ones, is one of 2 that started in 2018, is one of 21 with no phase, and was the 5th registered.
57 studies on the registry are indexed under Bullying; 9 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 96 is below the median of 228 across 51 interventional studies indexed under Bullying.
Browse Bullying studies →2 of the 22 studies in Bullying with a site in United States are open now, in 1 country. Each count lists the studies.
Of the 3 Bullying studies recruiting now, 0 (0%) set no upper age limit and 3 (100%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 3 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years to 70 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.
The full table on the hub →22 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2007; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2018.
Median enrollment 138 across the 21 interventional studies, 72 across the 1 observational. Of the 18 that completed or were terminated, 8 (44%) have results posted.
4 of 22 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,287 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.
Of its 180 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 143 (79%) have results posted.
University of Florida has 1 study filed under Bullying — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
3 of the studies in Bullying with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT07845292Pisareva Citadel Group LLCMethodology of Super-Early Training of Developer Engineers and Leading Analysts With a Diagnosis of ADHD/ASD for Ensuring the Engineering Sovereignty of the State: Time Horizon: 2026-2038-2050 | 2026-12-31 |
| NCT05541406Washington University School of MedicineEfficacy of a Multi-level School Intervention for LGBTQ Youth | 2027-04-30 |
| NCT07223957The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonUsing an Innovative Implementation Strategy to Increase the Translation of Effective Youth Violence Prevention Programs in Schools | 2027-06-30 |
Among the 22 studies in Bullying with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
The University of Florida's (UF) Lastinger Center for Learning, in partnership with the UF Psychology Department, have been funded by the National Institute of Justice to advance the skills of School Resource Officers (SROs) currently working in the Miami-Dade Schools Police Department through an innovative, scalable, online and in-person professional development system. The goal will be realized through a 36-month pilot project allowing for the development, testing, and refinement of the system conducted in partnership with the Miami-Dade County Public Schools, and includes an evaluation component to assess for efficacy and scalability.
The University of Florida Lastinger Center for Learning and the Psychology Department aim to pilot-test a system of job-embedded professional development that will train Miami-Dade County SROs in research-based, best-practice techniques for addressing the unique needs of the school environment. Using a combination of both online and in-person supports this innovative approach to SRO professional development will provide programming that is highly impactful, easily accessible, and cost-effective to implement and eventually scale up nationally.
This goal will be realized through a 36-month pilot project allowing for the development, testing, and refinement of the system conducted in partnership with the Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Additionally, it includes an evaluation component to assess for efficacy and scalability.
Trainings will be comprised of online modules and expert coaching in the following four areas:
Procedure:
The research design for this project will be an experimental time-series design where 70 SROs are randomly assigned to participate in the program (Cohort 1), and a control group of 70 SROs is placed on a waiting list to participate in the program starting six months after the first group completes the program (Cohort 2). The design includes a short time-series with treatment and control SROs measured simultaneously at three waves. The three measurements will occur before treatment assignment, after the treatment group completes the program, and six months after participation. After these three measurements are taken, the control group will receive the program. According to sample size guidelines from CrimeSolutions.org, for a time-series design, a sample size of at least 51 is expected to allow detection of a medium effect (0.50). However, some SRO attrition from the program is expected, and the selected sample size of 70 per group will protect against excessive loss of power due to attrition. In this program, attrition will be minimized due to the individual work that each SRO will perform with a coach. Also, participants will receive multiple reminders of each content e-clinic, and participants that miss a live e-clinic will be contacted by their coaches to encourage viewing of the recorded version.
The assignment of SROs for the groups will be at the school level, where all SROs within a school will be placed in either the treatment or control groups. The rationale of a school-level assignment is to avoid spill-over effects between treated and control SROs in the same schools. The population of schools for this study will include middle and high schools, and the treatment and control groups will have SROs in middle and high schools at proportions similar to the population. Recruitment into the professional development and evaluation study will be coordinated among the project partners, the University of Florida and the Miami Dade Schools Police Department. Information will be sent out via email and presentations will be made at appropriate meetings to recruit potential participants.'
Professional Development Program Components:
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
During the measurement period, this group will receive the intervention, described below: Content using three of UF Lastinger Center's innovations for cost-effective teaching and learning - e-Content Clinics, Coaching, and Communities of Practice. Elements of the professional development model are as follows: 1. E-Content Clinics- Content Clinics are offered online using digital video technology. 2. Coaching- Coaching develops strong cadres of leaders that have profound expertise and substantial success in advancing teaching and learning outcomes. This approach uses existing personnel to reinforce and deepen learning through online professional development by embedding it in day-to-day activities. 3. Online Community of Practice- This scalable online platform allows users to create virtual communities of practice designed to strengthen the learning and collaboration network.
Behavioral: Professional Development Enhancement
This arm will continue business as usual during the measurement period. They will receive the exact same intervention described above once data collection is complete.
Behavioral: Professional Development Enhancement
Professional development for SROs enhanced by content concerning trauma-informed care, cultural competency, restorative justice, and social-emotional learning.
Change in knowledge of child development, classroom management, child problem behaviors, and behavior management strategies
This assessment will be administered to all participant and non-participant SROs. The items will be developed by the study's team and evaluated using expert reviews and cognitive interviews. Following the first assessment, the discrimination of the items will be evaluated using item-to-total correlations and any items with low or negative item- to-total correlations will be removed from further use in the study.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Change in knowledge of Behavioral Principles as Applied To Children Test (KBPAC) - Short Form.
The KBPAC is a 50-item instrument designed to measure basic knowledge of behavioral principles applied to children. The shortened 10-item version of the KBPAC had a Kuder-Richardson reliability estimate of 0.77 and was shown to have an internal reliability parallel to the 50-item, and 25-item versions of the test. Response options are correct or incorrect.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Change in Trauma-Informed Self-Assessment Test
The TISAT was adapted from the Trauma- Informed Organizational Self-Assessment. The TISAT is a 17-item scale designed to measure an individual's knowledge of trauma-informed strategies associated with mental health outcomes, substance use, homelessness, triggers (reminders of traumatic events), and de-escalation techniques. Response options are a 6-point Likert-type scale where individuals self-report their level of confidence utilizing trauma-informed strategies.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Change in General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE).
The GSE is 10-item scale designed to measure self- reported self-efficacy. The instrument was found to be correlated with sentiments of positivity and work satisfaction with lower scores signaling stress, health complains, exhaustion, depression and anxiety. Response options range from "not at all true" to "exactly true."
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Change in Self-Assessment of Social and Emotional Competencies (SASEC).
The SASEC was adapted from Section 1-Part B of the "Self-Assessing Social and Emotional Instruction and Competencies: A tool for teachers". The measure is a self-report on a 4-point Likert-Type scale of how much individuals agree that they have specific social and emotional competencies influencing SRO's interactions at the school. The 21-item measure covers the following factors of Social Emotional Competencies: Self-Awareness, Self- Management/Emotion Regulation, Social Awareness, Relationship/Social Skills, and Responsible Decision Making.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Change in Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (ISS).
The ISS is a 24-item measure of intercultural sensitivity through five factors: interaction engagement, respect of cultural differences, interaction confidence, interaction enjoyment, and interaction attentiveness. The self-reported instrument is measured in a 5-point Likert-Type scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree).
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Change in Implicit Association Test (IAT).
The Implicit Association Test measures implicit automatic associations by tracking the speed at which participants associate different groups of words. The scale is delivered electronically using an open-source software. Scores will be evaluated using the latest scoring procedure .
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Change in LGBT Ally Identity Measure.
The LGBT Ally Identity Measure is designed to evaluate the competencies of heterosexual allies of the LGBT community with four main factors: skills to support the LGBT community, awareness of LGBT oppression, knowledge of the LGBT experience, and engagement in action with LGBT members of the community. Response options range from "not at all true" to "very true for me." The 19-item scale had a Cronbach's alpha of .68 for the knowledge and skills subscale, .81 for the openness and support subscale, and .65 for the oppression awareness subscale .
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Change in Measure of Role Clarity:
Role clarity will be measured by five items, which have a five-point Liker scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Change in Measure of Job Satisfaction
The study team will measure general job satisfaction using a five-item short form of the Brayfield-Rothe job satisfaction scale. The items of this short form are: "Most days I am enthusiastic about my work," "I feel fairly satisfied with my present job," "I find real enjoyment in my work," "Each day at work seems like it will never end," and "I consider my job rather unpleasant." The last two items are reverse-scored.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Change in Measure of Intent to Quit
The SROs intent to quit will be measure with two questions: 1) How likely are you to quit your job within the next month? 2) How likely are you to quit your job within the next year? A five-point response scale will be used: "Very likely", "Somewhat likely", "Neither likely nor unlikely", "Somewhat unlikely", "Very unlikely".
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Ran from Sep 2018 to primary completion in Aug 2019, 11 months.
Of 36 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Bullying, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 18. This study's 11 months is close to that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 40 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 20.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.