CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03328897Updated Nov 4, 2020Results posted

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Xolair® (Omalizumab) in Chinese Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

A Phase 3 interventional study of Omalizumab and Placebo in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 27 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-04.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
418
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab, compared with placebo, as an add-on to H1 antihistamines (H1AH) therapy in adult patients suffering from Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) who remained symptomatic despite H1AH therapy.

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized, multicenteric, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab as an add-on therapy for the treatment of patients of refractory CSU who remained symptomatic despite approved-dosed H1AH treatment.

The study consisted of three distinct epochs over 24 weeks: Screening epoch (Day -28 to Day -1), Randomized treatment epoch (Day 1 to Week 12) and Post-treatment follow-up epoch (Week 12 to Week 20). Patients were randomized into three treatment groups (omalizumab 300 mg s.c. omalizumab 150 mg s.c. and placebo) in a 2:2:1 ratio, stratified by latent tuberculosis (TB) status at Baseline (Yes/No).

On Day 1, eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive omalizumab (150 mg or 300 mg) or placebo by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection every 4 weeks (on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8) during the 12-week double-blind randomized-treatment epoch. Patients visited the study center at 4-week intervals. Patients were instructed to stay on the same CSU H1AH treatment at stable dose that they were using during the pre-randomization period during the randomized treatment epoch. They were allowed to use diphenhydramine as rescue medication during all epochs. The last dose of the study drug during the randomized-treatment epoch was administered at Week 8 study visit, however, the last assessment was done at Week 12.

After the completion of the 12-week randomized-treatment epoch, all patients entered an 8-week post-treatment follow-up epoch.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Keywords

  • Chronic spontaneous urticaria
  • ISS7
  • UAS7
  • omalizumab
  • China
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic CSU patients with CSU diagnosis for at least 6 months.
  • Patients must have been on an approved dose of an H1AH for CSU for at least the 3 consecutive days immediately prior to the Day -14 screening visit
  • Patients must have documented current use on the day of the initial screening visit

Main Exclusion Criteria

  • Clearly defined underlying etiology for chronic urticarias other than CSU (main manifestation being physical urticaria)
  • Other skin disease associated with itch Urticarial vasculitis, urticaria pigmentosa, erythema multiforme, mastocytosis, hereditary or acquired angioedema, lymphoma, leukemia, or generalized cancer
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
418 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Omalizumab 300mg

    patients received a dose of omalizumab 300 mg which consisted of two injections of omalizumab 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)

    Drug: Omalizumab

  • Experimental
    Omalizumab 150mg

    patients received a dose of omalizumab 150 mg which consisted of one injection of omalizumab 150 mg vial and one injection of placebo 150 mg vial every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)

    Drug: Omalizumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    patients received placebo which consisted of two injections of placebo 150 mg vials every 4 weeks (Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8)

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugOmalizumab

    injection of 150mg or 300 mg

    Also known as: IGE025

  • DrugPlacebo

    Injection of placebo

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline of the Itch Severity Score (ISS7) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment

    The severity of the itch was recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). Baseline ISS7 was calculated 7 days prior to the first treatment date. A weekly score (ISS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21, where 0 is the best score and 21 is the worst score. The complete itch response was defined as ISS7 = 0. Itch (Pruritus) Severity Score Scale: 0 = None 1. = Mild (minimal awareness, easily tolerated) 2. = Moderate (definite awareness, bothersome but tolerable) 3. = Severe (difficult to tolerate)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline of Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment

    UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline of Number of Hives Score (NHS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment

    Hives Severity Score (HSS), defined by number of hives, were recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). A weekly number of hives score (NHS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21. The complete hives response was defined as NHS7 = 0. Hives Severity Score scale: 0 - None * Mild (1-6 hives/12 hours) * Moderate (7-12 hives/12 hours) * Severe (\>12 hives/12 hours)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  3. Percentage of Patients With UAS7≤6 at Week 12

    UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement. Week 12 responders were defined as patients who achieved an absolute UAS7 ≤ 6 at Week 12. A patient with missing data at Week 12 was imputed as a responder if the patient was a responder at Week 10 and Week 11, otherwise as a non-responder.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Percentage of Complete Responders (UAS7 = 0) at Week 12

    UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement. Complete responders are defined as participants who achieved UAS7 = 0.

    Time frame: Week 12

  5. Percentage of Patients With ISS7 Minimally Important Difference (MID) at Week 12

    The severity of the itch was recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). Baseline ISS7 was calculated 7 days prior to the first treatment date. A weekly score (ISS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21, where 0 is the best score and 21 is the worst score. The complete itch response was defined as ISS7 = 0. Itch (Pruritus) Severity Score Scale: 0 = None 1. = Mild (minimal awareness, easily tolerated) 2. = Moderate (definite awareness, bothersome but tolerable) 3. = Severe (difficult to tolerate) The ISS7 MID response was defined as a reduction from Baseline in ISS7 of ≥ 5 points.

    Time frame: Week 12

  6. Change From Baseline of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment

    Dermatology life quality index (DLQI) is a 10-item dermatology- specific health-related quality of life measure. Patients rated their dermatology symptoms as well as the impact of their skin condition on various aspects of their lives. An overall score was calculated as well as separate scores for the following domains: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, treatment. Each domain had 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). "Not relevant" is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.

    Time frame: Week 12

  7. Time to ISS7 MID Response by Week 12

    The ISS7 MID response was defined as a reduction from Baseline in ISS7 of ≥ 5 points. Time to ISS7 MID response was the time (in weeks) from the date of the first dose to the date where ISS7 MID response was first achieved during Week 1 to Week 12.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

06

Results

Posted Nov 4, 2020

Participant flow

Patients were recruited from 27 sites across China.

Randomized-treatment Epoch
Participant flow — Randomized-treatment Epoch
MilestoneOmalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlacebo
Started16816783
Full analysis set (fas)16716783
Completed15216281
Not completed1652
Withdrew: Adverse event411
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up010
Withdrew: Pregnancy300
Withdrew: Patient/guardian decision831
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy100
Follow-up Epoch
Participant flow — Follow-up Epoch
MilestoneOmalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlacebo
Started16116381
Completed15316079
Not completed832
Withdrew: Adverse event401
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy111
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up010
Withdrew: Pregnancy100
Withdrew: Patient/guardian decision210

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline of the Itch Severity Score (ISS7) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment

The severity of the itch was recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). Baseline ISS7 was calculated 7 days prior to the first treatment date. A weekly score (ISS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21, where 0 is the best score and 21 is the worst score. The complete itch response was defined as ISS7 = 0. Itch (Pruritus) Severity Score Scale: 0 = None 1. = Mild (minimal awareness, easily tolerated) 2. = Moderate (definite awareness, bothersome but tolerable) 3. = Severe (difficult to tolerate)

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline of the Itch Severity Score (ISS7) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment
Score on a scaleOmalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline of the Itch Severity Score (ISS7) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment-10.11 ± 0.430-9.66 ± 0.424-5.87 ± 0.604
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab 300mg vs Placebo · Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM) · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -4.23 · 95% CI -5.70 to -2.77
  • Omalizumab 150mg vs Placebo · Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM) · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -3.79 · 95% CI -5.24 to -2.33
SecondaryChange From Baseline of Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment

UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline of Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment
Score on a scaleOmalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline of Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment-21.82 ± 0.895-20.74 ± 0.882-11.62 ± 1.258
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab 300mg vs Placebo · Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM) · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -10.19 · 95% CI -13.25 to -7.14
  • Omalizumab 150mg vs Placebo · Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM) · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -9.12 · 95% CI -12.14 to -6.10
SecondaryChange From Baseline of Number of Hives Score (NHS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment

Hives Severity Score (HSS), defined by number of hives, were recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). A weekly number of hives score (NHS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21. The complete hives response was defined as NHS7 = 0. Hives Severity Score scale: 0 - None * Mild (1-6 hives/12 hours) * Moderate (7-12 hives/12 hours) * Severe (\>12 hives/12 hours)

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline of Number of Hives Score (NHS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment
Score on a scaleOmalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline of Number of Hives Score (NHS7) After 12 Weeks of Treatment-11.68 ± 0.492-11.11 ± 0.485-5.76 ± 0.690
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab 300mg vs Placebo · Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM) · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -5.92 · 95% CI -7.59 to -4.24
  • Omalizumab 150mg vs Placebo · Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM) · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -5.35 · 95% CI -7.00 to -3.69
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With UAS7≤6 at Week 12

UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement. Week 12 responders were defined as patients who achieved an absolute UAS7 ≤ 6 at Week 12. A patient with missing data at Week 12 was imputed as a responder if the patient was a responder at Week 10 and Week 11, otherwise as a non-responder.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients With UAS7≤6 at Week 12
ParticipantsOmalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlacebo
Percentage of Patients With UAS7≤6 at Week 1281799
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab 300mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 7.02 · 95% CI 3.27 to 15.06
  • Omalizumab 150mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 7.03 · 95% CI 3.29 to 15.06
SecondaryPercentage of Complete Responders (UAS7 = 0) at Week 12

UAS7 is the sum of the HSS7 and the ISS7 scores. The possible range of the weekly UAS7 score is 0 to 42. A higher urticaria activity score indicates more severe symptoms. A negative change score from baseline indicates improvement. Complete responders are defined as participants who achieved UAS7 = 0.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Complete Responders (UAS7 = 0) at Week 12
ParticipantsOmalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlacebo
Percentage of Complete Responders (UAS7 = 0) at Week 1262394
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab 300mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 11.21 · 95% CI 3.88 to 32.37
  • Omalizumab 150mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 5.88 · 95% CI 2.01 to 17.17
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With ISS7 Minimally Important Difference (MID) at Week 12

The severity of the itch was recorded by the patient twice daily in their eDiary, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (intense/severe). Baseline ISS7 was calculated 7 days prior to the first treatment date. A weekly score (ISS7) was derived by adding up the average daily scores of the seven days preceding the visit. The possible range of the weekly score was therefore 0 to 21, where 0 is the best score and 21 is the worst score. The complete itch response was defined as ISS7 = 0. Itch (Pruritus) Severity Score Scale: 0 = None 1. = Mild (minimal awareness, easily tolerated) 2. = Moderate (definite awareness, bothersome but tolerable) 3. = Severe (difficult to tolerate) The ISS7 MID response was defined as a reduction from Baseline in ISS7 of ≥ 5 points.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients With ISS7 Minimally Important Difference (MID) at Week 12
ParticipantsOmalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlacebo
Percentage of Patients With ISS7 Minimally Important Difference (MID) at Week 1212512549
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab 300mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 2.73 · 95% CI 1.51 to 4.95
  • Omalizumab 150mg vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.002 · Odds ratio (or): 2.53 · 95% CI 1.41 to 4.56
SecondaryChange From Baseline of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment

Dermatology life quality index (DLQI) is a 10-item dermatology- specific health-related quality of life measure. Patients rated their dermatology symptoms as well as the impact of their skin condition on various aspects of their lives. An overall score was calculated as well as separate scores for the following domains: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, treatment. Each domain had 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). "Not relevant" is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment
Score on a scaleOmalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment-10.4 ± 0.50-9.9 ± 0.49-6.5 ± 0.69
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab 300mg vs Placebo · Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM) · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -4.0 · 95% CI -5.7 to -2.3
  • Omalizumab 150mg vs Placebo · Mixed Model with Repeated Measures(MMRM) · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -3.5 · 95% CI -5.1 to -1.8
SecondaryTime to ISS7 MID Response by Week 12

The ISS7 MID response was defined as a reduction from Baseline in ISS7 of ≥ 5 points. Time to ISS7 MID response was the time (in weeks) from the date of the first dose to the date where ISS7 MID response was first achieved during Week 1 to Week 12.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Time to ISS7 MID Response by Week 12
ParticipantsOmalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlacebo
First Response: >0 to <=4 weeks11410942
First Response: >4 to <=8 weeks182510
First Response: >8 to <=12 weeks10107
No response252324
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab 300mg vs Placebo · Regression, Cox · p = <0.001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.71 · 95% CI 1.25 to 2.33
  • Omalizumab 150mg vs Placebo · Regression, Cox · p = 0.001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.66 · 95% CI 1.22 to 2.25

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment (Day 1 to week 12) plus 8 weeks post-treatment follow-up epoch (week 12 to week 20).. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Omalizumab 300 mg0/167 (0%)5/167 (3%)84/167 (50.3%)
Omalizumab 150 mg0/167 (0%)5/167 (3%)79/167 (47.3%)
Placebo0/83 (0%)3/83 (3.6%)43/83 (51.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventOmalizumab 300 mgOmalizumab 150 mgPlacebo
Lumbar vertebral fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1670/1671/83
Meniscus injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1670/1671/83
Embolism venousVascular disorders0/1670/1671/83
Vertigo positionalEar and labyrinth disorders1/1670/1670/83
Pelvic inflammatory diseaseInfections and infestations0/1671/1670/83
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/1670/1670/83
Ectopic pregnancyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/1671/1670/83
PregnancyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions1/1671/1670/83
Cervical dysplasiaReproductive system and breast disorders0/1671/1670/83
RectoceleReproductive system and breast disorders0/1671/1670/83
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent other events
EventOmalizumab 300 mgOmalizumab 150 mgPlacebo
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations36/16725/16712/83
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations7/1678/1677/83
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders11/1673/1672/83
Blood uric acid increasedInvestigations5/1675/1674/83
InfluenzaInfections and infestations7/1677/1671/83
Hepatic function abnormalHepatobiliary disorders0/1672/1673/83
PharyngitisInfections and infestations1/1674/1673/83
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/1671/1673/83
DermatitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/1671/1673/83
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations1/1676/1671/83

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Omalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlaceboTotal
Mean40.4 ± 12.2938.8 ± 12.1842.8 ± 12.3240.2 ± 12.31
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Omalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlaceboTotal
Female11510853276
Male535930142
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Omalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlaceboTotal
Race — Asian16816783418
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Omalizumab 300mgOmalizumab 150mgPlaceboTotal
Ethnicity — Chinese16816783418
07

Study locations

27 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Beijing, Beijing 100039, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fuzhou, Fujian 350025, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nanning, Guangxi 530021, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Changsha, Hunan 410008, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shenyang, Liaoning 110000, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Urumqi, Xinjiang 830001, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310016, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Beijing, 100034, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Beijing, 100050, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Beijing, 100191, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chongqing, 400011, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chongqing, 400038, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Guangzhou, 510000, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nanjing, 210042, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shanghai, 200025, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shanghai, 200040, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shanghai, 200433, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bi XD, Lu BZ, Pan XX, Liu S, Wang JY. Adjunct therapy with probiotics for chronic urticaria in children: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021 Apr 17;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13223-021-00544-3. PubMed 33865434 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 10, 2016
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 11, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03328897
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 1, 2017
Start date
Apr 26, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 23, 2019
Completion
Sep 24, 2019
Results posted
Nov 4, 2020
Last update
Nov 4, 2020

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion