ClinicalTrials.gg
SuspendedNCT03327636Updated May 18, 2022

A Trial Comparing USG-HIFU vs AS in Management of Low-risk PTMC

An interventional study of Echopulse in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Suspended at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-18.

Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was suspended
not start in coming years
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
103
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 74 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) is a common tumor in Hong Kong. Early immediate surgery has traditionally been recommended. However, given its excellent prognosis, some have recommended Active Surveillance (AS) as an alternative. AS involves monitoring the patients who have PTMC until the tumor progresses. On the other hand, a new technology of ablation has been developing to be an alternative treatment for thyroid nodules comparing with traditional surgery, named High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). In our previous study, HIFU is proved in shrinking the size of target site by 6 months gradually and effectively.

The investigator hypothesize that HIFU is an effective treatment for PTMC. Compared to AS, HIFU may be a better option as it not only halts disease progression but also has a longer progression-free survival, longer time to tumor progression and is less likely to harbor active disease.

Read the detailed description

Differentiated thyroid cancer has been rising in incidence and is expected to be a leading cancer by the year 2030 . However, the rise has been mostly attributed to an increased detection of incidentally-discovered papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). PTMC is a papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) measuring ≤ 10mm in its greatest dimension. Previous screening and autopsy studies have confirmed these lesions are common and could be found in up to 15% of normal healthy individuals.

However, since the incidence of clinically-significant PTC has historically been \<0.5% (i.e. 100 times less than the occult rate), most occult PTMCs probably do not cause harm in one's life-time and could be safely observed without immediate surgery.

As a result, several groups of investigators worldwide began evaluating the feasibility and safety of observing PTMC without surgery. Rather than offering immediate surgery, well selected patients with low-risk PTMC (i.e. no extrathyroidal extension, nodal and distant metastases) were followed with regular ultrasound (USG) alone and only proceeded to definitive to surgery when the PTMC showed progression. As expected, >90% PTMCs did not progress and of those who progressed and had surgery, all were cured. This meant even when the initial surgery was deferred, there was no compromise in the chance of cure.

With a recent shift towards a more conservative approach in the management of PTC, it has become increasingly accepted that perhaps active surveillance (AS) might be a safe alternative in well selected low-risk PTMCs.

However, despite the fact that AS is a viable alternative, there are issues and challenges. First, although the majority of occult tumors do not progress initially, the accumulative risk of tumor progression increases with time. From an analysis of the 1479 PTMCs observed over 5 years, 212 (14.3%) eventually met the progression criteria (such as tumor enlargement, local invasion, new lymph node metastasis or becoming clinical disease) and had surgery. Therefore, with longer observation, a greater proportion of patients would end up having surgery. Second some patients tend to find it difficult to accept AS as a treatment. Even if they do initially, the "wait and see" approach may distress patients leading to non-compliance. To date, little is known how this may affect patients' well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) over time. Third, since there are no clinical or molecular parameters to predict which tumors are more likely to progress, patients often need life-long follow-up. However, this may be challenging because patients may move to different places. Lastly, there are now less invasive, non-surgical options available to potentially eradicate PTMCs. Image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) using laser ablation or radiofrequency ablation appears promising. With technological advances, they may eventually replace surgery in the future. However, reports have so far been non-randomized, uncontrolled and short follow-up. Furthermore, despite being less-invasive, they still require a small skin incision.

High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a form of IGTA that needs no skin incision or needle insertion and so, is a truly noninvasive treatment. Under USG guidance, it is able to cause irreversible tissue destruction deep to the skin and subcutaneous layer. Apart from being non-invasive, it is less dependent on the operator's skill as the treatment could be controlled by an automated program. In fact, HIFU is highly successful in a number of solid cancers. In the thyroid, it induces tissue damage via the cavitation and thermal effects. To date, several groups (including us) have confirmed that HIFU ablation is highly effective in inducing shrinkage of benign thyroid nodules.

02

Conditions studied

  • Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

Keywords

  • Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma
  • High intensity focused ultrasound
  • Active surveillance
03

In context

Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

24 studies on the registry are indexed under Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma; 8 are open to participants now.

Browse Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,292 studies on the registry; 348 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a thyroid nodule ≤10mm in the largest dimension that is confirmed on FNAC to be PTC (Bethesda class VI cytology) or suspicious of PTC (Bethesda V cytology). For the latter, the nodule needs to have an additional suspicious sonographic feature (i.e. marked hypoechogenicity, irregular margins, height-to-wide ratio >1 and intravascular microcalcifications);
  • Have not expressed a strong desire for immediate surgery after PTMC has been confirmed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≤ 18 or ≥ 75 years old;
  • Have another thyroid nodule that is either indeterminate or malignant on FNAC;
  • Have concomitant hypo- or hyperthyroidism (i.e. thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and/or free thyroxine levels outside the normal ranges)
  • Have sonographic evidence of chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (because this generally makes it difficult to assess and reassess tumor size accurately on USG alone)
  • Have a tumor considered not suitable for AS. This includes a PTMC with extrathyroidal extension, concomitant nodal or distant or a PTMC located within 3mm from trachea-esophageal groove or recurrent laryngeal nerve.
  • Have a condition considered not suitable for HIFU treatment (pregnancy, history of neck irradiation, known contralateral vocal cord palsy, a tumor with coarse, macroscopic intranodular calcifications or located outside the treatable depth of 5-30 mm from the skin, family history of non-medullary thyroid carcinoma and medical conditions precluding intravenous sedation).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
103 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High Intensity Focused Ultrasound

    Apply the machine 'Echopulse' with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound to treat the papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

    Device: Echopulse

  • No intervention
    Active surveillance

    The participants will be monitored by the doctors actively, like more frequent in follow-up to observe their current situation.

Interventions

  • DeviceEchopulse

    This is a machine to apply high intensity focused ultrasound to ablation the target zone. In this study, we would apply it to the papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

    Also known as: High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of tumors exhibiting disease progression

    To compare the proportion of patients with PTMC exhibiting signs of progression between HIFU and AS group at 24 months

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Median duration of progression-free survival

    To examine the median duration of progression-free survival within 2 years

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Change in tumor volume

    Tumor volume change from baseline (%) at 2 years

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Proportion of patients with active disease

    The proportion of patients with active disease confirmed by re-biopsy and CEUSG (%) at 2 years

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Proportion of patients undergoing planned and unplanned thyroidectomy

    To calculate the proportion of patients who undergoing thyroidectomy in planned or unplanned.

    Time frame: 24 months

  5. Health related quality of life (HRQOL)

    To examine participants HRQOL during the study with a questionnaire combined with different measurement tools: SF-12 (12-Item Short Form Health Survey), SF-6D (Short Form 6 Dimensions), EQ-5D-5L (EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels) and FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - general scale). The total score would be the health score of participants, as high score as high quality of life.

    Time frame: 24 months

  6. Incidence of potential side-effects from intensity focused ultrasound treatment

    To examine any treatment-related side-effects after the treatment

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Queen Mary Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;74(11):2913-21. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. Erratum In: Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 15;74(14):4006. PubMed 24840647 ↗
  • Davies L, Welch HG. Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973-2002. JAMA. 2006 May 10;295(18):2164-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.18.2164. PubMed 16684987 ↗
  • Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Bray F, Wild CP, Plummer M, Dal Maso L. Worldwide Thyroid-Cancer Epidemic? The Increasing Impact of Overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 18;375(7):614-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1604412. No abstract available. PubMed 27532827 ↗
  • Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, Pacini F, Randolph GW, Sawka AM, Schlumberger M, Schuff KG, Sherman SI, Sosa JA, Steward DL, Tuttle RM, Wartofsky L. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016 Jan;26(1):1-133. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020. PubMed 26462967 ↗
  • Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Kihara M, Higashiyama T, Kobayashi K, Miya A. Patient age is significantly related to the progression of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid under observation. Thyroid. 2014 Jan;24(1):27-34. doi: 10.1089/thy.2013.0367. Epub 2013 Nov 14. PubMed 24001104 ↗
  • Sugitani I, Toda K, Yamada K, Yamamoto N, Ikenaga M, Fujimoto Y. Three distinctly different kinds of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma should be recognized: our treatment strategies and outcomes. World J Surg. 2010 Jun;34(6):1222-31. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0359-x. PubMed 20066418 ↗
  • Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Inoue H, Fukushima M, Kihara M, Higashiyama T, Tomoda C, Takamura Y, Kobayashi K, Miya A. An observational trial for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Japanese patients. World J Surg. 2010 Jan;34(1):28-35. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0303-0. PubMed 20020290 ↗
  • Lang BH, Wong CK. A cost-effectiveness comparison between early surgery and non-surgical approach for incidental papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015 Sep;173(3):367-75. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0454. Epub 2015 Jun 23. PubMed 26104754 ↗
  • National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN Guidelines) 2015 Thyroid carcinoma. Version 2. 2015. Available: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp [Accessed on 16th February 2016]
  • Perros P, Boelaert K, Colley S, Evans C, Evans RM, Gerrard Ba G, Gilbert J, Harrison B, Johnson SJ, Giles TE, Moss L, Lewington V, Newbold K, Taylor J, Thakker RV, Watkinson J, Williams GR; British Thyroid Association. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014 Jul;81 Suppl 1:1-122. doi: 10.1111/cen.12515. No abstract available. PubMed 24989897 ↗
  • Brito JP, Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Tuttle RM. A Clinical Framework to Facilitate Risk Stratification When Considering an Active Surveillance Alternative to Immediate Biopsy and Surgery in Papillary Microcarcinoma. Thyroid. 2016 Jan;26(1):144-9. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0178. Epub 2015 Nov 5. PubMed 26414743 ↗
  • Papini E, Guglielmi R, Gharib H, Misischi I, Graziano F, Chianelli M, Crescenzi A, Bianchini A, Valle D, Bizzarri G. Ultrasound-guided laser ablation of incidental papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a potential therapeutic approach in patients at surgical risk. Thyroid. 2011 Aug;21(8):917-20. doi: 10.1089/thy.2010.0447. Epub 2011 May 19. Erratum In: Thyroid. 2011 Oct;21(10):1169. Hosseim, Gharib [corrected to Gharib, Hossein]. PubMed 21595556 ↗
  • Zhang M, Luo Y, Zhang Y, Tang J. Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Treating Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Prospective Study. Thyroid. 2016 Nov;26(11):1581-1587. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0471. Epub 2016 Aug 18. PubMed 27445090 ↗
  • Monchik JM, Donatini G, Iannuccilli J, Dupuy DE. Radiofrequency ablation and percutaneous ethanol injection treatment for recurrent local and distant well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):296-304. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217685.85467.2d. PubMed 16858194 ↗
  • She WH, Cheung TT, Jenkins CR, Irwin MG. Clinical applications of high-intensity focused ultrasound. Hong Kong Med J. 2016 Aug;22(4):382-92. doi: 10.12809/hkmj154755. Epub 2016 Jul 6. PubMed 27380753 ↗
  • Esnault O, Franc B, Chapelon JY. Localized ablation of thyroid tissue by high-intensity focused ultrasound: improvement of noninvasive tissue necrosis methods. Thyroid. 2009 Oct;19(10):1085-91. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0121. PubMed 19803790 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2022; primary completion for Aug 2024, 22 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 25, 2017
First posted
Oct 31, 2017
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
May 18, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 18, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03327636
Responsible party
Dr. Lang Hung Hin, Brian (Clinical Associate Professor, The University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 31, 2017
Start date
Oct 1, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
May 18, 2022

Study contacts

Hung Hin, Brian Lang, MBBS (Hons)
principal investigator · The University of Hong Kong

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is suspended, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion