ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03326791ASACUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Aspirin in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Acetylsalicylic acid and Placebo Oral Tablet in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases, Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases, sponsored by Oslo University Hospital. Completed at 14 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Oslo University Hospital · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 16, 2026Now CompletedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
466
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 22 studies testing aspirin in Colorectal Neoplasms — 1 open to participants now, 9 under way, 5 of them phase 3. Aspirin · Colorectal Neoplasms.

Enrollment
8th of 22
466 · median 161
Started
2017
with 1 other
Phase 2/3
3 of 22
none open now
Registered
15th of 22
by date

Among the 22 studies testing aspirin in Colorectal Neoplasms, this one is the 8th largest by enrollment, is one of 2 that started in 2017, is one of 3 in phase 2/3, and was the 15th registered.

By phase

22 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 27 · 1 open
Phase 37 · 0 open
No phase3 · 0 open
Phase 2/3this study3 · 0 open
Phase 11 · 0 open
Phase 41 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 1992; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2017.

Size and results

Median enrollment 161 across the 22 interventional studies. Of the 7 that completed or were terminated, 1 (14%) have results posted.

Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 22 studies testing aspirin in Colorectal Neoplasms, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The ASAC trial is a Scandinavian, multi-center, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study to determine whether adjuvant treatment with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) can improve disease free survival in patients treated with resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM).

Several studies have shown beneficial effect of ASA on primary prevention of CRC and the investigators group and others have shown a potential association of ASA also taken after the diagnosis on CRC survival in registry-based studies (secondary prevention). Up to 800 patients operated for CRCLM will be randomized to Arm#1 ASA 160 mg once daily or Arm#2 Placebo for a period of 3 years or till disease recurrence. The patients will be treated and followed up according to standard of care and the National Guidelines.

The ASAC trial will be the first clinical interventional trial to assess the beneficial role of ASA in recurrence of CRC liver metastases and survival. ASA is an inexpensive, well tolerated, and easily accessible drug that will be highly potential as adjuvant drug in secondary prevention of CRC liver metastases if the study shows a beneficial effect. This trial will also investigate the effect of ASA as adjuvant treatment on Health-related Quality of Life and the cost-effectiveness.

03

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Liver Metastases

Keywords

  • Acetylsalicylic acid
  • Aspirin
  • Trombyl
  • Secondary prevention
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • First time CRCLM (synchronous or metachronous).
  • Recurrence of CRCLM (not previously included in this trial).
  • In synchronous CRCLM and "Liver first" approach, the primary tumor must be resected within 6 weeks after the liver
  • Macroscopic (surgical) free resection margins (R0 or R1 resection).
  • Must be ambulatory with a performance status (ECOG) 0-2.
  • Must be at least 18 years of age.
  • Signed and expected cooperation of the patients for the treatment and follow up must be obtained and documented according to International Conference on Harmonization - Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP), and national/local regulations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant use of ASA or other anticoagulants or inhibitors such as warfarin or clopidogrel.
  • Ongoing regular use of or NSAIDs.
  • Inherited or acquired coagulopathy (haemophilia).
  • Blood platelets (thrombocytes) \< 100 x 10\^9/L.
  • Severe heart failure (classified as (NYHA) class >III)
  • Severe kidney failure >Stage 3b
  • CRCLM previously treated with radiofrequency or microwave ablation technique
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding. For women in childbearing age there will be pregnancy test at monthly intervals (urine human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) pregnancy tests (for home testing) will be given to the patients for monthly tests and the patient will self-report the results at each control). Furthermore, highly effective will be required.
  • without proper contraceptive measures such as oral contraceptives, other hormonal contraceptives (vaginal products, skin patches, or implanted or injectable products), or mechanical products such as an intrauterine device to avoid pregnancy for the entire study period.
  • Liver cirrhosis with a score >B7.
  • Alcoholism.
  • listed on the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) of Trombyl: /allergies to ASA, Thrombocytopenia, Previous severe gastrointestinal haemorrhage/peptic ulcer due to ASA/NSAID, Active peptic ulcer, Haemophilia, Liver cirrhosis, Severe congestive heart failure.
  • Need to use concomitant medications contraindicated according to SmPC of Trombyl.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
466 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Acetylsalicylic acid 160 mg once daily until recurrent disease or a total period of 3 years.

    Drug: Acetylsalicylic acid

  • Placebo comparator
    Control group

    Placebo Oral Tablet once daily until recurrent disease or a total period of 3 years.

    Drug: Placebo Oral Tablet

Interventions

  • Trombyl 160 mg once daily

    Also known as: Trombyl, Aspirin

  • DrugPlacebo Oral Tablet

    Placebo one tablet daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease Free Survival (DFS) after three years treatment

    DFS three years after initiation of treatment with ASA or Placebo after resection of liver metastases.

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to recurrence (TTR) of disease after randomization

    Time to recurrence of liver metastases three years after start of treatment.

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Overall survival (OS) three years after treatment start

    OS at three years after initiation of treatment with ASA or Placebo

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Health-related Quality of Life with 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

    SF-36 has been proven useful in monitoring population health, estimating the burdens of different diseases, monitoring outcome in clinical practice, and evaluating medical treatment effects. Health-related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) will be assessed with SF-36.

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. Health-related Quality of Life with EuroQoL 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)

    The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale. This will be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement. The scores on these five dimensions will be presented as a health profile. Health-related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) will be assessed with EuroQoL 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D).

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. ASA in CRC and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses I

    Changes in HR-QoL will be used in calculation of the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), a key outcome used in economic evaluations to compare treatments.

    Time frame: 3 years

  6. ASA in CRC and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses II

    Cost-effectiveness measured from a health care perspective by assessing the use of Health care provider in primary and specialized medicine.

    Time frame: 3 years

  7. ASA in CRC and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses III

    Cost-effectiveness measured from a societal perspective by assessing records in Statistics Norway (SSB).

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

14 sites
  • Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen
    Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Odense University Hospital
    Odense, Denmark
  • Haukeland University Hospital
    Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Oslo University Hospital
    Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Stavanger University Hospital
    Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
  • University Hospital of North-Norway
    Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
  • St Olavs Hospital
    Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway
  • Sahlgranska University Hospital
    Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Linköping University Hospital
    Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
  • Skåne University Hospital Lund
    Lund, Lund, Sweden
  • Karolinska University Hospital
    Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
  • Uppsala University Hospital
    Uppsala, Uppsala County, Sweden
  • University Hospital of Umeå
    Umeå, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yaqub S, Valberg M, Bjornbeth BA, Angelsen JH, Brudvik KW, Eilertsen IA, Fristedt R, Fristrup CW, Gilg S, Hemmingsson O, Isaksson B, Juel IS, Knudsen AR, Larsen PN, Mortensen KE, Olsen IC, Sandstrom P, Sandvik OM, Sparrelid E, Taflin H, Lothe RA, Tasken K; ASAC Study Group. Aspirin after curative-intent treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases (ASAC): a multicentre, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Sep 23:S2468-1253(26)00260-8. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(26)00260-8. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42777749 ↗
  • Yaqub S, Bjornbeth BA, Angelsen JH, Fristrup CW, Gronbech JE, Hemmingsson O, Isaksson B, Juel IS, Larsen PN, Lindell G, Mortensen FV, Mortensen KE, Rizell M, Sandstrom P, Sandvik OM, Sparrelid E, Taflin H, Tasken K; ASAC study group. Aspirin as secondary prevention in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (ASAC trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Sep 20;22(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05587-w. PubMed 34544470 ↗
09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 16, 2026
Publications
1 publication citing this study linked from PubMed, e.g. PubMed 42777749 ↗
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    Publications 1 publication citing this study linked from PubMed, e.g. PubMed 42777749 ↗
    + 2 other changes: verification date and date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03326791
Collaborators
Norwegian Cancer Society, The Research Council of Norway, Klinbeforsk
Responsible party
Sheraz Yaqub (MD PhD, Coordinating Investigator, Oslo University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 31, 2017
Start date
Dec 15, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2022
Completion
Jun 1, 2026
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Kjetil Taskèn, MD PhD
principal investigator · University of Oslo
Sheraz Yaqub, MD PhD
principal investigator · Oslo University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Aspirin

Start the discussion