ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03326141Updated Apr 24, 2024Results posted

Community-based Intervention Effects on Older Adults' Physical Activity

An interventional study of Otago Exercise Program and Physical activity monitors (e.g., Fitbit) in Exercise, Physical Activity and Accidental Fall, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-24.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
309
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 34 studies in Motor Activity by University of Minnesota — 1 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Motor Activity · University of Minnesota.

Enrollment
8th of 33
309 · median 77
Started
2017
with 1 other
No phase
29 of 34
1 open now
Registered
20th of 34
by date

Among the 34 studies in Motor Activity by University of Minnesota, this one is the 8th largest by enrollment of the 33 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2017, is one of 29 with no phase, and was the 20th registered.

Motor Activity

9,798 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Activity; 1,910 are open to participants now.

Browse Motor Activity studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 34 studies in Motor Activity by University of Minnesota is open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 1,201 Motor Activity studies recruiting now, 517 (43%) set no upper age limit and 535 (45%) stop at 75 or younger; 180 take children under 18; 420 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 70 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 34 studies in Motor Activity by University of Minnesota, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The research team will conduct a 2 x 2 factorial experiment testing the individual and combined effects of two empirically and theoretically relevant sets of behavior change strategies on community-dwelling older adults' physical activity. To do this the investigators will randomize participants >= 70 years old (n = 308) to 1 of 4 experimental conditions. All conditions include an evidence-based physical activity protocol endorsed by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for use by all older adults, including those with frailty and multiple co-morbidities and the commercially available physical activity monitor (e.g., Fitbit) to augment intervention delivery. Intervention components that are experimental and vary by condition are the sets of behavior change strategies which will be combined with the physical activity protocol and the physical activity monitor. Condition 1 has no specific behavior change strategies; Condition 2 includes an intervention component comprised of 5 interpersonal behavior change strategies, such as facilitating social support and social comparison; Condition 3 includes an intervention component comprised of 5 intrapersonal behavior change strategies, such as setting personally meaningful goals; and Condition 4 includes both sets of behavior change strategies -- 5 interpersonal strategies combined with 5 intrapersonal behavior change strategies.

Read the detailed description

To fully examine the effects of these experimental components, The investigators have delineated Primary, Secondary and Exploratory Aims:

Primary Aim: Determine which experimental intervention component(s) increase PA among community-dwelling older adults post-intervention: immediately, 6 months, and 12 months. Hypothesis: Participants receiving the interpersonal set of behavior change strategies (conditions 2 and 4) will have clinically meaningful increases in PA post- intervention (at all 3 time-points), compared to participants not receiving these strategies (conditions 1 and 3).

Secondary Aim: Determine which experimental intervention component(s)decrease fall occurrence and increase quality of life (QOL) among community-dwelling older adults 12 months post-intervention. Hypotheses: Participants receiving the set of interpersonal behavior change strategies will have clinically meaningful reductions in falls and increases in QOL, 12 months post-intervention, compared to participants not receiving these strategies.

Exploratory Aim: Evaluate experimental intervention component effects on targeted psychosocial constructs (social support; readiness; self-regulation) and physical constructs (functional leg strength and balance), which are theorized as mechanisms of change--and whether these mechanisms mediate the effects of experimental intervention components on PA and falls. Hypotheses: Receiving the interpersonal behavioral change strategies, relative to not receiving these strategies, will elicit increases in targeted psychosocial constructs and increases in physical constructs, which in turn will mediate the intervention's effects on PA behavior and falls.

03

Conditions studied

  • Exercise
  • Physical Activity
  • Accidental Fall
  • Motivation
  • Older Adults

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥70 years of age
  • English speaking
  • Low levels of PA (below recommended guidelines)
  • Self-reported fall risk as guided by the CDC, Steadi fall risk screener

    • One or more falls in the last year
    • Unsteadiness when standing or walking
    • Worries about falling
  • Participants who self-report the following symptoms will require clearance from a primary provider (as guided by the Exercise and Screening for You Questionnaire)

    • Pain, tightness or pressure in chest during PA (walking, climbing stairs, household chores, similar activities) that have not been checked and/ or treated by a healthcare provider
    • Current dizziness that have not been checked and/ or treated by a healthcare provider
    • Current, frequent falls that have not been checked and/ or treated by a healthcare provider

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lower extremity injury or surgery within the past 6 weeks
  • Inability to walk
  • Formal diagnosis of neurocognitive impairment or dementia
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
309 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Otago+PAM+Health / Wellness topics

    Condition 1: Otago Exercise Program adapted for delivery to small groups; a physical activity monitor such as a Fitbit (PAM); and, information about health and wellness (8) topics guided by content in the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention websites.

    Behavioral: Otago Exercise Program · Device: Physical activity monitors (e.g., Fitbit) · Other: Information about Health and Wellness

  • Experimental
    Otago + PAM + Interpersonal strategies

    Condition 2: Otago Exercise Program adapted for delivery to small groups; a PAM (e.g.,Fitbit); 5 Interpersonal behavior change strategies; and, information about health and wellness topics (1) guided by content in the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention websites.

    Behavioral: Otago Exercise Program · Device: Physical activity monitors (e.g., Fitbit) · Behavioral: Interpersonal Behavior Change Strategies

  • Experimental
    Otago, PAM, Intrapersonal strategies

    Condition 3: Otago Exercise Program adapted for delivery to small groups; a PAM (e.g.,Fitbit); 5 Intrapersonal behavior change strategies; and, health and wellness topics (1) guided by content in the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention websites.

    Behavioral: Otago Exercise Program · Device: Physical activity monitors (e.g., Fitbit) · Behavioral: Intrapersonal Behavior Change Strategies

  • Experimental
    Otago,PAM, Inter+Intra strategies

    Condition 4: Otago Exercise Program adapted for delivery to small groups; a PAM (e.g., Fitbit); 5 Interpersonal behavior change strategies; and, 5 Intrapersonal behavior change strategies

    Behavioral: Otago Exercise Program · Device: Physical activity monitors (e.g., Fitbit) · Behavioral: Interpersonal Behavior Change Strategies · Behavioral: Intrapersonal Behavior Change Strategies

Interventions

  • BehavioralOtago Exercise Program

    The program has been adapted for groups and includes 5 flexibility movements (e.g., back extension and ankle, head, neck, trunk movements), 5 leg strengthening exercises (knee extensor, knee flexor, hip abductor, ankle plantar flexes, ankle dorsiflexes), 12 balance movements (knee bends, backwards walking, walking and turning, sideways walking, tandem stance, tandem walk, one leg stand, heel walking, toe walking, heel-toe walking backwards, sit to stand, stair walking), and a walking plan. The number, intensity and duration of movements are individualized according to preference and ability and they are gradually progressed.

  • DevicePhysical activity monitors (e.g., Fitbit)

    We will use Fitbit Charge 2 (or an equivalent). Features essential for this research include built-in accelerometers that accurately measure steps and physical activity (PA) duration.Participants will have a brief orientation to these during baseline data collection and have the opportunity to return demonstrate. In addition, RAs will be available to help participants troubleshoot, as needed, via telephone and in person, after intervention meetings. Intervention meetings include discussions about the PAMs, but topics vary according to assigned study condition.

    Also known as: PAM

  • BehavioralInterpersonal Behavior Change Strategies

    The interpersonal content will include facilitated discussed about including PA into social routines, identifying and problem-solving social and environmental barriers to PA, social support for exercise, and friendly social comparisons about practicing PA outside the small group setting and interpreting/ sharing data.

  • BehavioralIntrapersonal Behavior Change Strategies

    The intrapersonal content will include encouragement and guidance to identify baseline PA patterns, develop and refine personally meaningful goals and plans, identify and problem solve personal barriers to staying physically active, integrate PA into personal routines, and monitor goal outcomes

  • OtherInformation about Health and Wellness

    Information about health and wellness varies in dose, according to time spent in each condition that addresses behavior change. Topics in condition 1 include sleep, vaccinations, supplements, fall risk factors, memory, hearing and pain guided by information for older adults available on the NIA and CDC websites. Topics in conditions 2 and 3 include fall risk factors and sleep. Topics in condition 4 include fall risk factors.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantity of Physical Activity Measured Objectively

    Average weekly minutes of total physical activity per week (light, moderate and vigorous intensities) as captured from PAM data (Fitbit Charge-2)

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-Intervention (one week, six months, twelve months)

  2. Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)

    Self-report Measure of Physical Activity. PASE is a validated questionnaire to measure the amount of physical activity in people over the age of 65 including types (e.g., walking, recreational, exercise, housework, care-giving). Scores, accounting for frequency, duration and intensity of physical activity are calculated and typically range from 0 to 793, with higher value representing more physical activity.

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-Intervention (one week, six months, twelve months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fall Rate

    Falls per person year, assessed via prospective monthly calendars

    Time frame: 12 months post intervention

  2. Number of Participants With Moderate or Major Injuries From Falls

    Number of injuries from falls was measured via prospective falls calendars mailed to participants monthly with return addressed/stamped envelopes. Circumstances and injuries related to each fall were documented on the calendars. Calendar documentation each fall was verified and detailed through phone conversations between participants and trained research staff. Moderate and Major injuries from falls were categorized according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality with moderate injuries defined as necessitating sutures, skin glue, splinting, and or involving muscle or joint strain. Major injuries were defined as those associated with internal injuries or a need for surgery, casting, traction, or neurological consults.

    Time frame: 12 months post intervention

  3. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale v1.2 Global Health

    Using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Questionnaire 1.2. Two constructs from this questionnaire were converted to t scores: self-reported physical health and self-reported mental health. . Mean t scores are 50, which indicates the adult population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Higher t scores are considered better, or healthier, for self-reported physical health and mental health. No clinically relevant thresholds were described in this study.

    Time frame: Baseline and post-intervention: one-week, six months, and 12 months

07

Results

Posted Apr 24, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOtago+PAM+Health / Wellness TopicsOtago + PAM + Interpersonal StrategiesOtago, PAM, Intrapersonal StrategiesOtago,PAM, Inter+Intra Strategies
Started78787677
Completed77767475
Not completed1222

Outcome measures

PrimaryQuantity of Physical Activity Measured Objectively

Average weekly minutes of total physical activity per week (light, moderate and vigorous intensities) as captured from PAM data (Fitbit Charge-2)

Time frame:
Baseline and Post-Intervention (one week, six months, twelve months)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes per day
Quantity of Physical Activity Measured Objectively
minutes per dayOtago+PAM+Health / Wellness TopicsOtago + PAM + Interpersonal StrategiesOtago, PAM, Intrapersonal StrategiesOtago,PAM, Inter+Intra Strategies
Baseline177.9 ± 62.2167.7 ± 79.1185.9 ± 70.5177.9 ± 72.7
one week post-intervention180.5 ± 68.5193.1 ± 82.1181 ± 68.2209.1 ± 79.2
six months post-intervention180 ± 73.8185.7 ± 84175.1 ± 68.9198 ± 78
twelve months post-intervention174.3 ± 72.0190.3 ± 99.1167.7 ± 68.6192.9 ± 80.4
PrimaryPhysical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)

Self-report Measure of Physical Activity. PASE is a validated questionnaire to measure the amount of physical activity in people over the age of 65 including types (e.g., walking, recreational, exercise, housework, care-giving). Scores, accounting for frequency, duration and intensity of physical activity are calculated and typically range from 0 to 793, with higher value representing more physical activity.

Time frame:
Baseline and Post-Intervention (one week, six months, twelve months)
Reported as:
Mean · Total PASE Score
Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)
Total PASE ScoreOtago+PAM+Health / Wellness TopicsOtago + PAM + Interpersonal StrategiesOtago, PAM, Intrapersonal StrategiesOtago,PAM, Inter+Intra Strategies
Baseline102.2 ± 46.4108.3 ± 66.6110.6 ± 44101.8 ± 48.5
One week post-intervention111.1 ± 47.3119.2 ± 69.9120.7 ± 56.2121.1 ± 58.7
Six months post-intervention106.7 ± 53.0118.2 ± 65.1119.5 ± 65.8112.2 ± 60.1
Twelve months post-intervention107.1 ± 60.0113.8 ± 66.8123.0 ± 92.3112.4 ± 60.9
SecondaryFall Rate

Falls per person year, assessed via prospective monthly calendars

Time frame:
12 months post intervention
Reported as:
Number · Falls per person year
Fall Rate
Falls per person yearOtago+PAM+Health / Wellness TopicsOtago + PAM + Interpersonal StrategiesOtago, PAM, Intrapersonal StrategiesOtago,PAM, Inter+Intra Strategies
Fall Rate0.91.00.91.1
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Moderate or Major Injuries From Falls

Number of injuries from falls was measured via prospective falls calendars mailed to participants monthly with return addressed/stamped envelopes. Circumstances and injuries related to each fall were documented on the calendars. Calendar documentation each fall was verified and detailed through phone conversations between participants and trained research staff. Moderate and Major injuries from falls were categorized according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality with moderate injuries defined as necessitating sutures, skin glue, splinting, and or involving muscle or joint strain. Major injuries were defined as those associated with internal injuries or a need for surgery, casting, traction, or neurological consults.

Time frame:
12 months post intervention
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Moderate or Major Injuries From Falls
ParticipantsOtago+PAM+Health / Wellness TopicsOtago + PAM + Interpersonal StrategiesOtago, PAM, Intrapersonal StrategiesOtago,PAM, Inter+Intra Strategies
Number of moderate injurious falls6766
Number of major injurious falls1221
SecondaryPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale v1.2 Global Health

Using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Questionnaire 1.2. Two constructs from this questionnaire were converted to t scores: self-reported physical health and self-reported mental health. . Mean t scores are 50, which indicates the adult population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Higher t scores are considered better, or healthier, for self-reported physical health and mental health. No clinically relevant thresholds were described in this study.

Time frame:
Baseline and post-intervention: one-week, six months, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · T score
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale v1.2 Global Health
T scoreOtago+PAM+Health / Wellness TopicsOtago + PAM + Interpersonal StrategiesOtago, PAM, Intrapersonal StrategiesOtago,PAM, Inter+Intra Strategies
Physical Health: Baseline39.2 ± 4.939.5 ± 5.339.1 ± 4.940 ± 5.1
Physical Health: Post-intervention, One week40.2 ± 4.739.6 ± 5.539.6 ± 4.640.5 ± 5.0
Physical Health: Post-intervention, six months38.7 ± 5.238.7 ± 5.639.2 ± 4.540.0 ± 5.1
Physical Health 12 months post-intervention39.5 ± 5.339.1 ± 6.238.9 ± 5.139.3 ± 5.1
Mental Health: Baseline50.8 ± 7.452.3 ± 7.951.8 ± 8.052.9 ± 8.1
Mental Health: Post-intervention, One week53.1 ± 7.152.4 ± 7.952.2 ± 8.353.8 ± 8.0
Mental Health: Post-intervention, Six months51.4 ± 7.050.6 ± 8.251.7 ± 7.452.8 ± 8.4
Mental Health: Post-intervention, Twelve months51.1 ± 7.450.3 ± 8.350.3 ± 7.449.9 ± 8.3

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Otago+PAM+Health / Wellness Topics1/77 (1.3%)0/77 (0%)2/77 (2.6%)
Otago + PAM + Interpersonal Strategies2/76 (2.6%)0/76 (0%)7/76 (9.2%)
Otago, PAM, Intrapersonal Strategies1/74 (1.4%)0/74 (0%)3/74 (4.1%)
Otago,PAM, Inter+Intra Strategies0/75 (0%)2/75 (2.7%)3/75 (4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOtago+PAM+Health / Wellness TopicsOtago + PAM + Interpersonal StrategiesOtago, PAM, Intrapersonal StrategiesOtago,PAM, Inter+Intra Strategies
cancerGeneral disorders0/770/760/741/75
StrokeCardiac disorders0/770/760/741/75
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventOtago+PAM+Health / Wellness TopicsOtago + PAM + Interpersonal StrategiesOtago, PAM, Intrapersonal StrategiesOtago,PAM, Inter+Intra Strategies
fractureGeneral disorders0/772/761/740/75
PainGeneral disorders2/771/761/741/75
InfectionInfections and infestations0/771/761/740/75
cancerGeneral disorders0/770/760/741/75
lung illnessGeneral disorders0/770/760/741/75
FallGeneral disorders0/771/760/740/75
Polymyalgia rheumatica--unrelatedGeneral disorders0/771/760/740/75
hyponatremiaGeneral disorders0/771/760/740/75

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Otago+PAM+Health / Wellness TopicsOtago + PAM + Interpersonal StrategiesOtago, PAM, Intrapersonal StrategiesOtago,PAM, Inter+Intra StrategiesTotal
Mean77.8 ± 577.7 ± 577.3 ± 576.6 ± 5.177.4 ± 5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Otago+PAM+Health / Wellness TopicsOtago + PAM + Interpersonal StrategiesOtago, PAM, Intrapersonal StrategiesOtago,PAM, Inter+Intra StrategiesTotal
Female64595958240
Male1419171969
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Otago+PAM+Health / Wellness TopicsOtago + PAM + Interpersonal StrategiesOtago, PAM, Intrapersonal StrategiesOtago,PAM, Inter+Intra StrategiesTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00101
Asian01113
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American131016948
White65665767255
More than one race00000
Unknown or Not Reported01102
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Minnesota - School of Nursing
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55408, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified data from this study, including baseline characteristics and outcome variables, will be shared via Data Repository at the University of Minnesota after March 2024

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: November 17, 2017 to September 2, 2022

Access criteria: IRB approval

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Oct 2023, 71 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2024, 5 months after primary completion.

Of 5,147 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Motor Activity, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36. This study's 71 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 5,207 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 1, 2017
First posted
Oct 31, 2017
StartActual
Nov 17, 2017
Primary completionActual
Oct 31, 2023
CompletionActual
Oct 31, 2023
Results first posted
Apr 24, 2024
Last update
Apr 24, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03326141
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 31, 2017
Start date
Nov 17, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2023
Completion
Oct 31, 2023
Results posted
Apr 24, 2024
Last update
Apr 24, 2024

Study contacts

Siobhan K McMahon, PhD
principal investigator · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion