ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03323502APPROACHESUpdated Dec 11, 2025Results posted

Aligning Patient Preferences: a Role Offering Alzheimer's Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Providers Education and Support

An interventional study of APPROACHES ACP Specialist Program and Standard of care in Alzheimer Disease and Dementia, sponsored by Indiana University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-11.

Sponsored by Indiana University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
47,396
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Nursing home (NH) patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias often receive unwanted, burdensome treatments such as hospitalization. Advance care planning (ACP) is a key strategy to support patients and family-caregivers in making informed decisions and ensuring treatment preferences are proactively known and honored. The ACP Specialist Program will improve care and reduce unwanted, burdensome hospitalizations through improved ACP procedures, standardized staff education on ACP, and systematic ACP facilitation delivered by existing NH staff.

Read the detailed description

A significant number of patients with Alzheimer's disease or related dementia diagnoses will be cared for in nursing homes near the end of life. Unfortunately, many of these patients experience unwanted and burdensome medical treatments, such as potentially avoidable hospitalizations, that negatively impact quality of life. Advance care planning (ACP) discussions with patients and family caregivers are important to explore goals in advance of a crisis and support informed, values-based decision-making. The ACP process helps ensure that preferences about treatments such as hospitalization are known, documented, and honored. Research indicates that ACP can reduce burdensome treatments and increase the likelihood that care will match documented preferences. Nursing homes are currently required by regulations to offer ACP to patients and families. However, there are no training requirements for nursing home staff and approaches to fulfilling this regulatory and ethical responsibility vary widely, resulting in inconsistent ACP. The "Aligning Patient Preferences - a Role Offering Alzheimer's patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare providers Education and Support (APPROACHES)" trial will test the APPROACHES ACP Specialist Program. Existing nursing home staff members will be trained to enhance care and reduce unwanted, burdensome hospitalizations through improved ACP procedures, standardized staff education on ACP, and systematic ACP facilitation. The primary trial outcome is annual hospital transfers (admissions and emergency department visits). Consistent with the spirit of a pragmatic trial, study outcomes rely on data already collected for quality improvement, clinical or billing purposes. In the 18 month R21 pilot phase, the aims are to: 1) Establish the trial's organizational structure and processes; and 2) Pilot test the intervention in 4 nursing homes. In the R33 phase, a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial will be conducted in partnership with 2 nursing home corporations who operate a combined total of 142 diverse urban and rural facilities in 8 states. The aims of the 42 month R33 phase are to: 3) Evaluate the primary outcome of hospital transfers over 12 months among patients with dementia in intervention versus control nursing homes; and 4) Compare measures of quality of care at the end of life between the intervention versus control nursing homes. If successful, the APPROACHES ACP Specialist Program will be primed for rapid translation into nursing home practice to reduce unwanted, burdensome hospitalizations and improve quality of care for patients with dementia. Actual enrollment and outcomes will not be available until Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services (CMS) claims and Minimum Data Set (MDS) data become available. Actual trial enrollment numbers will be updated at that time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Disease
  • Dementia

Keywords

  • Nursing Homes
  • Skilled Nursing Facilities
  • Advance Care Planning
  • Advance Directives
  • Alzheimer Disease
  • Dementia
  • Do Not Resuscitate Orders
  • Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment
  • Artificial Nutrition
  • Hospitalization
  • Intubation
  • Pragmatic Clinical Trials
  • Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Patient Preferences
  • Resuscitation Orders
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47,396 is above the median of 70 across 3,019 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Indiana University is the lead sponsor of 986 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 148 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Facilities are owned by NH corporate partners
  • Facilities are Medicare/Medicaid-certified
  • Facilities have an electronic medical records system
  • Minimum bedsize of 50 or more;
  • At least 50% long-stay as defined by a length of stay of 100 days or longer.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Problematic or unstable facilities will be removed in consultation with NH corporate leaders prior to randomization
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
47,396 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    APPROACHES ACP Specialist Program

    Enrolled facilities that will be trained in the APPROACHES Advance Care Planning (ACP) Specialist Program.

    Behavioral: APPROACHES ACP Specialist Program

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Enrolled facilities that will perform standard of care Advance Care Planning (ACP) procedures.

    Other: Standard of care

Interventions

  • BehavioralAPPROACHES ACP Specialist Program

    The APPROACHES Advance Care Planning (ACP) Specialist will work with nursing home leaders (in intervention arm facilities) to: i. Consolidate nursing home ACP procedures; ii. Train and educate staff; and iii. Facilitate ACP Specialist Program with patients who have Alzheimer's disease/related dementias and their family caregivers.

  • OtherStandard of care

    Standard of care Advance Care Planning (ACP) procedures

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hospital Transfers

    Hospital transfers (admissions and emergency department visits) over 12 months between Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) patients in intervention vs. control NHs

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospice Enrollment

    % ADRD patients who use hospice

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Death in Hospital

    % ADRD decedents who died in the hospital

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 26, 2025

Participant flow

145 nursing homes (NH) in 10 states were screened for eligibility. 142 nursing home (NH) facilities in 8 states met inclusion criteria and were randomized to two arms of the study. Corporate ownership divested from 14 facilities prior to study implementation and were thus excluded from study participation. 128 NHs participated in study implementation and were analyzed.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAPPROACHES ACP Specialist ProgramControl
Started2414823248
Completed74747358
Not completed1667415890
Withdrew: Resident could not be linked to cms data594435
Withdrew: Resident cognitive status could not be determined from cms data65516426
Withdrew: Resident was enrolled in hospice care at study start (exclusion criteria)247260
Withdrew: Resident did not reside in facility for at least one day of study period (exclusion criteria)896573
Withdrew: Resident did not have adrd as defined by study (exclusion criteria)83868196

Outcome measures

PrimaryHospital Transfers

Hospital transfers (admissions and emergency department visits) over 12 months between Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) patients in intervention vs. control NHs

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · number of hospital transfers
Hospital Transfers
number of hospital transfersAPPROACHES ACP Specialist ProgramControl
Hospital Transfers1.2 ± 2.31.3 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • APPROACHES ACP Specialist Program vs Control · Poisson Regression · p = 0.3313 · Incidence rate ratio (irr): 0.94 · 95% CI 0.84 to 1.06
SecondaryHospice Enrollment

% ADRD patients who use hospice

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Hospice Enrollment
ParticipantsAPPROACHES ACP Specialist ProgramControl
Hospice Enrollment10951181
Statistical analysis
  • APPROACHES ACP Specialist Program vs Control · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.3327 · Odds ratio (or): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.78 to 1.09
SecondaryDeath in Hospital

% ADRD decedents who died in the hospital

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death in Hospital
ParticipantsAPPROACHES ACP Specialist ProgramControl
Death in Hospital163146
Statistical analysis
  • APPROACHES ACP Specialist Program vs Control · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.3946 · Odds ratio (or): 1.13 · 95% CI 0.85 to 1.49

Adverse events

Collected over One year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
APPROACHES ACP Specialist Program2,005/7,474 (26.8%)0/7,474 (0%)0/7,474 (0%)
Control1,980/7,358 (26.9%)0/7,358 (0%)0/7,358 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

There were 31414 residents residing in participating nursing homes (NH), 15860 in APPROACHES ACP Specialist Program and 15554 in Control. The subpopulation of interest for analysis is residents identified to have Alzheimer's disease, dementia or a Cognitive Function Scale (CFS) score of \>=2, therefore the population reported is 7474 residents in APPROACHES ACP Specialist Program and 7358 in Control for a total of 14832.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)APPROACHES ACP Specialist ProgramControlTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7596811440
>=65 years6715667713392
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)APPROACHES ACP Specialist ProgramControlTotal
Mean78.7 ± 1179.3 ± 10.879.0 ± 10.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)APPROACHES ACP Specialist ProgramControlTotal
Female468846839371
Male278626755461
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)APPROACHES ACP Specialist ProgramControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino318167485
Not Hispanic or Latino7156719114347
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)APPROACHES ACP Specialist ProgramControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native235
Asian61218
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander202
Black or African American9338241757
White5650575111401
More than one race132134
Unknown or Not Reported8687471615
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)APPROACHES ACP Specialist ProgramControlTotal
United States7474735814832
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Miller's Merry Manor
    Warsaw, Indiana 46580, United States
  • Signature HealthCARE LLC
    Louisville, Kentucky 40299, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hickman SE, Mitchell SL, Hanson LC, Tu W, Stump TE, Unroe KT. The design and conduct of a pragmatic cluster randomized trial of an advance care planning program for nursing home residents with dementia. Clin Trials. 2022 Dec;19(6):623-635. doi: 10.1177/17407745221108992. Epub 2022 Jul 10. PubMed 35815777 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2020 to primary completion in Aug 2022, 30 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2025, 2 years 11 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Dec 2022.

Of 882 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Alzheimer Disease, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 51. This study's 30 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 959 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 51.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 24, 2017
First posted
Oct 27, 2017
StartActual
Feb 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2022
CompletionActual
Aug 31, 2022
Results delay requested
Dec 7, 2022
Results first posted
Aug 26, 2025
Last update
Dec 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03323502
Lead sponsor
Indiana University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), Hebrew SeniorLife, Regenstrief Institute, Inc.
Responsible party
Susan Elizabeth Hickman (Professor, Community Health Systems, Indiana University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2017
Start date
Feb 1, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2022
Completion
Aug 31, 2022
Results posted
Aug 26, 2025
Last update
Dec 11, 2025

Study contacts

Susan Hickman, PhD
principal investigator · Indiana University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion