ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03322059Updated Jul 23, 2019

Evaluating Whether Charity Incentives Motive Cancer Survivors to Increase Physical Activity

An interventional study of Experimental and Control in Cancer, Physical Activity and Incentives, sponsored by California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-23.

Sponsored by California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators propose to examine whether linking daily activity with charity-based incentives motivates cancer survivors to initiate and maintain physical activity. Linking daily physical activity goals with a cancer specific charity incentive may provide a uniquely salient motivator that promotes increased physical activity among cancer survivors. The investigators will examine whether using activity monitors in combination with charitable incentives leads to greater increases in physical activity compared to activity monitors alone. Target participants includes cancer survivors who are not already active. Physical activity (e.g., steps per day, time in moderate-intensity activity) will be examined at baseline and following a 12-week intervention period using an activPAL accelerometer. After the baseline assessment, both groups will receive a fitbit monitor and informational material designed to increase physical activity. Participants in the fitbit+charity group will have donations made in their name to a cancer charity if they meet daily step goals. Physical activity levels will be monitored using the fitbit device for 6-weeks following the formal intervention period.

Read the detailed description

The study is a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of a 12-week physical activity intervention. Fifty cancer survivors will be recruited and allocated to one of two research arms: Fitbit+Only Group or Fitbit+Charity Incentives Group. Participants in both intervention arms will be asked to track their physical activities using Fitbit One, an activity monitor that monitors steps and physical activity and will receive basic educational materials about increasing physical activity. Those in the Fitbit+charity incentives Group will raise money for cancer charities if they meet weekly step targets.

The key outcome variable of the RCT is steps as measured by an activPAL accelerometer. Data will be collected at baseline and 12-weeks. Fitbit data will also be collected for the duration of the 12-week intervention and for 6-weeks following the end of the intervention period to have an initial examination of behavior change maintenance (total 18-weeks).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer
  • Physical Activity
  • Incentives
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 60 across 7,703 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults ≥ 18 years and \<50 y, with diagnosed Adolescent or Young Adult cancer (diagnosed between 15-39y of age);
  2. ≥ 6 months post-cancer treatment
  3. English speaking
  4. Participate in \<60 minutes of MVPA/week
  5. Own a smartphone
  6. Have access to computer
  7. Participants must also pass a physical activity readiness questionnaire or receive medical clearance from their primary care physician or oncologist.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Joint, cardiovascular, or respiratory problem(s) precluding physical activity
  2. disease
  3. Planned elective surgery or pregnancy during intervention/follow-up that would interfere with participation (e.g., breast reconstructive surgery).
  4. Already using a wearable device >5 days per week
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control

    The core intervention will include educational materials, access to a basic smartphone app and a Fitbit. Participants will receive a weekly email with a step goal that will increase 10% beyond the previous weeks values.

    Behavioral: Control

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    The core intervention will include educational materials, access to a basic smartphone app and a Fitbit. Participants will receive a weekly email with a step goal that will increase 10% beyond the previous weeks values. Participants will be in the form of a charitable donation in their name to a cancer charity.

    Behavioral: Experimental

Interventions

  • BehavioralExperimental

    Participants will receive a fitbit and lifestyle counseling to increase steps. Weekly newsletter for first 6 weeks, bi-weekly for remaining weeks with behavioral content designed to increase physical activity (e.g., barriers, SMART goals). They will also receive a donation to a cancer charity of their choice if they meet daily step goals.

    Also known as: Fitbit+incentives

  • BehavioralControl

    Participants will receive a fitbit and lifestyle counseling to increase steps. Weekly newsletter for first 6 weeks, bi-weekly for remaining weeks with behavioral content designed to increase physical activity (e.g., barriers, SMART goals).

    Also known as: Fitbit-only

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Daily steps

    Daily steps as measured by activPAL

    Time frame: 12 weeks - change from baseline to 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participant retention

    Proportion of participants retained of those randomized

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Intervention Reach

    Proportion of individuals who agree to participate of those who express an interest in participation

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Step goal adherence

    Proportion of weeks meeting physical activity goal as measured by fitbit

    Time frame: 1-12 weeks

  4. Daily Steps

    Daily Steps as Measured by Fitbit

    Time frame: baseline to 12 weeks

  5. Sleep

    Sleep as Measured by Fitbit

    Time frame: baseline to 12 weeks

  6. Sedentary time

    Sedentary time as Measured by activPAL activity monitor

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  7. Standing time

    Standing time as Measured by activPAL

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  8. Stepping time

    Stepping time as Measured by activPAL

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  9. Moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) time

    MVPA time as Measured by activPAL

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  10. Sedentary breaks/patterns

    Sedentary breaks/patterns as Measured by activPAL

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  11. Fatigue

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue Short Form 8a (Total Score range 8-40). higher score is more fatigue.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  12. Physical Function

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 20a. Total score (range 20-100). Higher score is worse physical function

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  13. Depression

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression Short Form 8a. Total score range 8-40. Higher score is more depressed.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  14. Attitudes Toward Charitable Giving

    Attitudes Toward Charitable Giving Scale. Total of 20 questions with scores from 1-5, there are five domains higher score is more of a particular attitude. 1.) Inefficiency of Charitable Giving 2.) Efficiency of Charitable Giving 3.) Cynical Giving 4.) Altruistic Giving 5.) Purpose of Charity

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  15. Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire

    Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire -3. Contains 6 subscales Amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, intrinsic regulation, each range from 0-16, higher values indicate more motivation in that domain.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  16. Barriers Self-efficacy Scale

    Barriers Self-efficacy Scale. 15 items, total score range 0-1500. Higher indicated more self-efficacy

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  17. Physical Activity Enjoyment

    Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale. 18-item scale with 7-point bipolar rating. Total score range 18-126. Higher scores reflect greater levels of enjoyment.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  18. Pittsburg Sleep Quality Questionnaire

    Pittsburg Sleep Quality Questionnaire. Total score. Greater than 5 indicated poor sleep quality.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  19. Exercise Self-efficacy Scale

    Exercise Self-efficacy Scale. 6 items total score. Range 0-600, higher is more self-efficacy

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  20. Intervention Maintenance

    % of weeks adhered to step goal as measured by fitbit during 6-week follow-up period

    Time frame: 12-18 weeks

  21. Duration wore Fitbit

    Duration wore Fitbit during during 6-week follow-up period

    Time frame: 12-18 weeks

  22. Exercise outcome expectations

    Multidimensional Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale. Total score (range 15-75), higher score means more multidimensional outcome expectations.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  23. Sleep disturbance

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Form. Total score range 8-40. Higher score is more disturbance.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  24. Exercise Goal Setting

    10-item total score. Ranged from 10 to 50, higher score means more goal setting. Exercise Goal-Setting Scale.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • California Polytechnic State University
    San Luis Obispo, California 94307, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Keadle SK, Meuter L, Phelan S, Phillips SM. Charity-based incentives motivate young adult cancer survivors to increase physical activity: a pilot randomized clinical trial. J Behav Med. 2021 Oct;44(5):682-693. doi: 10.1007/s10865-021-00218-w. Epub 2021 Apr 7. PubMed 33825070 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Dec 2018, 13 months.

Of 1,981 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52. This study's 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,056 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52.

Neoplasms covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 13, 2017
First posted
Oct 26, 2017
StartActual
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Dec 1, 2018
CompletionActual
Dec 1, 2018
Last update
Jul 23, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03322059
Lead sponsor
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo
Responsible party
Sarah K Keadle (Assistant Professor, California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 26, 2017
Start date
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2018
Completion
Dec 1, 2018
Last update
Jul 23, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion