ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03319849Updated Sep 24, 2024Results posted

A Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of NT-501 in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 - Protocol B

A Phase 3 interventional study of NT-501 and Sham in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2, sponsored by Neurotech Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 27 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-24.

Sponsored by Neurotech Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
119
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a phase 3, randomized, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the NT-501 implants in participants with macular telangiectasia type 2.

Read the detailed description

Phase 3, prospective, multicenter, masked, sham-controlled study with the overall study objective to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NT-501 for the treatment of MacTel. Secondary objective was to evaluate the safety of NT-501 in participants with MacTel. This was a multicenter study conducted at 20 study centers in the United States, Australia, Germany, and the United Kingdom.

02

Conditions studied

  • Macular Telangiectasia Type 2

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF)
  • Macular Telangiectasia (MacTel)
  • MacTel
03

In context

Telangiectasis

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Telangiectasis; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 119 is above the median of 30 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Telangiectasis.

Browse Telangiectasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Neurotech Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant must have at least one study eye with a positive diagnosis of MacTel with evidence of fluorescein leakage typical of MacTel and at least one of the other features that include hyperpigmentation that is outside of a 500 micron radius from the center of the fovea, retinal opacification, crystalline deposits, right-angle vessels, or inner/outer lamellar cavities
  2. Participant must have an Inner Segment - Outer Segment Junction Line (IS/OS) Photo Receptor (PR) break in the study eye(s) and en face EZ (area of IS/OS loss) as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) between 0.16 mm\^2 and 2.00 mm\^2
  3. Participant's best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is a 54-letter score or better (20/80 or better) as measured by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at screening.
  4. Participant must have steady fixation in the foveal or parafoveal area and sufficiently clear media for good quality photographs
  5. Participant must be greater than 21 years of age or less than 80 years of age at screening
  6. Participant must be able to provide written to participate in the study, in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practices guidelines, and local regulations, before initiating any study-related procedures
  7. Women of must agree to use highly effective (Germany and France only)

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant is medically unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits
  2. Participant received intravitreal therapy for non-neovascular MacTel within the last 3 months
  3. Participant has ever received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in the study eye OR has, within the past 3 months, received intravitreal anti-VEGF in the fellow eye at randomization
  4. Participant has evidence of ocular disease other than MacTel that, in the judgment of the examining physician, may confound the diagnosis, procedures or outcome of the study (eg, glaucoma, severe nonproliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy, uveitis)
  5. Participant has a chronic requirement (eg, ≥ 4 weeks at a time) for ocular medications and/or has a diagnosed disease that, in the judgment of the examining physician, may be vision threatening or may affect the primary outcome (artificial tears are permitted)
  6. Participant has evidence of intraretinal neovascularization or subretinal neovascularization (SRNV), as evidenced by hemorrhage, hard exudate, subretinal fluid or intraretinal fluid in either eye
  7. Participant has evidence of central serous chorio-retinopathy in either eye
  8. Participant has evidence of pathologic myopia in either eye
  9. Participant has significant corneal or media opacities in either eye
  10. Participant has had a vitrectomy, penetrating keratoplasty, trabeculectomy, or trabeculoplasty
  11. Participant has any of the following lens opacities: cortical opacity > standard 3, posterior subcapsular opacity > standard 2, or a nuclear opacity > standard 3 as measured on the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) clinical lens grading system
  12. Participant has undergone lens removal in the previous 3 months or YAG laser within 4 weeks
  13. Participant was a participant in any other clinical trial of an intervention (drug or device) within the last 6 months
  14. Participant is on chemotherapy
  15. Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding
  16. Participant has a history of that would compromise the 24-month study survival
  17. Participant with a history of ocular herpes virus in either eye
  18. Participant has, in the opinion of the investigator, any physical or mental condition that would increase the risk of participation in the study or may interfere with the study procedures, evaluations, and outcome assessments
  19. Participant has evidence of intraretinal hyperreflectivity by OCT
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
119 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NT-501

    Test product

    Combination Product: NT-501

  • Sham comparator
    Sham

    A sham surgical procedure was performed to mimic the implant procedure; there was no comparator product.

    Procedure: Sham

Interventions

  • Combination productNT-501

    Each NT-501 implant consisted of hCNTF-secreting NTC-201-6A.02 cells encapsulated within supportive matrices and surrounded by a semipermeable polymer membrane. The NTC-201-6A cells continuously secrete CNTF from the NT-501 implant into the vitreous cavity. Implanted by a qualified Health Care Professional.

  • ProcedureSham

    The sham surgery involved a superficial conjunctival incision performed under local anesthetic and closure with a single suture.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Rate of Change in the Area of EZ Area of Loss From Baseline Through Month 24

    The rate of change in the area of EZ loss (IS/OS; macular photoreceptor loss) from baseline through month 24, as assessed using SD-OCT in the study eye of participants with MacTel.

    Time frame: End point timeframe is through Month 24. Baseline, Month 6, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Month 6 was collected but not included in the primary analyses.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Aggregate Retinal Sensitivity Loss and Aggregate Interpolated Retinal Sensitivity Loss by Microperimetry (mITT Population)

    Change from baseline in retinal sensitivity loss as measured by as measured by Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA)

    Time frame: Baseline through 24 months.

  2. Monocular Reading Speed (mITT Population)

    Change from baseline through Month 24 for Monocular reading speed assessed using International Reading Speed Texts (IReST) cards developed by the IReST Study Group 21

    Time frame: Baseline through 24 months.

07

Results

Posted Sep 24, 2024

Participant flow

Screening period for up to 30 days

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNT-501Sham
Started6059
Treated (underwent surgery)5954
Completed5749
Not completed310
Withdrew: Adverse event10
Withdrew: Physician decision01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Covid-1901
Withdrew: Other12
Withdrew: Eligible and did not enroll in amendment13
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up02

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Rate of Change in the Area of EZ Area of Loss From Baseline Through Month 24

The rate of change in the area of EZ loss (IS/OS; macular photoreceptor loss) from baseline through month 24, as assessed using SD-OCT in the study eye of participants with MacTel.

Time frame:
End point timeframe is through Month 24. Baseline, Month 6, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Month 6 was collected but not included in the primary analyses.
Reported as:
Mean · mm^2
The Rate of Change in the Area of EZ Area of Loss From Baseline Through Month 24
mm^2NT-501Sham
The Rate of Change in the Area of EZ Area of Loss From Baseline Through Month 240.111 ± 0.01420.160 ± 0.0149
Statistical analysis
  • NT-501 vs Sham · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0186 · Median difference (final values): -0.049 · 95% CI -0.0890 to -0.0082
SecondaryMean Change in Aggregate Retinal Sensitivity Loss and Aggregate Interpolated Retinal Sensitivity Loss by Microperimetry (mITT Population)

Change from baseline in retinal sensitivity loss as measured by as measured by Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA)

Time frame:
Baseline through 24 months.
Reported as:
Mean · dB
Mean Change in Aggregate Retinal Sensitivity Loss and Aggregate Interpolated Retinal Sensitivity Loss by Microperimetry (mITT Population)
dBAggregate Retinal Sensitivity Loss (dB) - NT-501Aggregate Retinal Sensitivity Loss (dB) - ShamAggregate Interpolated Retinal Sensitivity Loss (dB) - NT-501Aggregate Interpolated Retinal Sensitivity Loss (dB) - Sham
Baseline Actual55.54 ± 56.05051.84 ± 57.38034864.17 ± 35305.26032445.03 ± 38667.790
Month 24 Actual97.77 ± 78.62093.02 ± 70.41461076.49 ± 52619.37958360.26 ± 50535.070
Month 24 Change from Baseline40.02 ± 51.27841.97 ± 41.11124859.88 ± 31165.86226309.32 ± 25374.040
SecondaryMonocular Reading Speed (mITT Population)

Change from baseline through Month 24 for Monocular reading speed assessed using International Reading Speed Texts (IReST) cards developed by the IReST Study Group 21

Time frame:
Baseline through 24 months.
Reported as:
Mean · Reading Speed (words per minute)
Monocular Reading Speed (mITT Population)
Reading Speed (words per minute)NT-501Sham
Baseline Actual96.49 ± 47.31494.09 ± 42.806
Month 24 Actual92.18 ± 45.09077.33 ± 43.899
Month 24 Change from Baseline-5.46 ± 29.648-18.88 ± 33.705

Adverse events

Collected over During the Clinical Trial. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
NT-5011/59 (1.7%)11/59 (18.6%)56/59 (94.9%)
Sham0/54 (0%)10/54 (18.5%)48/54 (88.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent serious events
EventNT-501Sham
Suture related complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/590/54
Transient ischaemic attackNervous system disorders2/590/54
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/591/54
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/591/54
Breast cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/591/54
Colon cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/591/54
Invasive ductal breast carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/591/54
Tendon ruptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/591/54
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/591/54
PalpitationsCardiac disorders0/591/54
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 195
Most frequent other events
EventNT-501Sham
Conjunctival haemorrhageEye disorders19/5910/54
Delayed dark adaptationEye disorders15/592/54
Suture related complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications14/592/54
Foreign body sensation in eyesEye disorders14/598/54
Conjunctival hyperaemiaEye disorders12/597/54
Eye painEye disorders12/596/54
MiosisEye disorders8/590/54
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/596/54
Conjunctival oedemaEye disorders4/596/54
Vision blurredEye disorders6/593/54

Baseline characteristics

The modified intent-to-treat population comprised all randomized subjects who underwent surgery (NT-501 implantation or sham surgery) whether or not the subject adhered to the study protocol.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)NT-501ShamTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years423678
>=65 years171835
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)NT-501ShamTotal
Mean58.5 ± 7.6158.7 ± 8.8758.6 ± 8.20
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)NT-501ShamTotal
Female463682
Male131831
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)NT-501ShamTotal
Hispanic or Latino448
Not Hispanic or Latino5549104
Unknown or Not Reported011
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)NT-501ShamTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian314
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White5547102
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported167
Baseline Ocular Characteristics (mITT) - Ocular Visual Acuity
Baseline Ocular Characteristics (mITT) - Ocular Visual Acuity(Best-corrected visual acuity (letters))NT-501ShamTotal
Mean74.4 ± 7.7673.6 ± 9.2374.0 ± 8.47
Baseline Ocular Characteristics (mITT) - Area of EZ loss (mm^2)
Baseline Ocular Characteristics (mITT) - Area of EZ loss (mm^2)(Area of EZ loss (mm^2))NT-501ShamTotal
Mean0.518 ± 0.31200.476 ± 0.29340.498 ± 0.3027
Baseline Ocular Characteristics (mITT) - Monocular Reading Speed
Baseline Ocular Characteristics (mITT) - Monocular Reading Speed(words per minute)NT-501ShamTotal
Mean96.49 ± 47.31494.09 ± 42.80695.36 ± 45.051

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

27 sites
  • Retina Vitreous Assoc
    Beverly Hills, California 90211, United States
  • Retina Consultants of Southern Colorado, P.C.
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80909, United States
  • Emory University Eye Center
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Northwestern Medical Group
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Elman Retina Group, PA
    Baltimore, Maryland 21237, United States
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Ophthalmology Clinical Research Office
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • New England Retina Consultants
    Springfield, Massachusetts 01107, United States
  • University of Michigan, Kellogg Eye Center
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • The Retina Institute
    Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, United States
  • Retina Center of New Jersey - Envision Ocular, LLC
    Bloomfield, New Jersey 07003, United States
  • Flaum Eye - University of Rochester
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • University of Rochester Strong Memorial Hospital
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • Cincinnati Eye Institute
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, United States
  • Tulsa Retina Consultants
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74114, United States
  • Retina Northwest, PC
    Portland, Oregon 97221, United States
  • Scheie Eye Institute - University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Palmetto Retina Center
    West Columbia, South Carolina 29169, United States
  • Southeastern Retina Associates, PC
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37922, United States
  • Austin Clinical Research, LLC
    Austin, Texas 78705, United States
  • Retina Consultants of Texas
    Bellaire, Texas 77401, United States
  • Retina Center of Texas
    Southlake, Texas 76092, United States
  • Save Sight Institute, Sydney
    Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia
  • Centre for Eye Research Australia Macular Research Unit
    East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia
  • Klinik at Freiberg, Germany
    Freiburg, Baden-Wurttemberg Germany 79106, Germany
  • University of Bonn
    Bonn, NRW 53127, Germany
  • St. Franziskus, Muenster
    Muenster, NRW 48145, Germany
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03319849
Lead sponsor
Neurotech Pharmaceuticals
Collaborators
The Lowy Medical Research Institute Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 24, 2017
Start date
Jan 22, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2022
Completion
Sep 23, 2022
Results posted
Sep 24, 2024
Last update
Sep 24, 2024

Study contacts

Mark Gillies, MD
principal investigator · Save Sight/Sydney, Australia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor

Start the discussion