ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03319381Updated Oct 24, 2017

Geriatric Polytrauma SOP

An observational study in Geriatrics, sponsored by University of Zurich. Completed. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-24.

Sponsored by University of Zurich · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
311
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigated whether there were improvements in the in-hospital mortality, infection rate, and rate of palliative care among geriatric trauma patients after the implementation of new standard operating procedures (SOPs) for the resuscitation room. These new SOPs, comprising early whole-body computed tomography (CT), damage control surgery, and the use of goal-directed coagulation management, were designed for severely injured adult trauma patients

Read the detailed description

This study involved the analysis of a prospective single-centre database. Patients admitted via the resuscitation room with need for intensive care treatment after the resuscitation room phase were included and compared before the implementation of the new SOPs (between 1 January, 2000 and 31 December, 2006) and after their implementation in 2009 (between 1 January, 2010 and 31 December, 2012) of our level-I trauma centre.

02

Conditions studied

  • Geriatrics

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Algorithm
  • In-hospital mortality
  • Multiple trauma
  • Standard of care
03

In context

Multiple Trauma

139 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Trauma; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 311 is above the median of 200 across 84 observational studies indexed under Multiple Trauma.

Browse Multiple Trauma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Zurich is the lead sponsor of 1,049 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Trauma patients admitted via the resuscitation room with need for intensive care treatment after the resuscitation room phase were included in the internal trauma database

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion in internal trauma database

Exclusion Criteria:

Comprised age \< 65 years, ISS \< 9, and transfers from other hospitals.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
311 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
30 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • w/o SOP

    Time period 1: 2000-2006, without new SOPs

    Behavioral: Following new SOPs

  • SOP

    Time period 2: 2010-2012, after implementation of the new SOPs

    Behavioral: Following new SOPs

Interventions

  • BehavioralFollowing new SOPs

    The new SOPs comprised early whole-body CT, damage control surgery, and the use of goal-directed coagulation management and are based on the ATLS® concept, which was the strictly followed protocol before implementation of the new SOPs

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. In-hospital mortality

    In-hospital mortality

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Infections

    Infections

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Rate of palliative care

    Rate of palliative care

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Peterer L, Ossendorf C, Jensen KO, Osterhoff G, Mica L, Seifert B, Werner CML, Simmen HP, Pape HC, Sprengel K. Implementation of new standard operating procedures for geriatric trauma patients with multiple injuries: a single level I trauma centre study. BMC Geriatr. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1380-z. PubMed 31856739 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2000 to primary completion in Dec 2012, 155 months.

Of 30 observational studies under Multiple Trauma, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 57. This study's 155 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 17, 2017
First posted
Oct 24, 2017
StartActual
Jan 1, 2000
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2012
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2012
Last update
Oct 24, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 24, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03319381
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 24, 2017
Start date
Jan 1, 2000
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2012
Completion
Dec 31, 2012
Last update
Oct 24, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion