CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03318848Updated Oct 24, 2017

Use of Bed Bath Video During Simulation in Developing Student Skills

An interventional study of Video during simulation in Students, sponsored by Federal University of São Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-24.

Sponsored by Federal University of São Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study´s objective was to identify the effectiveness of bed bath video during simulation in the performance of undergraduate student skills. Method. This is a randomized, blinded clinical trial. The sample consisted of students of the second year of nursing graduation who were divided into two groups: intervention group (students who simulated bed bath using the video) and control group (students who simulated bed bath without the video). The primary end point was the performance of the students' abilities about bed bath procedure, which was evaluated in two moments (before and after the simulation) and we used a previously elaborated and validated checklist. Prior to the collection, the research project was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee and the data was collected after its approval.

Read the detailed description

This study´s objective was to identify the effectiveness of bed bath video during simulation in the performance of undergraduate student skills. Method. This is a randomized, blinded clinical trial. The sample consisted of students of the second year of nursing graduation who were divided into two groups: intervention group (students who simulated bed bath using the video) and control group (students who simulated bed bath without the video). The students attended an expository dialog class about bed bath, structured on the basis of literature and that subsidized the elaboration of the video and the instrument to evaluate of the performance of the abilities. After the class, the subjects were consulted about the desire to participate, and those who agreed, signed the consent form. After the theoretical class, students were invited to attend the UNIFESP Skills and Simulation Teaching Center and were randomized to one of two groups (control or intervention), according to the sequence determined by the Random System. Randomization was carried out by a teacher who did not participate of any phase of this study, with masking of this phase. After randomization, the student was instructed to perform the bed bathing procedure on the low fidelity manikin, based on the knowledge obtained in the theoretical class, and no guidance was given at this time. At this stage, the teacher evaluated the student's skills through the checklist. It is emphasized that this teacher was not informed if the student evaluated was of the control group or intervention, and there is masking of this phase. The instrument for evaluating the performance of bed bath skills was the previously prepared and validated checklist called "Instrument for bathing in the bed - IABL", which presented good internal consistency in the validation study (Cronbach's alpha = 0.896) . This instrument is composed of three topics (nursing orientation, material preparation and procedure) and 56 items, whose scores vary from 0 to 56 points, in which the higher the score the better the students' abilities performance. Each item of this instrument was observed during the execution of the procedure before and after the simulation and was considered as executed properly (1 point), inadequate (0 point) or not performed (0 point). The performance of each student was analyzed by adding the scores of the items of the instrument. Subsequent to this first evaluation, the students, both in the control group and in the intervention group, received the intervention by another teacher. The students of the control group performed the simulation of the bed bath procedure, with the aid of a tutor and the intervention group simulated the bed bath while watching the video, under the supervision of the tutor. The tutor, from both groups, acted as facilitator of the teaching-learning process, according to the needs presented during the simulation period. At the end of the simulation, the student of both groups was instructed to perform the bed bath procedure once again, and no guidance was given at this time. The performance of the student's abilities was evaluated by the same instrument and by the same teacher of the first evaluation. Prior to the collection, the research project was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee and the data was collected after its approval.

02

Conditions studied

  • Students

Keywords

  • students, nursing
  • simulation training
  • Instructional Films and Videos
  • Aptitude
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Minimum 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who have ever performed the bed bath
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Video during simulation

    The intervention group simulated the bed bath while watching the video, under the supervision of the tutor

    Other: Video during simulation

  • No intervention
    Simulation without video

    The students of the control group performed the simulation of the bed bath procedure, with the aid of a tutor.

Interventions

  • OtherVideo during simulation

    The intervention group simulated the bed bath while watching the video, under the supervision of the tutor

    Also known as: Educational

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from score of student's skills about bed bath

    The student's skills was evaluated using the checklist previously elaborated and validated, immediately before and after interventions.

    Time frame: The students were followed for two days

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Federal University of São Paulo
    São Paulo, SP 04021001, Brazil
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Baxter P, Akhtar-Danesh N, Valaitis R, Stanyon W, Sproul S. Simulated experiences: nursing students share their perspectives. Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Nov;29(8):859-66. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jun 4. PubMed 19500886 ↗
  • Fleming SE, Reynolds J, Wallace B. Lights... camera... action! a guide for creating a DVD/video. Nurse Educ. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):118-21. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181a0270e. PubMed 19412052 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We not plan to make individual participant data avaiable to other researchers.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03318848
Lead sponsor
Federal University of São Paulo
Collaborators
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Responsible party
Juliana de Lima Lopes (PhD, Federal University of São Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 24, 2017
Start date
Mar 1, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 8, 2016
Completion
Mar 8, 2016
Last update
Oct 24, 2017

Study contacts

Juliana de Lima Lopes, PhD
principal investigator · Federal University of São Paulo
Alba LB Barros, PhD
study director · Federal University of São Paulo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion