ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03316885Updated Aug 21, 2023Results posted

Post-Market Clinical Investigation of the Clareon® IOL

An interventional study of Clareon® IOL and Cataract Surgery in Cataract and Aphakia, sponsored by Alcon Research. Completed at 19 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-21.

Sponsored by Alcon Research (part of Alcon) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
245
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term (3 years) visual acuity and adverse event outcomes for the Clareon® Intraocular Lens (IOL). A comparison to historical safety and performance endpoint (SPE) rates as reported in the European Standard International Organization for Standardization (EN ISO) 11979-7:2014 will be conducted at one year. The secondary purpose of this study is to evaluate the visual acuity outcomes with the Clareon IOL at Years 2 and 3.

Read the detailed description

Subjects will attend a total of 12 study visits over a period of approximately 36 months: One preoperative screening visit, two operative visits, and nine post-implantation visits. Both eyes will be implanted, with the second eye implantation to occur 2-21 days after the first. Primary endpoint data will be collected at the Year 1 visit (Day 330-420 post-implantation from second eye surgery).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cataract
  • Aphakia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cataract

1,629 studies on the registry are indexed under Cataract; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 245 is above the median of 79 across 1,092 interventional studies indexed under Cataract.

Browse Cataract studies →

Lead sponsor

Alcon Research is the lead sponsor of 624 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Of its 112 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 102 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with bilateral cataracts
  • Planned small incision cataract removal surgery
  • Able to comprehend and willing to sign a statement of and complete all required post-implantation visits

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who may reasonably be expected to require ocular surgical treatment or refractive surgical procedures at any time during the study
  • Certain eye conditions, as specified in the protocol, including but not limited to glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, and macular degeneration
  • Pregnant or lactating, current or planned during the course of the study

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
245 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Clareon IOL

    Clareon® aspheric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens implanted with the Alcon Monarch III-D delivery system as a replacement of the human crystalline lens during cataract surgery

    Device: Clareon® IOL · Procedure: Cataract Surgery

Interventions

  • DeviceClareon® IOL

    Foldable, single-piece posterior chamber IOL intended for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient. This device is CE-marked (European Conformity) in the countries with participating Investigators.

    Also known as: Model SY60WF

  • ProcedureCataract Surgery

    Routine small incision cataract surgery with unilateral IOL implantation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 0.3 Logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) or Better at 1 Year Post-Implantation

    Visual acuity (VA) was tested for the first implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at a distance of 4 meters (m) from the eye. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. VA was compared to the historical safety and performance endpoint (SPE) of 92.5% \[as reported in the European Standard International Organization for Standardization (EN ISO) 11979-7:2014\].

    Time frame: Year 1 post-implantation from second eye surgery

  2. Percentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 1 Year Post-Implantation

    VA was tested for the second implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. VA was compared to the historical SPE of 92.5% (EN ISO 11979-7:2014).

    Time frame: Year 1 post-implantation from second eye surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 2 Years Post-Implantation

    VA was tested for the first implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Year 2 post-implantation from second eye surgery

  2. Percentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 2 Years Post-Implantation

    VA was tested for the second implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Year 2 post-implantation from second eye surgery

  3. Percentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 3 Years Post-Implantation

    VA was tested for the first implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Year 3 post-implantation from second eye surgery

  4. Percentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 3 Years Post-Implantation

    VA was tested for the second implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Year 3 post-implantation from second eye surgery

  5. Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) at 1 Year Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye

    VA was tested for the first implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 diopter (D) spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Year 1 post-implantation from second eye surgery

  6. UCDVA at 1 Year Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye

    VA was tested for the second implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 D spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Year 1 post-implantation from second eye surgery

  7. UCDVA at 2 Years Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye

    VA was tested for the first implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 D spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Year 2 post-implantation from second eye surgery

  8. UCDVA at 2 Years Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye

    VA was tested for the second implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 D spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Year 2 post-implantation from second eye surgery

  9. UCDVA at 3 Years Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye

    VA was tested for the first implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 D spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Year 3 post-implantation from second eye surgery

  10. UCDVA at 3 Years Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye

    VA was tested for the second implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 D spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

    Time frame: Year 3 post-implantation from second eye surgery

07

Results

Posted Aug 21, 2023

Participant flow

Study participants were recruited from 19 study centers located in Australia (n = 3), France (n = 2), Germany (n = 2), Italy (n = 2), the Netherlands (n = 2), Spain (n = 5), and the United Kingdom (n = 3).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneClareon IOL
Started215
Implanted in first eye only215
Implanted in second eye only209
Implanted in 1 eye only6
Completed183
Not completed32
Withdrew: Adverse event1
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up4
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject9
Withdrew: Covid related8

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 0.3 Logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) or Better at 1 Year Post-Implantation

Visual acuity (VA) was tested for the first implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at a distance of 4 meters (m) from the eye. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. VA was compared to the historical safety and performance endpoint (SPE) of 92.5% \[as reported in the European Standard International Organization for Standardization (EN ISO) 11979-7:2014\].

Time frame:
Year 1 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Number · percentage of first implanted eyes
Percentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 0.3 Logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) or Better at 1 Year Post-Implantation
percentage of first implanted eyesClareon IOL
Percentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 0.3 Logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) or Better at 1 Year Post-Implantation99.5 (97.2 to 100.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Clareon IOL · Comparison: 100.0
PrimaryPercentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 1 Year Post-Implantation

VA was tested for the second implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. VA was compared to the historical SPE of 92.5% (EN ISO 11979-7:2014).

Time frame:
Year 1 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Number · percentage of second implanted eyes
Percentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 1 Year Post-Implantation
percentage of second implanted eyesClareon IOL
Percentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 1 Year Post-Implantation99.5 (97.2 to 100.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Clareon IOL · Comparison: 100.0
SecondaryPercentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 2 Years Post-Implantation

VA was tested for the first implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Year 2 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Number · percentage of second implanted eyes
Percentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 2 Years Post-Implantation
percentage of second implanted eyesClareon IOL
Percentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 2 Years Post-Implantation99.5 (97.1 to 100.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 2 Years Post-Implantation

VA was tested for the second implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Year 2 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Number · percentage of second implanted eyes
Percentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 2 Years Post-Implantation
percentage of second implanted eyesClareon IOL
Percentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 2 Years Post-Implantation98.9 (96.2 to 99.9)
SecondaryPercentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 3 Years Post-Implantation

VA was tested for the first implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Year 3 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Number · percentage of first implanted eyes
Percentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 3 Years Post-Implantation
percentage of first implanted eyesClareon IOL
Percentage of First Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 3 Years Post-Implantation99.5 (97.0 to 100.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 3 Years Post-Implantation

VA was tested for the second implanted eye using the correction obtained from the manifest refraction and 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR is equivalent to 20/40 Snellen visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Year 3 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Number · percentage of second implanted eyes
Percentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 3 Years Post-Implantation
percentage of second implanted eyesClareon IOL
Percentage of Second Implanted Eyes Achieving BCDVA of 0.3 logMAR or Better at 3 Years Post-Implantation98.9 (96.1 to 99.9)
SecondaryUncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) at 1 Year Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye

VA was tested for the first implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 diopter (D) spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Year 1 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) at 1 Year Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye
logMARClareon IOL
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) at 1 Year Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye0.079 ± 0.1499
SecondaryUCDVA at 1 Year Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye

VA was tested for the second implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 D spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Year 1 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
UCDVA at 1 Year Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye
logMARClareon IOL
UCDVA at 1 Year Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye0.058 ± 0.1364
SecondaryUCDVA at 2 Years Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye

VA was tested for the first implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 D spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Year 2 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
UCDVA at 2 Years Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye
logMARClareon IOL
UCDVA at 2 Years Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye0.088 ± 0.1533
SecondaryUCDVA at 2 Years Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye

VA was tested for the second implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 D spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Year 2 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
UCDVA at 2 Years Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye
logMARClareon IOL
UCDVA at 2 Years Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye0.083 ± 0.1624
SecondaryUCDVA at 3 Years Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye

VA was tested for the first implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 D spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Year 3 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
UCDVA at 3 Years Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye
logMARClareon IOL
UCDVA at 3 Years Post-Implantation - First Implanted Eye0.091 ± 0.1614
SecondaryUCDVA at 3 Years Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye

VA was tested for the second implanted eye without visual correction using 100% contrast electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 D spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on an ETDRS chart. A UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower numeric value representing better visual acuity. No hypothesis testing was prespecified for this endpoint.

Time frame:
Year 3 post-implantation from second eye surgery
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
UCDVA at 3 Years Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye
logMARClareon IOL
UCDVA at 3 Years Post-Implantation - Second Implanted Eye0.086 ± 0.1706

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs) were collected pre-treatment (Day -60 to 0) up to Day 990-1140 post-treatment/study exit. AEs were obtained through solicited and spontaneous comments from subjects and through observations by the Investigator.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pretreatment0/215 (0%)0/215 (0%)0/215 (0%)
SY60WF First Eye0/215 (0%)6/215 (2.8%)34/215 (15.8%)
SY60WF Second Eye0/209 (0%)4/209 (1.9%)39/209 (18.7%)
SY60WF Systemic10/215 (4.7%)31/215 (14.4%)0/215 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 48
Most frequent serious events
EventPretreatmentSY60WF First EyeSY60WF Second EyeSY60WF Systemic
Intra-ocular injectionSurgical and medical procedures0/2154/2152/2090/215
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/2150/2150/2093/215
COVID-19Infections and infestations0/2150/2150/2093/215
Cystoid macular oedemaEye disorders0/2152/2150/2090/215
Multiple organ dysfunction syndromeGeneral disorders0/2150/2150/2092/215
Biliary sepsisInfections and infestations0/2150/2150/2092/215
Age-related macular degenerationEye disorders0/2151/2151/2090/215
IridocyclitisEye disorders0/2151/2151/2090/215
Retinal vein occlusionEye disorders0/2151/2151/2090/215
Anterior capsular ruptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2150/2151/2090/215
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPretreatmentSY60WF First EyeSY60WF Second EyeSY60WF Systemic
Dry eyeEye disorders0/21523/21522/2090/215
Posterior capsule opacificationEye disorders0/21511/21519/2090/215

Baseline characteristics

All Implanted Analysis Set: All subjects/eyes with successful test article implantation

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Clareon IOL
Mean72.1 ± 8.07
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Clareon IOL
Female126
Male89
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Clareon IOL
Hispanic or Latino17
Not Hispanic or Latino195
Unknown or Not Reported3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Clareon IOL
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian6
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1
Black or African American3
White204
More than one race0
Other1
08

Study locations

19 sites
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Footscray, Victoria 3011, Australia
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Mornington, Victoria 3931, Australia
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Sydney, 2067, Australia
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Brest, Cedex 29609, France
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Lyon, 69003, France
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Paris, 75014, France
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Frankfurt, 60590, Germany
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Perugia, 06129, Italy
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Pisa, 56124, Italy
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Amsterdam, 1105AZ, Netherlands
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Jerez De La Frontera, Cadiz 11408, Spain
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Alcalá De Henares, 28805, Spain
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Oviedo, 33012, Spain
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    San Sebastián, 20014, Spain
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Valencia, 46015, Spain
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Sutton, Carshalton SM5 1AA, United Kingdom
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Brighton, BN2 5BF, United Kingdom
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    London, EC1V2PD, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Oct 2019, 19 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2023, 3 years 10 months after primary completion.

Of 190 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Cataract, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 28. This study's 19 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 490 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 28.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 18, 2017
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
StartActual
Mar 14, 2018
Primary completionActual
Oct 18, 2019
CompletionActual
Sep 23, 2021
Results first posted
Aug 21, 2023
Last update
Aug 21, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03316885
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
Start date
Mar 14, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 18, 2019
Completion
Sep 23, 2021
Results posted
Aug 21, 2023
Last update
Aug 21, 2023

Study contacts

Sr. Clinical Trial Lead, CDMA, Surgical
study director · Alcon Research, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion