ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03314025TEMPOURUpdated May 19, 2021

Prophylactic Tamsulosin in Prevention of Post-operative Urinary Retention in Men After Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery

A Phase 2 interventional study of Tamsulosin Hydrochloride 0.4 MG and Placebo oral capsule in Urinary Retention, sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval. Status unknown at 3 sites in Canada. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-19.

Sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
158
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 26 studies testing tamsulosin in Urinary Retention — 7 open to participants now, 7 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Tamsulosin · Urinary Retention.

Planned enrollment
10th of 26
158 · median 136
Started
2017
with 4 others
Phase 2
4 of 26
2 open now
Registered
11th of 26
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 26
CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

Among the 26 studies testing tamsulosin in Urinary Retention, this one is the 10th largest by planned enrollment, is one of 5 that started in 2017, is one of 4 in phase 2, and was the 11th registered.

By phase

26 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 48 · 1 open
Phase 37 · 2 open
Phase 2this study4 · 2 open
Phase 13 · 1 open
No phase2 · 1 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2007; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2017.

Size and results

Median enrollment 136 across the 26 interventional studies. Of the 16 that completed or were terminated, 9 (56%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 26 studies testing tamsulosin in Urinary Retention, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Post-operative urinary retention (POUR) is a frequent complication reported as ranging from 10 to 55% in the literature. In a recent retrospective study from Laliberte et al in Quebec City, we observed that 19% of the patients operated using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) had a post-operative urinary retention (POUR). Factors related to the patient, the tumor and the surgery were not observed to be associated risk factors. Tamsulosin has been shown as an effective preventive agent of POUR for certain ano-rectal and inguinal surgeries. The efficacy of this prophylactic therapy in transanal endoscopic microsurgery has not been studied yet and is unclear considering the particularities of this procedure. TEM uses a rigid proctoscope of four centimeters of diameter and creates a continuous pneumorectum (insufflation of the rectum during all the procedure). We think that these two elements, which cause local inflammation, may be part of the reason explaining the high incidence of post-operative urinary retention after TEM procedures. The objective of our multicenter clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of perioperative tamsulosin for the reduction of POUR in men, as well as the impact on the interventions and hospital admissions related to this complication.

Read the detailed description

We are conducting a feasibility study (Vanguard phase) with three Canadian centers :

  1. CHU de Quebec - Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  2. St-Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British-Columbia, Canada
  3. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Other Canadian centers will be offered to join our study if the Vanguard phase demonstrates the feasibility of this clinical trial.

Large scale study

We anticipate the detection of a 15% absolute risk reduction of POUR in the Experimental group in comparison with the Placebo group. To detect a 15% reduction of POUR in the Experimental group (10% anticipated) in comparison with the Placebo group (25% anticipated) and to assure a study power of 80% with a unilateral Chi2 and a significance level of 5%, we need 158 patients in total; 79 in each group.

Feasibility study (Vanguard phase)

We expect at least a 60% recruitment rate throughout the two first participating Canadian centers, which translates into a mean of 8 patients recruited each month overall. Regarding the medication adherence, two studies that evaluated the use patterns and adherence to medications for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia found an adherence of 67% to 89%, with a mean of 78%. Based on these two studies, we expect that the patients will at least take 80% of the medication at study. To detect an 80% medication adherence with a 95% confidence interval, we need 62 enrolled patients.

The research pharmacy at the CHU de Quebec - Laval University will be responsible for preparing the study drug. The active medication or the placebo (sugar) will be encapsulated using identical capsules. The research pharmacy at the coordinating center will provide the study drug and the placebo to the other participating centers. There will be a quality control of the capsules; a temperature monitor will be in the boxes sent to the other centers and a control on the expiration date will be made. The capsules that are not used will be destroyed at each center. The randomization will be kept at the CHU de Quebec - Laval University research center. Patients will be stratified by center.

The patients are asked to report any potential adverse effect and our data safety monitoring board will meet annually to assess these or sooner if any adverse effect is serious.

We justify the duration of the intervention by the time needed to reach a steady state, which is estimated to be 4 to 5 days. The 7-day therapy is also based on the study from Patel et al, which showed a significant reduction of acute urinary retention with a 7-day intake of tamsulosin. It is the common and recommended dose used in other patient population.

Data collection

Patients will be identified by a study number in the study database. A master list of participants linking their study number with their medical record number will be kept in the computer of the PI at every research center participating in the study, and will be password protected. Data will be collected prospectively at the bedside during the study period.

Statistical analysis

First, a descriptive analysis of the population at study will be performed for socio- demographic, anthropometric and clinical characteristics. The means, standard deviations, medians and interquartile ranges will be presented as continuous numerical variables, while the frequencies and percentages will be determined for categorical variables. In the large-scale study, a Chi-square test or Fisher Exact test, if appropriate, will be used for the analysis of the primary endpoint, which is the comparison of the rate of POUR in the Experimental group with the rate of POUR in the Placebo group. This same test will also be helpful in the analysis of the secondary endpoints. If the patient doesn't take all of his medication or his surgery is cancelled he will still be included, since this will be an intention-to-treat analysis. Sub-group analyses will be performed to evaluate the impact of the tumour's characteristics, the duration of the surgery, the volume of intravenous fluids received during the intervention, the type of anaesthesia and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS).

Potential conflicts of interest

This is an investigator-led study that is independent and not sponsored by the industry. The study is funded through local funds (CHU de Quebec - Laval University, Department of Surgery) as well as from in-kind funding of the institution.

03

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Retention

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male patients of 18 years and older that are scheduled for a TEM resection during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient already taking an alpha1-adrenergic blocking agent Flomax® (Tamsulosin), Cardura® (Doxazosin), Hytrin® (Terazosine) Rapaflo® (Silodosin), Xatral® (Alfuzosin), Minipress® (Prazosin)
  • Patient having an indwelling bladder catheter
  • Allergy or hypersensibility to any alpha1-adrenergic blocking agent
  • Patient taking one of the following:

Anti-retroviral therapy, Antifungal drug, Clarithromycin, Erythromycin, Paroxetine, Terbinafine, Cimetidine, Warfarin, Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Vardenafil (these drugs have possible interactions with the study drug)

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
158 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tamsulosin

    The patients in the Experimental group will receive Tamsulosin Hydrochloride 0.4 MG (milligrams) once a day for 5 days before the surgery, one capsule on the day of the surgery and one on the day after. The intervention will consist of a total of 7 capsules

    Drug: Tamsulosin Hydrochloride 0.4 MG · Device: Foley catheter

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    The patients in the Placebo group will receive a placebo oral capsule (sugar) once a day for 5 days before the surgery, one capsule on the day of the surgery and one on the day after. The intervention will consist of a total of 7 capsules

    Drug: Placebo oral capsule · Device: Foley catheter

Interventions

  • Peri-operative therapy of Tamsulosin Hydrochloride 0.4 milligrams daily for a total of 7 days.

    Also known as: Tamsulosin

  • DrugPlacebo oral capsule

    Peri-operative therapy of a Placebo oral capsule daily for a total of 7 days.

    Also known as: Sugar pill, Control

  • DeviceFoley catheter

    Every patient with a post-operative urinary retention will have a foley catheter, as standard of care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-Operative Urinary Retention (POUR) (yes or no)

    The absence of natural voiding after a surgery needing an intervention as a Foley catheter or a catheterization. If the patient needs this intervention, he will be stated to have had a POUR.

    Time frame: 6 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Side effects of Tamsulosin Hydrochloride

    Every potential side effect will be reported

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Hospital admission

    Every admission related to the primary outcome

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Indwelling catheter

    Duration of the indwelling catheter (24-48 hours vs more than 48 hours)

    Time frame: 1 month

  4. Recurrence

    Recurrence of urinary retention after catheter removal

    Time frame: 24 hours after the removal of the catheter

  5. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Score

    The standardized questionnaire will be submitted to the patients before and after the prophylactic therapy. The score is out of 35. Score Correlation 0-7 Mildly symptomatic 8-19 Moderately symptomatic 20-35 Severely symptomatic

    Time frame: 7 days

  6. Late POUR

    Late post-operative urinary retention

    Time frame: Between 6 hours and 24 hours post-op

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
  • St. Paul's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
    Terminated
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
    Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada
    Withdrawn
  • CHU de Quebec - Universite Laval
    Quebec City, Quebec G1L 3L5, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Sebastien Drolet, MD, FRCSC · ContactSebastien.Drolet.chx@gmail.com · (418)525-4444
    • Ann Wright, RN · ContactAnn.Wright@chuq.qc.ca · (418)525-4444
    • Sebastien Drolet, MD FRCSC · Principal investigator
    • Claudya Morin, MD · Sub investigator
    • Alexandre Bouchard, MD FRCSC · Sub investigator
    • Philippe Bouchard, MD FRCSC · Sub investigator
    • Alexis Turgeon-Fournier, MD MSc FRCPC · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Akkoc A, Aydin C, Topaktas R, Kartalmis M, Altin S, Isen K, Metin A. Prophylactic effects of alpha-blockers, Tamsulosin and Alfuzosin, on postoperative urinary retention in male patients undergoing urologic surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Int Braz J Urol. 2016 May-Jun;42(3):578-84. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0256. PubMed 27286124 ↗
  • Bailey HR, Ferguson JA. Prevention of urinary retention by fluid restriction following anorectal operations. Dis Colon Rectum. 1976 Apr;19(3):250-2. doi: 10.1007/BF02590913. PubMed 1269351 ↗
  • Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1139-57. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819f7aea. PubMed 19352147 ↗
  • Barkin J, Diles D, Franks B, Berner T. Alpha blocker monotherapy versus combination therapy with antimuscarinics in men with persistent LUTS refractory to alpha-adrenergic treatment: patterns of persistence. Can J Urol. 2015 Aug;22(4):7914-23. PubMed 26267031 ↗
  • Bozlu M, Ulusoy E, Doruk E, Cayan S, Canpolat B, Schellhammer PF, Akbay E. Voiding impairment after prostate biopsy: does tamsulosin treatment before biopsy decrease this morbidity? Urology. 2003 Dec;62(6):1050-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.07.006. PubMed 14665353 ↗
  • Buckley BS, Lapitan MC. Drugs for treatment of urinary retention after surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;(10):CD008023. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008023.pub2. PubMed 20927768 ↗
  • Cataldo PA, Senagore AJ. Does alpha sympathetic blockade prevent urinary retention following anorectal surgery? Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Dec;34(12):1113-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02050073. PubMed 1959461 ↗
  • Chung SJ, Jung SI, Ryu JW, Hwang EC, Kwon DD, Park K, Kim JW. The preventive effect of tamsulosin on voiding dysfunction after prostate biopsy: a prospective, open-label, observational study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 May;47(5):711-5. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-0955-7. Epub 2015 Mar 27. PubMed 25812823 ↗
  • Dreijer B, Moller MH, Bartholdy J. Post-operative urinary retention in a general surgical population. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Mar;28(3):190-4. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328341ac3b. PubMed 21206278 ↗
  • Elshaikh MA, Ulchaker JC, Reddy CA, Angermeier KW, Klein EA, Chehade N, Altman A, Ciezki JP. Prophylactic tamsulosin (Flomax) in patients undergoing prostate 125I brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma: final report of a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 May 1;62(1):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.036. PubMed 15850917 ↗
  • Fisher E, Subramonian K, Omar MI. The role of alpha blockers prior to removal of urethral catheter for acute urinary retention in men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;2014(6):CD006744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006744.pub3. PubMed 24913721 ↗
  • Goldman G, Leviav A, Mazor A, Kashtan H, Aladgem D, Greenstein A, Wiznitzer T. Alpha-adrenergic blocker for posthernioplasty urinary retention. Prevention and treatment. Arch Surg. 1988 Jan;123(1):35-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400250037005. PubMed 3337653 ↗
  • Gonullu NN, Dulger M, Utkan NZ, Canturk NZ, Alponat A. Prevention of postherniorrhaphy urinary retention with prazosin. Am Surg. 1999 Jan;65(1):55-8. PubMed 9915533 ↗
  • Jang JH, Kang SB, Lee SM, Park JS, Kim DW, Ahn S. Randomized controlled trial of tamsulosin for prevention of acute voiding difficulty after rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2730-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1712-z. PubMed 22806208 ↗
  • Jeong IG, You D, Yoon JH, Hong S, Lim JH, Hong JH, Choo MS, Ahn H, Kim CS. Impact of tamsulosin on urinary retention following early catheter removal after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Urol. 2014 Feb;21(2):164-8. doi: 10.1111/iju.12225. Epub 2013 Jul 30. PubMed 23906190 ↗
  • Jordan CG. Post-Operative Urinary Retention. Ann Surg. 1933 Jul;98(1):125-37. doi: 10.1097/00000658-193307000-00012. No abstract available. PubMed 17867002 ↗
  • Kapoor A. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) management in the primary care setting. Can J Urol. 2012 Oct;19 Suppl 1:10-7. PubMed 23089343 ↗
  • Keita H, Diouf E, Tubach F, Brouwer T, Dahmani S, Mantz J, Desmonts JM. Predictive factors of early postoperative urinary retention in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2005 Aug;101(2):592-596. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000159165.90094.40. PubMed 16037182 ↗
  • Lamonerie L, Marret E, Deleuze A, Lembert N, Dupont M, Bonnet F. Prevalence of postoperative bladder distension and urinary retention detected by ultrasound measurement. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Apr;92(4):544-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh099. Epub 2004 Feb 20. PubMed 14977795 ↗
  • Laliberte AS, Lebrun A, Drolet S, Bouchard P, Bouchard A. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery as an outpatient procedure is feasible and safe. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3454-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4158-1. Epub 2015 Mar 24. PubMed 25801107 ↗
  • Leventhal A, Pfau A. Pharmacologic management of postoperative overdistention of the bladder. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978 Mar;146(3):347-8. PubMed 625669 ↗
  • Livne PM, Kaplan B, Ovadia Y, Servadio C. Prevention of post-hysterectomy urinary retention by alpha-adrenergic blocker. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983;62(4):337-40. doi: 10.3109/00016348309156234. PubMed 6138916 ↗
  • Lose G, Lindholm P. Prophylactic phenoxybenzamine in the prevention of postoperative retention of urine after vaginal repair: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1985 Sep;23(4):315-20. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(85)90026-8. PubMed 2866119 ↗
  • Lowe FC. Summary of clinical experiences with tamsulosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S13-21. PubMed 16986050 ↗
  • Lucas MG, Stephenson TP, Nargund V. Tamsulosin in the management of patients in acute urinary retention from benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2005 Feb;95(3):354-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05299.x. PubMed 15679793 ↗
  • Agrawal MS, Yadav A, Yadav H, Singh AK, Lavania P, Jaiman R. A prospective randomized study comparing alfuzosin and tamsulosin in the management of patients suffering from acute urinary retention caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. Indian J Urol. 2009 Oct-Dec;25(4):474-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.57917. PubMed 19955671 ↗
  • Madani AH, Aval HB, Mokhtari G, Nasseh H, Esmaeili S, Shakiba M, Shakiba RS, Seyed Damavand SM. Effectiveness of tamsulosin in prevention of post-operative urinary retention: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):30-6. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.05. PubMed 24642148 ↗
  • Mason SE, Scott AJ, Mayer E, Purkayastha S. Patient-related risk factors for urinary retention following ambulatory general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2016 Jun;211(6):1126-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 Jul 17. PubMed 26257154 ↗
  • Mohammadi-Fallah M, Hamedanchi S, Tayyebi-Azar A. Preventive effect of tamsulosin on postoperative urinary retention. Korean J Urol. 2012 Jun;53(6):419-23. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.6.419. Epub 2012 Jun 19. PubMed 22741052 ↗
  • Basheer A, Alsaidi M, Schultz L, Chedid M, Abdulhak M, Seyfried D. Preventive effect of tamsulosin on postoperative urinary retention in neurosurgical patients. Surg Neurol Int. 2017 May 10;8:75. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_5_17. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28584678 ↗
  • Nasu K, Moriyama N, Fukasawa R, Tsujimoto G, Tanaka T, Yano J, Kawabe K. Quantification and distribution of alpha1-adrenoceptor subtype mRNAs in human proximal urethra. Br J Pharmacol. 1998 Apr;123(7):1289-93. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701731. PubMed 9579721 ↗
  • Patel R, Fiske J, Lepor H. Tamsulosin reduces the incidence of acute urinary retention following early removal of the urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2003 Aug;62(2):287-91. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00333-9. PubMed 12893337 ↗
  • Petersen MS, Collins DN, Selakovich WG, Finkbeiner AE. Postoperative urinary retention associated with total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Aug;(269):102-8. PubMed 1864026 ↗
  • Petros JG, Bradley TM. Factors influencing postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing surgery for benign anorectal disease. Am J Surg. 1990 Apr;159(4):374-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81274-7. PubMed 2316800 ↗
  • Reitz A, Haferkamp A, Kyburz T, Knapp PA, Wefer B, Schurch B. The effect of tamsulosin on the resting tone and the contractile behaviour of the female urethra: a functional urodynamic study in healthy women. Eur Urol. 2004 Aug;46(2):235-40; discussion 240. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.04.009. PubMed 15245819 ↗
  • Shaw MK, Pahari H. The role of peri-operative use of alpha-blocker in preventing lower urinary tract symptoms in high risk patients of urinary retention undergoing inguinal hernia repair in males above 50 years. J Indian Med Assoc. 2014 Jan;112(1):13-4, 16. PubMed 25935942 ↗
  • Tammela T, Kontturi M, Puranen J. Prevention of postoperative urinary retention after total hip arthroplasty in male patients. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1987;76(3):170-2. PubMed 3314645 ↗
  • Toyonaga T, Matsushima M, Sogawa N, Jiang SF, Matsumura N, Shimojima Y, Tanaka Y, Suzuki K, Masuda J, Tanaka M. Postoperative urinary retention after surgery for benign anorectal disease: potential risk factors and strategy for prevention. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006 Oct;21(7):676-82. doi: 10.1007/s00384-005-0077-2. Epub 2006 Mar 22. PubMed 16552523 ↗
  • Verhamme KM, Dieleman JP, Bleumink GS, Bosch JL, Stricker BH, Sturkenboom MC. Treatment strategies, patterns of drug use and treatment discontinuation in men with LUTS suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Triumph project. Eur Urol. 2003 Nov;44(5):539-45. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00376-2. PubMed 14572751 ↗
  • Wu AK, Auerbach AD, Aaronson DS. National incidence and outcomes of postoperative urinary retention in the Surgical Care Improvement Project. Am J Surg. 2012 Aug;204(2):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.11.012. Epub 2012 May 3. PubMed 22560203 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2022, 59 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 15, 2017
First posted
Oct 19, 2017
StartActual
Oct 6, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2022
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2022
Last update
May 19, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03314025
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 19, 2017
Start date
Oct 6, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
May 19, 2021

Study contacts

Claudya Morin, MD
Contact
Claudya.Morin.1@ulaval.ca
(418)641-9732
Ann Wright, RN
Contact
Ann.Wright@chuq.qc.ca
(418)525-4444 ext. 53887
Sebastien Drolet, MD FRCSC
principal investigator · CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tamsulosin

Start the discussion