CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03313336EMLAUpdated Nov 14, 2017

A Study to Assess Therapeutic Equivalence Between Test EMLA Patch With Marketed EMLA Patch in Healthy Subjects.

A Phase 1 interventional study of EMLA test patch and EMLA current reference patch in Pain, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-14.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Phase 1, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A double-blind, randomized, 2-period, placebo-controlled, single-center, crossover study, efficacy study demonstrating the therapeutic equivalence of the test cellulose disc (matrix) in EMLA patch and the current commercial cellulose disc (matrix) in EMLA patch in healthy subjects.

Read the detailed description

This study will be a double-blind, randomized, 2-period, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy male and female subjects, performed at a single study center. Prior to inclusion, informed consent will be obtained. A brief medical history, including limited demographic data (gender, age and ethnicity) will be recorded, and eligibility for inclusion to the study will be established through a physical inspection of hands. Subjects will be shown how to complete the VAS. Visual analogue scale (VAS) as a research tool is frequently used for the assessment of pain severity and relief. VAS is easy to use and can be applied in a variety of settings; results are reproducible. VAS data are sensitive to treatment effects and can be analyzed using parametric statistical techniques. At each specific study visit, each subject will undergo a left-right comparison of two patch preparations, followed by a repeated test with an alternate combination of preparations. Thus, the study will comprise: Visit 1: EMLA Test Patch plus Placebo Patch OR EMLA Test Patch plus EMLA current Reference Patch. Visit 2: EMLA Test Patch plus EMLA current Reference Patch OR EMLA Test Patch plus Placebo Patch. There will be a washout period of at minimum of 4 calendar days between treatment periods (visits). No follow-up visit is needed. Any adverse event (AE) that is ongoing at the last visit will be followed up as appropriate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Keywords

  • Dermal anesthesia.
  • Venipuncture and intravenous cannulation.
  • Skin blanching or erythema.
  • Phase I.
  • Therapeutic equivalence.
  • Eutectic Mixture of Local anaesthetics (EMLA)
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Provision of signed and dated, written informed consent prior to any study specific procedures.
  2. Healthy male and female subjects aged 18 to 60 years.
  3. Have healthy skin over hands, with no inflammation or open wounds.
  4. Able to understand, read and speak the German language.
  5. Easy accessible veins on the dorsum of both hands.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current significant active skin disease such as widespread eczema or active atopic dermatitis.
  2. History of severe allergy/hypersensitivity or ongoing allergy/hypersensitivity, as judged by the PI, to local anesthetics of the amide type or to any of the components of the EMLA emulsion (e.g., castor oil polyoxyl hydrogenated).
  3. History of severe allergy/hypersensitivity or ongoing allergy/hypersensitivity, as judged by the PI to chlorohexidine (preservative in the placebo patch emulsion).
  4. Subjects who previously entered this study.
  5. Involvement of any AstraZeneca, PAREXEL or study site employee or their close relatives.
  6. Judgement by the PI that the subject should not participate in the study if they have any ongoing or recent (i.e., during the screening period) minor medical complaints that may interfere with the interpretation of study data or are considered unlikely to comply with study procedures, restrictions, and requirements.
  7. Vulnerable subjects, e.g., kept in detention, protected adults under guardianship, trusteeship, or committed to an institution by governmental or juridical order.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cohort 1

    EMLA Test Patch.

    Drug: EMLA test patch

  • Active comparator
    Cohort 2

    EMLA Reference Patch.

    Drug: EMLA current reference patch

  • Placebo comparator
    Cohort 3

    Placebo patch.

    Drug: Placebo Patch

Interventions

  • DrugEMLA test patch

    EMLA® Test Patch containing the active ingredients lidocaine base 25 mg/g and prilocaine base 25 mg/g in an oil-in-water emulsion saturating the absorbent cellulose disc. The source of cellulose for the cellulose disc will be provided from a new supplier in this test patch.

  • DrugEMLA current reference patch

    EMLA current Reference Patch, containing the active ingredients lidocaine base 25 mg/g and prilocaine base 25 mg/g in an oil-in-water emulsion saturating the absorbent cellulose disc.

  • DrugPlacebo Patch

    Placebo Patch, based on the EMLA Test Patch (incorporating the absorbent cellulose disc with cellulose from the current supplier), where the absorbent disc will be saturated with a placebo oil-in-water emulsion, where the eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine is replaced with fractionated coconut oil and chlorhexidine digluconate 20%, with identical appearance to the active EMLA patches.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of EMLA Test Patch with the marketed EMLA patch (EMLA current Reference Patch) by pain reduction assessment.

    To compare the anesthetic efficacy in pain reduction after an intravenous needle insertion whether or not actual IV insertion was achieved will be evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). The degree of pain experienced will be assessed on a 100 mm horizontal, non-graded paper-based VAS, with the endpoints representing "no pain" (0 mm), to "the worst possible pain" (100 mm). The VAS scores will be listed by subject, treatment sequence (TP/TR and TR/TP, where T=test, R=reference and P=Placebo), treatment (T, R and P) and hand (left, right).

    Time frame: At test procedure 1 and at test procedure 2 (which is after 4 days of washout period following test procedure 1).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with Adverse events (AEs), skin sensation and reactions as variables of safety and tolerability.

    AEs will be collected from the start of randomization throughout the treatment period up to and including the Follow-up Visit. Any AE that is ongoing at the last visit will be followed up as appropriate. Serious AEs will be recorded from the time of informed consent. Local skin sensations will be assessed by asking about injection site sensations (sensation experienced before removal of the patch), this will be rated on a four-point scale: none, mild, moderate or severe. Skin reactions will be performed after removal of the patch to inspect the area which has been in contact with the cream and the patch. Two separate assessments will be made - one for the skin in contact with the cream and one for the skin which had been in contact with the adhesive border.

    Time frame: From randomization until test procedure 2 or last study visit, whichever is later.

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Research Site
    Berlin, 14050, Germany
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03313336
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Collaborators
Parexel
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 18, 2017
Start date
Oct 30, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 9, 2017
Completion
Nov 9, 2017
Last update
Nov 14, 2017

Study contacts

Dr. med.Rainard Fuhr
principal investigator · PAREXEL Early Phase Clinical Unit Berlin

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion