ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03310294EVIM2Updated Oct 16, 2017

Immune Evidence to the Consumption of Lactobacillus GG and FOS Consumption in Patients With Herpes Labialis

An interventional study of Placebo and Prebiotics and Probiotics in Herpes Labialis, sponsored by Sprim Advanced Life Sciences. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-16.

Sponsored by Sprim Advanced Life Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2010, registered Oct 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
157
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Herpes labialis (HL) is the result of the presence of a virus called HSV-1 and is a common disease. Because of its visibility due to cold sores it has a serious impact on social life. Until now there is no effective treatment to prevent virus outbreaks. However, prebiotics and probiotics have both been shown to have a favorable and supportive effect on the immune system in different health conditions such as influenza, atopic dermatitis and diarrhea, so it is possible that they are able to have a favourable effect also on HL.

A recently completed pilot clinical trial (Protocol Number 08-SBUS-2-GRA-01, EVIM-1) was completed using a fermented milk (minidrink) containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS; it showed promising results in the reduction of HL recurrences in a population of 78 subjects with HSV-1. The study investigated the effect of pre- or probiotics or a combination of the two on the recurrence of HL lesions as well as on the immune system in general, showing that the consumption of a minidrink containing the probiotic L. rhamnosus or a minidrink containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS reduced the occurrence and the incidence of recurrent HL lesions.

Aim of this study: corroborate whether the consumption of a minidrink containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS results in less recurrence and a better progression of HL lesion, in a larger population. In addition, the response of the consumption of the minidrink on the QoL and the response on immunity specific biomarkers were evaluated.

Design: 152 patients were eligible to participate in the study and after a run-in period of two weeks consuming a placebo minidrink were randomized to one of the two experimental study groups: placebo minidrink (n=79) and a minidrink containing a combination of a pre- and probiotic (n=78). These minidrinks were consumed until the end of the study (day 140). At day 33 of the study the lip most prone to the development of a lesion was stimulated with UVB to provoke a lesion. During the entire study period subjects were checked for any clinical signs of a lesion, completed a self-assessment regarding the lesion and a QoL questionnaire at baseline (day 14), at day 49 and the end of the study (day 140). In addition, a blood sample was collected at baseline, at day 49 and at the end of the study to be analyzed for HSV-specific antibody concentrations , to check immune system specific functions.

Read the detailed description

Background: Herpes labialis is the result of the presence of HSV-1 and is a common disease. Because of its visibility it has a serious impact on social life. Until now there is no effective treatment to prevent virus outbreaks. However, prebiotics and probiotics have both been shown to have a favorable and supportive effect on the immune system in different health conditions such as influenza, atopic dermatitis and diarrhea.

A recently completed pilot clinical trial (Protocol Number 08-SBUS-2-GRA-01, EVIM-1) parallel groups, placebo controlled, triple blind, single center, randomized study, with a fermented milk (minidrink) containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS showed promising results in the reduction of HL recurrences in a population of 78 subjects with HSV-1; the study investigated the effect of pre- or probiotics or a combination of the two on the recurrence of HL lesions as well as on the immune system in general, showing that the consumption of a minidrink containing the probiotic L. rhamnosus or a minidrink containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS reduced the occurrence and the incidence of recurrent HL lesions.

Aim of the study: corroborate whether the consumption of a minidrink containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS results in less recurrence and a better progression of HL lesion, in a larger population. In addition, the response of the consumption of the minidrink on the QoL and the response on immunity specific biomarkers were evaluated.

Design: 152 patients were eligible to participate in the study and after a run-in period of two weeks consuming a placebo minidrink were randomized to one of the two experimental study groups: placebo minidrink (n=79) and a minidrink containing a combination of a pre- and probiotic (n=78). These minidrinks were consumed until the end of the study (day 140). At day 33 of the study the lip most prone to the development of a lesion was stimulated with UVB to provoke a lesion. During the entire study period subjects were checked for any clinical signs of a lesion, completed a self-assessment regarding the lesion and a QoL questionnaire at baseline (day 14), at day 49 and the end of the study (day 140). In addition, a blood sample was collected at baseline, at day 49 and at the end of the study to be analyzed for HSV-specific antibody concentrations (circulating concentrations of IgG1 and IgG3 (Th1) and IgG4 (Th2), NK activity, CXCL10 analyzed by ELISA at days 14, 49 and 140).

as regards the primary endpoint results have shown that there was a significant decrease (54.3%) in the recurrences of Herpes labialis lesions, post UV stimulation, at day 49 (V4) compared to placebo in the PP population with consumption of the study product minidrink with fermented low fat milk added with Lactobacillus rhamnosus and FOS. Considering the secondary endpoints in the PP population, considering the number of subjects who presented lesions between V0 and V5, the number of lesions is reduced significantly (both statistically and clinically) in the treatment group compared to the placebo group. There was a decrease in the lesion size in the treatment group when compared to placebo although the statistical significance is marginal. As regards 'Subjective assessment of pain', evaluated by means of a VAS scale, significant pain reduction was found in the treatment group compared to the placebo group. As regards immunological parameters was shown an increase in CXCL10 at V4 in the study group compared to the placebo group. As regards IgG1, IgG3 and IgG4 (V0, V4 and V5) although substantial increases were registered for some of these parameters, these were not sufficient to describe a definite trend. The natural killer (NK) cell activity did not show significant difference in their functional activity in the treatment group as compared to the placebo group.

It has been verified through quality of life questionnaire (SF-36 questionnaire) that treatment improved Mental Health in the treatment group (Nervous, Peaceful, Happy, Down in Dumps, Sad) compared to the placebo group and clinical significance was found at V4 and V5. General Health and Vitality has been improved at V4 and V5.

For each trial participant the adverse events/serious adverse events occurrences and a brief clinical examination were assessed. No special or unusual features of the safety evaluations were found.

02

Conditions studied

  • Herpes Labialis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lactobacillus
  • Herpes Labial
  • Immune repsonse
03

In context

Herpes Labialis

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Herpes Labialis; 2 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 157 is close to the median of 157 across 50 interventional studies indexed under Herpes Labialis.

Browse Herpes Labialis studies →

Lead sponsor

Sprim Advanced Life Sciences is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy free-living men and women aged 18 to 65 years-old.
  • History of recurrent HL (2 - 4 episodes) after exposure to sunlight in the previous 12 months.
  • Fitzpatrick skin type 1 to 4 (appendix 1 of the study protocol).
  • No presence of HL lesions at time of recruitment, including baseline.
  • Agreement to adhere to the prescribed list of dietary recommendations provided at the start of the study (appendix 3 of the study protocol).
  • Women of are required to use adequate birth protection during the study.
  • Sign and date the ICF to and to comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of acute/terminal disease.
  • Intolerance for milk protein or lactose.
  • Treatment with acyclovir or other medication believed to interfere with immune responses at the time of the study.
  • Participation in any herpes UV reactivation study within the previous three months.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Any condition (e.g. schizophrenia, psychosis, major depression or mental deficiency) or major co-morbidity that the study investigator thinks might compromise the person's ability to comply with the requirements of the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
157 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    one bottle of placebo (minidrink fermented with low-fat milk but without Lactobacillus rhamnosus and without FOS, and without viable bacteria 90 grams)

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Prebiotics and Probiotics

    one bottle of the study product (minidrink with fermented low-fat milk added with Lactobacillus rhamnosus (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) and fructooligosaccharides (FOS), 90 grams)

    Dietary Supplement: Prebiotics and Probiotics

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementPlacebo

    one bottle of placebo (minidrink fermented with low-fat milk but without Lactobacillus rhamnosus and without FOS, and without viable bacteria 90 grams)per day at breakfast until the end of the study (V5, day 140). At each visit, subjects were dispensed a sufficient amount of minidrinks until the next visit.

  • Dietary supplementPrebiotics and Probiotics

    one bottle of the study product (minidrink with fermented low-fat milk added with Lactobacillus rhamnosus (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) and fructooligosaccharides (FOS),per day at breakfast until the end of the study (V5, day 140). At each visit, subjects were dispensed a sufficient amount of minidrinks until the next visit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. reduction of HL recurrence.

    to evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the reduction of the number of HL recurrences at day 49 vs baseline.

    Time frame: Day 49

Secondary outcomes

  1. reduction of HL recurrence.

    to evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the reduction of the number of HL recurrences at day 49 vs baseline.

    Time frame: day 14

  2. reduction of HL recurrence.

    to evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the reduction of the number of HL recurrences at day 49 vs baseline.

    Time frame: day 140

  3. change IGS markers concentration

    Evaluate the effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix on specific IGs markers;

    Time frame: day 14

  4. change IGS markers concentration

    Evaluate the effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix on specific IGs markers;

    Time frame: day 49

  5. change IGS markers concentration

    Evaluate the effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix on specific IGs markers;

    Time frame: day 140

  6. time to healing

    Evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the time to healing, defined as either loss of the hard crust or return to normal skin (measured in days);

    Time frame: Day 14

  7. time to healing

    Evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the time to healing, defined as either loss of the hard crust or return to normal skin (measured in days);

    Time frame: Day 49

  8. time to healing

    Evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the time to healing, defined as either loss of the hard crust or return to normal skin (measured in days);

    Time frame: Day 140

  9. lesion size

    Evaluate measurement of lesion size as a product of the length and the width of the lesion development (measured in mm2) by classification of lesion stage

    Time frame: Day 14

  10. lesion size

    Evaluate measurement of lesion size as a product of the length and the width of the lesion development (measured in mm2) by classification of lesion stage

    Time frame: Day 49

  11. lesion size

    Evaluate measurement of lesion size as a product of the length and the width of the lesion development (measured in mm2) by classification of lesion stage

    Time frame: Day 140

  12. SF-36

    Evaluate quality of life by means of SF-36 questionnaire

    Time frame: Day 14

  13. SF-36

    Evaluate quality of life by means of SF-36 questionnaire

    Time frame: Day 49

  14. SF-36

    Evaluate quality of life by means of SF-36 questionnaire

    Time frame: Day 140

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2010 to primary completion in May 2011, 7 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 4, 2017
First posted
Oct 16, 2017
StartActual
Sep 14, 2010
Primary completionActual
May 5, 2011
CompletionActual
Aug 1, 2011
Last update
Oct 16, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03310294
Lead sponsor
Sprim Advanced Life Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 16, 2017
Start date
Sep 14, 2010
Primary completion
May 5, 2011
Completion
Aug 1, 2011
Last update
Oct 16, 2017

Study contacts

Michelangelo La Placa, master
principal investigator · Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, dell'Invecchiamento e Malattie Nefrologiche Università degli Studi di Bologna

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion