ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03310268Updated Nov 27, 2020Results posted

A Clinical Study to Evaluate a Stannous Fluoride Toothpaste for the Relief of Dentinal Hypersensitivity

An interventional study of 0.454% Stannous fluoride (SnF2) and 0.072% sodium fluoride (NaF): 1450 ppm fluoride in total and 1400 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP) in Dentin Sensitivity, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-27.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
185
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 28 studies in Dentin Sensitivity by GlaxoSmithKline — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Dentin Sensitivity · GlaxoSmithKline.

Enrollment
14th of 28
185 · median 164
Started
2017
with 1 other
No phase
13 of 28
none open now
Registered
26th of 28
by date

Among the 28 studies in Dentin Sensitivity by GlaxoSmithKline, this one is the 14th largest by enrollment, is one of 2 that started in 2017, is one of 13 with no phase, and was the 26th registered.

Dentin Sensitivity

288 studies on the registry are indexed under Dentin Sensitivity; 46 are open to participants now.

Browse Dentin Sensitivity studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 28 studies in Dentin Sensitivity by GlaxoSmithKline is open now. The open studies under Dentin Sensitivity, anywhere →

Who these studies take

Of the 18 Dentin Sensitivity studies recruiting now, 6 (33%) set no upper age limit and 11 (61%) stop at 75 or younger; 1 takes children under 18; 11 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 70 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 28 studies in Dentin Sensitivity by GlaxoSmithKline as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to provide evidence of clinical efficacy of an experimental dentifrice containing stannous fluoride (SnF2) compared to regular fluoride dentifrice in the reduction of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH). This study will be considered successful if there is a statistically significant difference in the primary efficacy variable, change from baseline in Schiff sensitivity score, after 8 weeks of treatment.

Read the detailed description

This will be a single centre, randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, 3 treatment arm, parallel group design study, stratified by maximum baseline Schiff sensitivity score (of the two selected test teeth), with a treatment period of 8 weeks. DH will be assessed following an acclimatization period of 2-6 weeks at Baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks treatment. The study will be conducted in healthy participants with pre-existing self-reported and clinically diagnosed tooth sensitivity at Screening. A standard fluoride dentifrice with no specific anti-sensitivity, anti-gingivitis and anti-plaque activity will be included as the negative control. A Chinese marketed positive control dentifrice with sensitivity benefits (containing stannous chloride (SnCl2)) will also be included in this study.

03

Conditions studied

  • Dentin Sensitivity

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Evidence of a personally signed and dated indicating the participant has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study before any assessment is performed.
  • Male and female participants who, at the time of screening, are between the ages of 18 and 70 years, inclusive.
  • Participants who are willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, and other study procedures.
  • Good general and mental health, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee.
  • Male participants able to father children and female participants of and at risk for pregnancy must agree to use a highly effective method of throughout the study and for at least 5 days after the last dose of assigned treatment. Female subjects who are not of childbearing potential must these meet requirements: Achieved status, defined as follows: cessation of regular menses for at least 12 consecutive months with no alternative pathological or physiological cause; and have a serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level confirming the post-menopausal state; have undergone a documented hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy; have medically confirmed ovarian failure. All other female subjects (including females with tubal ligations) will be considered to be of childbearing potential.
  • The following oral and dental inclusions will apply at Screening (Visit 1): Self-reported history of dentinal lasting more than six months but not more than 10 years, good general oral health, with a minimum of 20 natural teeth, minimum of 2 accessible non-adjacent teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars), preferably in different quadrants, that meet all of the following criteria: signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion (EAR), tooth with Modified Gingival Index (MGI) score =0 adjacent to the test area (exposed dentine) only and a clinical mobility of ≤1, tooth with signs of sensitivity measured by a qualifying tactile stimulus (Yeaple ≤20g) qualifying evaporative air assessment (Schiff sensitivity score >=2). The following dental inclusions will apply at Baseline (Visit 2): Minimum of two, non-adjacent accessible teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars), with signs of sensitivity, measured by response to a qualifying tactile stimulus (Yeaple ≤20g) and evaporative air assessment (Schiff sensitivity score ≥2). The two selected test teeth must have also qualified at Screening for this criteria. The Investigator will select two Test Teeth from those which meet both the tactile threshold and Schiff sensitivity score criteria, in addition to meeting all other criteria. Test teeth should not be adjacent to each other and preferably in different quadrants.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who are site staff members directly involved in the conduct of the study and their family members, site staff members otherwise supervised by the investigator, or participants who are GSK employees directly involved in the conduct of the study.
  • Participation in another clinical study (including cosmetic studies), or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days prior to the Screening visit and/or during study participation.
  • Participation in another tooth desensitizing treatment study within 8 weeks of the Screening visit.
  • Acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study.
  • Pregnant female participants. This will be confirmed verbally at Screening and confirmed by Urine pregnancy testing (carried out on all female participants of child bearing potential) at the Baseline visit.
  • Breastfeeding female participants.
  • Known or suspected intolerance or to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
  • Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse.
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with the lifestyle guidelines described in this protocol.
  • Participants who have previously been enrolled in this study.
  • General oral and dental exclusions: Dental prophylaxis within 4 weeks of Screening, tongue or lip piercing or presence of dental implants, gross periodontal disease, treatment of periodontal disease (including surgery) within 12 months of Screening, scaling or root planning within 3 months of Screening, teeth bleaching within 8 weeks of Screening, use of an over-the-counter (OTC) desensitizing product (e.g. dentifrice) and/or professional desensitizing treatment within 8 weeks of Screening. participants will be required to bring their current oral care products to the site in order to verify the absence of known anti-sensitivity ingredients.
  • Specific dental exclusions for test teeth: sensitive tooth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter dentifrice in the opinion of the investigator, tooth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing aetiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentine.
  • Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay within 12 months of Screening.
  • Concomitant Medication: Daily doses of medication/treatments or traditional herbal ingredients/treatments which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the perception of pain. Examples of such medications include analgesics, anticonvulsants, antihistamines that cause marked or moderate sedation, sedatives, tranquilisers, anti-depressants, mood-altering and anti-inflammatory drugs. Examples of herbal ingredients/treatments include clove oil, olive oil, or other treatments that are directly applied to the oral cavity for the treatment of oral health conditions. Currently taking antibiotics or has taken antibiotics within 2 weeks of Screening and/or Baseline, Daily dose of a medication which, in the opinion of the investigator, is causing xerostomia, Individuals who require antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures.
  • Any participant who, in the judgment of the investigator, should not participate in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
185 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Test Product

    Participants will be instructed to self administer experimental dentifrice containing 0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% sodium fluoride (NaF) (1450 parts per million \[ppm\] fluoride in total).

    Other: 0.454% Stannous fluoride (SnF2) and 0.072% sodium fluoride (NaF): 1450 ppm fluoride in total

  • Active comparator
    Negative Control

    Participants will be instructed to self administer negative control dentifrice containing 1400 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP).

    Other: 1400 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP)

  • Active comparator
    Positive Control

    Participants will be instructed to self administer positive control dentifrice containing SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF (1450 ppm fluoride in total).

    Other: Stannous Chloride (SnCl2) and 0.15% NaF: 1450 ppm fluoride in total

Interventions

  • Other0.454% Stannous fluoride (SnF2) and 0.072% sodium fluoride (NaF): 1450 ppm fluoride in total

    Participants will be instructed to apply experimental dentifrice (containing 454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF, 1450 ppm fluoride in total), covering the full length of toothbrush head (full ribbon) and will brush twice daily (morning and evening) for one timed minute (in their usual manner) and expectorate.

  • Other1400 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP)

    Participants will be instructed to apply negative control dentifrice (containing 1400 ppm fluoride as SMFP), covering the full length of toothbrush head (full ribbon) and will brush twice daily (morning and evening) for one timed minute (in their usual manner) and expectorate.

  • OtherStannous Chloride (SnCl2) and 0.15% NaF: 1450 ppm fluoride in total

    Participants will be instructed to apply positive control dentifrice (containing SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF, 1450 ppm fluoride in total), covering the full length of toothbrush head (full ribbon) and will brush twice daily (morning and evening) for one timed minute (in their usual manner) and expectorate.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score After 8 Weeks of Treatment

    The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale which was scored as follows - 0: Participant did not respond to air stimulation; 1: Participant responded to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, and requested discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score will be indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold After 8 Weeks of Treatment

    The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed the application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10 grams (g) and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.

    Time frame: Week 8

07

Results

Posted May 20, 2019

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from one center in China.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTest Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP)Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])
Started626261
Completed615761
Not completed150
Withdrew: (not specified)150

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score After 8 Weeks of Treatment

The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale which was scored as follows - 0: Participant did not respond to air stimulation; 1: Participant responded to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, and requested discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score will be indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · Score on Scale
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score After 8 Weeks of Treatment
Score on ScaleTest Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP)Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])
Schiff score at baseline2.22 ± 0.3692.23 ± 0.3852.18 ± 0.303
Schiff score at Week 81.69 ± 0.4491.50 ± 0.5261.70 ± 0.572
Change from baseline in Schiff score at Week 8-0.53 ± 0.562-0.72 ± 0.567-0.48 ± 0.591
Statistical analysis
  • Test Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride]) vs Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0476 · Difference of least square mean: 0.19 · 95% CI 0.002 to 0.374Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favors the first named treatment.
  • Test Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride]) vs Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride]) · ANCOVA · p = 0.8411 · Difference of least square mean: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.202 to 0.164Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favors the first named treatment.
  • Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP) vs Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride]) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0298 · Difference of least square mean: 0.21 · 95% CI 0.020 to 0.393Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favors the first named treatment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Tactile Threshold After 8 Weeks of Treatment

The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed the application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10 grams (g) and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · Grams
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold After 8 Weeks of Treatment
GramsTest Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP)Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])
Tactile threshold at baseline11.13 ± 2.29411.42 ± 2.27211.80 ± 3.032
Tactile threshold at Week 828.52 ± 22.84636.49 ± 29.12433.93 ± 24.902
Change from baseline at Week 817.38 ± 22.63125.00 ± 28.76922.31 ± 24.229
Statistical analysis
  • Test Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride]) vs Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP) · ANCOVA · p = 0.1232 · Difference of least square mean: -7.20 · 95% CI -16.376 to 1.975Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favors the first named treatment.
  • Test Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride]) vs Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride]) · ANCOVA · p = 0.3793 · Difference of least square mean: -4.04 · 95% CI -13.099 to 5.011Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favors the first named treatment.
  • Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP) vs Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride]) · ANCOVA · p = 0.4979 · Difference of least square mean: -3.16 · 95% CI -12.330 to 6.017Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favors the first named treatment.

Adverse events

Collected over From screening up to Week 8. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Test Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])0/62 (0%)0/62 (0%)7/62 (11.3%)
Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP)0/62 (0%)0/62 (0%)3/62 (4.8%)
Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])0/61 (0%)0/61 (0%)4/61 (6.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTest Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP)Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations0/622/620/61
Oral HerpesInfections and infestations1/621/621/61
Angular ChelitisInfections and infestations0/620/621/61
Pulpitis DentalInfections and infestations0/620/621/61
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/620/621/61
Lip UlcerationGastrointestinal disorders1/620/620/61
Mouth UlcerationGastrointestinal disorders1/620/620/61
Non infective GingivitisGastrointestinal disorders1/620/620/61
Ligament SprainInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/620/620/61
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/620/620/61

Baseline characteristics

Safety Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. This population was based on the treatment the subject actually received.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Test Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP)Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Total
Mean40.2 ± 10.8340.3 ± 9.1239.4 ± 9.9539.9 ± 9.94
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Test Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP)Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Total
Female554759161
Male715224
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Test Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP)Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Total
Hispanic or Latino0000
Not Hispanic or Latino626261185
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Test Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP)Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Total
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian626261185
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0000
White0000
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Stratification n (%)
Stratification n (%)(Participants)Test Product (0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Negative Control (1400 Ppm Fluoride as SMFP)Positive Control (SnCl2 and 0.15% NaF [1450 Ppm Fluoride])Total
Maximum baseline Schiff score 2444443131
Maximum baseline Schiff score 318181854
08

Study locations

1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Shanghai, 200023, China
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Tao D, Ling MR, Feng XP, Gallob J, Souverain A, Yang W, Alavi A. Efficacy of an anhydrous stannous fluoride toothpaste for relief of dentine hypersensitivity: A randomized clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Aug;47(8):962-969. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13305. Epub 2020 Jun 8. PubMed 32391584 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD for this study is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (copy the URL below to your browser)

Access criteria: Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Feb 2018, 2 months.

Results were first posted in May 2019, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

Of 33 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Dentin Sensitivity, half reached primary completion within 3 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 6. This study's 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 144 studies reached it within 6 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 10.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 11, 2017
First posted
Oct 16, 2017
StartActual
Nov 18, 2017
Primary completionActual
Feb 2, 2018
CompletionActual
Feb 2, 2018
Results first posted
May 20, 2019
Last update
Nov 27, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03310268
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 16, 2017
Start date
Nov 18, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2018
Completion
Feb 2, 2018
Results posted
May 20, 2019
Last update
Nov 27, 2020

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion