CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03309787Updated Jul 8, 2020Results posted

Health Coaching & Technology in a Weight Loss Center

An observational study in Obesity, Technology and Videoconferencing, sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-08.

Sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
37
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The national epidemic of obesity is associated with considerable morbidity, disability and early mortality.

Conventional weight loss programs beyond a primary care setting have the potential to reduce weight, but are difficult to access for adults with obesity in rural areas due to lack of transportation and access to specialty care. Routine intensive behavioral therapy, while effective, is often not supplemented with adjuncts that could be helpful in engaging participants in behavioral change. The overarching goal of this SYNERGY pilot project is to overcome barriers rural adults face by using video-conferencing to deliver specialty obesity care that otherwise is inaccessible to most adults faced with this disease. It also intends to use emerging mobile health (mHealth) technology which has shown considerable promise in providing motivational feedback. This proposal highlights T3/T4 translation bridging technologists, allied health staff, and clinicians in the development and implementation of new therapeutic modalities. The study aims to evaluate a telehealth-based health coaching program that is embedded in the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Weight and Wellness Center that integrates novel remote monitoring technology in effecting behavioral change using Amulet, a Dartmouth Computer Science developed mHealth device over a 16-week period. First, the feasibility and accessibility of an eHealth-delivered health coaching obesity intervention using remote monitoring and video-conferencing (Aim 1) will be evaluated. The potential effectiveness of achieving the primary outcome of 5% weight loss, with secondary outcomes of improved physical function and self reported health (Aim 2) will be ascertained. The intervention's impact on implementation outcomes of workflow, adoption, and organizational change that could affect further scalability and generalizability in other high-risk population groups (Aim 3) will be assessed. These preliminary findings will be used in a future competitive application for an extramural R01 designed to assess the effectiveness of our intervention in achieving weight loss in rural obese adults. If successful, this application has the potential to redesign care using applied methods of telehealth translated to community-based, rural populations to facilitate behavioral change. The project also meets criteria of the NIH Strategic Plan for Obesity and the Institute of Medicine's need for Telehealth research.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Technology
  • Videoconferencing
  • mHealth
  • Behavior, Health
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study will recruit 30 older motivated adults with obesity (aged 18-65 years). This study pilot will be based at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock (D-H) Weight and Wellness Center (DH-WWC) in Lebanon, NH. No randomization will be performed. Health coaches will deliver the intervention to participants

Inclusion criteria

  • English speaking;
  • Community-dwelling;
  • Age 18-65 years;
  • Obesity based on: BMI ≥30kg/m2 54;
  • Participating in the DH-WWC health coach program;
  • Access to home, high-speed internet with Wi-Fi;
  • Medical clearance from their primary care provider;
  • Provide voluntary, written consent;
  • Require an EHR patient portal account and credentials ; -----If subjects do not have an account, one will be created for the purposes of this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling to participate in the 16 week pilot or complete study measures;
  • Individuals unwilling/unable to provide consent;
  • A medical record diagnosis of dementia as intensive behavioral therapy and health coaching require the ability to complete questionnaires and change behavior, all of which may be challenging in individuals with cognitive impairment;
  • Cognitive impairment measured by the 6-item Callahan screen, a brief and reliable six-item screening questionnaire with acceptable sensitivity (88.7%) and specificity (88.0%) in identifying individuals with cognitive impairment. Its diagnostic properties are comparable to the full Folstein Mini-Mental Status Examination in those scoring ≥3. This questionnaire can be administered by telephone or face-to-face interview and is being as an adjunct to medical record documentation of cognitive impairment;
  • Life-threatening illness including those receiving palliative care or hospice services;
  • Nursing facility or hospital admission in the past six months;
  • Psychiatric diagnosis that would interfere with study participation and require significant modification to meet their needs such as major depressive disorder, substance abuse, suicidal ideation or severe mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder);
  • History of bariatric surgery;
  • American College of Sports Medicine contraindications to exercise57 including: a resting heart rate of >120bpm; Blood pressure >180/100mmHg; unstable angina;
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
37 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Amulet only

    As per usual care participants will receive an eHealth (Amulet + videoconferencing) intervention over a 16 week period of time.

    Behavioral: eHealth

  • Amulet/Fitbit

    As per usual care participants will receive an eHealth (Amulet/Fitbit + videoconferencing) intervention over a 16 week period of time.

    Behavioral: eHealth

  • Fitbit only

    As per usual care participants will receive an eHealth (Fitbit + videoconferencing) intervention over a 16 week period of time.

    Behavioral: eHealth

Interventions

  • BehavioraleHealth

    Intervention Description: The pilot comprises of five components listed below which provide access to specialty obesity care to rural obese adults, and enhance it with technology (telehealth and remote monitoring): Team-based care; medical plan, nurses, psychologists, dietician, Health coaching, Weekly coaching sessions , Messaging and Remote Monitoring

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Completion Rate: Number of Participants Completing the Intervention

    Completion/ Feasibility: The following rates will be computed: screened for inclusion; eligibility; enrollment; completion; assessment. We will assess entry criteria (reasons for dropout/non-adherence) and time to collect data. Enrollment success will be defined as 30 patients. Adequate retention is defined as a dropout rate of \<20%. Completion of \>80% of post-study measures will be defined as adequate. Attending \>80% of sessions will be considered acceptable. Staff will track equipment, software or technical issues (malfunctions, data loss, hardware) in a journal.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  2. Acceptability

    Acceptability: Qualitative interviews will ensure the appropriateness of the pilot and its strengths/weaknesses. Participants will answer questions on a scale from 0-5, where 5 = high acceptability of the program.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Weight

    Weight will be measured using a Seca 770 analyzer (in clinic) and by the Omron HBF-514 (at home remotely). Weight Loss (change in weight)

    Time frame: Baseline/16 weeks

  2. Change in 6 Minute Walk

    6-Minute Walk (6MWT) is a cardiovascular fitness surrogate measuring distance (normal 400-700m) related to function. A clinically important difference or change is 50-55m

    Time frame: Baseline/16 weeks - pre/post change - increase = longer distance

  3. Diet Change

    The Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants (REAPS) is a 16 item survey (score 13-39) of diet habits. Higher scores = higher diet quality. Positive score = better diet quality

    Time frame: Baseline/16 weeks

  4. Subjective Health

    The 10-question, non-proprietary Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems General Health-10 (PROMIS) captures physical, mental and social aspects of quality of life. Positive change scores = improved health. The score ranges from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, 10 consists of 1SD, and higher scores equate better health.

    Time frame: Baseline/16 weeks - Change

  5. Readiness to Change

    The University of Rhode Island Change Assessment is a 12 item questionnaire assessing one's stages of change based on contemplation, action, maintenance and pre-contemplation.. The range of scores from -2 to +14. Higher scores indicate higher readiness to change

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  6. Willingness to Pay

    Patient Perception of Value: Two questions will assess Willingness to Pay (WTP) - whether they would pay for telemedicine delivery of the intervention in lieu of in-person travel time or cost.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Staff Adoption

    Staff Adoption: Haug's 12-item Measure of Evidence-Based Practice Adoption assesses stage of change, experience, attitudes, organization barriers and strategies to support evidence-based practices (1-5 point scale - strongly disagree to agree).

    Time frame: 16 weeks

06

Results

Posted Jul 8, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCombined Group (Amulet/Fitbit)Fitbit OnlyAmulet Only
Started8209
Completed6147
Not completed262

Outcome measures

PrimaryCompletion Rate: Number of Participants Completing the Intervention

Completion/ Feasibility: The following rates will be computed: screened for inclusion; eligibility; enrollment; completion; assessment. We will assess entry criteria (reasons for dropout/non-adherence) and time to collect data. Enrollment success will be defined as 30 patients. Adequate retention is defined as a dropout rate of \<20%. Completion of \>80% of post-study measures will be defined as adequate. Attending \>80% of sessions will be considered acceptable. Staff will track equipment, software or technical issues (malfunctions, data loss, hardware) in a journal.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Completion Rate: Number of Participants Completing the Intervention
ParticipantsCombined Amulet/FitbitFitbit OnlyAmulet Only
Completion Rate: Number of Participants Completing the Intervention6147
PrimaryAcceptability

Acceptability: Qualitative interviews will ensure the appropriateness of the pilot and its strengths/weaknesses. Participants will answer questions on a scale from 0-5, where 5 = high acceptability of the program.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Acceptability
score on a scaleCombined Amulet/FitbitAmulet OnlyFitbit Only
Acceptability4 (4 to 5)4 (3 to 5)5 (4 to 5)
SecondaryChange in Weight

Weight will be measured using a Seca 770 analyzer (in clinic) and by the Omron HBF-514 (at home remotely). Weight Loss (change in weight)

Time frame:
Baseline/16 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · weight change (kg)
Change in Weight
weight change (kg)Combined Amulet/FitbitFitbit OnlyAmulet
Change in Weight-0.47 ± 2.77-3.06 ± 3.63-2.51 ± 2.16
SecondaryChange in 6 Minute Walk

6-Minute Walk (6MWT) is a cardiovascular fitness surrogate measuring distance (normal 400-700m) related to function. A clinically important difference or change is 50-55m

Time frame:
Baseline/16 weeks - pre/post change - increase = longer distance
Reported as:
Mean · meters
Change in 6 Minute Walk
metersCombined Amulet/FitbitAmulet OnlyFitbit Only
Change in 6 Minute Walk111.25 ± 27.8227.14 ± 140.14-45.67 ± 180.5
SecondaryDiet Change

The Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants (REAPS) is a 16 item survey (score 13-39) of diet habits. Higher scores = higher diet quality. Positive score = better diet quality

Time frame:
Baseline/16 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Diet Change
units on a scaleCombined Amulet/FitbitFitbit OnlyAmulet
Diet Change3.17 ± 4.712.42 ± 4.112.85 ± 2.91
SecondarySubjective Health

The 10-question, non-proprietary Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems General Health-10 (PROMIS) captures physical, mental and social aspects of quality of life. Positive change scores = improved health. The score ranges from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, 10 consists of 1SD, and higher scores equate better health.

Time frame:
Baseline/16 weeks - Change
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Subjective Health
units on a scaleCombined Amulet/FitbitFitbit OnlyAmulet
Subjective Health2.58 ± 6.114.54 ± 4.385.6 ± 6.8
SecondaryReadiness to Change

The University of Rhode Island Change Assessment is a 12 item questionnaire assessing one's stages of change based on contemplation, action, maintenance and pre-contemplation.. The range of scores from -2 to +14. Higher scores indicate higher readiness to change

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Readiness to Change
score on a scaleCombined Amulet/FitbitFitbit OnlyAmulet
Readiness to Change10.22 ± 1.319.64 ± 2.3310.3 ± 1.9
SecondaryWillingness to Pay

Patient Perception of Value: Two questions will assess Willingness to Pay (WTP) - whether they would pay for telemedicine delivery of the intervention in lieu of in-person travel time or cost.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Willingness to Pay
ParticipantsCombined Amulet/FitbitAmulet OnlyFitbit Only
Time — >60min013
Time — <60min6611
Cost <$30 — >60min5711
Cost <$30 — <60min103
Other pre-specifiedStaff Adoption

Staff Adoption: Haug's 12-item Measure of Evidence-Based Practice Adoption assesses stage of change, experience, attitudes, organization barriers and strategies to support evidence-based practices (1-5 point scale - strongly disagree to agree).

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Staff Adoption
units on a scaleStaff Adoption
Staff Adoption2.64 ± 0.49

Adverse events

Collected over study itself - 16weeks;. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Combined Amulet/Fitbit0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)
Amulet Only0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)
Fitbit Only0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Combined Amulet/FitbitAmulet OnlyFitbit OnlyTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years892037
>=65 years0000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Combined Amulet/FitbitAmulet OnlyFitbit OnlyTotal
Mean48.4 ± 12.549.4 ± 10.345.1 ± 12.146.9 ± 11.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Combined Amulet/FitbitAmulet OnlyFitbit OnlyTotal
Female881632
Male0145
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Combined Amulet/FitbitAmulet OnlyFitbit OnlyTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0000
White892037
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Combined Amulet/FitbitAmulet OnlyFitbit OnlyTotal
United States892037
07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Batsis JA, McClure AC, Weintraub AB, Sette D, Rotenberg S, Stevens CJ, Gilbert-Diamond D, Kotz DF, Bartels SJ, Cook SB, Rothstein RI. Barriers and facilitators in implementing a pilot, pragmatic, telemedicine-delivered healthy lifestyle program for obesity management in a rural, academic obesity clinic. Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Sep 30;1:83. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00075-9. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33015640 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 6, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03309787
Lead sponsor
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Responsible party
John A. Batsis, MD (Associate Professor of Medicine and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 16, 2017
Start date
Nov 29, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2018
Completion
Dec 1, 2019
Results posted
Jul 8, 2020
Last update
Jul 8, 2020

Study contacts

John A Batsis, MD
principal investigator · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion