ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03309410Updated Oct 13, 2017

Mathematical Arterialization of Venous Blood Gas

An observational study in Matched-Pair Analysis, Blood Gas Analysis and Emergency Service, Hospital, sponsored by Aalborg University. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-13.

Primary conditionnone(registry's first term: Emergencies)No conditionIs this wrong?Emergencies describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about. The study names no condition we can place it under, so it is not compared with other studies by condition.

Sponsored by Aalborg University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30
01

Study summary

Objective: Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis is essential in the clinical assessment of potential acutely ill patients. Venous to arterial conversion (v-TAC), a mathematical method, has recently been developed to convert peripheral venous blood gas (VBG) values to arterialized VBG (aVBG) values. The aim of this study was to test the reliability of aVBG compared to ABG in an emergency department (ED) setting.

Method: Twenty ED patients were included in this study. ABG and three aVBG samples were collected from each patient. The aVBG samples were processed in three different ways for comparison: aVBG1 was held steady and analysed within 5 minutes; aVBG2 was tilted in 5 minutes and analysed within 7 minutes; aVBG3 was held steady and analysed after 15 minutes. All VBG samples were arterialized using the v-TAC method. ABG and aVBG samples were compared using Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman's analysis.

Read the detailed description

Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis is essential in assessment of respiratory and metabolic status in acutely ill patients. In comparison to peripheral venous blood (PVG) sampling, the ABG sampling procedure is more painful for the patient and technically more challenging for the clinician to perform. Other drawbacks of ABG sampling include adverse events such as subcutaneous hematoma, arterial thrombosis or embolization, and the serious, though rare, complication pseudoaneurysms.

Peripheral venous blood gas (VBG) sampling has been suggested as an alternative to the ABG procedure. This procedure causes less patient discomfort and the sample can be analysed in combination with other venous blood tests. Studies have revealed that pH and bicarbonate have good correlation, whereas venous and arterial blood gasses (pO2 and pCO2) show low agreement. A recent systematic review comparing ABG and VBG in the ED setting found similar results and concluded that venous pCO2 was not an accurate representative of arterial pCO2.

However, a new method has been developed to calculate ABG values mathematically from peripheral venous blood by use of venous to arterial conversion (v-TAC) software (Obimedical, Denmark), supplemented with oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry. The principle of the method is a mathematical transformation of VBG values to arterialized values (aVBG) by simulating the transport of blood back through the tissue. To facilitate this simulation the following physiologically relevant assumptions were made: 1) The peripheral extremity was well perfused; 2) change in base excess across the tissue sampling site was approximately zero; 3) the respiratory quotient (rate of CO2 production and O2 utilisation over capillaries) could not vary outside the range 0.7 and 1.0, and 4) the haemoglobin concentration was constant from artery to vein. Initial testing of the method in an emergency department setting showed acceptable clinical congruence between arterial and mathematically arterialized pH and pCO2 with a small difference on 0.001- 0.024 and 0.00 0.46 kPa, respectively. However, inaccurate values of pO2 were seen when oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry was above 96%, due to the flat shape of the oxygen dissociation curve (ODC).

The aim of this study was to test appropriate practical handling of venous blood gas samples and evaluate the reliability of the v-TAC method, in an acute medical emergency setting in awake and circulatory stable patients capable of giving consent.

Methods Patient inclusion The study was conducted in the ED at North Denmark Regional Hospital from September through October 2015 in daytime. This hospital is 24-hour hospital with a collective medical and abdominal surgery emergency department, with 7-10.000 annual admissions per year.

Circulatory stable patients needing ABG analysis for respiratory and metabolic assessment were selected randomly for participation in the study. Patients were considered circulatory stable if systolic blood pressure was above 90 mmHg and heart rate was 50 to 110 beats/min in accordance with Danish Emergency Process Triage (DEPT), which were used to triage patients upon admission. A total of 30 patients were included; 10 patients for a pre-study purpose and then 20 patients in the following main study. Allocation to either the pre-study or the main study was performed by simple quasi-random allocation in order of admission. The clinical indication for ABG analysis was decided by the responsible physician in the ED upon patient admission and based on national guidelines and criteria.

Blood collection In the pre-study, venous samples were collected in paired 2 mL ABG syringes and 4.5 mL tubes from each of the 10 patients, to determine which blood collection method was preferred. VBG samples were collected via a butterfly needle with a three-way stopcock in conjunction with routine venous blood sampling upon admission. VBG samples were collected by the biomedical laboratory technician in the same manner as PVB samples in the normal clinical setting. Results from the pre-study were used to determine the preferred blood collection method in the main study. In this study, paired ABG and VBG samples were collected simultaneously from each of the 20 patients. The ABG samples were collected by the responsible physician.

Blood analysis Blood for VBG analysis collected in the syringe and 4.5 mL tube in the pre-study were analysed within five minutes after sampling. In the main study blood for VBG analysis was collected in three 4.5 mL tubes and converted to arterialised VBG (referred to as aVBG). Each aVBG tube was processed differently as follows: aVBG1 was held steady and analysed within five minutes of sample collection, aVBG2 was tilted in five minutes and analysed after seven minutes and aVBG3 was handled as aVBG1, but analysed after fifteen minutes. ABG samples were analysed within five minutes after sampling. All ABG and VBG samples were analysed with ABL800 blood gas analyser (Radiometer, Denmark) an VBG samples were mathematically converted to aVBG using v-TAC software which was integrated into the ABL800 analyser. In our hospital, the reference values for ABG parameters are as follows: pH 7.37-7.45, pCO2 4.30-6.00 kPa, and pO2 9.60-14.4 kPa. All results from analysed ABG and aVBG samples were registered automatically in the hospital database. On the standard of care basis, only the ABG results were used as the usual standard reference in the medical evaluation of the patients, who took part in the study.

Ethics and data protection The Danish Research Ethics Committee in the North Denmark Region was notified. Since the v-TAC method has previously been approved to be used in clinical research and blood sampling was performed as routine practice, ethical approval was not required. This study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency.

02

Conditions studied

  • Matched-Pair Analysis
  • Blood Gas Analysis
  • Emergency Service, Hospital

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Blood Gas Analysis
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Venous to arterial conversion
  • Matched-Pair Analysis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Aalborg University is the lead sponsor of 182 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Circulatory stable patients needing ABG analysis for respiratory and metabolic assessment were selected randomly for participation in the study. Patients were considered circulatory stable if systolic blood pressure was above 90 mmHg and heart rate was 50 to 110 beats/min in accordance with Danish Emergency Process Triage (DEPT), which were used to triage patients upon admission. A total of 30 patients were included; 10 patients for a pre-study purpose and then 20 patients in the following main study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Admission to the emergency department.
  • Need for ABG for respiratory or metabolic assessment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Circulatory unstable patients (systolic blood pressure \< 90mmHg og heart rate \<50beats/min or >110beats/min).
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
None retained

Groups and cohorts

  • Pre-study

    In the pre-study, venous samples were collected in paired 2 mL ABG syringes and 4.5 mL tubes from each of the 10 patients, to determine which blood collection method was preferred. VBG samples were collected via a butterfly needle with a three-way stopcock in conjunction with routine venous blood sampling upon admission. VBG samples were collected by the biomedical laboratory technician in the same manner as PVB samples in the normal clinical setting. Results from the pre-study were used to determine the preferred blood collection method in the main study. In this study, paired ABG and VBG samples were collected simultaneously from each of the 20 patients. The ABG samples were collected by the responsible physician. Allocation to either the pre-study or the main study was performed by simple quasi-random allocation in order of admission.

    Diagnostic Test: Venous to arterial conversion (v-TAC)

  • Main study

    In this study, paired ABG and VBG samples were collected simultaneously from each of the 20 patients. The ABG samples were collected by the responsible physician. Allocation to either the pre-study or the main study was performed by simple quasi-random allocation in order of admission. The clinical indication for ABG analysis was decided by the responsible physician in the ED upon patient admission and based on national guidelines and criteria.

    Diagnostic Test: Venous to arterial conversion (v-TAC)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testVenous to arterial conversion (v-TAC)

    This was an observational study. Paired arterial blood gas and venous blood gas was drawn from each patient and compared. Venous blood gas was converted to arterial blood gas values using v-TAC.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of venous pH between glass and syringe samples.

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of venous pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of venous pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of venous pH between glass and syringe samples.

    Time frame: 1 day

  5. Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of venous pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.

    Time frame: 1 day

  6. Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of venous pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.

    Time frame: 1 day

  7. Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of pH between aVBG and ABG.

    Time frame: 1 day

  8. Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.

    Time frame: 1 day

  9. Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.

    Time frame: 1 day

  10. Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of pH between aVBG and ABG.

    Time frame: 1 day

  11. Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.

    Time frame: 1 day

  12. Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hemoglobin concentration

    Comparison of venous blood hemoglobin (Unit of Measurement: mmol/L) between glass and syringe blood.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dar K, Williams T, Aitken R, Woods KL, Fletcher S. Arterial versus capillary sampling for analysing blood gas pressures. BMJ. 1995 Jan 7;310(6971):24-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6971.24. No abstract available. PubMed 7827548 ↗
  • Matheson L, Stephenson M, Huber B. Reducing pain associated with arterial punctures for blood gas analysis. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Sep;15(3):619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2013.06.001. Epub 2014 Feb 24. PubMed 24572291 ↗
  • Leone V, Misuri D, Console N. Radial artery pseudoaneurysm after a single arterial puncture for blood-gas analysis: a case report. Cases J. 2009 Jul 21;2:6890. doi: 10.4076/1757-1626-2-6890. PubMed 19829877 ↗
  • Dev SP, Hillmer MD, Ferri M. Videos in clinical medicine. Arterial puncture for blood gas analysis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 3;364(5):e7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMvcm0803851. No abstract available. PubMed 21288091 ↗
  • Zavorsky GS, Cao J, Mayo NE, Gabbay R, Murias JM. Arterial versus capillary blood gases: a meta-analysis. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007 Mar 15;155(3):268-79. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Aug 17. PubMed 16919507 ↗
  • Ak A, Ogun CO, Bayir A, Kayis SA, Koylu R. Prediction of arterial blood gas values from venous blood gas values in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2006 Dec;210(4):285-90. doi: 10.1620/tjem.210.285. PubMed 17146193 ↗
  • McCanny P, Bennett K, Staunton P, McMahon G. Venous vs arterial blood gases in the assessment of patients presenting with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;30(6):896-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Sep 9. PubMed 21908141 ↗
  • Kelly AM. Can VBG analysis replace ABG analysis in emergency care? Emerg Med J. 2016 Feb;33(2):152-4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204326. Epub 2014 Dec 31. PubMed 25552544 ↗
  • Bloom BM, Grundlingh J, Bestwick JP, Harris T. The role of venous blood gas in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;21(2):81-8. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32836437cf. PubMed 23903783 ↗
  • Rees SE, Toftegaard M, Andreassen S. A method for calculation of arterial acid-base and blood gas status from measurements in the peripheral venous blood. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006 Jan;81(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 21. PubMed 16303205 ↗
  • Tygesen G, Matzen H, Gronkjaer K, Uhrenfeldt L, Andreassen S, Gaardboe O, Rees SE. Mathematical arterialization of venous blood in emergency medicine patients. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;19(6):363-72. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834de4c6. PubMed 22082876 ↗
  • Skriver C, Lauritzen MM, Forberg JL, Gaardboe-Poulsen OB, Mogensen CB, Hansen CL, Berlac PA. [Triage quickens the treatment of the most sick patients]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2011 Oct 3;173(40):2490-3. Danish. PubMed 21975184 ↗
  • Toftegaard M, Rees SE, Andreassen S. Evaluation of a method for converting venous values of acid-base and oxygenation status to arterial values. Emerg Med J. 2009 Apr;26(4):268-72. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.052571. PubMed 19307387 ↗
  • Collins JA, Rudenski A, Gibson J, Howard L, O'Driscoll R. Relating oxygen partial pressure, saturation and content: the haemoglobin-oxygen dissociation curve. Breathe (Sheff). 2015 Sep;11(3):194-201. doi: 10.1183/20734735.001415. PubMed 26632351 ↗
  • Kelly AM, McAlpine R, Kyle E. Venous pH can safely replace arterial pH in the initial evaluation of patients in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2001 Sep;18(5):340-2. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.5.340. PubMed 11559602 ↗
  • Ibrahim I, Ooi SB, Yiong Huak C, Sethi S. Point-of-care bedside gas analyzer: limited use of venous pCO2 in emergency patients. J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.04.014. Epub 2008 Oct 18. PubMed 18930370 ↗
  • Hedberg P, Majava A, Kiviluoma K, Ohtonen P. Potential preanalytical errors in whole-blood analysis: effect of syringe sample volume on blood gas, electrolyte and lactate values. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009;69(5):585-91. doi: 10.1080/00365510902878716. PubMed 19396657 ↗
  • Castagneto M, Giovannini I, Boldrini G, Nanni G, Pittiruti M, Sganga G, Castiglioni GC. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic adequacy and their relation to survival in sepsis. Circ Shock. 1983;11(2):113-30. PubMed 6416705 ↗
  • Lauscher P, Lauscher S, Kertscho H, Habler O, Meier J. Hyperoxia reversibly alters oxygen consumption and metabolism. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:410321. doi: 10.1100/2012/410321. Epub 2012 May 1. PubMed 22623894 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Sensitive individual participant data (IPD) will not be available to other researchers. IPD will be kept in a secure personal drive within the regions server. All sensitive IPD will be anonymized before publication.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2015 to primary completion in Jan 2016, 4 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 5, 2017
First posted
Oct 13, 2017
StartActual
Sep 1, 2015
Primary completionActual
Jan 30, 2016
CompletionActual
Oct 1, 2017
Last update
Oct 13, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 13, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03309410
Lead sponsor
Aalborg University
Collaborators
Department of Anesthesiology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Center for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital
Responsible party
Mads Lumholdt (Principal investigator, Aalborg University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 13, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2015
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2016
Completion
Oct 1, 2017
Last update
Oct 13, 2017

Study contacts

Erika Christensen
study chair · Aalborg University
Peter Leutscher
study director · Center for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion