CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03309306FoodImageUpdated Jan 24, 2025Results posted

Evaluating Household Food Behavior With a Smartphone App

An interventional study of Natural Environment/Stress Management and Natural Environment/Reduce Food Waste in Food Habits, sponsored by Pennington Biomedical Research Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-24.

Sponsored by Pennington Biomedical Research Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to test the use of a smartphone app as a way to measure food waste.

Investigators propose to improve the accuracy and convenience of household food waste measurement so that consumer food waste program evaluations yield more power, less bias, less measurement error, and greater representation of targeted populations.

Read the detailed description

Investigators will improve measurement via the development of the FoodImage smartphone app, a technology leveraging the investigators' expertise in creating and deploying apps to measure food intake and deliver nutritional interventions in free-living household conditions. Investigators will validate the app against weighed waste in a controlled laboratory setting.

The study will yield an app ready for future study deployment while analyses of the data will inform rapidly evolving policy discussions concerning optimal approaches to reduce food waste. These outcomes align with program priorities to understand the economics of food waste and to use behavioral economics to address consumption behavior.

Specific objectives include:

  1. Development of FoodImage, a smartphone app that measures household food waste and food-waste-related behaviors,
  2. Assess differences in the accuracy and time burden of measurements taken with the FoodImage app versus two current household food waste measurement approaches (a pen-and-paper diary, and a pen-and-paper diary with a scale).
  3. Use the FoodImage app in a pilot randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of reducing household food waste through behavioral nudges in the form of personalized feedback about food waste levels and household-specific reduction goals.
02

Conditions studied

  • Food Habits
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • age 18-65 years
  • body mass index 18.5 - 50 kg/m2, based on self-reported height and weight
  • Shops for groceries
  • Conducts some of the food shopping and food preparation for their household
  • Be willing to do food shopping for the study (if necessary)
  • Have an iPhone and an operable Apple ID, password, and email address and is willing to use these to collect data during the study, acknowledging that data usage, and associated charges, are a result of study participation
  • Be willing to complete all study procedures corresponding to their randomization group

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

In addition to those who do not meet inclusion criteria, subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from enrollment:

  • Persons who are severely immune compromised
  • Persons who are pregnant, as assessed by self-report
  • Pennington employee
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Phase 1: Lab Testing (Visit 1, Day 0)

    In a laboratory kitchen, participants will use the following 3 methods to record and measure food waste during simulated shopping trip and kitchen clean-outs: the FoodImage App, Pen-and-paper Records, and Pen-and-paper records with a scale. Measurements will be collected by participants with all three methods, while lab personnel directly weigh foods to provide the criterion value.

  • Active comparator
    Phase 2: RCT Stress Management

    Participants will use the FoodImage app to capture data on food purchases, food waste that occurs during food preparation, food waste that is present after eating, and food waste from food purges in free-living conditions. Participants will capture baseline data for 4-7 days. After a 1-week break, participants will use the app to record food waste for approximately 4-7 days over the subsequent week. They will also receive information on stress management

    Other: Natural Environment/Stress Management

  • Experimental
    Phase 2: RCT Food Waste Reduction

    Phase 2 will occur in participants' natural environment (free-living conditions). Participants will use the FoodImage app to capture data on food purchases, food waste that occurs during food preparation, food waste that is present after eating, and food waste from food purges. Participants will use the app to record food waste for approximately 4-7 days over the subsequent week. They will also be provided with the following: 1. Feedback on the amount of food waste their household created during the first week, 2. A goal to reduce the next week's food waste by 20% or more, and 3. Tips on how to reduce household food waste adapted from current consumer campaigns

    Behavioral: Natural Environment/Reduce Food Waste

Interventions

  • OtherNatural Environment/Stress Management

    Participants will use the FoodImage app to capture data on food purchases, food waste that occurs during food preparation, food waste that is present after eating, and food waste from food purges in free-living conditions. Participants will capture baseline data for 4-7 days. After a 1-week break, participants will use the app to record food waste for approximately 4-7 days over the subsequent week. They will also receive information on stress management

  • BehavioralNatural Environment/Reduce Food Waste

    Participants will use the FoodImage app to capture data on food purchases, food waste that occurs during food preparation, food waste that is present after eating, and food waste from food purges in free-living conditions. Participants will use the app to record food waste for approximately 4-7 days over the subsequent week. They will also be provided with the following: 1. Feedback on the amount of food waste their household created during the first week, 2. A goal to reduce the next week's food waste by 20% or more, and 3. Tips on how to reduce household food waste adapted from current consumer campaigns

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Phase 1: Food Waste Error

    Participant estimations of food waste using the following three experimental methods as compared to the criterion value of weighed waste collected by study staff: 1) the FoodImage App (FoodImage app estimates minus the criterion value of lab personnel measured weighed food waste), 2) pen and paper diary with visual estimation of food amounts (pen and paper estimates minus the criterion value), and 3) pen and paper diary with a scale (pen and paper dairy accompanied by a scale minus directly weighed foods by lab personnel). All food values are in grams. The error values noted here represent less accurate estimates the further away they are from zero, either in the positive or negative direction. There are no min and max values to error measures.

    Time frame: Visit 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phase 2: Weight of All Household Waste

    Difference in change in total weight of all sources of household food waste.

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 14

06

Results

Posted Jan 24, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhase 2: RCT Stress ManagementPhase 2: RCT Food Waste Reduction
Started2319
Completed2218
Not completed11

Outcome measures

PrimaryPhase 1: Food Waste Error

Participant estimations of food waste using the following three experimental methods as compared to the criterion value of weighed waste collected by study staff: 1) the FoodImage App (FoodImage app estimates minus the criterion value of lab personnel measured weighed food waste), 2) pen and paper diary with visual estimation of food amounts (pen and paper estimates minus the criterion value), and 3) pen and paper diary with a scale (pen and paper dairy accompanied by a scale minus directly weighed foods by lab personnel). All food values are in grams. The error values noted here represent less accurate estimates the further away they are from zero, either in the positive or negative direction. There are no min and max values to error measures.

Time frame:
Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · grams
Phase 1: Food Waste Error
gramsFoodImage AppDiary: Visual EstimationDiary With a Scale
Phase 1: Food Waste Error-16.25 ± 84.7231.34 ± 134.8020553.6 ± 111,151
SecondaryPhase 2: Weight of All Household Waste

Difference in change in total weight of all sources of household food waste.

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 14
Reported as:
Least squares mean · grams
Phase 2: Weight of All Household Waste
gramsPhase 2: RCT Stress ManagementPhase 2: RCT Food Waste Reduction
Phase 2: Weight of All Household Waste-232.65 ± 289.44-325.05 ± 319.99

Adverse events

Collected over 4 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Participants0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Includes individuals recruited to participate, screened for eligibility, and measured at baseline. Arms/Groups are combined because baseline measures were collected prior to randomization.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Participants
Mean36.3 (18 to 63)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Participants
Female38
Male4
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian2
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American8
White30
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported2
Avoidable waste
Avoidable waste(grams/week)All Participants
Mean741.5 ± 984.4
07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Roe BE, Qi D, Beyl RA, Neubig KE, Martin CK, Apolzan JW. The Validity, Time Burden, and User Satisfaction of the FoodImage Smartphone App for Food Waste Measurement Versus Diaries: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020 Sep;160:104858. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104858. Epub 2020 May 21. PubMed 32773964 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 26, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03309306
Lead sponsor
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Collaborators
Ohio State University
Responsible party
Corby K. Martin (Principal Investigator, Pennington Biomedical Research Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 13, 2017
Start date
Apr 26, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 7, 2018
Completion
Mar 31, 2020
Results posted
Jan 24, 2025
Last update
Jan 24, 2025

Study contacts

Corby K Martin, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion