A Phase 2 interventional study of nivolumab and ipilimumab in Renal Cell Carcinoma, sponsored by Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research. Completed at 14 sites in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-06.
Sponsored by Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors that target PD-1 and CTLA-4 have shown activity in mRCC. However, the optimal schedule of the combination therapy has yet to be defined.
The objective of the trial is to determine the efficacy of combination immunotherapy of nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
The expansion phase shall address the role of ipilimumab in case of clinically insignificant progression.
Despite the encouraging results of recent trials, only a minority of patients shows significant response to single agent immunotherapy with nivolumab (Overall response rate (ORR) around 20%). Therefore, further investigations are urgently needed to improve the prognosis of patients with mRCC. Recent analyses of phase I trials in mRCC and also in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients as well as more advanced studies in melanoma patients have provided evidence that combination of immunotherapies can improve response rates and response duration.
Cancer immunotherapy rests on the premise that tumors can be recognized as foreign rather than as self and can be effectively attacked by an activated immune system. An effective immune response in this setting is thought to rely on immune surveillance of tumor antigens expressed on cancer cells that ultimately results in an adaptive immune response and cancer cell death. Meanwhile, tumor progression may depend upon acquisition of traits that allow cancer cells to evade immunosurveillance and escape effective innate and adaptive immune responses. Current immunotherapy efforts attempt to break the apparent tolerance of the immune system to tumor cells and antigens by either introducing cancer antigens by therapeutic vaccination or by modulating regulatory checkpoints of the immune system.
Dysfunctional T cells in cancer show an upregulation of inhibitory receptors (T cell exhaustion). Combined blockade of inhibitory receptors including CTLA-4 and PD-1 are considered to act synergistically. Indeed, early trials in mRCC showed improved response rates and combinations have also demonstrated to be prolonging progression-free survival in melanoma. While CTLA-4 is mainly involved in transmitting negative signals in T cells during priming in the lymph node, PD-1 is thought to mainly inhibit T cell cytotoxicity within the tumor by engagement of ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, which are upregulated by tumor cells and inflammatory cells within the tumor microenvironment as shield against the immune attack. It is therefore reasonable to combine PD-1 blockade with CTLA-4 blockade and this has been tested with an intriguing doubling of ORR in a phase I trial in patients with mRCC. An important aspect of any combination therapy is the question of additional/ excessive toxicity. In that trial the combination of nivolumab 3mg/kg/q3w (cont.) and ipilimumab 1mg/kg/q3w (4 times) proved to be safe, efficacious and feasible (much better safety profile in patients with mRCC compared to patients in melanoma trials). 78% of patients had any AE, but only 28% a grade 3-4 AE event. While diarrhea was quite common, only 4.8% had grade 3-4 diarrhea. Other treatment related immune-mediated AEs, especially endocrinopathy, pneumonitis, skin disorders were recorded at lower grades than 3. No deaths were reported for this combination. The overall response rate was 43% with durable responses of 78% in patients that had an initial response (durable responses).
Moreover, recent variations of dosing schedules and strengths of the nivolumab-ipilimumab combinations have shown improvement of toxicity rates with no loss of efficacy. For example, ipilimumab every 6 weeks at 1mg/kg was shown to be well tolerated in patients with non-small cell lung cancer when combined with nivolumab.
Nivolumab has proven efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile as a 2nd line therapy in mRCC. It is therefore destined to become the standard therapy after a first line TKI therapy. However, only a minority of patients shows clear responses leaving plenty of room for improvement. The addition of a further agent including blockade of CTLA-4 that acts synergistically could improve the response rate and also extend the progression-free and overall survival in patients with mRCC.
The addition of ipilimumab to nivolumab in order to increase response rates and induce more often durable remissions in patients is a reasonable next step and is currently tested in several randomized trials. However, at this point it is unclear which subgroup benefits most from the combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade and the optimal regimen/schedule remains unknown. To this end, this trial will test a combination of ipilimumab with nivolumab at an alternate schedule and a subsequent adaptation of the treatment regimen to the individual response with the aim to increase efficacy while reducing toxicity in mRCC patients. Ipilimumab is often used only in the first weeks of antineoplastic treatment for initial immune priming, allowing the presumption that it could be stopped after an initial priming phase. A phase I dose finding study is not needed, as experience with this dose and even higher doses have been reported and data are on file at Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). In addition, sequential biopsies and biomarker studies shall identify patients that benefit the most of a combination immunotherapy. In this trial, it was decided to have a nivolumab lead-in phase to be able to determine whether any acute side effect is nivolumab or ipilimumab related.
Exclusion Criteria:
Exception:
Patients start treatment with nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks during the first 20 weeks, 480 mg every 4 weeks thereafter). After 2 weeks, ipilimumab (1mg/kg every 6 weeks) will be introduced. As soon as a radiographic complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) is observed, ipilimumab has to be stopped and only the single-agent treatment with nivolumab is continued. Once ipilumimab has been stopped because of a response, it will not be re-started later on.
Drug: nivolumab · Drug: ipilimumab
240 mg every 2 weeks during the first 20 weeks, 480 mg every 4 weeks thereafter
Also known as: Opdivo
After 2 weeks 1mg/kg every 6 weeks
Also known as: Yervoy
Overall response rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as proportion of patients achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to RECIST v1.1 at any time between registration and documented disease progression\*, death, or subsequent therapy, whichever occurs first. \*PD before the 3rd administration of ipilimumab not leading to treatment discontinuation does not count as progression for this endpoint. Furthermore, the additional tumor assessment at 20 weeks for patients with PD n.c.s. before week 20 will not be taken into consideration for calculation of this endpoint.
Time frame: at 2 years.
Progression-free survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the time from registration until progression according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD before the 3rd administration of ipilimumab not leading to treatment discontinuation does not count as progression for this endpoint. Furthermore, the additional tumor assessment at 20 weeks for patients with PD n.c.s. before week 20 will not be taken into consideration for calculation of this endpoint. Patients without event at the time of analysis and patients starting a new anticancer therapy in the absence of an event will be censored at the date of the last tumor assessment showing non-progression (before the start of the new therapy, if any).
Time frame: at weeks 8, 14, 20, 26, and then every 12 weeks up to 2 years.
Duration of response (DOR)
DOR is defined as time from the date when a patient first meets the criteria for PR or CR according to RECIST v1.1, until documented progression, relapse or death due to disease progression, whichever occurs first. PD before the 3rd administration of ipilimumab not leading to treatment discontinuation does not count as progression for this endpoint. Furthermore, the additional tumor assessment at 20 weeks for patients with PD n.c.s. before week 20 will not be taken into consideration for calculation of this endpoint. Patients without event at the time of analysis and patients starting a new anticancer therapy in the absence of an event will be censored at the date of the last tumor assessment showing non-progression before the start of the new therapy (if any). DOR will only be analyzed in the subgroup of patients achieving PR or CR during trial treatment.
Time frame: at weeks 8, 14, 20, 26, and then every 12 weeks up to 2 years.
Time to treatment failure (TTF)
TTF defined as time from registration to treatment discontinuation due to any reason. Patients still on treatment at the time of analysis will be censored at the date of last treatment administration. Furthermore, the additional tumor assessment at 20 weeks for patients with PD n.c.s. before week 20 will not be taken into consideration for calculation of this endpoint.
Time frame: at weeks 8, 14, 20, 26, and then every 12 weeks up to 2 years.
Overall survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from registration until death from any cause. Patients without event at the time of analysis will be censored at the date they were last known to be alive.
Time frame: At weeks 8. 14, 20, 26, then every 12 weeks until 2 years.
Adverse events (AEs)
AEs are assessed according to NCI CTCAE v4.03.
Time frame: at weeks 8, 14, 20, 26, then every 12 weeks, until 100 days after last dose of treatment.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research