CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03290677Updated Mar 18, 2024

Study of Core Needle Biopsy and Cryoablation of an Enlarging Tumor in Patients With Metastatic Lung Cancer and Metastatic Melanoma Receiving Post-progression Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

An interventional study of Cryoablation and Biopsy in Lung Cancer, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-18.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This research study is studying cryoablation (a treatment to kill cancer cells with extreme cold) combined with continued treatment with current immune checkpoint inhibitor as a possible treatment for lung cancer.

Read the detailed description

This research study is a Phase II clinical trial. Phase II clinical trials test the safety and effectiveness of an investigational intervention to learn whether the intervention works in treating a specific disease. "Investigational" means that the intervention is being studied.

The FDA (the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) has approved each aspect of this therapy, however this research study is unique because it combines them as a treatment option for the participant's disease. That has not been approved by the FDA.

In this research study, The investigators are...

  • Continuing the participant on the participant's immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy even though the participant's doctor believes that the participant's cancer is growing. Since the participant's cancer is growing, there is only a small chance the participant will respond to continued drug therapy.
  • Taking a biopsy of the participant's cancer to confirm there is cancer growing in the location to be treated.
  • Performing cryoablation on an enlarging tumor. This involves passing a special needle into the participant's body (cryoprobe) to freeze tumor and kill a small part (not all) of the participant's cancer. Your immune system will respond to the damage caused by freezing part of the participant's tumor.
  • The investigators are hoping to demonstrate that combining post-progression immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with cryoablation is safe, and may induce and/or restore an immune response to cancer in other places in the participant's body
02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (age > 18) with stage IV lung cancer receiving commercial supply immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with progression of disease, and for whom an additional 4-6 weeks of current therapy (post-progression therapy) is acceptable as standard therapy
  • Must have a growing tumor amenable to percutaneous image-guided cryoablation based on routine Interventional Radiology criteria
  • Must have measurable disease (by RECIST) independent of the lesion to be ablated. Measurable disease is defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded for non-nodal lesions and short axis for nodal lesions) as ≥20 mm with conventional techniques or as ≥10 mm with spiral CT scan, MRI, or calipers by clinical exam. See Section 11 for the evaluation of measurable disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who are receiving an investigational agent(s)
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study because immune checkpoint inhibitors have the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with immune checkpoint inhibitors, breastfeeding should be discontinued.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CT-guided Percutaneous Cryoablation of Lung Tumor

    * Image-guided core needle biopsy to confirm cancer will be perform * Patients will undergo cryoablation as a standard procedure * cryoablation will be performed with a three-cycle freeze-thaw phase protocol * Non-contrast CT images will be obtained in 3 to 5 minutes intervals to visualize the evolving ablation zone

    Procedure: Cryoablation · Procedure: Biopsy

Interventions

  • ProcedureCryoablation

    This involves passing a special needle into the body (cryoprobe) to freeze tumor and kill a small part (not all) of the cancer. The immune system will respond to the damage caused by freezing part of the tumor.

  • ProcedureBiopsy

    Removing a small piece of the affected area to confirm cancer

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative Incidence of Treatment Related Serious Adverse Events

    The safety and feasibility of the procedure will be determined based on observed adverse events. Cryoablation will be determined safe and feasible to implement in this study population if the cumulative incidence of serious adverse events (SAE) related to cryoablation is no higher than 20%. Adverse events are assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4).

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Radiologic Response Rate Of Cryoablation

    The number of participants that achieve a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) following cryoablation. * Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. * Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: 2 years

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02214, United States
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03290677
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
William M. Wood Foundation
Responsible party
Meghan Mooradian (Principal Investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2017
Start date
Jan 17, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2023
Completion
Nov 30, 2023
Last update
Mar 18, 2024

Study contacts

Meghan J Mooradian, MD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion