CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03288272ERASERUpdated Sep 20, 2017

Evaluation of Repeated Whole Brain Radiotherapy Versus Best Supportive Care for Multiple Brain Metastases.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Whole Brain Radiotherapy and Best Supportive Care in Brain Metastasases, sponsored by Stephanie Combs. Status unknown at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-20.

Sponsored by Stephanie Combs · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) has been established as the treatment standard in patients with multiple cerebral metastases from solid tumors. However, intracerebral recurrence is possible and a repeated WBRT may be indicated to improve intracerebral tumor control. Each institutsion offers different dosing regimens, which have all been published to be safe and effective. Some favor best supportive care only.

The current study protocol is aimed at evaluating primarily the toxicity as well as secondarily the local and loco-regional tumor control, overall survival and QoL after repeated WBRT using 2 different dose concepts (20 Gy in 10 Fx vs. 30 Gy in 15 Fx) compared to BSC.

Read the detailed description

According to Nussbaum et al., 24-45% of cancer patients develop cerebral metastases during the course of the disease. Brain metastases are generally associated with a poor prognosis and high morbidity. Published median survival rates after WBRT are between 2 and 7 months. Standard of care in multiple BM is WBRT delivered as 30 Gy in 10 fractions, leading to modest palliation with a median survival of 3 to 5 months. Prognostic factors include the RPA-classification, performance status, response to steroids and evidence of systemic disease.

Unfortunately, intracerebral recurrence happens. For example, in the cohort of Meyners et al.(2010) on WBRT in relatively radioresistant tumors, median time to recurrence was 4.5months and the local control rates at 6 and 12 months post radiationem were 37% and 15%, respectively. Furthermore, the treatment of intracerebral recurrence after previous WBRT is challenging. In case of \</= 3 recurrent BM, surgery or radiosurgery (RS) are options. One other option, especially in case of >3 recurrent BM is repeated WBRT. In this setting, one of the first reports on repeated WBRT was published by Cooper et al. in 1990. The authors reported on repeated WBRT (n=52) consisting of 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Response to reirradiation was seen in 42% of the patients. Furthermore, the patients improved by at least one level in their neurologic function status. Survival after second therapy averaged 5 months. In the report by Wong et al. (1996) median dose of retreatment (n=86) was 20 Gy. Resolution of symptoms was achieved in 27% of patients, partial improvement in 43% and no improvement or worsening of symptoms was seen in 29% of patients. The majority of patients had no significant toxicity secondary to re-irradiation. Five patients had radiographic abnormalities of their brain consistent with radiation-related changes. One patient had symptoms of dementia that was thought to be caused by radiotherapy. Sadikov et al. (2007) reported on 72 patients who underwent repeated WBRT for recurrent or progressive BM. The median survival after re-irradiation was 4.1 months. One patient was reported as having memory impairment and pituitary insufficiency after 5 months of progression-free survival.

In the report by Mayer et al. on re-irradiation tolerance of the human brain -in this analysis focused on recurrent glioma-, the authors concluded that radiation-induced brain tissue necrosis is found to occur at normalized tolerance doses of cumulative > 100 Gy.

The current study protocol is aimed at evaluating primarily the toxicity as well as secondarily the local and loco-regional tumor control, overall survival and QoL after repeated WBRT using 2 different dose concepts (20 Gy in 10 Fx vs. 30 Gy in 15 Fx) compared to BSC.

In the present trial, the primary endpoint toxicity as well as the secondary endpoints QoL, loco-regional progression-free survival, overall survival and imaging response in patients previously treated with WBRT requiring repeated WBRT for intracerebral tumor progression will be evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Metastasases

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • histologically confirmed malignancy
  • previous WBRT
  • MR-imaging confirmed cerebral metastases (>1)
  • age ≥ 18 years of age
  • Karnofsky Performance Score ³60
  • For women with childbearing potential, (and men) adequate contraception.
  • Ability of subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial
  • Written informed consent (must be available before enrolment in the trial)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • refusal of the patients to take part in the study
  • Patients who have not yet recovered from acute high-grade toxicities of prior therapies
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Participation in another clinical study or observation period of competing trials, respectively
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm 1 - WBRT 10 x 2 Gy

    Arm 1 - WBRT 10 x 2 Gy Whole brain radiotherapy with a total dose of 20 Gy in single fractions of 2 Gy

    Radiation: Whole Brain Radiotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Arm 2 - WBRT 15 x 2 Gy

    Arm 2 - WBRT 15 x 2 Gy Whole brain radiotherapy with a total dose of 30 Gy in single fractions of 2 Gy

    Radiation: Whole Brain Radiotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Arm 3 - Best Supportive Care

    Symptomatic treatment includes steroids, pain medication, nutritional support etc.

    Other: Best Supportive Care

Interventions

  • RadiationWhole Brain Radiotherapy

    Radiotherapy of the whole brain

  • OtherBest Supportive Care

    Best Supportive Care including nutrition, pain medication, steroids as needed

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Toxicity

    The primary endpoint is toxicity according to CTCAE after whole brain radiotherapy.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. loco-regional progression-free survival

    follow-up and local control of brain metastases as well as loco-regional control

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Quality of Life (QOL)

    QOL

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Survival

    survival after radiotherapy

    Time frame: 6 months

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar
    Munich, 81675, Germany
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Scharp M, Hauswald H, Bischof M, Debus J, Combs SE. Re-irradiation in the treatment of patients with cerebral metastases of solid tumors: retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 3;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-4. PubMed 24387239 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03288272
Lead sponsor
Stephanie Combs
Responsible party
Stephanie Combs (Professor and Chair, Technical University of Munich) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 20, 2017
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
May 2018 (estimated)
Completion
May 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 20, 2017

Study contacts

Stephanie E Combs, Prof. Dr.
Contact
stephanie.combs@tum.de
+49-89-4140- ext. 4501
Carmen Kessel, MA
Contact
carmen.kessel@tum.de
+49-89-4140- ext. 4501
Stephanie E Combs, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Professor and Department Chair

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion