CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03287414Updated Jun 18, 2024Results posted

Study of Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of VAY736 in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

A Phase 2 interventional study of VAY736 and Placebo in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Terminated at 16 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-18.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Sponsor decision
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of VAY736 as potential therapy for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

Read the detailed description

This was an exploratory (non-confirmatory) randomized, patient-, investigator-, sponsor- blinded, placebo controlled study of VAY736 in IPF patients. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of 300 mg VAY736 administered subcutaneously (s.c.) every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio on top of local standard of care (SOC), to receive VAY736 or placebo. Randomized subjects entered the treatment epoch (for up to 48 weeks), followed by two follow-up epochs: the PK/safety follow-up epoch and the PD/safety follow-up epoch. The PK/safety follow-up epoch lasted for 20 weeks. When the PK/safety follow-up epoch was completed, participants in the placebo arm were discharged from the study; but participants in the active arm (those who had received VAY736) continued into the PD/safety follow-up epoch. Participants in the PD/safety follow-up epoch were followed until B-cell recovery (in the peripheral blood), defined as: B cells >=50/μL or B cells >= 80% of baseline (whichever occurred first). If a participant had not recovered his/her B-cells after a period of 2 years from the last dose of VAY736, then this participant was discharged from the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Keywords

  • idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
  • VAY736
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A diagnosis of definite or probable IPF within 5 years of the screening visit
  • Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) 40-90% predicted (inclusive)
  • Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs (DLCO), corrected for hemoglobin, 25-79% predicted (inclusive)
  • Forced Expiratory Volume in first second (FEV1)/FVC >70%
  • Unlikely to die from cause other than IPF within the next 3 years, in the opinion of the investigator
  • Unlikely to undergo lung transplantation during this trial

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emphysema > fibrosis on screening high-resolution computed tomography (must be confirmed by central reader)
  • History of major organ, hematopoietic stem cell or bone marrow transplant
  • Clinically diagnosed acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) or other significant clinical worsening within 3 months of randomization
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Ejection Fraction (EF) \<25%
  • Current smoker
  • Prior use of any B-cell depleting therapy (e.g., rituximab, ofatumumab, or other anti-CD20 mAb, anti-CD40, anti-CD19,anti-CD22 mAb, anti-CD52 mAb, or anti-BAFF mAb)
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    VAY736

    Participants received 300 mg VAY736 administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 48 weeks on top of current standard-of-care therapy

    Drug: VAY736 · Drug: Standard of Care (SoC)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants received placebo administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 48 weeks on top of current standard-of-care therapy

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Standard of Care (SoC)

Interventions

  • DrugVAY736

    300 mg VAY736 administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 48 weeks

    Also known as: Ianalumab

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 48 weeks

  • DrugStandard of Care (SoC)

    Background standard-of-care treatment for IPF: nintedanib, pirfenidone, or no background therapy

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC).

    FVC was defined as the maximum amount of air that an individual was able to forcibly exhale from his / her lungs after taking the deepest breath they could. Change from baseline to end of treatment epoch (48 weeks of treatment) in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) was analyzed using a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) and considering all assessments collected during the treatment epoch. The model included treatment and visit as fixed effects, standard of care treatment (Nintedanib, Pirfenidone, or no treatment) as factor and baseline value as a covariate, treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as interaction terms. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment pre-dose before or on randomization date.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality Events

    All-cause mortality events were defined as deaths due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with the event of interest along with 80% two-sided confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula are provided.

    Time frame: Up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment

  2. Percentage of Participants With Survival Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) -Related Mortality Events

    IPF-related mortality events were defined as deaths due to IPF related cause. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with the event of interest along with 80% two-sided confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula are provided.

    Time frame: Up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment

  3. Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Events

    PFS events were divided into: 1) PFS1 events including progression (relative reduction in FVC ≥ 10%) or death due to all causes, and 2) PFS2 events including progression (relative reduction in FVC ≥ 10%) or death due to IPF-related causes. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with the event of interest (PFS1 events or PFS2 events) along with 80% two-sided confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula are provided.

    Time frame: Up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment

  4. Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Events

    The following disease progression events were considered: a) relative reduction in FVC ≥ 10%; b) relative reduction in Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs (DLCO) ≥ 15%; c) absolute reduction in Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) ≥ 50 m. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with the event of interest along with 80% two-sided confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula are provided.

    Time frame: Up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment

  5. Percentage of Participants With Composite Events

    Composite events were defined as: 1) death (all-cause mortality), or relative reduction in FVC ≥ 10%, or relative reduction in DLCO ≥ 15%, or relative reduction in 6MWD ≥ 50 m (composite endpoint 1); and 2) Death (IPF-related mortality), or relative reduction in FVC ≥ 10%, or relative reduction in DLCO ≥ 15%, or relative reduction in 6MWD ≥ 50 m (composite endpoint 2). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with the event of interest along with 80% two-sided confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula are provided.

    Time frame: Up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment

  6. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs

    DLCO is a measurement to assess the lungs' ability to transfer gas from inspired air to the bloodstream. DLCO was determined according to ATS guidelines. Change from baseline to end of treatment epoch (48 weeks of treatment) in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was analyzed using a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) and considering all assessments collected during the treatment epoch. The model included treatment and visit as fixed effects, standard of care treatment (Nintedanib, Pirfenidone, or no treatment) as factor and baseline value as a covariate, treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as interaction terms. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment pre-dose before or on randomization date.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment

  7. Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

    A standardized 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society 2002. The distance walked in six minutes (6MWD) was recorded. Change from baseline to end of treatment epoch (48 weeks of treatment) in 6MWD was analyzed using a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) and considering all assessments collected during the treatment epoch. The model included treatment and visit as fixed effects, standard of care treatment (Nintedanib, Pirfenidone, or no treatment) as factor and baseline value as a covariate, treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as interaction terms. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment pre-dose before or on randomization date.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment

  8. Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Distance Saturation Product

    Distance saturation product is the product of distance walked and lowest oxygen saturation during the 6-min walk test. Change from baseline to end of treatment epoch (48 weeks of treatment) in distance saturation product was analyzed using a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) and considering all assessments collected during the treatment epoch. The model included treatment and visit as fixed effects, standard of care treatment (Nintedanib, Pirfenidone, or no treatment) as factor and baseline value as a covariate, treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as interaction terms. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment pre-dose before or on randomization date.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment

  9. Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Resting Oxygen Saturation Level (on Room Air)

    Change from baseline to end of treatment epoch (48 weeks of treatment) in resting oxygen saturation (on room air) was analyzed using a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) and considering all assessments collected during the treatment epoch. The model included treatment and visit as fixed effects, standard of care treatment (Nintedanib, Pirfenidone, or no treatment) as factor and baseline value as a covariate, treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as interaction terms. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment pre-dose before or on randomization date.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment

  10. Number of Participants With Positive Serum Anti-VAY736 Antibodies

    Number of participants with positive serum anti-VAY736 antibodies. A bridging ELISA method that is designed to detect the presence of anti-VAY736 antibodies in human serum was used.

    Time frame: Day 1, 29, 85, 169, 253 and 337

  11. Ctrough of VAY736 From the Serum Concentration-time Data

    The lowest serum concentration of VAY736 observed during a dosing interval at steady state (Ctrough) was determined

    Time frame: At pre-dose on Day 1, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309 and 337

06

Results

Posted Mar 10, 2023

Participant flow

The study was conducted across 16 centers in 6 countries.

Treatment Epoch
Participant flow — Treatment Epoch
MilestoneVAY736Placebo
Started1416
Treated1316
Completed612
Not completed84
Withdrew: Adverse event01
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor22
Withdrew: Subject/guardian decision40
Withdrew: Discontinued early with reason "other" selected11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
PK/Safety Follow-up Epoch
Participant flow — PK/Safety Follow-up Epoch
MilestoneVAY736Placebo
Started713
Completed713
Not completed00
PD/Safety Follow-up Epoch
Participant flow — PD/Safety Follow-up Epoch
MilestoneVAY736Placebo
Started70
Completed50
Not completed20
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Subject/guardian decision10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC).

FVC was defined as the maximum amount of air that an individual was able to forcibly exhale from his / her lungs after taking the deepest breath they could. Change from baseline to end of treatment epoch (48 weeks of treatment) in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) was analyzed using a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) and considering all assessments collected during the treatment epoch. The model included treatment and visit as fixed effects, standard of care treatment (Nintedanib, Pirfenidone, or no treatment) as factor and baseline value as a covariate, treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as interaction terms. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment pre-dose before or on randomization date.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter (L)
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC).
Liter (L)VAY736Placebo
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC).0.039 ± 0.1116-0.023 ± 0.0773
Statistical analysis
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.3248 (1-sided p-values were obtained using MMRM Model.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.063 · 80% CI -0.115 to 0.241
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality Events

All-cause mortality events were defined as deaths due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with the event of interest along with 80% two-sided confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula are provided.

Time frame:
Up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality Events
Percentage of participantsVAY736Placebo
Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality Events8.3 (2.39 to 26.92)0 (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.868
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Survival Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) -Related Mortality Events

IPF-related mortality events were defined as deaths due to IPF related cause. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with the event of interest along with 80% two-sided confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula are provided.

Time frame:
Up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Survival Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) -Related Mortality Events
Percentage of participantsVAY736Placebo
Percentage of Participants With Survival Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) -Related Mortality Events0 (NA to NA)0 (NA to NA)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Events

PFS events were divided into: 1) PFS1 events including progression (relative reduction in FVC ≥ 10%) or death due to all causes, and 2) PFS2 events including progression (relative reduction in FVC ≥ 10%) or death due to IPF-related causes. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with the event of interest (PFS1 events or PFS2 events) along with 80% two-sided confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula are provided.

Time frame:
Up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Events
Percentage of participantsVAY736Placebo
PFS161.0 (38.22 to 84.20)31.9 (18.04 to 52.51)
PFS257.1 (33.44 to 82.86)31.9 (18.04 to 52.51)
Statistical analysis
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.921 · Hazard ratio (hr): 2.6 · 80% CI 1.1 to 6.3
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.863 · Hazard ratio (hr): 2.2 · 80% CI 0.9 to 5.6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Disease Progression Events

The following disease progression events were considered: a) relative reduction in FVC ≥ 10%; b) relative reduction in Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs (DLCO) ≥ 15%; c) absolute reduction in Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) ≥ 50 m. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with the event of interest along with 80% two-sided confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula are provided.

Time frame:
Up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Events
Percentage of participantsVAY736Placebo
FVC57.1 (33.44 to 82.86)31.9 (18.04 to 52.51)
DLCO73.8 (46.56 to 94.24)56.1 (38.65 to 75.10)
6MWD38.3 (19.96 to 64.88)75.0 (58.52 to 88.74)
Statistical analysis
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.863 · Hazard ratio (hr): 2.2 · 80% CI 0.9 to 5.6
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.457 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.9 · 80% CI 0.4 to 2.0
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.019 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.3 · 80% CI 0.1 to 0.6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Composite Events

Composite events were defined as: 1) death (all-cause mortality), or relative reduction in FVC ≥ 10%, or relative reduction in DLCO ≥ 15%, or relative reduction in 6MWD ≥ 50 m (composite endpoint 1); and 2) Death (IPF-related mortality), or relative reduction in FVC ≥ 10%, or relative reduction in DLCO ≥ 15%, or relative reduction in 6MWD ≥ 50 m (composite endpoint 2). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with the event of interest along with 80% two-sided confidence intervals using Greenwood's formula are provided.

Time frame:
Up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Composite Events
Percentage of participantsVAY736Placebo
Composite Endpoint 181.0 (63.86 to 93.29)66.3 (50.84 to 81.18)
Composite Endpoint 279.2 (61.07 to 92.70)66.3 (50.84 to 81.18)
Statistical analysis
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.611 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.1 · 80% CI 0.6 to 2.0
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.549 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.1 · 80% CI 0.6 to 1.9
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs

DLCO is a measurement to assess the lungs' ability to transfer gas from inspired air to the bloodstream. DLCO was determined according to ATS guidelines. Change from baseline to end of treatment epoch (48 weeks of treatment) in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was analyzed using a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) and considering all assessments collected during the treatment epoch. The model included treatment and visit as fixed effects, standard of care treatment (Nintedanib, Pirfenidone, or no treatment) as factor and baseline value as a covariate, treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as interaction terms. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment pre-dose before or on randomization date.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mililiter/minute/millimeter Mercury
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs
mililiter/minute/millimeter MercuryVAY736Placebo
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs-1.954 ± 1.0816-1.033 ± 0.7244
Statistical analysis
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.7576 (1-sided p-values were obtained using MMRM Model.) · Least squares of the mean: -0.920 · 80% CI -2.615 to 0.774
SecondaryChange From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

A standardized 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society 2002. The distance walked in six minutes (6MWD) was recorded. Change from baseline to end of treatment epoch (48 weeks of treatment) in 6MWD was analyzed using a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) and considering all assessments collected during the treatment epoch. The model included treatment and visit as fixed effects, standard of care treatment (Nintedanib, Pirfenidone, or no treatment) as factor and baseline value as a covariate, treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as interaction terms. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment pre-dose before or on randomization date.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Meter (m)
Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
Meter (m)VAY736Placebo
Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)19.743 ± 53.5268-12.479 ± 28.9400
Statistical analysis
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.3018 (1-sided p-values were obtained using MMRM Model.) · Least squares of the mean: 32.222 · 80% CI -47.572 to 112.015
SecondaryChange From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Distance Saturation Product

Distance saturation product is the product of distance walked and lowest oxygen saturation during the 6-min walk test. Change from baseline to end of treatment epoch (48 weeks of treatment) in distance saturation product was analyzed using a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) and considering all assessments collected during the treatment epoch. The model included treatment and visit as fixed effects, standard of care treatment (Nintedanib, Pirfenidone, or no treatment) as factor and baseline value as a covariate, treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as interaction terms. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment pre-dose before or on randomization date.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Meter% (m%)
Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Distance Saturation Product
Meter% (m%)VAY736Placebo
Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Distance Saturation Product9.746 ± 52.2985-19.420 ± 28.3755
Statistical analysis
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.3140 (1-sided p-values were obtained using MMRM Model.) · Least squares of the mean: 29.166 · 80% CI -48.220 to 106.553
SecondaryChange From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Resting Oxygen Saturation Level (on Room Air)

Change from baseline to end of treatment epoch (48 weeks of treatment) in resting oxygen saturation (on room air) was analyzed using a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) and considering all assessments collected during the treatment epoch. The model included treatment and visit as fixed effects, standard of care treatment (Nintedanib, Pirfenidone, or no treatment) as factor and baseline value as a covariate, treatment-by-visit and baseline-by-visit as interaction terms. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment pre-dose before or on randomization date.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 48 weeks post first dose of study treatment
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percentage (%)
Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Resting Oxygen Saturation Level (on Room Air)
Percentage (%)VAY736Placebo
Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment Epoch (48 Weeks of Treatment) in Resting Oxygen Saturation Level (on Room Air)-0.117 ± 1.0179-1.887 ± 0.9415
Statistical analysis
  • VAY736 vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.1269 (1-sided p-values were obtained using MMRM Model.) · Least squares of the mean: 1.770 · 80% CI -0.219 to 3.759
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Positive Serum Anti-VAY736 Antibodies

Number of participants with positive serum anti-VAY736 antibodies. A bridging ELISA method that is designed to detect the presence of anti-VAY736 antibodies in human serum was used.

Time frame:
Day 1, 29, 85, 169, 253 and 337
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Positive Serum Anti-VAY736 Antibodies
ParticipantsVAY736Placebo
Day 113
Day 2912
Day 8511
Day 16902
Day 25321
Day 33700
SecondaryCtrough of VAY736 From the Serum Concentration-time Data

The lowest serum concentration of VAY736 observed during a dosing interval at steady state (Ctrough) was determined

Time frame:
At pre-dose on Day 1, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309 and 337
Reported as:
Mean · nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)
Ctrough of VAY736 From the Serum Concentration-time Data
nanogram (ng) / mililiter (mL)VAY736
Day 10.00 ± 0.000
Day 29676.79 ± 499.931
Day 57779.89 ± 645.363
Day 85786.63 ± 501.225
Day 113771.88 ± 623.268
Day 1411316.05 ± 877.240
Day 1691019.00 ± 587.097
Day 197985.50 ± 495.652
Day 2251271.10 ± 863.055
Day 253998.57 ± 947.343
Day 281705.00 ± 997.021
Day 309827.40 ± 678.836
Day 337688.50 ± 1172.124

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline up to end of study, assessed up to approximately 2.4 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
VAY7361/13 (7.7%)5/13 (38.5%)13/13 (100%)
Placebo0/16 (0%)9/16 (56.3%)15/16 (93.8%)
Total1/29 (3.4%)14/29 (48.3%)28/29 (96.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent serious events
EventVAY736PlaceboTotal
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/133/163/29
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/131/162/29
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders1/130/161/29
Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/130/161/29
HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/130/161/29
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/131/162/29
VasculitisVascular disorders1/130/161/29
Aortic valve incompetenceCardiac disorders0/131/161/29
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders0/131/161/29
Retinal vein occlusionEye disorders0/131/161/29
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 119
Most frequent other events
EventVAY736PlaceboTotal
Weight decreasedInvestigations1/134/165/29
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders3/131/164/29
Injection site pruritusGeneral disorders3/132/165/29
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/131/164/29
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/133/164/29
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders2/130/162/29
FatigueGeneral disorders2/131/163/29
Injection site erythemaGeneral disorders2/131/163/29
BronchitisInfections and infestations2/132/164/29
Respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/131/163/29

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics are provided for all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)VAY736PlaceboTotal
Mean69.7 ± 9.3068.3 ± 8.1568.9 ± 8.55
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)VAY736PlaceboTotal
Female112
Male121527
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)VAY736PlaceboTotal
White131629
07

Study locations

16 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0007, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Coswig, 01640, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dublin, D04, Ireland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Forli, FC 47100, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Modena, MO 41124, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Siena, SI 53100, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB23 3RE, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 23, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Aug 6, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03287414
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2017
Start date
Dec 20, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 25, 2020
Completion
Feb 14, 2022
Results posted
Mar 10, 2023
Last update
Jun 18, 2024

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion