CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03286374Updated Oct 23, 2020

Do Change in Life Style Improve Work Ability?

An interventional study of Occupational rehabilitation in Obesity, Morbid, Sick-leave and Work Related Illnesses, sponsored by Molde University College. Completed at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 67 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-23.

Sponsored by Molde University College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
95
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 67 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main aim of this Cohort trial is to get more information about how life style changes affect work participation for people with BMI above 30. The information can contribute to improving the quality of occupational rehabilitation programs in the specialized health care services and for others who work with weight loss programs and work related rehabilitation programs.

Read the detailed description

The goal of rehabilitation, in general, is to help people to reach and maintain their optimal function and copying capabilities and to promote independence and participation in society. For occupational rehabilitation is the goal also to increase function and work ability to prevent the individuals permanent to fall out of working life. People with high BMI needs beside work rehabilitation also focus on life style changes to reduce consequences of obesity. The Central Norway Regional Health Authority (HMN RHF) has initiated action to reduce work absence and consequence of obesity by introducing a work related rehabilitation program for people with BMI above 30. This program combines work participation and life style changes and exists only in two institutions in Norway. The goal of the program is to increase function and work ability and weight loss. The program is new, and few documents exist on the effect and the correlation between life style changes and work ability. There is also need to question whether obesity is the reason for work absence or is there other factors that affect work ability. This trial wants to follow-up a group of people who have been participating occupational rehabilitation at Muritunet.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity, Morbid
  • Sick-leave
  • Work Related Illnesses
  • Life Style

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Obesity
  • Occupational rehabilitation
  • Sick leave
  • Life style treatment
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 67 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. People who are on sick leave or stands in danger of being sick because of problems related to obesity.
  2. The participants must have a realistic opportunity to return to work.
  3. Body mass index above 30
  4. Age 18-67 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria;

  1. People with a severe eating disorder.
  2. People without a capacity to consent.
  3. People with severe alcohol and/or drug abuse.
  4. People with a major mental illness.
  5. Being pregnant.
  6. People with a health condition that contraindicates physical activity.
  7. People who receive work assessment allowance.
  8. People with or plan to apply for disability benefits.
  9. People with permanently adapted work.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
95 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Occupational rehabilitation

    The participants will receive the current occupational rehabilitation program at Muritunet.

    Behavioral: Occupational rehabilitation

Interventions

  • BehavioralOccupational rehabilitation

    The participants in the occupational rehabilitation program get both practical and theoretical intervention in groups. Four main interventions; cognitive therapy, physical activity, diets and training in work-oriented approach. The rehabilitation stay is as followed: 1. Four weeks with an institutional stay at Muritunet (BL) 2. Follow-up; 1. Eight weeks, telephone contact between therapist at Muritunet and the participant. 2. 16 weeks, video conference on SKYPE between all the participants and a therapist. Lecture on diets. 3. 28 weeks, Follow-up at Muritunet. Central themes that day is education, conversation, physical test, and forms. (T1) 4. 40 weeks, telephone contact between therapist at Muritunet and the participant. 5. 52 weeks, Follow-up at Muritunet. Central themes that day is education, conversation, physical test, and forms. (T2)

    Also known as: Life style treatment

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Work participation

    Work participation after a work related rehabilitation program at Muritunet.

    Time frame: 1-4 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Life quality

    Quality of life; health - 15D ( Harri Sintonen, http://www.15d-instrument.net)

    Time frame: Survey data collected at baseline, six and twelve months after participation in the trial.

  2. Work motivation

    Return to work self-efficacy, Return-to-work self-efficacy scale (RTWSE-19) (Shaw et al. 2011)

    Time frame: Survey data collected at baseline, six and twelve months after participation in the trial.

  3. Weight loss

    Weight changing

    Time frame: Weight collected at baseline, six and twelve months after participation in the trial.

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Anita Dyb Linge
    Valldal, Møre Og Romsdal 6210, Norway
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Linge AD, Bjorkly SK, Jensen C, Hasle B. Bandura's Self-Efficacy Model Used to Explore Participants' Experiences of Health, Lifestyle, and Work After Attending a Vocational Rehabilitation Program with Lifestyle Intervention - A Focus Group Study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Dec 24;14:3533-3548. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S334620. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34992380 ↗
  • Linge AD, Jensen C, Laake P, Bjorkly SK. Changes to body mass index, work self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, and work participation in people with obesity after vocational rehabilitation: a prospective observational study. BMC Public Health. 2021 May 17;21(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10954-y. PubMed 34001067 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 24, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03286374
Lead sponsor
Molde University College
Collaborators
Volda University College
Responsible party
Anita Dyb Linge (Ph.D Student, Molde University College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 18, 2017
Start date
Aug 30, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2019
Completion
Aug 31, 2019
Last update
Oct 23, 2020

Study contacts

Odd Ragnar Hunnes, Dean
study director · Volda University Collage

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion