ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03285035CryotherapyUpdated Oct 11, 2019

Quality of Life Assessment of Cryotherapy in Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Cancer

An observational study in Esophageal Cancer, sponsored by Western Regional Medical Center. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-11.

Sponsored by Western Regional Medical Center · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cryoablation combined with chemotherapy on the quality of life of patients with non resectable esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer.

Read the detailed description

This is a single arm prospective study to determine the effect of cryoablation combined with chemotherapy on the quality of life of patients with non resectable esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Esophageal Cancer

Keywords

  • Cryotherapy
  • Palliation
  • Dysphagia
03

In context

Esophageal Neoplasms

1,873 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal Neoplasms; 501 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 200 across 432 observational studies indexed under Esophageal Neoplasms.

Browse Esophageal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Western Regional Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients with non resectable esophageal cancer

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Has esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer and will be receiving chemotherapy
  • Dysphagia score of 1, 2, 3 or 4.
  • Age ≥18 years old
  • (ASA) Physical Status Classification ≤ 4
  • Deemed not a candidate for esophageal cancer surgical resection
  • Female subjects must be either , surgically sterilized, or willing to use an acceptable method of (i.e., total abstinence, birth control pills, an intrauterine device (IUD), diaphragm, progesterone injections or implants, or condoms plus a spermicide) for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (ECOG) performance status greater than 2
  • Patient who received radiation treatment in the prior 8 weeks
  • Known causing cranial nerve deficits which can cause dysphagia
  • Inability to undergo an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)
  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Surgery or anatomy where capacity of stomach is reduced making cryotherapy
  • Patients with tracheoesophageal fistula
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Non-operable esophageal cancer

    Cryotherapy treatment

    Device: Administration of questionaires to patients receiving an upper endoscopy with cryotherapy in addition to chemotherapy for esophageal cancer palliation.

Interventions

  • DeviceAdministration of questionaires to patients receiving an upper endoscopy with cryotherapy in addition to chemotherapy for esophageal cancer palliation.

    Upper endoscopy with cryotherapy using liquid nitrogen.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in baseline quality of life (QOL) assessment using a modified EORTC QLQ-OES18 at 6 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in dysphagia score using the 5 point Likert scale at 1 to 2 weeks post-procedure compared to baseline

    Time frame: 1 to 2 weeks

  2. Number of participants with adverse events as assessed by CTCAE 4.03.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Number of participants requiring alternative treatments for dysphagia palliation such as stenting, photodynamic therapy or brachytherapy and stenting

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Subjective Global Assessment scale of nutritonal status will be determined at baseline and approximately 3 month intervals.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Tumor length in centimeters, endoscopist estimated luminal diameter and endoscopist subjective assessment of size as compared to the prior endoscopy will be determined

    Time frame: 1 to 12 weeks

  6. Immunoassays will be obtained before and after treatment

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. local tumor control will be compared to systemic tumor control

    Time frame: 1 year

  8. Survival while on cryotherapy and systemic chemotherapy will be measured.

    Time frame: 1 year

  9. Change in baseline quality of life (QOL) assessment using a modified EORTC QLQ-OES18 at 1 to 2 weeks compared to baseline

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Western Regional Medical Center, Inc.
    Goodyear, Arizona 85338, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2020, 36 months after the start.

Of 152 non-industry observational studies under Esophageal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 81 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 252. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 174 studies reached it within 60 months; a quarter within 33 and three quarters within 252.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 28, 2017
First posted
Sep 15, 2017
StartActual
Jul 13, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Jul 13, 2020
CompletionEst.
Jan 13, 2021
Last update
Oct 11, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 11, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03285035
Lead sponsor
Western Regional Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 15, 2017
Start date
Jul 13, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 13, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 13, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 11, 2019

Study contacts

Study Coordinator
Contact
WesternTrials@ctca-hope.com
623-207-3000
Research Nurse, RN
Contact
WesternTrials@ctca-hope.com
623-207-3000
Toufic Kachaamy, MD
principal investigator · Western Regional Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion