CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03282903PREdiCCtUpdated May 20, 2024

The PRognostic Effect of Environmental Factors in Crohn's and Colitis

An observational study in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease and Ulcerative Colitis, sponsored by University of Edinburgh. Completed at 41 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 6 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-20.

Sponsored by University of Edinburgh · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,629
Ages
6 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The PREdiCCt Study:

This is a major study that is now being launched. This is the first study of its kind and is specifically directed toward understanding how environmental factors and the gut microorganisms influence IBD flare and recovery. For the PREdiCCt study, the investigators hope to recruit 3100 people in remission from Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (illness under control) from 28 inflammatory bowel disease clinics across the UK.

The investigators hope to conduct the study in the following stages;-

  1. Patients with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBDU) in clinical remission (under control) will be approached in gastroenterology clinics across the country and invited to take part in the PREdiCCt study. Alternatively they will express their interest in the study after seeing PREdiCCt promotional leaflets/posters/videos/social media.
  2. Participants will attend a clinic visit for routine tests and also to complete several questionnaires with a research nurse.
  3. At home over the next week participants will complete detailed questionnaires assessing their environment and diet. Participants will also collect a stool and saliva sample and send this to our laboratories (the investigators have developed easy ways of doing this reliably by post). The stool sample is to analyse the microorganisms in the participant's gut and the saliva is used to analyse their DNA. In addition to this the participants are asked to complete a 4-day weighed food diary. The food diary is sent to the University of Aberdeen for analysis.
  4. Investigators will then follow patients' progress over 24 months. They will be asked to complete a short questionnaire every month with a longer questionnaire after 12 months and culminating in a final questionnaire 24 months after their initial clinic visit.
  5. If a participant experiences a flare, investigators will collect an additional stool sample; but most importantly investigators will look to see how the environmental and microorganism factors recorded at the beginning differ for those that flare up versus those that don't.

What investigators hope to achieve;-

  1. Finding out the environmental and dietary factors for patients to avoid because they trigger flare.
  2. Finding out behaviours for patients to adopt because they bring about remission.
  3. Finding out what the microorganisms that predict flare look like.
  4. Gaining information which helps future studies aimed at finding better diets for IBD sufferers.
  5. Developing ways of gathering information online from IBD patients about their well-being that doctors can routinely use.

The investigators have assembled expert doctors, epidemiologists, microbiologists, nutrition scientists, and bioinformaticians. These experts will use the systems the investigators have put in place to make sure PREdiCCt succeeds. It will yield a lot of new information to help sufferers right away; but the information will also help to kick start many important future studies that will bring us ever closer to a cure for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Read the detailed description

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a common cause of chronic ill-health among young people in the UK (prevalence estimated at 1 in 200 for adults and 1 in 2000 for children, with a peak incidence in the second and third decades of life)1-2. The major forms of IBD, namely Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), all too often confer a lifetime of unpleasant, intrusive and potentially dangerous burden of intestinal inflammation on individuals. Typical symptoms include abdominal pain, diarrhoea, weight loss, and lethargy. These adversely affect schooling, work attainment, psycho-social well-being and sexual health 3-4. IBD costs the NHS £720 million per year, based on an average per patient cost of £3,000; of which half of the costs are directly attributable to relapsing patients 5. Healthcare expenditure focus in IBD is shifting from hospitalisation and surgery to medical therapy 6. However, existing treatment modalities remain limited by lack of efficacy, unacceptable toxicity and poor patient acceptability. Major surgical intervention is frequently required (>50% in CD; \~20% in UC), with a high risk of disease recurrence, and there is an increased risk of cancer (in CD), with the highest incidence of colon cancer observed in those patients with poorly controlled disease 7. Nevertheless, there is a wide spectrum of disease severity. Around one third of patients will follow a relatively quiescent disease course 8. Understanding who gets severe, progressive disease and why, is an urgent research priority. Accurate prediction of these patients will enable precise, tailored intervention early in the disease course. This should reduce the substantial morbidity and costs associated with IBD.

Genetics, Environment and the Microbiota and Disease Natural History.

Genetic factors play a modest role in defining disease location and extent but not disease behaviour 9-12. There is very limited evidence about the gut microbiota in disease progression, although emerging data support a potential role in treatment response. We cannot alter our genes and, despite intense interest in modifying the gut microbiota (e.g. faecal transplantation) there is only limited clinically data to support this 13-14. However, it is within our control to change what we eat and to therefore potentially modify our gut microbiota to a more favourable phenotype. Patients suspect this should be part of the answer: one of the commonest questions in the clinic is, "What should I eat?" Established clinical strategies include the use of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) to induce remission in CD, and a low fibre diet to alleviate obstructive symptoms in stricturing disease 15. However, beyond this there is presently very limited data to support any on-going specific dietary strategy for the vast majority of patients with IBD 16. Multiple lines of emerging evidence in animal models suggest that diets high in natural plant fibres favour an anti-inflammatory gut milieu, via alterations in the gut microbiota, measurable by short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations in stool 17. Dietary fibre may protect against the development of IBD, through several mechanisms, through its conversion to acetate, butyrate and propionate (the major SCFAs). Firstly, butyrate is the main energy source for colonocytes and is associated with the maintenance of the intestinal epithelium 18. Secondly, SCFAs have immunomodulatory roles including inhibition of the transcription factor NF-KB and are the only known ligands of G-protein-coupled receptor, GPR43, which limits the inflammatory response 19-20. Interestingly, the fermentation of fibre is dependent on gut microbiota, such as Bacteroidetes species, which are deficient in patients with IBD 21. The individual source of fibre may also be important. In the US Nurses' Health Study of 170,776 women with 3,317,425 person-years of follow-up over 26 years there were 269 incident cases of Crohn's disease diagnosed and 338 cases of ulcerative colitis 22. For the latter illness, there were no associations with either total dietary fibre intake or fibre from any specific food groups. However, for Crohn's disease the highest quintile of energy-adjusted cumulative average dietary fibre intake, namely 24.3 g/day, was associated with a 41% reduction in risk compared with the lowest quintile (hazard ratio (HR) =0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI=)=0.39-0.90). This reduction was associated with the fibre content from fruits (highest vs. lowest quintile HR=0.57, 95% CI=0.38-0.85) with no associations detected between fibre from vegetables, cereals or legumes.

These are important issues; the lack of data means patients may resort to untested and potentially harmful 'fad' diets 16. More pressingly, this is potentially a novel therapeutic approach to both induce and maintain prolonged remission. Interventional studies in cases and controls will be necessary, but first further data are required from observational epidemiological studies to inform which 'interventions' are indicated and/or justified.

Rationale for the Study

It is presently very hard to predict which IBD patients in remission will flare and when. Scant data are available to advise patients on any substantial lifestyle measure they can adopt to help prevent or retard future disease from flaring. Potential areas of direct relevance to patients are aspects of habitual diet, regular exercise, sleep and stress, including that from major life events. It is hypothesised that there are multiple factors in habitual diet that are associated with increased risk of disease flare, including reduced levels of dietary fibre, high levels of n-6 PUFAs, low levels of n-3 PUFAs and dietary emulsifiers. High levels of regular physical activity are also hypothesised to reduce the rates of disease flare. These dietary aspects and facets in concert with other lifestyle factors may contribute in part to the intestinal dysbiosis associated with flare, where the investigators anticipate seeing a reduction in microbial diversity.

The major aim of this study is to identify the environmental and gut microbiota factors that predispose to disease flare and influence disease outcomes in IBD. Further, the investigators aim to build intelligent predictive models of disease behaviour and prognosis combining phenotypic, environmental and biological data inputs of direct clinical utility.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
  • Crohn Disease
  • Ulcerative Colitis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

IBD patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis or IBD unspecified, who are in clinical remission, >6 since diagnosis, >2 months since any change in therapy for Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or IBDU, aged 6 or over at study entry and who informed consent can be obtained from (or parent/guardian).

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis or IBDU (Lennard-Jones/Porto criteria).

Clinical remission (see definition Section 3.2 of protocol) >6 months since diagnosis with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or IBDU >2 months since any change in therapy for Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or IBDU Aged six years or over at study entry Written informed consent obtained from patient or parent / guardian

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient unwilling to take part in all aspects of the study Unable to obtain written informed consent Systemic corticosteroids (oral or intravenous) within the last two months Thiopurines / methotrexate / biologic therapy started in the preceding two months
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,629 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Crohn's disease patients

    1550 Crohn's disease patients who are symptomatically controlled.

  • Ulcerative Colitis patients

    1550 Ulcerative Colitis patients who are symptomatically controlled.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical flare

    Patients will be asked to answer a monthly follow up, providing details of their IBD over the last month. A clinical flare will be determined by a patient answering "no" to the following question in the monthly follow up: "Do you think your disease has been well controlled in the past 1 month?"

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hard clinical flare

    Clinical flare (primary outcome) plus commencement of any new medication; altered dosing of existing medication for the treatment of IBD flare, with an increase in CRP (\>5mg/L) and / or faecal calprotectin (\>200mcg/g).

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

06

Study locations

41 sites
  • Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
    Aberdeen, United Kingdom
  • Bronglais General Hospital
    Aberystwyth, United Kingdom
  • NHS Lanarkshire
    Airdrie, United Kingdom
  • Ulster Hospital
    Belfast, BT16 1RH, United Kingdom
  • Bristol Royal Infirmary
    Bristol, United Kingdom
  • West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust
    Bury Saint Edmunds, United Kingdom
  • Cambridge Addenbrooke's Hospital
    Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Glangwili General Hospital
    Carmarthen, United Kingdom
  • University Hospital Coventry & Warwickshire
    Coventry, United Kingdom
  • Darlington Memorial Hospital
    Darlington, United Kingdom
  • Ninewells Hospital
    Dundee, DD2 1UB, United Kingdom
  • Eastbourne General Hospital
    Eastbourne, United Kingdom
  • Western General Hospital
    Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
  • Royal Hospital for Sick Children,Edinburgh
    Edinburgh, EH9 1LF, United Kingdom
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
    Exeter, United Kingdom
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital
    Gateshead, United Kingdom
  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary
    Glasgow, G4 0SF, United Kingdom
  • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
    Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom
  • Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow
    Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom
  • Withybush General Hospital
    Haverfordwest, United Kingdom
  • Raigmore Hospital
    Inverness, IV2 3UJ, United Kingdom
  • Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    Kettering, United Kingdom
  • Queen Elizabeth King's Lynn
    King's Lynn, United Kingdom
  • Kingston Hospital
    Kingston Upon Thames, United Kingdom
  • NHS Fife
    Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom
  • NHS Forth Valley
    Larbert, United Kingdom
  • Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • St John's Hospital
    Livingston, EH54 6PP, United Kingdom
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
    London, United Kingdom
  • Royal Free Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Royal London Hospital (Barts Health)
    London, United Kingdom
  • Newcastle Royal Victoria Hospital
    Newcastle, United Kingdom
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Royal Berkshire Hospital
    Reading, United Kingdom
  • Salford Royal Hospital
    Salford, United Kingdom
  • Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
    Sandwell, United Kingdom
  • Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
    Stoke Mandeville, United Kingdom
  • Musgrove Park Hospital
    Taunton, United Kingdom
  • Pinderfield General Hospital
    Wakefield, United Kingdom
  • Warrington and Halton NHS FT
    Warrington, United Kingdom
  • Royal Hampshire Hospital
    Winchester, United Kingdom
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Anonymised data will be shared with collaborators to allow analysis. Only aggregate level data will be published.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03282903
Lead sponsor
University of Edinburgh
Collaborators
University of Aberdeen, Wellcome Sanger Institute, NHS Lothian, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government, Crohn's and Colitis in Childhood, Cure Crohn's and Colitis, Edinburgh and Lothain Health Fund (Lothian Health Board)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 14, 2017
Start date
Nov 1, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 20, 2020
Completion
Mar 20, 2022
Last update
May 20, 2024

Study contacts

Charlie Lees
principal investigator · University of Edinburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion