ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03275506NEOPEMBROVUpdated Sep 11, 2025

PEMBRO With Chemo in Neo Adj Treatment of Ovarian Cancer .

A Phase 2 interventional study of Pembrolizumab Injectable Product - Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab in Ovarian Cancer Stage IV, sponsored by ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP. Completed at 22 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-11.

Sponsored by ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
91
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 24 studies in Ovarian Neoplasms by ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP — 3 open to participants now, 4 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Ovarian Neoplasms · ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP.

Enrollment
12th of 19
91 · median 118
Started
2018
with 2 others
Phase 2
10 of 24
1 open now
Registered
15th of 24
by date

Among the 24 studies in Ovarian Neoplasms by ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP, this one is the 12th largest by enrollment of the 19 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2018, is one of 10 in phase 2, and was the 15th registered.

Ovarian Neoplasms

3,385 studies on the registry are indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms; 792 are open to participants now.

Browse Ovarian Neoplasms studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 24 studies in Ovarian Neoplasms by ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP are open now, in 7 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 3 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 605 Ovarian Neoplasms studies recruiting now, 442 (73%) set no upper age limit and 107 (18%) stop at 75 or younger; 39 take children under 18; 45 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 24 studies in Ovarian Neoplasms by ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

There are several data suggesting that pembrolizumab and bevacizumab may be synergistic. Enhanced tumor angiogenesis is commonly associated with absence of tumor-infiltrating T cells in patients. There is evidence in OC that tumor expression of VEGF is negatively correlated to the density of CD3+TILs and this phenotype is associated with early recurrence, consistent with prior studies showing a correlation of VEGF to early recurrence and short survival. Furthermore, in ascites, high levels of VEGF correlate to low numbers of NK T-like CD3+CD56+ cells

This randomized phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab in combina-tion with the standard neo adjuvant chemotherapy followed by IDS and the safety of this strategy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We assume that its administration in the neo adjuvant setting combination with standard of care (4 cycles of standard chemotherapy) would improve the response rate and consequently will help to achieve optimal debulking rate at IDS.

After surgery, patients will continue to be treated with standard of care (chemotherapy for 2 to 5 cycles plus or less bevacizumab) or the same combination plus pembrolizumab (keytruda).

Read the detailed description

The standard procedure for initial diagnosis recommends the realization of laparoscopy first for all suspicious advanced ovarian carcinoma. This procedure should able to confirm histo-logical diagnosis and to describe the all abdominal extension of the disease.

For advanced stages, complete primary cyto-reductive surgery followed by 6 cycles of chemotherapy based remains the standard of care as first treatment in ovarian cancer. It is part of a large surgery including total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, appendectomy, lymphadenectomy and removal of all peritoneal carcinomatosis.

More recently, complete resection of all macroscopic disease at primary debulking surgery has been shown to be the single most important independent prognostic factor in advanced ovarian carcinoma , and this was confirmed for interval debulking surgery (IDS) after neo adjuvant chemotherapy in the EORTC-GCG study . These results suggest that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical cytoreduction is an acceptable management strategy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer and is more and more frequently used in Europe in advanced ovarian cancer patients with high burden of tumor . Due to these confirmed results, the rate of patients receiving neo adjuvant chemotherapy increased over time compared to up front surgery Hence, we hypothesize that improving the response rate to neo adjuvant chemotherapy would improve the optimal debulking rate at IDS and ultimately the survival. This change of medical practices over time opened the possibility to explore new agent in combination with chemotherapy. For patients whose extent of disease is not amenable to complete or optimal upfront debulking surgery, neo adjuvant treatment with carboplatin plus paclitaxel should be considered, followed by an interval debulking surgery. A minimum of 3 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel must be administered before to propose interval surgery. After interval surgery, completion of the chemotherapy with 3 or 4 more chemotherapy regimen is proposed.

For patients with macroscopic residual disease or when disease remains unresectable, combination with bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy then a maintenance phase of bevacizumab alone can be proposed as a standard of care Given that facts, there is a strong rationale to introduce additional neo adjuvant therapies that would strengthen the tumor shrinkage and improve the resectability rate.

Furthermore, immune surveillance plays an important role in tumor outcome of ovarian cancer patients. Indeed, clinical data in ovarian cancer patients have demonstrated that an antitumor immune response and immune evasion mechanisms are correlated, respectively, with a better and lower survival). Thus, immunotherapies are emerging as potential strategies to enhance classical EOC treatments.

More recently, they also have demonstrated significant efficacy in aggressive cancers of other histology such as metastatic Lung Cancer , metastatic Renal Cell Cancer or metastatic Bladder Cancer .

Approximately half of OC patients display a spontaneous antitumor immune response by antibodies and oligoclonal T-cells which recognize autologous tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). OC exhibits an extreme degree of heterogeneity of TAAs with an average of 60 private nonsynonymous mutations per tumor which are rarely shared among different tumors.

Though data remains scarce, high IHC PD-L1 expression (score 2 \& 3) has been detected in 68% of ovarian cancer patients (n=70) and that expression of PD-L1 had a strong prognostic value . The authors found also that the density of intraepithelial CD8+ T cells was inversely correlated to expression of PD-L1 by tumors, suggesting that the expres-sion of PD-L1 on tumor cells may inhibit invasion of tumor epithelium by CD8+ T cells.

In addition, PD-1 expression at the surface of intra-tumoral CD4+ FOXP3+ Tregs was found to show the highest levels in ovarian cancer (around 20% of the cells) compared to other tumor types, including melanoma, renal cell cancer or hepatoma . Thus targeting PD-1/PD-L1 pathway may inhibit Treg expression, one of the major component of ovarian cancer immunosuppression. Also Curiel et al showed that myeloid dendritic cells (MDCs) from ovarian cancer express PD-1 and that blockade of PD-1 enhanced MDC-mediated T-cell activation, including upregulation of IL-2 and interferon-gamma, and down regulation of IL-10, which resulted in enhanced T-cell immunity against autologous ovarian human tumors into NOD-SCID mice.

Together with the aforementioned data on immune infiltration, these data provide the rationale for a therapeutic PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockade in ovarian cancer.

In ovarian carcinoma patients, the anti-PD1 compound nivolumab has been reported to achieve 3 objectives responses out of 13 (23%) heavily pre-treated patients. Response was prolonged over 1 year in 2 out of the 3 responders. Similarly, the anti-PD1 pembrozilumab achieved 3 confirmed responses (11.5% [(95% CI, 2.4-30.2]) in 26 patients treated in a phase IB study and 3 additional patients had a tumor reduction of at least 30%. Most common AEs were fatigue (42.3%), anemia (30.8%), and decreased appetite (30.8%). Drug-related AEs occurred in 69.2% of pts (grade ≥ 3, 1/26 pts).

The anti-PD-L1 avelumab has reported a 10.7% objective response and a 44% stabilization rate in 75 patients with ovarian cancer in relapse. In this study, con-firmed or unconfirmed responses (n=11) tend to be more frequently observed in patients with low burden of tumor, limited number of prior lines of chemotherapy and in the setting of platinum-sensitivity. Toxicity was minimal. Considering all grades, fatigue was observed in 16% of the patients, chills in 12%, nausea in 10.7%, diarrhea in 10.7%, rash in 8% and hypothyroidism in 5.3%.

Rationale for combining pembrolizumab and standard chemotherapy Kryczek et al compared the PD-1 expression level at the surface of intra-tumoral CD4+ FOXP3+ Tregs among many cancer types. Interestingly, the higher level of PD-1 expression (around 20%) was found on Tregs of ovarian cancers whereas it was much lower (\<10%) in other cancer types (Colon cancer, Hepatic cancer, Melanoma, Pancreatic carcinoma, Renal cell carcinoma). PD-L1 expression has also been detected in ovarian cancer tissue analysis by Immunohistochemistry staining and its level of expression has been correlated to a bad outcome of patients (59). Together with the aforementioned data on immune infiltration, these results provide rationale for a therapeutic PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockade in ovarian cancer. In the published trials on such compounds, addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy or using alone has been shown to improve the response rates with a median time to response at 8 weeks (60,61).

Rationale for combining pembrolizumab and bevacizumab There are several data suggesting that pembrolizumab and bevacizumab may be synergistic. Enhanced tumor angiogenesis is commonly associated with absence of tumor-infiltrating T cells in patients. There is evidence in OC that tumor expression of VEGF is negatively correlated to the density of CD3+TILs and this phenotype is associated with early recurrence, consistent with prior studies showing a correlation of VEGF to early recurrence and short survival. Furthermore, in ascites, high levels of VEGF correlate to low numbers of NK T-like CD3+CD56+ cells.

This randomized phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab in combina-tion with the standard neo adjuvant chemotherapy followed by IDS and the safety of this strategy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We assume that its administration in the neo adjuvant setting combination with standard of care (4 cycles of standard chemotherapy) would improve the response rate and consequently will help to achieve optimal debulking rate at IDS.

After surgery, patients will continue to be treated with standard of care (chemotherapy for 2 to 5 cycles plus or less bevacizumab) or the same combination plus pembrolizumab (keytruda).

03

Conditions studied

  • Ovarian Cancer Stage IV

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • neoadjuvant
  • debulking surgery
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Be willing and able to provide written /assent for the trial.
  2. Woman ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years old on day of signing informed consent
  3. confirmed diagnosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma or fallopian tube carcinoma or primary peri-toneal carcinoma with the exception of mucinous histology. Histology should be obtained by laparoscopy (or by laparotomy).
  4. High grade serous or endometrioid (see appendix 1 bis)
  5. Advanced FIGO stage IIIC to IV patient not able to receive primary debulking surgery for which neo chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended (primary debulking surgery has been denied after an evaluation through laparoscopy or laparotomy). Patients with extra abdominal (FIGO 2014 Stage IV) can be included in case of completely resectable metastasis.
  6. Primary debulking surgery denied and maximum surgical effort of cytoreduction with the goal of no residual disease planned at interval debulking surgery. Sugarbaker index before inclusion must be less than 30
  7. Eligible for carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in accordance with local standards of care following cy-toreductive surgery.
  8. Interval complete surgery anticipated in a center with excellence.
  9. performance status (PS) ≤ 2.
  10. of at least 6 months,
  11. Interval between diagnosis and enrolment (informed consent) ≤ 8 weeks,
  12. Be willing to provide blood, and tissue from a newly obtained core or excisional of a tumor lesion. Newly-obtained is defined as a specimen obtained up to 8 weeks (56 days) prior to initiation of treatment on Day 1.
  13. Demonstrate adequate organ function as defined in the table below, all screening labs should be performed within 7 days before randomization.
  14. Adequate hematological laboratory value: (ANC): ≥1,500/mm3

    • : ≥100,000/mm3
    • : ≥9 g/dL or ≥5.6 mmol/L without transfusion or EPO dependency (within 7 days of assessment)
  15. Adequate renal laboratory value:

    • Serum creatinine and Measured or calculated a ( can also be used in place of creatinine or CrCl) ≤1.5 X (ULN) OR ≥60 mL/min for subject with creatinine levels > 1.5 X institutional ULN (Creatinine clearance is calculated according to Cockcroft formula or to MDRD formula for patients older than 65 years-old. Glo-merular filtration rate or creatinine clearance according to MDRD formula is: GFR = 186 x (creatinine (μmol/l) x 0,0113)-1,154 x age- 0,203 x 0.742.)
  16. Adequate hepatic laboratory value:

    • Serum total : ≤ 1.5 X ULN OR
    • Direct bilirubin: ≤ ULN for subjects with total bilirubin levels > 1.5 ULN
    • LDH, CRP
    • (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT): ≤ 2.5 X ULN OR ≤ 5 X ULN for subjects with liver metastases
  17. Adequate coagulation laboratory value:

    • (INR) or Prothrombin Time (PT) : ≤1.5 X ULN unless subject is receiving anticoagulant therapy as long as PT or PTT is within therapeutic range of intended use of anticoagulants
    • Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT): ≤1.5 X ULN unless subject is receiving anticoagulant therapy as long as PT or PTT is within therapeutic range of intended use of anticoagulants
  18. Female subject of should have a negative urine or serum pregnancy within 72 hours prior randomization. If the urine test is positive or cannot be confirmed as negative, a serum pregnancy test will be required.
  19. Female subjects of childbearing potential should be willing to use 1 or 2 methods of or be surgically sterile, or abstain from heterosexual activity for the course of the study through 4 months after the last dose of study medication and 6 months after the last dose of bevacizumab, or paclitaxel, or carboplatin. Subjects of childbearing potential are those who have not been surgically sterilized or have not been free from menses for > 1 year. (see below NB: contraception requirement)
  20. Patient should be beneficiary of healthcare coverage under the social security system.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Histological diagnosis of malignant tumor of non-epithelial origin (e.g. germ cell tumor, sex cord-stromal tumor) of the ovary, the fallopian tube or peritoneum or borderline tumor of the ovary (tumor of low malignant potential).
  2. Patients with extra abdominal (FIGO 2014 Stage IV) not completely resectable, as e.g. multiple parenchymal lung metastases (preferably proven), non resectable lymph node metastases, brain me-tastases.
  3. Prior systemic therapy for ovarian cancer (e.g. chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, oral targeted therapy, hormonal therapy),
  4. Prior radiotherapy to the abdomen or prior radiotherapy to an extra-abdominal target volume that would bear the risk of increased toxicity of chemotherapy,
  5. Serious illness or concomitant non-oncological disease such as neurologic, psychiatric or infectious disease, active ulcers (gastrointestinal tract, skin) or a laboratory abnormality that may Increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration and in the judgment of the investigator would make the patient inappropriate for entry into the study,
  6. Any for therapy with paclitaxel or carboplatin, e.g. a history of severe reactions to paclitaxel or platinum-containing compounds and their , or other drugs formulated with Pol-yoxyl 35Is currently participating and receiving study therapy or has participated in a study of an agent and received study therapy or used an investigational device within 4 weeks of the first dose of treatment.
  7. Diagnosis of immunodeficiency or receiving prolonged period of systemic therapy or any other form of therapy within 7 days prior to the first dose of trial treatment.
  8. Known history of active Bacillus Tuberculosis (TB)
  9. Hypersensitivity to pembrolizumab or any of its excipients.
  10. Prior anti-cancer monoclonal antibody (mAb) within 4 weeks prior to study Day 1 or no recovery (i.e., ≤ Grade 1 or at baseline) from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier.
  11. Known additional that is progressing or requires active treatment. Exceptions include basal cell carcinoma of the skin or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has undergone potentially curative therapy or in situ cervical cancer.
  12. Known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis. Subjects with previously treated may participate provided they are stable (without evidence of progression by imaging for at least four weeks prior to the first dose of trial treatment and any neurologic symptoms have returned to baseline), have no evidence of new or enlarging brain metastases, and are not using steroids for at least 7 days prior to trial treatment. This exception does not include carcinomatous meningitis which is excluded regardless of clinical stability.
  13. Active disease that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years (i.e. with use of disease modifying agents, corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs). Replacement therapy (e.g., thyroxine, insulin, or physiologic corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal or pituitary insufficiency, etc.) is not considered a form of systemic treatment.
  14. Prior therapy with an , anti-PD-L1, or anti-PD-L2 agent.
  15. History of (HIV) (HIV 1/2 antibodies).
  16. Active (e.g., HbsAg reactive) or (e.g., HCV RNA [qualitative] is detected).
  17. Vaccination with a within 30 days of planned start of study therapy.

    Note: Seasonal influenza vaccines for injection are generally inactivated flu vaccines and are allowed; however intranasal influenza vaccines (e.g., Flu-Mist®) are live attenuated vaccines, and are not allowed.

  18. History of (non-infectious) pneumonitis that required steroids or current pneumonitis.
  19. Active infection requiring systemic therapy.
  20. History or current evidence of any condition, therapy, or laboratory abnormality that might confound the results of the trial, interfere with the subject's participation for the full duration of the trial, or is not in the best interest of the subject to participate, in the opinion of the treating investigator.
  21. Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical factors potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule,
  22. Psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with cooperation with the requirements of the trial.
  23. Active alcohol or drug abuse,
  24. Pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive or father children within the projected duration of the trial, starting with the pre-screening or screening visit through 4 months after the last dose of trial treatment, and six months after the last dose of bevacizumab, or paclitaxel, or carboplatin.
  25. Patient unable to give their consent by their own (guardianship and curatorship)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(32)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
91 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy

    Arm B (n=60): 4 neo-adjuvant cycles of standard 3 weekly Pembrolizumab 200 mg then carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²) Arm B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg then carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W) The total number of cycles of chemotherapy will be 6 cycles from the start of the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Three additional cycles are allowed if required (maximum 9 cycles in total). The planning of administration or not of bevacizumab will be defined before the randomization and could not be modified (stratification factor). After chemotherapy: * In the Arm A \& B, for patients receiving bevacizumab (as standard therapy) (15 mg/kg Q3W), this will be continue until a maximum of 15 months in total from the beginning of the adjuvant therapy. * In the arm B, patient will receive Pembrolizumab 200 mg until a maximum of 15 months in total from the beginning of the adjuvant therapy.

    Drug: Pembrolizumab Injectable Product - Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab

  • Active comparator
    Chemotherapy alone

    Arm A (n=30): 4 neo-adjuvant cycles of standard 3 weekly carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²) Arm A: carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), q3 weeks +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W) The total number of cycles of chemotherapy will be 6 cycles from the start of the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Three additional cycles are allowed if required (maximum 9 cycles in total). The planning of administration or not of bevacizumab will be defined before the randomization and could not be modified (stratification factor). After chemotherapy: \- In the Arm A \& B, for patients receiving bevacizumab (as standard therapy) (15 mg/kg Q3W), this will be continue until a maximum of 15 months in total from the beginning of the adjuvant therapy.

    Drug: Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab

Interventions

  • DrugPembrolizumab Injectable Product - Chemotherapy - Bevacizumab

    Pembrolizumab 200 mg then carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W)

  • DrugChemotherapy - Bevacizumab

    Carboplatin (AUC5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175mg/m²), +/- bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W)

This study also gives Pembrolizumab. No intervention listed here names it: that was found by reading the record.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary objective

    Efficacy: Complete Resection Rate (CC0) after interval debulking surgery

    Time frame: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary objective

    Efficacy : CCI score evaluated by centers and by central review

    Time frame: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.

  2. Secondary objective

    Efficacy : PCI score evaluated by centers and by central review

    Time frame: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.

  3. Secondary objective

    Efficacy : Rate of Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) after surgery

    Time frame: Average of 4 months after the randomization of the last patient.

  4. Secondary objective

    Efficacy : Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Time frame: Average of 3 months after the first neo-adjuvant cycle.

  5. Secondary objective

    Efficacy : Best Overall Response

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until the end of treatment.

  6. Secondary objective

    Efficacy : Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to date event, assessed up to 5 years.

  7. Secondary objective

    Efficacy : Biological Progression-Free Interval (PFIBIO)

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to date event, assessed up to 5 years.

  8. Secondary objective

    Efficacy : Overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to death, assessed up to 5 years.

  9. Secondary objective

    Safety and Tolerability of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy : Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    Time frame: 30 days after last treatment intake.

  10. Secondary objective

    Post-operative mortality

    Time frame: 30 days after the interval debulking surgery.

  11. Secondary objective

    Post-operative morbidity

    Time frame: 30 days after the interval debulking surgery.

07

Study locations

22 sites
  • Hôpital Henri Duffaut
    Avignon, 84000, France
  • CHRU Jean Minjoz
    Besançon, 25030, France
  • Centre François Baclesse
    Caen, 14000, France
  • Centre Jean Perrin
    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil
    Créteil, 94010, France
  • Centre Georges François Leclerc
    Dijon, 21079, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Départemental Les Oudairies
    La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren
    Limoges, 87042, France
  • Centre Léon Bérard
    Lyon, 69373, France
  • Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz
    Lyon, 69373, France
  • Institut Paoli Calmettes
    Marseille, 13009, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
    Orléans, 45067, France
  • Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses-Croix Saint Simon
    Paris, 75020, France
  • Institut Mutualiste Montsouris-Jourdan
    Paris, 75674, France
  • Centre CARIO-HPCA
    Plérin, 22190, France
  • Institut Jean Godinot
    Reims, 51056, France
  • Centre Henri Becquerel
    Rouen, 76038, France
  • ICO Centre René Gauducheau
    Saint-Herblain, 44805, France
  • CHU Saint-Etienne - Pôle de Cancérologie
    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42271, France
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, 67091, France
  • Institut Claudius Regaud
    Toulouse, 31059, France
  • Clinique Pasteur
    Toulouse, 31076, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Collet L, Ardin M, Venet D, Berthet J, Ghamry-Barrin S, Treilleux I, Noel JC, Leheurteur M, Meunier J, Bengrine Lefevre L, Martinez M, Priou F, Selle F, Just PA, Bataillon G, Rothe F, Sotiriou C, Caux C, Dubois B, Ray-Coquard I, Le Saux O. Unraveling the Tumor Microenvironment and PD-L1 Expression across Tissue Types in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in the NeoPembrOV/GINECO Phase II Randomized Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 1;31(15):3317-3331. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2712. PubMed 40378056 ↗
  • Le Saux O, Ardin M, Berthet J, Barrin S, Bourhis M, Cinier J, Lounici Y, Treilleux I, Just PA, Bataillon G, Savoye AM, Mouret-Reynier MA, Coquan E, Derbel O, Jeay L, Bouizaguen S, Labidi-Galy I, Tabone-Eglinger S, Ferrari A, Thomas E, Menetrier-Caux C, Tartour E, Galy-Fauroux I, Stern MH, Terme M, Caux C, Dubois B, Ray-Coquard I. Immunomic longitudinal profiling of the NeoPembrOv trial identifies drivers of immunoresistance in high-grade ovarian carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 16;15(1):5932. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47000-5. PubMed 39013886 ↗
  • Ray-Coquard IL, Savoye AM, Schiffler C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Derbel O, Kalbacher E, LeHeurteur M, Martinez A, Cornila C, Martinez M, Bengrine Lefevre L, Priou F, Cloarec N, Venat L, Selle F, Berton D, Collard O, Coquan E, Le Saux O, Treilleux I, Gouerant S, Angelergues A, Joly F, Tredan O. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab in advanced high-grade serous carcinoma: the randomized phase II NeoPembrOV clinical trial. Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 16;15(1):5931. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46999-x. PubMed 39013870 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Sep 2020, 31 months.

Of 228 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Ovarian Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 54 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 40 and three quarters within 80. This study's 31 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 344 studies reached it within 47 months; a quarter within 33 and three quarters within 72.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 18, 2017
First posted
Sep 7, 2017
StartActual
Feb 26, 2018
Primary completionActual
Sep 30, 2020
CompletionActual
Mar 19, 2024
Last update
Sep 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03275506
Lead sponsor
ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 7, 2017
Start date
Feb 26, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2020
Completion
Mar 19, 2024
Last update
Sep 11, 2025

Study contacts

Isabelle RAY-COQUARD, MD, PhD
principal investigator · isabelle.ray-coquard@lyon.unicancer.fr

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Pembrolizumab

Start the discussion