ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03273881Updated Oct 11, 2023

Intrapartum Glucose and Insulin Compared to Glucose Alone in Diabetic Women

An interventional study of glucose solution and Insulin and glucose solution only in Obstetric Labor and Pregnancy in Diabetics, sponsored by HaEmek Medical Center, Israel. Recruiting at 1 site in Israel. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-11.

Sponsored by HaEmek Medical Center, Israel · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2023, 2 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2017; still recruiting 9 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to examine the effect of intrapartum treatment of diabetic women with combined glucose and constant insulin infusion compared to glucose alone on the incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia. Pregnant women with diabetes in pregnancy will be randomly divided during labor to 2 groups: group 1, will receive intravenous glucose with constant insulin infusion; group 2 will receive intravenous glucose alone. The primary outcome is the incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia.

Read the detailed description

About 2 to 9% of pregnant women are diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Peripartum complications attributed to diabetes include: birth trauma, neonatal hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. The incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia is about 40%. Strict glycemic control may lower the risk of neonatal complications. There is a lack of evidence on how to manage women with diabetes during labor. Previous studies recommended the use of intravenous saline solution boosted with 5% glucose and insulin as needed, glucose 5% with constant insulin infusion and others recommended the use lactated Ringer's solution. Most of these studies are either retrospective or have a small number of participants.

In this study we will examine the effect of 2 different protocols on glycemic control during labor and the immediate neonatal period. Women in group 1, will receive intravenous saline solution boosted with 5% glucose and constant insulin infusion. Women in group 2, will receive intravenous saline solution boosted with 5% glucose alone. The desirable intrapartum glucose level will be 70 to 100 mg/dL. Glucose levels will be checked hourly. Women in both groups will receive additional insulin infusion in cases of glucose levels above 100 mg/dL. Additionally, the 5% glucose solution will be substitute with lactated Ringer's solution in cases of glucose levels above 140 mg/dL.

Intravenous fluid regimens will be assigned according to a computer randomization sequence generation program. Women will randomly assigned to the 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. The randomization sequence results will be kept in the delivery ward in a closed study box. Site investigators will enroll participants after confirming eligibility. The sequence will be concealed until intervention is assigned (and after obtaining a signed informed consent).

Our hypothesis is that 5% glucose combined with constant insulin infusion will achieve better glycemic control and thus will lead to lower rate of neonatal hypoglycemia. In order to detect a reduction of neonatal hypoglycemia from 40% to 20%, 182 women will be needed in both groups in order to achieve a level of significance of 95% (α, 2-sided = 0.05) and a power of 80% (β = 0.2).

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstetric Labor
  • Pregnancy in Diabetics

Keywords

  • Gestational diabetes mellitus
  • Pre-gestational diabetes mellitus
  • Treatment
  • Neonatal hypoglycemia
03

In context

Pregnancy in Diabetics

46 studies on the registry are indexed under Pregnancy in Diabetics; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 95 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Pregnancy in Diabetics.

Browse Pregnancy in Diabetics studies →

Lead sponsor

HaEmek Medical Center, Israel is the lead sponsor of 237 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • >37 weeks gestation
  • gestational diabetes mellitus according to Carpenter and Coustan
  • pregestational diabetes mellitus

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intrauterine fetal death
  • estimated fetal weight\<10p
  • multiple gestation
  • major fetal malformations
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    glucose solution and insulin

    Participants will receive intravenous saline solution boosted with 5% glucose + 8 units regular insulin in a rate of 125 mL/h.

    Drug: glucose solution and Insulin · Drug: glucose solution only

  • Active comparator
    glucose solution only

    Participants will receive intravenous saline solution boosted with 5% glucose in a rate of 125 mL/h.

    Drug: glucose solution and Insulin

Interventions

  • Drugglucose solution and Insulin

    Drug pages: Glucose · Insulin

    Women in group 1, will receive intravenous saline solution boosted with 5% glucose combined with 8 units of insulin at a rate of 125mL/h. The desirable intrapartum glucose level will be 70 to 100 mg/dL. Glucose levels will be checked hourly. Glucose level between 100-140 mg/dL will be treated with additional intravenous insulin, 1 units/hour. Glucose level between 141-160 mg/dL will be treated with intravenous insulin, 2 units/hour. Additionally, the 5% glucose solution will be substitute with lactated Ringer's solution. Glucose level between 161-200 mg/dL will be treated with intravenous insulin, 4 units/hour. Glucose level above 200 mg/dL will be treated with intravenous insulin, 6 units/hour.

    Also known as: Group 1

  • Drugglucose solution only

    Women in group 2, will receive intravenous saline solution boosted with 5% glucose only, at a rate of 125mL/h. Women in this group will be treated similar to group 1 if glucose levels crossed over 100 mg/dL.

    Also known as: Group 2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neonatal hypoglycemia

    about 2-3 hours postpartum the neonate will have a capillary glucose test

    Time frame: 2-3 hours postpartum

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maternal glycemic control during labor

    During labor glucose level will be obtained every hour. Average glucose level during labor will be calculated after labor.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Maternal urine ketones

    Immediately post partum maternal urine will be checked for ketones

    Time frame: 1 hour

  3. Total amount of regular insulin during labor

    The total amount of regular insulin during labor will be calculated post partum

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. Mode of delivery

    Mode of delivery

    Time frame: 1 hour

  5. Length of delivery

    Length of delivery

    Time frame: 24 hours

  6. Breastfeeding

    How many women breastfed in every study group

    Time frame: 48 hours

  7. Neonatal APGAR score

    Neonatal APGAR score

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  8. Umbilical cord PH

    Umbilical cord PH

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  9. Umbilical cord glucose level

    Umbilical cord glucose level

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  10. The need for neonatal IV glucose infusion

    The need for neonatal IV glucose infusion

    Time frame: 48 hours

  11. Neonatal jaundice

    Neonatal jaundice- hyperbilirubinemia

    Time frame: 48 hours

  12. Length of neonatal hospital stay

    Length of neonatal hospital stay

    Time frame: 30 days

  13. NICU admission

    NICU admission

    Time frame: 48 hours

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Soler NG, Soler SM, Malins JM. Neonatal morbidity among infants of diabetic mothers. Diabetes Care. 1978 Nov-Dec;1(6):340-50. doi: 10.2337/diacare.1.6.340. PubMed 729447 ↗
  • Sacks DA, Hadden DR, Maresh M, Deerochanawong C, Dyer AR, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Coustan DR, Hod M, Oats JJ, Persson B, Trimble ER; HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG consensus panel-recommended criteria: the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Diabetes Care. 2012 Mar;35(3):526-8. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1641. PubMed 22355019 ↗
  • Taricco E, Radaelli T, Rossi G, Nobile de Santis MS, Bulfamante GP, Avagliano L, Cetin I. Effects of gestational diabetes on fetal oxygen and glucose levels in vivo. BJOG. 2009 Dec;116(13):1729-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02341.x. Epub 2009 Oct 13. PubMed 19832834 ↗
  • HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group; Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, Coustan DR, Hadden DR, McCance DR, Hod M, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Persson B, Rogers MS, Sacks DA. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 8;358(19):1991-2002. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943. PubMed 18463375 ↗
  • Reece EA, Leguizamon G, Wiznitzer A. Gestational diabetes: the need for a common ground. Lancet. 2009 May 23;373(9677):1789-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60515-8. PubMed 19465234 ↗
  • Ju H, Rumbold AR, Willson KJ, Crowther CA. Borderline gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008 Jul 30;8:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-31. PubMed 18664297 ↗
  • Catalano PM, McIntyre HD, Cruickshank JK, McCance DR, Dyer AR, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Trimble ER, Coustan DR, Hadden DR, Persson B, Hod M, Oats JJ; HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: associations of GDM and obesity with pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):780-6. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1790. Epub 2012 Feb 22. PubMed 22357187 ↗
  • Committee on Fetus and Newborn; Adamkin DH. Postnatal glucose homeostasis in late-preterm and term infants. Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127(3):575-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3851. Epub 2011 Feb 28. PubMed 21357346 ↗
  • Carron Brown S, Kyne-Grzebalski D, Mwangi B, Taylor R. Effect of management policy upon 120 Type 1 diabetic pregnancies: policy decisions in practice. Diabet Med. 1999 Jul;16(7):573-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00124.x. PubMed 10445833 ↗
  • Kline GA, Edwards A. Antepartum and intra-partum insulin management of type 1 and type 2 diabetic women: Impact on clinically significant neonatal hypoglycemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;77(2):223-30. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.10.024. Epub 2006 Nov 28. PubMed 17126946 ↗
  • Lean ME, Pearson DW, Sutherland HW. Insulin management during labour and delivery in mothers with diabetes. Diabet Med. 1990 Feb;7(2):162-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1990.tb01352.x. PubMed 2137758 ↗
  • Balsells M, Corcoy R, Adelantado JM, Garcia-Patterson A, Altirriba O, de Leiva A. Gestational diabetes mellitus: metabolic control during labour. Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2000 Oct;13(5):257-62. PubMed 11105967 ↗
  • Hussain K, Sharief N. The inaccuracy of venous and capillary blood glucose measurement using reagent strips in the newborn period and the effect of haematocrit. Early Hum Dev. 2000 Feb;57(2):111-21. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(99)00060-2. PubMed 10735458 ↗
  • Hernandez-Rivas E, Flores-Le Roux JA, Benaiges D, Sagarra E, Chillaron JJ, Paya A, Puig-de Dou J, Goday A, Lopez-Vilchez MA, Pedro-Botet J. Gestational diabetes in a multiethnic population of Spain: clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 May;100(2):215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.030. Epub 2013 Mar 26. PubMed 23538268 ↗
  • Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Dec 1;144(7):768-73. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90349-0. PubMed 7148898 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2023, 74 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 4, 2017
First posted
Sep 6, 2017
StartActual
Oct 31, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2023
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2023
Last update
Oct 11, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03273881
Collaborators
Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel
Responsible party
Gali Garmy (Dr Gali Garmi, HaEmek Medical Center, Israel) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 6, 2017
Start date
Oct 31, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 11, 2023

Study contacts

Gali Gali, MD
Contact
galit_ga@clalit.org.il
972-4-6494035
Raed Salim, MD
Contact
salim_ra@clalit.org.il
972-4-6494355
Gali Gali, MD
principal investigator · HaEmemk Medical Center, Afula, Israel.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion