ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03273439Updated Sep 6, 2017

A Study of rTMS for Cognitive Deficits in Chronic Patients With Schizophrenia

An interventional study of repetitive TMS and Sham rTMS in Schizophrenia, sponsored by Suzhou Psychiatric Hospital. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-06.

Sponsored by Suzhou Psychiatric Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2012, registered Mar 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
47
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, we assessed the therapeutic effects and safety of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on negative symptoms of schizophrenia. We evaluated the efficacy of rTMS on cognition in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded trial. 47 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia on stable antipsychotic treatment were randomly assigned to active rTMS treatment group (n=25) or a sham rTMS treatment group (n=22). 25 patients in the active rTMS group received 10 Hz 110% rTMS, while 22 patients were subjected to sham rTMS, both being given 4-week treatment (5 days per week). Efficacy of negative symptom was assessed with the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Positive and Negative symptom scale (PANSS) at baseline, the end of 4 weeks and 8 weeks. The cognitive function was assessed with CANTAB at baseline, the end of 4 weeks and 8 weeks .The side effects were assessed with Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale at baseline and the end of 4 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Negative symptoms
  • randomized controlled trial
  • Schizophrenia
  • cognition
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,565 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 492 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47 is below the median of 71 across 2,945 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Suzhou Psychiatric Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Right-handed;
  2. meeting the diagnosis of schizophrenia for at least 2 years;
  3. had been on anti-psychotic medications for more than 12 weeks;
  4. with unresolved negative symptoms (SANS>20).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. with substance use disorders ;
  2. with cerebral pathologies (e.g. seizure, aneurysm, stroke), intra-cranial metals, pacemakers, severe cardiovascular diseases;
  3. receiving electroconvulsive therapy in the past 3 months.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    repetitive TMS

    Prior to each TMS administration, motor threshold was determined by stimulating the left motor strip with the lowest possible energy to produce, within 10 stimuli, at least 5 evoked potentials Z0.05 . In active rTMS, 10 Hz stimulations over left DLPFC occurred at a power of 110% of MT for 5-s intervals with 30-s intertrain interval. 30 trains were administered each day (MondayFriday) for 4 consecutive weeks (total stimuli=30,000).

    Device: repetitive TMS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS

    all procedures were identical except they were the unmagnetized steel cylinders, instead of cylindrical magnets, that were rotated. Participants were, therefore, unable to distinguish between active and sham rTMS.

    Device: Sham rTMS

Interventions

  • Devicerepetitive TMS

    Prior to each TMS administration, motor threshold was determined by stimulating the left motor strip with the lowest possible energy to produce, within 10 stimuli, at least 5 evoked potentials Z0.05 . In active rTMS, 10 Hz stimulations over left DLPFC occurred at a power of 110% of motor threshold (MT) for 5-s intervals with 30-s intertrain interval. 30 trains were administered each day (MondayFriday) for 4 consecutive weeks (total stimuli=30,000).

    Also known as: rTMS

  • DeviceSham rTMS

    Sham rTMS, without stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS)

    clinical negative symptoms

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Positive and Negative symptom scale (PANSS)

    Clinical symptoms

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. CANTAB

    cognition

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2012 to primary completion in Feb 2014, 19 months.

Of 755 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Schizophrenia, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 56. This study's 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 768 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 15, 2017
First posted
Sep 6, 2017
StartActual
Jul 1, 2012
Primary completionActual
Feb 1, 2014
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2015
Last update
Sep 6, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03273439
Lead sponsor
Suzhou Psychiatric Hospital
Responsible party
Zhe Li (Attending Psychiatrist, Suzhou Psychiatric Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 6, 2017
Start date
Jul 1, 2012
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2014
Completion
Jun 30, 2015
Last update
Sep 6, 2017

Study contacts

Guangzhong Yin, MD
study chair · Suzhou Guangji Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion