ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03271788Updated Sep 5, 2017

Can Stroke Patients and Their Caregiver Benefit From Additive Mindfulness Training

An interventional study of Mindfulness, MBSR in Stroke, Relatives and Motor Disorder, sponsored by Zurich University of Applied Sciences. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-05.

Sponsored by Zurich University of Applied Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2017), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main purpose of the study is to find out if MBSR (Mindfulness) in addition to occupational therapy, can improve the therapeutic results in stroke-patients and help relatives of stroke patients to improve their quality of life.

Read the detailed description

The study seeks primarily to determine the effect of Mindfulness (conducted additionally to occupational therapy) on physical and mental capabilities of life of stroke patients.

Furthermore, we want to find out if Mindfulness has a positive impact towards the quality of life and the daily burden of stroke patients and their caregivers.

The overall purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the process-basis, resources-basis, management-basis, and scientific basis for a further larger study. We want to conduct an exploratory case study as an A-B Design in which the A-Phase is "only regular occupational therapy" (no additive intervention) and the B-Phase contains the "regular occupational therapy" and "MBSR" (Mindfulness-Course; intervention).

Four stroke patients and their closest relative will be included in the study (n=8).

The study is non-blinded and no randomised allocation will take place. We will compare the outcomes of Phase B with the outcomes of Phase A of every person.

The purpose of the exploratory case study is to analyse the feasibility of the study design that will be used in a subsequent research study.

The study will last 16 weeks; split into two parts of eight weeks (A Phase and B-Phase).

  1. Baseline Measurement

    If the patient and the caregivers are included into the study they perform several measurements and questionnaires:

    • Measurements to assess physical capabilities (Patient)
    • Measurement to assess attention (Patient)
    • Measurements to assess Quality of life daily burden of illness and caregiving (Patient and Caregiver
    • Semi structured Interviews (Patient and Caregiver)
  2. A-Phase The stroke patient continues his/her regular occupational treatment for eight weeks.

    The caregivers get no study-related treatment.

  3. 2nd (Midterm)-Measurement Same procedure as the baseline measurement.
  4. B-Phase (Intervention Phase) Within the B-Phase of the study, the participant gets Mindfulness Training (intervention) in addition to the regular occupational therapy.

    Before Patients and Caregivers start the MBSR Course (Mindfulness) the get information from an experienced Mindfulness trainer about e.g. duration, contents of the course, etc. They have the opportunity to ask questions.

    The course lasts eight weeks. The MBSR group meet every week for 2.5h. The participants will get "homework" that they to perform at home (1h per day). If the duration of practice is to burdensome for the participants, then they can talk to the MBSR-trainer about time reduction.

  5. 3rd (Final) Measurement Same procedure as the baseline and second (Midterm-) measurement.
02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Relatives
  • Motor Disorder
  • Attention Deficit
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 8 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Zurich University of Applied Sciences is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants (out-patients) fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:
  • as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
  • Adult stroke patients (outpatients) who gets regular occupational therapy
  • Time after stroke at least 6 months
  • Modified Rankin Scale ≥1≤ 4
  • Mini Mental State ≥ 24

Participants (caregivers) fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:

  • Close relative who is primary in charge and bear the largest burden of the caregiving of the stroke patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Co-Morbidity (e.g. severe psychological, neurological disorders)
  • Severe cognitive disorders
  • Severe speech comprehension disorders
  • Known or suspected drug, medication or alcohol abuse
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
8 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    stroke patients and caregivers

    Stroke patients will conduct two phases ( A-Phase: regular occupational therapy; B-Phase occupational therapy with additional mindfulness) Caregivers of the patients will conduct the MBSR Course (Mindfulness) together with their relatives (Phase B). In Phase A they will not receive any treatment.

    Other: Mindfulness, MBSR

Interventions

  • OtherMindfulness, MBSR

    Participants (stroke patients and one of their closest relatives) will conduct an MBSR Course in Phase B

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wolf Motor Function Test

    The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) quantifies upper extremity (UE) motor ability through timed and functional tasks (Wolf et al., 1995). The first 6 items involve timed functional tasks, items 7-14 are measures of strength, and the remaining 9 items consist of analyzing movement quality when completing various tasks. Performance is rated on a scale (Wolf et al., 2005) from 1("does not attempt with UE being tested") to 6 ("appears normal"). Lower scores indicate lower functioning levels. Since a maximum of 120 s is allocated to each item, it is estimated to take approximately 30 min with additional time for measuring grip strength (item 14).

    Time frame: 20min

  2. Motor Activity LOG (MAL)

    The MAL is a scripted structured interview to measure real-works upper extremity function. Patients have to assess their capabilities of the upper limb in terms of 1. How often do they use the affected limb in their everyday live and 2. How would they evaluate the quality of the use? (Taub et al, 2011)

    Time frame: Time of performance: ca. 15 min

  3. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)

    The purpose of the AMPS is to evaluate a person's quality of performance of personal or instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) by observing the person doing the task (e.g. cooking a pancake, put on socks, etc.) The AMPS is used to test a person in a relevant and familiar environment as he or she performs ADL tasks that have been prioritized by the client. It measures the degree to which a person's ADL task performances are free of increased clumsiness or physical effort, decreased efficiency, safety risk, and/or need for assistance. It is possible to score the quality of 16 ADL motor and 20 ADL process performance skills and facilitate occupation-focused documentation and occupation-based intervention planning. (Downloaded from website: http://www.innovativeotsolutions.com/content/amps/ )

    Time frame: 50min

  4. ASPA (Attention and Performance Self-Assessment)

    The purpose of the self-assessment questionnaire ASPA is to evaluate and analyse a person's memory and attention that is necessary in everyday tasks.

    Time frame: 5min

  5. WHOQoL-BREF (for patients and caregivers)

    The WHOQOL-BREF instrument comprises 26 items, which measure the following broad domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. The WHOQOL-BREF is a shorter version of the original instrument that may be more convenient for use in large research studies or clinical trials. The WHOQOL-BREF self-assessment was completed, together with socio-demographic and health status questions. Analyses of internal consistency, item-total correlations, discriminant validity and construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis, indicate that the WHOQOL-BREF has well to excellent psychometric properties of reliability and performs well in preliminary tests of validity. These results indicate that overall, the WHOQOL-BREF is a sound, cross-culturally valid assessment of QOL (Skevington et al, 2004).

    Time frame: 20 min

  6. EQ-5D

    EQ-5D is a standardised measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. EQ-5D is designed for self-completion by respondents and is ideally suited for use in postal surveys, in clinics, and in face-to-face interviews. It is cognitively undemanding, taking only a few minutes to complete. Instructions to respondents are included in the questionnaire (Oemar et al., 2013)

    Time frame: 5 min

  7. Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM) (patients and caregivers)

    The PRISM is a tool used to represent the burden of an illness graphically.in relation to oneself and one's life measured with the Self-Illness-Separation (SIS) instrument (Streffer et al., 2009; Kassardjian et al., 2008)

    Time frame: 10min

  8. Burden Scale of family caregivers BSFC (Häusliche Pflegeskala) only caregivers

    The Burden Scale of Family Caregivers (BSFC) is a 28-item questionnaire developed ot measure the levels of perceived burden of family caregivers. The BSFC is designed for use * to identify individual caregiver service needs, plan intervention, and evaluate progress in clinical practice. * to evaluate service effectiveness of a program and to predict caregiver health and caregiving situation in research studies.

    Time frame: 10min

Secondary outcomes

  1. Semi-structured Interview (patients and caregivers)

    Different topics that are important for the patients and the caregivers will be discussed e.g. * Change in family-roles and relationship, handling of dependencies * Daily burden, strain, daily problems * Coping strategies * Etc.

    Time frame: 60min

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2017; primary completion for Dec 2018, 12 months later.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 1, 2017
First posted
Sep 5, 2017
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2018
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2018
Last update
Sep 5, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 5, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03271788
Lead sponsor
Zurich University of Applied Sciences
Responsible party
Silke Neumann (Master of Science, Zurich University of Applied Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 5, 2017
Start date
Dec 1, 2017 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 5, 2017

Study contacts

Silke Neumann, MSc
Contact
neus@zhaw.ch
0041 58 934 49 76
Heidrun Becker, Prof
Contact
heidrun.becker@zhaw.ch
0041 58 934 64 77
Silke Neumann, MSC
principal investigator · Zurich University of Applied Sciences

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion