ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03268213FMTUpdated Feb 22, 2022

Fecal Microbial Transplantation for C. Difficile and/or Ulcerative Colitis or Indeterminate Colitis

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Fecal Microbial Transplantation in Clostridium Difficile Infection, Ulcerative Colitis and Indeterminate Colitis, sponsored by Stony Brook University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 7 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-22.

Sponsored by Stony Brook University · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
7 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 121 studies in Clostridium Infections with a site in United States — 16 open to participants now, 19 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Clostridium Infections · United States.

Enrollment
80th of 102
12 · median 57
Started
2013
with 8 others
Phase 1
18 of 121
5 open now
Registered
41st of 121
by date

Among the 121 studies in Clostridium Infections with a site in United States, this one is the 80th largest by enrollment of the 102 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 9 that started in 2013, is one of 18 in phase 1, and was the 41st registered.

Clostridium Infections

251 studies on the registry are indexed under Clostridium Infections; 51 are open to participants now.

Browse Clostridium Infections studies →

Open to participants now

16 of the 121 studies in Clostridium Infections with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

11 more — sign in →

All 16 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 36 Clostridium Infections studies recruiting now, 22 (61%) set no upper age limit and 8 (22%) stop at 75 or younger; 9 take children under 18; 3 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 7 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 121 studies in Clostridium Infections with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation will be offered to eligible C. difficile patients (does not require Investigational New Drug designation) and to eligible ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis patients as Investigational New Drug treatment

Read the detailed description

The following hypothesis will be tested in this study:

  1. Fecal microbiota transplantation is a safe, tolerable, and efficacious procedure for C. difficile patients and is a safe and tolerable procedure for ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis patients.
  2. The fecal microbial diversity, composition and function in stool recipients after fecal transplantation will change to a similar microbial diversity, composition and functionality as found in donor stool.

Primary objectives:

  1. To determine the short term safety and tolerability of fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis up to 12 weeks post-transplant.

Secondary objectives:

1a. To determine the long term safety and tolerability of fecal microbiota transplantation up to 1 year post-transplant in patients with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.

1b. To determine the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile defined as no recurrence of C. difficile within one year.

  1. To compare microbial diversity in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT recipient stools collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
  1. To compare microbial composition in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT recipient stools from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
  1. To compare microbial function in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT recipient stools from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
  1. To compare microbial diversity in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 1 week post-transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
  1. To compare microbial composition in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 1 week post-transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
  1. To compare microbial function in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 1 week post-transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
  1. To compare microbial diversity in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 12 week post transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
  1. To compare microbial composition in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 12 week post transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
  1. To compare microbial function in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 12 week post transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
  1. Stool calprotectin levels will be measured in the recipient at baseline pre-FMT, 1 week and 12 weeks post FMT to determine if FMT causes a statistically significant change.
03

Conditions studied

  • Clostridium Difficile Infection
  • Ulcerative Colitis
  • Indeterminate Colitis
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

For C. difficile patients/recipients only:

Inclusion:

  1. Patient is 7 years of age or older. 2. One of the following: 2a. At least two recurrences (total three CDI infections) of mild to moderate C. difficile (\<6 diarrheal stools/day) diagnosed by positive toxin PCR or EIA after completing standard medical therapy with metronidazole, vancomycin or fidaxomicin.

2b. At least two episodes of severe C. difficile infection (>6 diarrheal stools/day requiring hospitalization and associated with significant morbidity).

2c. Moderate C. difficile infection (3-6 diarrheal stools/day not responding to successive standard therapy, e.g. metronidazole, vancomycin and/or fidaxomicin) lasting at least 28 days.

2d. Severe and/or fulminant C. difficile colitis (> 6 diarrheal stools/day) with no response to standard therapy after 48 hours.

Exclusion:

  1. younger than 7 year old
  2. scheduled for abdominal surgery within the next 12 weeks
  3. had major abdominal surgery within the past 3 months
  4. pregnancy
  5. \< 6 g/dL
  6. less than 1500/mm3
  7. known diagnosis of graft vs. host disease
  8. used an drug within the past 2 months
  9. used a TNFα agonist within the past 2 weeks
  10. diagnosed with Bacteremia within the past 4 weeks

For patients with ulcerative and indeterminate colitis only:

Inclusion:

  1. Patient is 7 years of age or older.
  2. One of the following:

2a. treated with therapy for at least one month. 2b. treated with immunomodulatory therapy for at least one month 2c. treated with biological therapy for at least one month.

Exclusion:

  1. younger than 7 years old
  2. scheduled for abdominal surgery within the next 12 weeks
  3. had major abdominal surgery within the past 3 months
  4. pregnancy
  5. Hemoglobin \< 6 g/dL
  6. absolute neutrophil count less than 1500/mm3
  7. known diagnosis of graft vs. host disease
  8. used an investigational drug within the past 2 months
  9. used a TNFα agonist within the past 2 weeks
  10. diagnosed with Bacteremia within the past 4 weeks
  11. previous FMT
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fecal microbial transplantation

    Treated with fecal microbial transplantation

    Biological: Fecal Microbial Transplantation

Interventions

  • Fecal microbial transplant is offered as treatment option to eligible patients. Donors selected by the patients will be screened by questionnaire and by blood and stool tests for potential transmissible pathogens. The stool filtrate will be administered in the ileum and/or cecum via colonoscopy

    Also known as: FMT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

    Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events with grade greater than 2 within one year after FMT will be reported. Safety will be assessed as a report of no new medical condition after the transplant, Tolerability, as recorded by report of no serious adverse events after the transplant and Efficacy of the procedure will be recorded as improvement in clinical symptoms during any clinically indicated colonoscopies after the transplant as compared to before transplant C. Diff patients will have a negative C. diff test report after the transplant as an out come measure.

    Time frame: 9 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. To measure the effect of fecal microbial transplantation on microbial diversity in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT, 1 week post FMT, and 12 weeks post-FMT recipient stools.

    Fecal DNA samples will undergo V3-V4 16S rRNA sequencing. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) will be produced by clustering sequences with identical taxonomic assignments. Alpha diversity indices (e.g. Chao1, Shannon complexity H, Shannon Evenness H/Hmax) will be calculated inferred through 1000 replicate resamplings using Explicet. Beta diversity (Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distances) will be calculated for the recipient Pre-FMT, 1 week post-FMT and 12 weeks post-FMT as compared to their pared donor using the adonis function in the R vegan package at the phyla, family and genus level. A linear mixed model will be used to compare alpha-diversity (ShannonH) and beta-diversity (Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distance) between each timepoint (FMT) and each disease group (Group). P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

    Time frame: 10 years

  2. To measure the effect of fecal microbial transplantation on microbial composition in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT, 1 week post FMT, and 12 weeks post-FMT recipient stools.

    Fecal DNA samples will undergo V3-V4 16S rRNA sequencing. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) will be produced by clustering sequences with identical taxonomic assignments. Linear mixed models analyses on individual OTUs at the genus level will be conducted on 105 OTUs after eliminating OTUs with an average relative abundance of \< 0.001% in the donor and recipient pre-FMT samples, and after discarding OTUs where more than 75% of the samples had a zero count. To compare the relative abundance of each OTU between timepoints before and after FMT \[pre-transplant recipient, 1-wk. post-FMT recipient, 3-mos. post-FMT recipient\] and each disease group, a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) or generalized estimating equation (GEE) will be used by taking the actual counts of each OTU as the outcomes that were assumed to follow a negative binomial distribution. The p-values will be adjusted for multiple comparisons by the Bonferroni correction or by the Benjamin-Hochberg method (FDR \< 0.05).

    Time frame: 10 years

  3. To measure the effect of fecal microbial transplantation on microbial function using shotgun DNA metagenomic in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT, 1 week post FMT, and 12 weeks post-FMT recipient stools.

    Fecal DNA samples will undergo shotgun DNA metagenomics sequencing. After removing human sequences, the Reads per kilobase gene length (RKP) will be calculated using HUMANN2 software for individual bacterial proteins/enzymes and pathways. . A linear mixed model will be used to compare RPK associated with pathways and individual proteins between each timepoint (FMT) and each disease group (Group). P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.Linear mixed models analyses on the RPK associated with individual genes and pathways will be analyzed using linear mixed models between timepoints before and after FMT \[pre-transplant recipient, 1-wk. post-FMT recipient, 3-mos. post-FMT recipient\] and each disease group, a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) or generalized estimating equation (GEE) were used by taking the actual RPK as the outcomes that will be assumed to follow a negative binomial distribution.

    Time frame: 10 years

  4. To measure the effect of fecal microbial transplantation on microbial function using bacterial metatranscriptomic sequencing

    Fecal RNA samples will undergo bacterial metatranscriptomic RNA sequencing. After removing human sequences, the Reads per kilobase transcript (RKP) will be calculated for individual bacterial proteins/enzymes and pathways. A linear mixed model will be used to compare RPK associated with pathways and individual proteins between each timepoint (FMT) and each disease group (Group). P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

    Time frame: 10 years

  5. To measure the effect of fecal microbial transplantation on microbial function using targeted metabolomic assays.

    Fecal samples will undergo extraction for targeted metabolomics analysis of short chain fatty acids (micrograms/gram stool) using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and of bile acids (microgram/gram stool) using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. A linear mixed model will be used to compare respectively short chain fatty acid and bile acid metabolites between each timepoint (FMT) and each disease group (Group). P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

    Time frame: 10 years

  6. Determine if FMT causes a statistically significant change in recipient fecal calprotectin levels

    Fecal calprotectin (microgram/gram stool) levels will be measured as in the recipient at baseline pre-FMT, 1 week, and 12 weeks post FMT. A linear mixed model will be used to compare fecal calprotectin levels between each timepoint (FMT) and each disease group (Group). P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

    Time frame: 10 years

  7. Determine number of C. difficile recipients who have recurrent C. difficile within a year after fecal microbial transplant

    Currently the efficacy of colonoscopic FMT is approximately 90% after 12 weeks. However it may be lower with patients who also have inflammatory bowel disease. We will quantify the efficacy of fecal microbial transplant on C. difficile recurrence within a year in patients with C. difficile without inflammatory bowel diseases, C. difficile with Crohn's disease and C. difficile with ulcerative or indeterminate colitis.

    Time frame: 10 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Stony Brook University Hospital
    Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mintz M, Khair S, Grewal S, LaComb JF, Park J, Channer B, Rajapakse R, Bucobo JC, Buscaglia JM, Monzur F, Chawla A, Yang J, Robertson CE, Frank DN, Li E. Longitudinal microbiome analysis of single donor fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection and/or ulcerative colitis. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):e0190997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190997. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29385143 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2013, a primary completion of Feb 2022 and a completion of Feb 2022. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 22, 2016
First posted
Aug 31, 2017
Start
Nov 2013
Primary completionActual
Feb 15, 2022
CompletionActual
Feb 15, 2022
Last update
Feb 22, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03268213
Responsible party
Anupama Chawla (Professor, Stony Brook University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 31, 2017
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2022
Completion
Feb 15, 2022
Last update
Feb 22, 2022

Study contacts

Anupama Chawla, MD
principal investigator · Stony Brook Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fecal microbiota

Start the discussion